N. Gopalswamy, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, P. Mäkelä, S. Yashiro, I. Usoskin

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NBYM 2006 A major proton event of 2005 January 20: propagating supershock or superflare? V. Grechnev 1, V. Kurt 2, A. Uralov 1, H.Nakajima 3, A. Altyntsev.
Advertisements

On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal phenomena On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal.
Recent developments in our understanding of solar energetic particles Karl-Ludwig Klein SoHO/EIT.
Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,
13. Flare Classification in the Era of Global Coverage of the Sun A. Vourlidas, C. Cohen The GOES SXR characterization of solar flares has been used widely.
Extreme CME Events from the Sun Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Extreme Space Weather Events (ESWE) workshop, Boulder, CO May 14-17, 2012.
TRACE and RHESSI observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of Wrocław.
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Erupting flux rope, rising X-ray source and CME on 16 April 2002 C. Goff 1, L. van Driel-Gesztelyi 1,2,3, L. K. Harra 1, S. A. Matthews 1, and C.H. Mandrini.
Strength of Coronal Mass Ejection- driven Shocks Near the Sun and Its Importance in Predicting Solar Energetic Particle Events Chenglong Shen 1, Yuming.
Working Group 2 - Ion acceleration and interactions.
Multiwavelength Study of Magnetic Reconnection Associated with Sigmoid Eruption Chang Liu BBSO/NJIT
Coronal IP Shocks Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Elmau CME Workshop, 2003 February 7 Plenary talk Sun Earth.
Observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope – a direct application of the quadrupolar model for a solar flare Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical.
CME Interactions and Particle Acceleration N. Gopalswamy (NASA/GSFC) 2003 February 11 Elmau CME workshop, Group-C Presentation (B. Klecker’s Group)
GLOBAL ENERGETICS OF FLARES Gordon Emslie (for a large group of people)
Constraints on Particle Acceleration from Interplanetary Observations R. P. Lin together with L. Wang, S. Krucker at UC Berkeley, G Mason at U. Maryland,
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
January Nobeyama radioheliograph visit Microwave Signatures of Fast CMEs Nat Gopalswamy NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USA.
High-Cadence EUV Imaging, Radio, and In-Situ Observations of Coronal Shocks and Energetic Particles: Implications for Particle Acceleration K. A. Kozarev.
A Catalog of Halo Coronal Mass Ejections from SOHO N. Gopalswamy 1, S. Yashiro 2, G. Michalek 3, H. Xie 3, G. Stenborg 2, A. Vourlidas 4, R. A. Howard.
Relation between Type II Bursts and CMEs Inferred from STEREO Observations N. Gopalswamy, W. Thompson, J. Davila, M. Kaiser NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
Coronal hard X-ray sources and associated decimetric/metric radio emissions N. Vilmer D. Koutroumpa (Observatoire de Paris- LESIA) S.R Kane G. Hurford.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
1 20 January 2005: Session Summary SHINE 2006 Zermatt, Utah, 31 July - 4 August Invited Talks Riley: what was the Alfven speed in the corona at.
SOHO-20 “Transient events on the Sun and In the Heliosphere” – August 28, 2008, Ghent SOHO-20 “Transient events on the Sun and In the Heliosphere” – August.
Connecting Near-Sun CME flux Ropes to the 1-AU Flux Ropes using the Flare-CME Relationship N. Gopalswamy, H. Xie, S. Yashiro, and S. Akiyama NASA/GSFC.
Properties of CME Acceleration in the Low Corona Jie Zhang George Mason University SHINE June 28 – July 2, 2004 Big Sky - Montana Address.
The Space Weather Week Monique Pick LESIA, Observatoire de Paris November 2006.
Fast Magnetosonic Waves and Global Coronal Seismology in the Extended Solar Corona Ryun Young Kwon, Jie Zhang, Maxim Kramar, Tongjiang Wang, Leon Ofman,
Improving Space Weather Forecasts Using Coronagraph Data S.P. Plunkett 1, A. Vourlidas 1, D.R. McMullin 2, K. Battams 3, R.C. Colaninno 4 1 Naval Research.
Modeling of CME-driven Shock propagation with ENLIL simulations using flux-rope and cone-model inputs Using observations from STEREO/SECCHI and SOHO/LASCO,
UV Spectroscopy of CME Currrent Sheets John Raymond Angela Ciaravella Silvio Giordano Dave Webb.
Type IV Radio Bursts and Source Regions Observed by NoRH: Results Sara Petty, CUA/ GSFC Advisor: Dr. Nat Gopalswamy Type IV Radio Bursts Revisited Research.
Flare Ribbon Expansion and Energy Release Ayumi ASAI Kwasan and Hida Observatories, Kyoto University Explosive Phenomena in Magnetized Plasma – New Development.
Xie – STEREO SWG – Dublin – March 2010 Low Mass Coronal Mass Ejections Missed by STEREO A/B or LASCO and Associated ICMEs H. Xie 1,2, O. C. St. Cyr 2,
Shine 2004, A. Sterling CME Eruption Onset Observations: Dimmings Alphonse C. Sterling NASA/MSFC/NSSTC.
ENLIL Modeling for the interaction event: Effect of Interacting CMEs on SEP Intensity NASA/GSFC H. Xie, N. Gopalswamy, P. Makela, S. Yashiro.
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
1 SEP Timing Studies: An Excruciatingly Brief Review Allan J. Tylka US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC SHINE 2006 Where was the CME when the SEPs.
Discussion Points for CME Group A. Vourlidas NRL.
Relationships between flares and CMEs FRIDAY 9:00 am – 12:00 pm SHINE 2009.
Interplanetary proton and electron enhancements associated with radio-loud and radio-quiet CME-driven shocks P. Mäkelä 1,2, N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2,
Driving 3D-MHD codes Using the UCSD Tomography
R. Miteva1, K.-Ludwig Klein1, Ines Kienriech2,
Dong Li Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS
First VarSITI General Symposium June 6-10, 2016, Albena, Bulgaria
Solar Radio Imaging Array SIRA
Multiwavelength Study of Solar Flares Chang Liu Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT Seminar Day November 2, 2007.
Particle Acceleration at Coronal Shocks: the Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures Fan Guo (Los Alamos National Lab), Xiangliang.
Consequences of the Anomalous Expansion of CMEs in Solar Cycle 24
Karl-Ludwig Klein & Rositsa Miteva
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
Forecasting the arrival time of the CME’s shock at the Earth
Alexei Struminsky1,2  1 Space Research Institute
Coronal and interplanetary radio emission as a tracer of solar energetic particle propagation Karl-Ludwig Klein (F Meudon)
EVENT of 20 JANUARY 2005 INJECTION TIME of IONS, PROTONS and ELECTRONS
Series of high-frequency slowly drifting structure mapping the magnetic field reconnection M. Karlicky, A&A, 2004, 417,325.
SIDC Space Weather briefing
SMALL SEP EVENTS WITH METRIC TYPE II RADIO BURSTS
The CME-Flare Relationship in Homologous Eruptive Events
Teriaca, et al (2003) ApJ, 588, SOHO/CDS HIDA/DST 2002 campaign
Solar Sources of Wide Coronal Mass Ejections during the Ascending Phase of Cycle 24 Sachiko Akiyama1,2, Nat Gopalswamy2, Seiji Yashiro1,2 , and Pertti.
High-cadence Radio Observations of an EIT Wave
Phillip Hess Jie Zhang, Dusan Odstrcil
On coronal streamer changes
Flux Rope from Eruption Data (FRED) and its Interplanetary Counterpart
-Short Talk- The soft X-ray characteristics of solar flares, both with and without associated CMEs Kay H.R.M., Harra L.K., Matthews S.A., Culhane J.L.,
V. Grechnev1, A. Uralov1, I. Kuzmenko2, A. Kochanov1, V
A STUDY OF THE KINEMATIC EVOLUTION OF CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS J
Presentation transcript:

N. Gopalswamy, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, P. Mäkelä, S. Yashiro, I. Usoskin Heliocentric Distance of CMEs at the Time of Energetic Particle Release: GLE Events of Solar Cycle 23 N. Gopalswamy, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, P. Mäkelä, S. Yashiro, I. Usoskin 32nd ICRC Beijing 2011 August 16

Motivation & Approach Test shock acceleration: Where is the CME when GLE particles are released? Metric type II bursts – earliest indicators of shocks Flare & CME start simultaneously (CSHKP) CME acceleration profile same as HXR profile CME speed max = SXR flare Max All 16 GLEs of cycle 23 have good CME data Limitation: Only C2 data (first appearance >2.5 Rs) Major issue: How to extrapolate CME height to SPR time Cross-check for 2 events (1 MLSO, 1 LASCO/C1) CME Height at GLE release: 1.7 – 7.6 Rs

Extrapolations 3 Events: CME appeared before SPR Time 4 events: CME appeared 2 -4 min after SPR Time CME speed matured, so extrapolation has minimal error Remaining 9 events: try 4 different methods of quadratic extrapolation (constant acceleration), assume flare onset = CME onset, assume CME pre-eruption height = 1.25 Rs

Particle Release after CME Appearance: No major extrapolation CME: 4.94 (5.63) Rs at 02:30 UT GLE SPR at 02:32 UT W117 Shock compression V = 2712 km/s; a = - 10.5 ms-2 CME height at 02:32 UT = 5.99 Rs 3 events like this (GLE ## 61, 62, 66)

2001/11/04 GLE CME: 2.67 Rs at 16:25 SPR time: 16:57 Spherical expansion case ad = – 63.4 m/s/s  7.59 Rs CME: 2.67 Rs at 16:25 SPR time: 16:57 Extrapolate by 32 min N06W18 Linear extrapolation at 1846 km/s  CME height at SPR: 7.76 Rs

2003/10/29 GLE ad = -146.5 m/s/s  4.14 Rs CME: 2.92 Rs at 20:54 SPR time: 21:01 Extrapolate by 7 min S19W09 Linear extrapolation at 2049 km/s  CME height at SPR: 4.34 Rs

SPR Just before the CME Appearance N14W25 CME: 3.02 Rs (3.32 Rs) at 9:54 SPR 09:52 Extrapolate by 2 min Linear extrapolation at 2802 km/s  CME height at SPR: 2.84 Rs Four events like this (## 55, 63, 67, 69)

2001/12/26 GLE N08W54 CME: 3.84 (4.72) Rs at 05:30 SPR time: 05:27 Extrapolate by 3 min N08W54 Linear extrapolation at 1779 km/s  CME height at SPR: 4.26 Rs

1997/11/06 GLE LASCO/C1 Data Available 1.45 Rs CME: 5.18 (5.75) Rs at 12:11 SPR time: 12:07 Extrapolate by 4 min S18W63 Linear extrapolation at 1726km/s  CME height at SPR: 5.15 Rs

1997/11/07 LASCO/C1 LASCO/C1 images at 11:54:34 (1.45 Rs) And 11:56:53 (1.88 Rs) Deprojected: 1.61 Rs & 2.09 Rs SPR 12:07 UT Extrapolate from 11:57 to 12:07 CME height at SPR = 4.14 Rs From LASCO/C2: 5.15 Rs From Flare acceleration: 3.48 Rs Overall uncertainty: 1.67 Rs CME Height at Type II Onset Expected <1.61 Rs Extrapolate to 11:53 H = 1.57 Rs vs. 1.45 Rs LASCO/C1

2003/11/02 GLE MLSO Data Available 1.67 Rs CME: 3.27 (3.75) Rs at 17:30 SPR time: 17:27 Extrapolate by 3 min S18W59 Linear extrapolation at 2981 km/s  CME height at SPR: 2.98 Rs

2003/11/02 CME with GLE 17:19 1.67 Rs 17:22 1.93 Rs 17:25 2.39 Rs MLSO 1411 km/s 3.27 Rs 6.00 Rs 14.03 Rs LASCO 2598 km/s

Cross-checking SPR time between the last MLSO image (2.39 Rs) and first SOHO image (3.27 Rs) CME height at SPR between 2.75 and 3.75 Rs (Deprojected) Use combined kinematics to get the CME height at SPR time as 3.02 Rs CME height at type II onset from MLSO data is 1.18 Rs (constant local speed). 1.28 Rs using LASCO data G: 3.02 Rs 3.27 Rs II: 1.28 Rs

Events with CME Appearance Close (2-4 min) to SPR or before SPR GLE# First App UT dist (DP) Rs SPR CME Dist @SPR (Rs) CME Dist@ SPR - Accel 1997/11/06 12:11 5.18 (5.75) 12:07 5.15 3.48 2001/04/18 02:30 4.94 (5.63) 02:32 5.99 ------ 2001/11/04 16:25 2.67 (2.72) 16:57 7.59 9.52 2001/12/16 05:30 3.84 (4.72) 05:27 4.26 2.44 2003/10/29 20:54 2.92 (2.95) 21:01 4.34 4.61 2003/11/02 17:30 3.27 (3.75) 17:27 2.98** 3.43* 2005/01/17 17:32 3.02 (3.32) 2.84 2.94 Average 4.74 4.40 Correct value from MLSO Data: 3.02 Rs  error = 13.6%* and 1.3%** Average CME Height at Solar Particle Release: 3.86 Rs [1.7 – 7.6] Well-connected events: 3.08 Rs; Poorly connected: 4.87 Rs

Other Events: Extrapolation Needed First appearance time and height (<H> = 4.4 Rs, 2.5 to 6Rs) Linear extrapolation is not valid because of the acceleration in the 2 – 3 Rs range We do not know the CME onset time Use Flare onset = CME onset (two aspects of the same energy release; flare arcade and CME flux rope formed by the same process; Flare decides CME width; RC flux and MC flux correlated) Constant acceleration (also an approximation) Case 1: a = V/Δt; Δt = Flare onset to first appearance; no H used Case 2: a = 2ΔH/Δt2 ; ΔH= 1.25 Rs to First app. Height Case 3: a = V2/2ΔH; no time used Case 4: Same as case 1, but Δt = Flare onset to flare peak Flare acceleration = CME acceleration (has observational support)

CME speed max at Flare peak Gopalswamy et al., 2009 Zhang et al., 2001 CME Speed GOES SXR CME Speed GOES SXR 0.4 kms-2 CME speed profile similar to the Flare soft X-ray profile CME onset ~ Flare Onset

Initial Accelerations Accelerations range from 0.5 km/s2 to 7.5 km/s2 ½ ρV2 ≤ B2/8π  V ≤ VA  a ≤ VA/tA= VA2/L (Vrsnak, 2008) VA = 1500 km/s; L ~175,000 km  a ≤ 13 kms-2

CME Height at Type II Onset & SPR

Summary CME initial acceleration is in the range 0.5 to 7.5 km/s2, consistent with theoretical expectations Shocks form when the CME drivers are at a heliocentric distance of ~1.5 Rs (metric type II) GLE particles are released when the CME reaches a heliocentric distance of ~3.9 Rs Particle release when CMEs are at a lower height (3.0 Rs compared to 4.9 Rs for poorly connected events) Independent verification possible for 2 events that had inner coronal observations

2010/06/13 fp = 150 MHz  np =2.8x108 cm-3 CME starts at 5:34 at 1.13 Rs; Type II starts at 5:36 when the CME at 1.17 Rs; shock 1.19 Rs Gopalswamy et al., 2011 ApJ

CME Height at Type II Onset 01/11/04 98/08/24 CME Height at Type II Onset CME Height at GLE Onset

CME Height at Type II Onset Number of Events 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 CME Height at Type II Onset [Rs]

CME Height at GLE Onset [Rs] Flare Longitude – 60o