Lesson 6 Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction Exercise Team #

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Systems Engineering From a Life Cycle Perspective John Groenenboom Director Engineering – Mesa Boeing Rotorcraft Dec 12, 2007.
Advertisements

UJTL Ontology Effort TMCM Nelson And Marti Hall. Overview Vision for the UJTL and METLs Scenario Mapping Findings Proposed POA&M outline.
PMT-352 Systems Engineering Seminar
I/ITSEC Orlando, 2012 Stefan Klaes VP Sales Management Rheinmetall Defence.
SACM Terminology Nancy Cam-Winget, David Waltermire, March.
Term Project Pick a system (discuss choice with me)  Want simple functionality, security issues, whole system (e. g., client and server side) Submit a.
TECH 101 Product Design and Manufacturing. TECH 1012 System Life-Cycle Engineering 2 Major phases in almost all products and in many cases services –Acquisition.
System design technique  System Development Life Cycle  Prototyping  Rapid Application Development.
ITE Vision Adapted and Updated from the background for the Presentation, "Naval Platform Control Systems: 2015 and Beyond,” Eleventh Ship Control Systems.
Thirteenth Lecture Hour 8:30 – 9:20 am, Sunday, September 16 Software Management Disciplines Process Automation (from Part III, Chapter 12 of Royce’ book)
Risk Management - the process of identifying and controlling hazards to protect the force.  It’s five steps represent a logical thought process from.
NDIA Systems Engineering Supportability & Interoperability Conference October 2003 Using Six Sigma to Improve Systems Engineering Rick Hefner, Ph.D.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Policies and procedures for developing acquisition plans; determining whether to use commercial or Government resources; whether it is more economical.
Fifth Lecture Hour 9:30 – 10:20 am, September 9, 2001 Framework for a Software Management Process – Life Cycle Phases (Part II, Chapter 5 of Royce’ book)
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 What is Solution Assessment & Validation?
Cmpe 589 Spring 2006 Lecture 2. Software Engineering Definition –A strategy for producing high quality software.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
2.1 ACQUISITION STRATEGYSlide 1 Space System Segments.
An Iterative Method For System Integration
Project Cost Management
Supportability Design Considerations
Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA)
Life Cycle Logistics.
Lesson Objectives Assess the major requirements management activities during the acquisition process from Milestone B to Initial Operational Capability.
School of Business Administration
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Lesson 5 Materiel Solution Analysis (MSA) Exercise Team#
Risk and Issue Exercise Tasks
Lesson 9 Production and Deployment (P&D) Exercise Team #
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Lesson 9 Production and Deployment (P&D) Exercise Team #
Project Management Lifecycle Phases
DAG CH 3 Figure 11: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Lesson 10 Operations and Support (O&S) Exercise Team #
JTAMS PRE-MILESTONE B ANALYSIS
Lesson 6 Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction Exercise Team #
Lesson 4 Systems Engineering Plan Exercise Team #
DAG CH 3 Figure 17: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 23: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
JTAMS PRE-MILESTONE B ANALYSIS
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
The MDMP Process MDMP Inputs MDMP Outputs Step 1 MDMP Inputs Step 5
DAG CH 3 Figure 13: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 19: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Identify Key Factors that Impact Effective Change Efforts
Product Support Considerations
DAG CH 3 Figure 18: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Testing in the Context of the Operational Mission Mike Toole Army Future Combat Systems System Of Systems Test 4 March 2003.
DAG CH 3 Figure 28: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Relationship between MRLs and AS6500
CIS12-3 IT Project Management
DAG CH 3 Figure 15: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Requirements Management
DOD’S PHASED SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
CS/EE/ME 75(a) Nov. 19, 2018 Today: Prelimnary Design Review Homework.
Cybersecurity EXERCISE (CE) ATD Scenario questions
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
The Army Maintenance Program at the Platoon/Section Level
DAG CH 3 Figure 21: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
JTAMS PRE-MILESTONE B ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions:
DAG CH 3 Figure 27: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 22: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
JTAMS PRE-MILESTONE B ANALYSIS
DAG CH 3 Figure 25: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
MOWLES Interim Progress Report
Presentation transcript:

Lesson 6 Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction Exercise Team #

Lesson 6, Question 1 Team 1/6 CDD Requirements Good CDD Requirement? Y/N Spec traces to CDD? Y/N Is Related Spec Requirement Good? Y/N Verification Method? Comments (Resolutions for bad CDD and/or Spec requirements or other recommendations) 5.1.1.1 Dissemination of Target Data ≤10 sec Threshold ≤5 sec Objective 5.1.5 Unrefueled Range – Mission range from Operator Control Unit (OCU) unrefueled ≥10 km Threshold ≥30 km Objective 5.2.3 IFF Accuracy – Single-target identification accuracy ≥.90 Threshold ≥.99 Objective 5.3.1 Air Transportability. The UGV shall be air transportable in a C-130 or larger aircraft (Threshold = Objective)

Lesson 6, Question 1 Team 2 CDD Requirements Good CDD Requirement? Y/N Spec traces to CDD? Y/N Is Related Spec Requirement Good? Y/N Verification Method? Comments (Resolutions for bad CDD and/or Spec requirements or other recommendations) 5.1.3.2 Minimum Top Speed ≥15 kph Threshold ≥40 kph Objective 5.1.3.1 Degrees of Incline Capable of Traversing ≥15 deg Threshold ≥30 deg Objective 5.2.4 Automatic fire override. The UGV shall automatically override any firing command upon the IFF system detect a friendly target. 5.1.2.1 Probability of Detect (Pd) for Mines ≥.95 Threshold ≥.99 Objective

Lesson 6, Question 1 Team 3 CDD Requirements Good CDD Requirement? Y/N Spec traces to CDD? Y/N Is Related Spec Requirement Good? Y/N Verification Method? Comments (Resolutions for bad CDD and/or Spec requirements or other recommendations) 5.1.1.2 Time to Establish Communications with AC-130 ≤10 sec Threshold ≤3 sec Objective 5.1.2.2 Probability of Kill (Pk) in Autonomously Targeting and Launching One or More Weapons ≥.75 Threshold ≥.90 Objective 5.2.5 Laser Attack The UGV shall be capable of lasering a target to allow an airborne unit to launch one or more weapons (Threshold = Objective) 6.1 Infrastructure Support. Vehicles must be supportable by current and projected combat support and service support assets.

Lesson 6, Question 1 Team 4 CDD Requirements Good CDD Requirement? Y/N Spec traces to CDD? Y/N Is Related Spec Requirement Good? Y/N Verification Method? Comments (Resolutions for bad CDD and/or Spec requirements or other recommendations) 5.1.1.3 Continuous Network Connectivity with Operator Control Unit (OCU) ≥.98 Threshold ≥.99 Objective 5.1.4 Operational Availability (Ao) ≥.80 Threshold ≥.95 Objective 6.7 Transportation. The UGV shall be capable of transportation to the theater of operation in standard shipping containers. These containers shall be selected from the existing government inventory. Once in theater, UGV shall be capable of rapid deployment to forward operating areas. 6.9 Maintenance and Operations. The UGV will have three categories of maintenance: organization, intermediate and depot level. The system shall not require the use of highly educated or trained personnel for its operation or for organizational maintenance.

Lesson 6, Question 1 Team 5 CDD Requirements Good CDD Requirement? Y/N Spec traces to CDD? Y/N Is Related Spec Requirement Good? Y/N Verification Method? Comments (Resolutions for bad CDD and/or Spec requirements or other recommendations) 5.1.6 Computer Based Training (CBT) – Percent of entry-level training conduct using CBT approach ≥80% Threshold ≥90% Objective 5.3.4 Naval Transportability - The UGV System shall be transportable by current and planned US Naval craft to include SSC, LCAC, LCU, JHSV, INLS, LHA, LHD, LSD and LPD-17. The UGV shall be transportable by Marine Corps Maritime Prepositioning Force (MPF) and commercial shipping. 6.6.1 Operational Environments: UGV must be capable of conducting operations in all applicable operational environments, including hot, basic, and cold climates. Environmental conditions include electronic and electromagnetic environments. 6.1.1 Combat Support Requirements. The UGV shall be capable of battlefield damage repair in the field using currently available tools and repair techniques.

TMRR Vehicle Pros/Cons 2. What are the pros and cons associated with your two vehicle platforms taken into the TMRR phase? Use the data from “Early Competitive Prototyping Test Status” (see artifacts), findings from Dragonfly M&S (if available; using same baseline vehicle configurations from Exercise 5 in both the “Minefield Transit” and “Interoperability (Passive) AC-130 Gunship” Dragonfly Scenarios), and your experiences and/or background to identify potential pros and cons. Tracked Vehicle: Wheeled Vehicle: Hover Vehicle:

TMRR Platform Design Comparison Criteria 3. a. Identify at least four important platform performance criteria (likely consider KPPs and/or KSAs) that you can use to compare the alternatives. Then considering the pros and cons from the previous slides, rank order the platforms to allow you to select the best one to take forward into the EMD acquisition phase. b. Provide your assumptions and associated rationale supporting your selections. c. Use a weighting factor of 60% for Performance / 30% for Cost / 10% for Schedule.

TMRR Platform Design Comparisons Describe the results of your platform design comparisons and identify which platform will be taken forward into the EMD phase. Explain why you selected these performance criteria as critical to the mission(s). Change/expand chart as needed: TMRR Phase Comparisons Criteria Weight Factor Platform #1 Platform #2 PERFORMANCE: .60 TOTAL COST: .30 SCHEDULE: .10 TOTAL SCORE:

Technical Reviews/Assessments 4. Technical Reviews (refer to DAG): a. Given these phase reviews/assessments, what is their purpose? b. What entrance/exit criteria would you propose for these Bull Dog reviews? Team #1 Team #2 Team #3 Team #4 Team #5 Team #6 DRFPRD X CDD Validation SRR SFR PDR TRA

Technical Management Processes 5. Relate the following Technical Management Processes to what you do at work (Briefer pick one). Decision Analysis Technical Planning Technical Assessment Requirements Management Risk Management Configuration Management Technical Data Management Interface Management Note: You must relate the above processes to your work tasks. Keep your answers top level. You do not have to tie your answers into this lesson exercise.