9/30 Reflections: “The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma” Thesis drafting BA4

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing.
Advertisements

Week 8: Ms. Lowery.  Large-scale revision and examining higher- order concerns  Revision techniques for content, structure, and adherence to the assignment.
Week 8: Ms. Lowery.  Large-scale revision and examining higher- order concerns  Revision techniques for content, structure, and adherence to the assignment.
The UNA University Writing Center Writing & Research Process Workshop Series Dr. Robert T. Koch Jr. Director, University Writing Center University of North.
 Do Now › Take Roll  Review – Draft 1.1 › Questions  Workshop (as a class) › Steele › Dewey › Emerson  Important Reminders  Tips for Writing the.
“America Needs its Nerds” Common Errors
Writing a Persuasive Essay
Writing a Persuasive Essay
Summary-Response Essay Responding to Reading. Reading Critically Not about finding fault with author Rather engaging author in a discussion by asking.
Writing and Research: What you need to remember Kaplan University.
 An article review is written for an audience who is knowledgeable in the subject matter instead of a general audience  When writing an article review,
Introduction to the ERWC (Expository Reading and Writing Course)
Writing Exercise Try to write a short humor piece. It can be fictional or non-fictional. Essay by David Sedaris.
Unit 6: Report Writing. What is a Report? A report is written for a clear purpose and to a particular audience. Specific information and evidence is presented,
Week 7 Caleb Humphreys. Free Write (10 minutes)  Create a basic outline for your rhetorical analysis. Include your thesis statement and important points.
Non-fiction and Media Higher Tier.
In Concert: An Integrated Reading and Writing Approach by Kathleen T
Today’s goals Introduce elements of writing style
National 5 Critical Essays.
SMARTER BALANCED Student Overview
ENG1120K Review Class.
Writing Paper Three Monday, November 2.
BA 3: AUDIENCE, PURPOSE, & RHETORICAL STRATEGIES
Rhetorical Analysis Review
Approaches to the Analyzing Passages Prompts
The Final Exam.
English 1301 Week 2: Ms. Lowery.
RWS 100 – Monday - 9/18/17 Body Paragraphs.
How to transform my outline to an ‘A’wesome essay!!
RWS 100: Writing Paper #2.
Get out any notes you have on the Constitution
By Jennifer Forsthoefel Courtesy of The Writing Studio
FOCUS: IDEAS, ORGANIZATION
Writing a good expository Essay
THE ESSAY From the French ‘essai’ - attempt
The In-Class Critical Essay
Essays in 1B.
Writing the Persuasive/Argumentative Essay
An In-Depth Look at the Synthesis Essay Question
The Argumentative Essay A Review
Constructing Arguments
Writing a Summary.
An In-Depth Look at the Synthesis Essay Question
HINT: It is not the subject of your essay
Today’s goals Continue discussion of strategies for closed form prose, focusing on introductions Discuss strategies for hooks Introduce criteria for evaluating.
Week 11: Planning Revision
English 1301 Week 4 – (June 25, 2018) - Monday.
Week 9 March 21, 2018 English 1301.
Please sit with your Huck Finn mini groups
Informative Essay.
Week 12: INTRODUCTION REVISION
Effective Writing for Narrative, Expository, and Persuasive Essays
An In-Depth Look at the Synthesis Essay Question
Parts of an Essay Ms. Ruttgaizer.
MCAS 2.0 Dates of the Test ELA – April 24th and 25th Math – May 8th and 9th Science – May 22nd and 23rd.
They Say, I Say Chapter 1 and 12
English 1301 Week 3 Ms. Lowery.
SMARTER BALANCED Student Overview
LA 9 Common Terms #15-27 are Essay Related
Parts of an Essay.
An In-Depth Look at the Synthesis Essay Question
Developing Academic Paragraphs
Unit 2 Read, wRite, and Research
Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric
Lesson 4 Synthesis Overview & Peer Evaluation
Essays in 1B.
Supporting your Argument with research
Five Sentence Paragraph
9th Literature EOC Review
National 5 Critical Essays.
Presentation transcript:

9/30 Reflections: “The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma” Thesis drafting BA4 Reading critically Annotating Analyzing the text Writing clearly and intelligently “The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma” Thesis drafting BA4 Some writing basics

Tuesday and Thursday 7 to 9 pm Room ENGL 352 Study Sessions Tuesday and Thursday 7 to 9 pm Room ENGL 352

New Policy I will now be giving participation points for coming to office hours. I’ll give up to three.

Reflections Reading critically: What did I learn from the text that is new to me? What did the text prompt me to consider that I had not thought about before? What stuck with me after I finished reading? Do I agree with what the text says? Why? Why not? What information can you gather about the place of publication? What can you then infer?

Reflections Annotating What do you find confusing or unclear? What can you do to clear up this confusion? What key terms and ideas do you see? What sticks in your mind? What sources does the text allude to, refer to, or cite? What to you agree and disagree with? Why? Discuss difference between allusion, reference, and citation. Chart on 7b.

Reflections Analyzing the text Table 6.1 in the textbook, page 118. What are the main points? Are they stated implicitly or explicitly? What do you agree and disagree with? Why? What kind of evidence does the text use? Is it sufficient to back up the text? Do you see viewpoints other than the author’s? Are they treated fairly or unfairly? Do they sufficiently prove them wrong? How trustworthy are the sources the author uses? Table 6.1 in the textbook, page 118.

Reflections Writing clearly and sounding intelligent: St Martin’s Handbook: Section 5: Word Choice Section 6: Sentence Grammar Section 7: Sentence Clarity Section 8: Sentence Style Section 9: Punctuation Section 10: Mechanics

“The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma” Audience? Why? Purpose? Why? Some rhetorical choices?

Audience and Purpose In “The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma,” Jared Diamond writes this article for readers of Natural History who have a particular interest in ethnobiology, however the audience is not exclusive to just professional scientists because in the article Diamond discusses in great detail what he did while in New Guinea. Jared Diamond’s purpose was to emphasize the need that the average person must have prior knowledge of a subject in order to learn from an expert. Diamond wants his audience to realize that before learning from a professional they must gain knowledge over the subject.

Explanation of Audience and Purpose In “The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma,” Jared Diamond writes this article for readers of Natural History who have a particular interest in ethnobiology, however the audience is not exclusive to just professional scientists because in the article Diamond discusses in great detail what he did while in New Guinea. I’m not sure I follow your reasoning here. You’re right that the audience is readers of Natural History, but could other people be interested in this? Would all people reading this text be interested?

Explanation of Audience and Purpose Jared Diamond’s purpose was to emphasize the need that the average person must have prior knowledge of a subject in order to learn from an expert. Diamond wants his audience to realize that before learning from a professional they must gain knowledge over the subject. Very good. He says that one must have some knowledge of an expert’s field and perspective in order to gain knowledge from the expert.

Thesis In “The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma,” Jared Diamond uses analogies, metaphors, and illustration in order for his readers to understand that they must have prior knowledge of a subject in order to learn from a professional.

Explanation of Thesis In “The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma,” Jared Diamond uses analogies, metaphors, and illustration in order for his readers to understand Try: in order to persuade his readers that they must have prior knowledge of a subject in order to learn from a professional. Readers isn’t specified here. Is this ok?

Audience and Purpose Jared Diamond’s purpose behind his article is to show the many problems that confront ethnobiologists in their field of study. He also highlights how these problems parallel challenges faced in everyday life. Another point Diamond makes in his paper is that sometimes individuals need to educate themselves prior to asking a superior for assistance. Diamond’s intended audience is comprised of those who work in the field of ethnobiology and those who are also interested in sciences as a whole.

Explanation of Audience and Purpose Jared Diamond’s purpose behind his article You could be more concise here and take out “behind his article.” is to show the many problems that confront ethnobiologists in their field of study.

Explanation of Audience and Purpose He also highlights how these problems parallel challenges faced in everyday life. Another point Diamond makes in his paper is that sometimes individuals need to educate themselves prior to asking a superior for assistance. This is a more accurate statement of purpose than what you have in the first sentence. When dealing with rhetorical analyses, you want to examine the ways in which the author argues for a point of view or a version of reality; ultimately, their devices and usage of language will be part of a larger strategy to persuade the audience of that idea or reality. This is not as neutral as “informing” or “showing”: it is informing and showing in order to persuade.

Explanation of Audience and Purpose Diamond’s intended audience is comprised Try either “comprises” or “composed of.” of those who work in the field of ethnobiology and those who are also interested in sciences as a whole. Good work on audience.

Thesis In “The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma”, Jared Diamond uses evidence from sources and personal anecdotes to persuade those interested in the field of ethnobiology and sciences as a whole to stress the importance of putting forth the required effort needed to comprehend what you’re studying before consulting an expert.

Explanation of Thesis In “The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma”, Place commas within to quotation, after Dilemma. Jared Diamond uses evidence from sources and personal anecdotes to persuade those interested in the field of ethnobiology and sciences as a whole to stress the importance of putting forth the required effort needed to comprehend what you’re studying before consulting an expert.

Explanation of Thesis In “The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma”, Jared Diamond uses evidence from sources and personal anecdotes to persuade those interested in the field of ethnobiology and sciences as a whole to stress the importance of putting forth the required effort needed to comprehend what you’re Avoid second person, especially in your thesis. Always avoid contractions. studying before consulting an expert.

Explanation of Thesis In “The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma”, Jared Diamond uses evidence from sources and personal anecdotes to persuade those interested in the field of ethnobiology and sciences as a whole to stress the importance of putting forth the required effort needed to comprehend what you’re studying before consulting an expert. This is good but far too wordy; also, you only included two devices. To simplify your prose, you might try writing “persuades the audience of the need to…”

Audience and Purpose In “The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma”, Jared Diamond’s intended audience is young scientists or ethnobiologists like him, as well as anyone trying to learn more about a certain culture. The purpose of this essay is to explain and point out the mistakes made by him and other ethnobiologists in New Guinea. Diamond also tries to give readers some insight on how one should approach people from different cultures when trying to learn more about them. Diamond wants the reader to put more effort when trying to learn about different cultures and and foreign environments.

Explanation of Audience and Purpose In “The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma”, Make sure to put the comma inside the quotation, after Dilemma. Jared Diamond’s intended audience is young scientists or ethnobiologists like him, as well as anyone trying to learn more about a certain culture.

Explanation of Audience and Purpose In “The Ethnobiologist’s Dilemma”, Jared Diamond’s intended audience is young scientists or ethnobiologists like him, as well as anyone trying to learn more about a certain culture. For an accurate understanding of the audience, you need to look at where the essay was published. The readers of Natural History magazine either work in scientific fields or are educated laypeople (non-scientists) with an interest in topics related to natural history. Culture is only one aspect of Diamond’s argument.

Explanation of Audience and Purpose The purpose of this essay is to explain and point out the mistakes made by him and other ethnobiologists in New Guinea. This is too narrow. Think about why Diamond includes the example about his mechanic. He and his mechanic share the same culture but still have difficulty communicating, because the mechanic is an expert and Diamond is not.

Explanation of Audience and Purpose Diamond also tries to give readers some insight on how one should approach people from different cultures when trying to learn more about them. Diamond wants the reader to put more effort when trying to learn about different cultures and and foreign environments. You’re placing too much emphasis on the cultural aspect of Diamond’s essay. He gives other examples of communication difficulties between people who share the same culture. The common thread is the difficulty of communication between experts and non-experts.

Thesis Diamond argues that knowledge about a foreign environment and a new culture must be gained by being respectful and spending the necessary time with its people, as well as to use methods that are known to the environment as well as the people.

Explanation of Thesis Diamond argues that knowledge about a foreign environment and a new culture must be gained by being respectful and spending the necessary time with its people, as well as to use methods that are known to the environment as well as the people. Your use of “as well as” is a bit repetitive. You haven’t listed any rhetorical choices and your description of the essay’s purpose is not accurate.

Your turn Spend a few minutes drafting a thesis for the text you tend to work with. Don’t be afraid to ask questions. If time, let them get into groups to discuss their theses.

BA4 Due Friday by midnight! Using three texts specified by your classroom instructor, or three of the four texts listed below (Rosenberg, Birkerts, Budiansky, or Jaschik; do this!), you will: 1) Identify the audience and purpose of each text and explain what those are in about 75-100 words; 2) Create a thesis statement for a rhetorical analysis for each text.

We’ll be looking for: Your thesis to clearly present the paper as a rhetorical analysis Focus Your thesis to identify the author and title of the text and offer reasonable interpretation of the central purpose Your thesis to present a clear claim about how you will analyze the text. (specific strategies) Overall tone, style, and word choice of your response. Here, talk about how many choices would be appropriate.

Some writing basics: Your paper should flow and connect: Paragraph: Introduction includes thesis, which all points made in the rest of the paper should refer back to. Transition to first paragraph, which should then transition to the second, which then transitions to the third. Paragraph: Topic sentence: never begin with a quote. Evidence should be followed by explanation. Never end with a quote. You always want the last word to be yours.

For next class: St. Martin’s: Textbook: 3f and 3g, “Planning” and “Drafting” Textbook: Chapter 10, pages 197-205 (More on a paper and paragraph’s overall cohesion) Bring three quotes from the text you will be writing your rhetorical analysis over to class. They must be support to the rhetorical choices you plan to analyze.