UNECE LRTAP-38th Session of the September 2006

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Appeal of NSF/ANSI 60 Drinking Water Additives Treatment Chemicals Chlorate SPAC JOINT COMMITTEE - DRINKING WATER ADDITIVES, TREATMENT CHEMICALS MEETING.
Advertisements

Presented by the New Brunswick Lung Association In partnership with Health Canada.
Summary Slide Some Industry views on POP/PBT identification in Europe.
© Cengage Learning – Purchasing & Supply Chain Management 4 ed ( ) Practice 16. Negotiating techniques and rules of conduct.
1 EGTEI – 22 November 2011 Nadine ALLEMAND – EGTEI secretariat VOC monitoring issues in the Gothenburg Annex.
Background and mandate of the new Task Force on POPs Richard Ballaman Chairman of the Working Group on Strategies and Review.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
Persistent Organic Pollutants in Marine Ecosystems.
TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop: Session V – Human Health Effects Nathan Pechacek, M.S. Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Environmental Risk Analysis
UNEP POPs Negotiations Background Mandate Status Report Relevance to Great Lakes.
Technical Considerations on the Quantifiability of Wood Smoke Health Impacts Regional Technical Forum November 18, 2014.
Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.
1 Planning of the Stage 3 In-depth Review 2008 Joint TFEIP/EIONET air emissions meeting Tallinn, May 2008 Martin Adams Expert Panel on Review European.
1 Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to the Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation for the AB 2588 Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program.
TASK FORCE ON WRDs SURVEILLANCE TASK FORCE ON WRDs SURVEILLANCE Monica Francesca Blasi, Paola Meli, Mario Carere, Enzo Funari National Institute of Health.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Phasing Out PFOS and PBDEs: Voluntary and Regulatory Steps Kenneth Moss Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, EPA HQ October.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION TWO UNDERSTANDING THE ORGANIZATION OF CODEX Module 2.5 How do Codex Committees function?
Review of the Gothenburg Protocol: WGSR Conclusions Review of the Gothenburg Protocol: WGSR Conclusions 8th Joint TFEIP/EIONET Meeting Dublin, October.
Chlorinated Paraffins
Varteg Hill – Coal Recovery and Land Reclamation Pre-Application enquiry by Glamorgan Power Ltd. Members Seminar 31/3/14.
Management of threats to fish and wildlife from PBTs Scott Redman, Puget Sound Action Team Puget Sound Plankton - The Ultimate Seafood Experience, Jan.
Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections Emission inventory adjustments – an update TFEIP co-chairs: Chris Dore, Martin Adams and Kristina Saarinen.
Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.
WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Joint WHO/ECEH - Convention Task Force on Health Aspects of Air Pollution (TFH) Health Risks of Persistent.
Information update: EB 26 decisions (December 2008) on emissions Review/revision of the Protocols Information update: EB 26 decisions (December 2008) on.
State Responses to BFRs Towards an Integrated Chemicals Policy Ken Geiser University of Massachusetts Lowell.
UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE EMISSION DATA REPORTING UNDER LRTAP Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections: Oct. 2004,
Task Force on POPs Generic Guidelines and Procedures.
Gas Regional Initiative North West Region - Draft Framework Guidelines Capacity Allocation Mechanisms BNetzA/CRE Pre-Comitology Meeting Bonn – 26 May 2011.
California Sediment Quality Advisory Committee Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California.
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
Presentation of Nominations to the World Heritage Committee by the Advisory Bodies Presentation by ICOMOS Paris, January 2013.
1 Public Workshop to Discuss Proposed Amendments to the AB 2588 Guidelines Regulation July 27, 2006 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources.
Water.europa.eu Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances Part I – Technical process 13 th Working Group E meeting March.
WP6 – Monitoring and Evaluation 17th November 2014 Rome.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Policy proposals update
Communication: Safety Summary
Joint thematic session on B(a)P pollution: main activities and results
MID-COURSE REPORT Risk Assessment and Monitoring for Environmental Chemicals ( JICA HIC, 1st June 2007) MUCHLIS (INDONESIA)
Working Group on Effects, 29th Session, September 2010
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
LRTAP Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution
Reporting of priority substances in Norway
D8 and D9 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:
Review of the WFD priority substances list
TRAINING WORKSHOP FOR UPDATING INVENTORY OF INITIAL AND NEW POPs
Actions to Reduce Mercury
D 4 Food webs Process: two open workshops WGGES consultation
Dedicated maps on contaminants
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Concentration limits for new POPs: State of the play
EPA’s Current Air Toxics Activities
Shanghai, China February 21–22, 2011
Chemicals Policy Area Up-date
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
Control of hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea region - COHIBA
Overview of environmental monitoring at EU and regional level
Expectations of WGSR from EGTEI
News from the Convention
3rd meeting, 8 March 2006 EEA Copenhagen
Presentation to IPC RoHS Meeting
State of the Environment reporting Agenda 5.
Stakeholder consultation meeting on the CAFE baseline scenario Welcome 30 April, 2004 CAFE BASELINE SCENARIO STAKEHOLDER MEETING, 30 April, 2003.
EAF (9) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 02/10/2006
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)
Presentation transcript:

UNECE LRTAP-38th Session of the 19 - 22 September 2006 Track A Track B Exploration Management options Future work/guidance WGSR

Track A-Workplan Conducted technical reviews of: hexachlorobutadiene (HCBD), octabromodiphenyl ether (OctaBDE) polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCN) pentachlorobenzene (PeCB) short-chained chlorinated paraffins (SCCP)

Track A Process Peer reviewers examined dossiers and summaries of additional information. February/March –Letter & guidance materials sent to reviewers; teleconference held with reviewers. Reviewers worked independently. The work was conducted in accordance with the generic guidelines for technical reviews. Independent reviews were summarized. Summaries were revised to reflect reviewers comments. Independent reviews and summaries were sent to Secretariat for distribution to Task Force. Task Force meeting & report June 2006, Estonia.

Results of Track A Review Task Force concluded that the five dossiers contained sufficient information for screening in relation to the requirements of Executive Body Decision 1998/2. Supported the dossier’s conclusion that the five proposed substances be considered POPs in the context of the Protocol.

Hexachlorobutadiene (HCBD) TF supports the dossier’s conclusion that HCBD is a POP. HCBD is present in biota in Greenland and in air samples in Sweden in areas of no known release; supports conclusion of LRAT. Acute and long-term toxicity to aquatic organisms and nephrotoxicity observed in rat studies. Majority of experts conclude data supports persistence & bioaccumulation – except 1 expert (& 1 observer.) Dec 1998/2 paragraphs 2(a)–(b): monitoring information in remote locations supported the view that LRAT of HCBD is occurring; indications of the potential for environmental and/or human health effects due to LRAT; except 1 expert (& 1 observer.)

Octabromodiphenyl ether (OctaBDE TF supports the dossier’s conclusion that commercial-OctaBDE is a POP. Sufficient information satisfies LRAT values. Monitoring data in remote regions indicates that lower and higher brominated congeners of c-OctaBDE are susceptible to LRAT. Toxicity & Persistence: sufficient information to conclude that commercial OctaBDE meets the values. Bioaccumulation: complicated by heterogeneous composition of c-OctaBDE, however concluded sufficient information; except 1 expert (and 1 observer). Dec 1998/2 paragraphs 2(a)–(b): some congeners contained in c-OctaBDE formulations, particularly the lower brominated components, were frequently found in remote locations; indications of the potential for environmental and/or human health effects due to LRAT; except 1 expert (and 1 observer).

Polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCN) TF supports the dossier’s conclusion that PCN is a POP. Sufficient information, particularly for tri- to octachloronaphthalenes, satisfies LRAT values monitoring data in air samples in the Canadian and Norwegian Arctic. The mono- and possibly the dichloronaphthalenes did not satisfy the indicative value for half-life; information on monitoring of these congeners was not available. Toxicity: sufficient information to support conclusion, based on their acute and chronic toxicity and dioxin-like activity. Persistence: sufficient information to conclude that PCN met the values; exception of 1 expert (and 1 observer). Bioaccumulation: sufficient information, particularly for the di- to heptachloronaphthalenes. Dec 1998/2 paragraphs 2(a)–(b): data supportive of the view that LRAT of PCN has led to residues in environments distant from their source; indications of the potential for environmental and/or human health effects due to LRAT; except 1 expert (and 1 observer).

Pentachlorobenzene (PeCB) TF supports the dossier’s conclusion that PeCB is a POP. Sufficient information to support the dossier’s conclusion for: potential for LRAT, toxicity, persistence, and bioaccumulation. Dec 1998/2 paragraphs 2(a)–(b): monitoring information in remote locations supports that LRAT is occurring; indications of potential for environmental and/or human health effects due to LRAT; except 1 expert (and 1 observer).

Short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCP) TF supports dossier’s conclusion that SCCP is a POP. LRAT: sufficient information; monitoring data in Arctic biota. Potential to adversely affect the environment due to their toxicity to aquatic organisms. Persistent, based upon a weight of evidence approach that included information on abiotic and biotic degradation and monitoring data. One expert from industry noted there was insufficient information on the persistence of SCCP in sediment. Bioaccumulation: sufficient information. Dec 1998/2 paragraphs 2(a)–(b): monitoring information in remote locations supports on the weight of evidence view that LRAT of SCCP is occurring; except 1 observer; indications of the potential for environmental effects due to LRAT Existing data did not allow the assessment of risks to human health

Track B review 5 substances proposed in 2005 Review Process (HCBD, c-OctaBDE, PeCB, PCN and SCCP) Review Process Conclusions

Conclusions Track B Dossier Use/emissions Emissions Management Costs and benefits

Management options for PeBDE and PFOS Track B continued PeBDE, Norway PFOS, Sweden

PeBDE/PFOS Chemical identity Use Production, use and emissions Management options

PeBDE/PFOS Further work Questionnaire Management options Alternatives (inter)national regulations Quantification of emissions and use Questionnaire (also for other (5?) proposed substances)

Guidance of WGSR Role of observers in Task Force meetings. Paragraph 2(b)of Executive Body decision 1998/2. Treatment of additional information and comments (summaries). Summaries in track A peer reviews.

Future priorities of the Task Force and workplan for 2007 Track A and Track B reviews of dossiers as requested; Continue work on PentaBDE, PFOS and other substances as decided by the Executive Body. Update the generic guidelines for the technical review of dossiers of new substances. Circulate a questionnaire to gather further information on management strategies and options for PentaBDE, PFOS and other substances. Consider issues related to paragraph 2(b) of Executive Body decision 1998/2 as a priority at its next meeting in 2007. Hold 6th meeting in 2007.

Conclusions Track A review : The TF supported conclusion that HCCB, PCN, OctaBDE, SCCPs, PeCB are POPs in the context of the Protocol. Track B: 5 substances proposed in 2005 More work required on Management Options for substances.