Canadian Institute of Actuaries L’Institut canadien des actuaires

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IFRS 4 Phase 2 Insurance Contract Model IAA Fund Meeting Kuala Lumpur, October 10, 2011 Darryl Wagner, FSA, MAAA.
Advertisements

2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois Canadian Institute of Actuaries L’Institut canadien des actuaires.
2006 General Meeting PD 30 CLIFR Update Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois Canadian Institute of Actuaries L’Institut canadien des actuaires.
2008 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2008.
TOR-MOWJT2MKT-027 Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian Institute of Actuaries L’Institut canadien des actuaires L’Institut canadien des actuaires 2008.
2008 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2008.
Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver 2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian.
2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver 2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian.
2007 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2007 Vancouver, British Columbia 2007 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2007 Vancouver, British Columbia Canadian.
Session VAL5 – CLIFR Part II Use of Actuarial Judgement CIA Annual Meeting Ÿ Assemblée annuelle de l’ICA June 29 & 30, 2006  Les 29 et 30 juin 2006 Ottawa,
2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver 2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian.
PD 27 CLIFR Update 2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario PD 27 CLIFR Update 2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto,
*connectedthinking  Discussion Paper Preliminary Views on Insurance Contracts Sabine Wuiame.
2008 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2008.
CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future.
2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario 2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario Canadian Institute of Actuaries.
2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario 2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario Canadian Institute of Actuaries.
2008 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2008.
2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006.
OSFI Update November 19, 2009 Bernard Dupont Director, Capital Division.
2009 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2009 Halifax, Nova Scotia ● Halifax (Nouvelle-Écosse) 2009 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2009 Halifax, Nova.
2007 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2007 Montréal, Québec 2007 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2007 Montréal, Québec Canadian Institute of Actuaries.
CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future.
2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2009.
2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2009.
Proposed changes in the Economic Reinvestment Assumptions for Life Insurer Valuation Presented by: Ty Faulds, Alexis Gerbeau, Edward Gibson March 20, 2013.
2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois Canadian Institute of Actuaries.
2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois 2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois Canadian Institute of Actuaries.
2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Considerations in the Valuation of Segregated Fund Products.
Current Issues in Stochastic Modeling of Segregated Fund Guarantee Products Michael Bean FCAS, FSA, FCIA Director, Capital Division Seminar for the Appointed.
2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec 2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian Institute.
CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future.
2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006.
Segregated Fund Liability & Capital Methodologies Task Force Josephine Robinson.
PD-34: Capital Models OSFI Guidance Canadian Institute of Actuaries General Meeting Ottawa November 2009.
CIA Annual Meeting Assemblée annuelle de l’ICA June 29 & 30, 2006  Les 29 et 30 juin 2006 Ottawa, Ontario Session Val-5 CLIFR Part II.
2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec 2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian Institute.
2009 General Meeting ● Assemblée générale 2009 Ottawa, Ontario ● Ottawa (Ontario) 2009 General Meeting ● Assemblée générale 2009 Ottawa, Ontario ● Ottawa.
2009 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2009 Halifax, Nova Scotia ● Halifax (Nouvelle-Écosse) 2009 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2009 Halifax, Nova.
2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec 2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec Canadian Institute of Actuaries IP-25 Canadian.
LIFE INSURANCE CAPITAL Market and Credit Risk QIS Sylvain St-Georges, FSA, FCIA November 19, 2009.
PD – 27 CLIFR Update 2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario PD – 27 CLIFR Update 2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto,
2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver 2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian.
CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future.
1 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Claudette Cantin, FCIA, FCAS, MAAA Munich Reinsurance Company of Canada September 14, 2004 Las Vegas Session 7 Loss Reserve.
2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec 2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian Institute.
2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2009 ASB update on IFRS – Nicholas Bauer 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary.
Canadian Institute of Actuaries L’Institut canadien des actuaires
Insurance IFRS Seminar Hong Kong, December 1, 2016 Eric Lu
2006 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2006 Chicago, Illinois
Insurance IFRS Seminar Hong Kong, August 3, 2015 Eric Lu Session 18
IFRS 4 Phase 2 Insurance Contract Model
24th India Fellowship Seminar
FASB Targeted Improvements
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 2, 2016 Chris Hancorn Session 32
IASB Questions & Feedback
2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario
1 The roles of actuaries & general operating environment
2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver
2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver
2008 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2008 Québec
CIA Annual Meeting Assemblée annuelle de l’ICA
Canadian Institute of Actuaries L’Institut canadien des actuaires
Canadian Institute of Actuaries L’Institut canadien des actuaires
Canadian Institute of Actuaries
Canadian Institute of Actuaries L’Institut canadien des actuaires
Considerations in the Valuation of Segregated Fund Products
Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees
Canadian Institute of Actuaries L’Institut canadien des actuaires
CIA Annual Meeting Assemblée annuelle de l’ICA
Presentation transcript:

Canadian Institute of Actuaries L’Institut canadien des actuaires 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2009 1

PD-11 (Life) CLIFR Update Dale Mathews Rebecca Rycroft

Agenda Mortality Improvement Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risks Long – Term Equity Returns Term of the Liability/Segregated Funds Group Life and Health Calibration of Interest Rate Models Universal Life Income Taxes 2009 Fall Letter

Mortality Improvement Status Changes to Standards of Practice Notice of Intent published June 2008 Exposure Draft Hope to have approved at October ASB meeting Promulgation of Improvement Rates Promulgation of rates will be done by ASB Will have the force of Standards Research Paper/Educational Note Will support promulgated rates and levels of margins

Mortality Improvement Changes to Standards of Practice – current CLIFR Draft Insurance Mortality (2350.06 and 2350.07) Maximum reduction based on promulgated rates where improvement reduces liabilities Minimum increase based on promulgated rates where improvement increases liabilities (at appropriate level of aggregation) Low and high margins per 1000 for adverse deviation remain at 3.75/ex and 15/ex

Mortality Improvement Changes to Standards of Practice – current CLIFR Draft Annuity Mortality (2350.011 and 2350.12) Minimum increase in liabilities based on promulgated rates where improvement increases liabilities Low and high margins per 1000 for adverse deviation changed to 2% and 8% respectively applied to best estimate

Mortality Improvement Proposed Base Rates Improvement rates will be the same for males and females Products where improvement decreases liabilities Maximum improvement rates are equal to 50% of “base” rates Maximum duration of improvements is 25 years Products where improvement increases liabilities Minimum improvement rates are 150% of “base” rates Minimum duration of improvements is 25 years

Mortality Improvement Proposed Annuity Valuation Rates

Mortality Improvement Rates Hardy Study versus Proposed Base

Mortality Improvement: Life Expectancies Issue Age* 40 50 60 80% of CIA Table 81.6 82.4 83.8 50% of Scale 82.7 83.3 84.5 100% of Scale 83.7 84.2 85.2 150% of Scale 84.8 85.1 85.9 Mod AA Scale 84.4 85.0 * For a Male Non-Smoker

Mortality Improvement: Life Expectancies* * For a Male Non-Smoker at 3 Issue Ages

Mortality Improvement Proposed Annuity Margins Proposed Range is 2% to 8% Life Insurance MfADs produce lower PfADs Mortality improvement previously not permitted for insurance MfAD needed only for missestimation of mean MfAD for deterioration now included with mortality improvement Proposed range approximates life margin at age 60

Mortality Improvement Effective Date Expected to be Oct. 2010 Possible additional capital requirements from OSFI

Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risk Status Notice of Intent to Revise Standards published November 15, 2007 Exposure Draft for Revised Standards published May 22, 2009 Comment Period to June 30th, 2009 Final Standard approved at August ASB meeting – effective Oct. 15, 2009 Educational Note being finalized consistent with proposed changes to Standards

Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risk Proposed Changes to Standards of Practice (2340.17-2340.19) Base scenario assumption developed from currency forward rates or risk-free interest rate differentials Consistent with previous fall letter guidance and earlier CLIFR proposal PfAD developed from adverse scenario reflecting historical volatility Earlier proposal was 5%-50% MfAD reflecting how well economies were integrated Minimum MfAD of 5%

Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risk Proposed Changes to Standards of Practice (2340.17-2340.19) Changes to approach for MfAD reflect feedback received Combination of forward rates for base scenario plus high end margin could be unduly conservative Base scenario is more of a “risk neutral” approach Being combined with “real world” type margin

Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risk Proposed Changes to Standards of Practice (2340.17-2340.19) Proposed approach parallels that for interest rates Base scenario using forward rates Additional scenario to develop PfAD Minimum PfAD of 5% parallels +/- 10% interest rate scenarios

Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risk Educational Note – Additional Guidance Guidance applies to unhedged currency risk in valuation Actuary must look at underlying cash flows to assess whether or not currency risk exists E.g. common equity of companies that transact business in several currencies Practical application in CALM

Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risk Educational Note – Additional Guidance Construction of Adverse Scenario Examine volatility over periods consistent with expected time over which mismatch expected to last Suggest use of one standard deviation of change in exchange rate for unbiased measure If strong economic evidence that exchange rates will move, use mean plus one standard deviation if directionally consistent

Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risk Educational Note Example 1 US/Canada

Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risk Liability Example (at Sept. 30, 2008) Liability of $1000 Canadian payable at the end of 10 years Assets backing liability are $U.S. 10 year risk free rates at valuation date US: 3.83% Canada: 3.72% Exchange rate at valuation date 1 USD buys 1.059 CAD Assume underlying USD asset earns risk free rate at valuation date

Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risk Implied movement in exchange rates over 10 years From risk free rates (Base Scenario): 1.059  1.048 From one Standard Deviation of .17 over 10 year periods (Adverse Scenario): 1.059  .877

Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risk Results: Liability in CAD Continuation of current exchange rate $686.71 Base currency scenario $694.02 Adverse scenario $829.36 5% minimum margin $730.48 Liability booked PfAD $135.34 PfAD as % of base scenario liability: 19.5%

Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risk Educational Note Example 2 Canada/Jamaica

Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risk Liability Example (at Sept. 30, 2008) Liability of 1000 JAD payable at the end of 10 years Assets backing liability are CAD 10 year risk free rates at valuation date Jamaica: 13.0% (assumed) Canada: 3.72% Exchange rate at valuation date 1 CAD buys 72.40 JAD Assume underlying CAD asset earns risk free rate at valuation date

Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risk Implied movement in exchange rates over 10 years From risk free rates (Base Scenario): 72.40  170.6 From mean of 1.22 minus one Standard Deviation of .587 over 10 year periods (Adverse Scenario) 72.40  118.4

Currency (Foreign Exchange) Risk Results: Liability in JAD Continuation of current exchange rate $694.02 Base currency scenario $294.59 Adverse scenario $424.20 5% minimum margin $310.09 Liability booked PfAD $129.61 PfAD as % of base scenario liability: 44.0%

Long-Term Equity Returns Development of an Educational Note for establishing investment return assumptions for non-fixed income assets Expect to publish Educational Note in early 2010 Expansion of guidance in previous Fall Letters

General Update Segregated Funds Exposure Draft Practice-Specific Standards for Insurers, Subsection 2320 – Term of the Liability Approved by ASB and published in February 2009 Comment period ended March 31 2009 No comments received Final Standard approved July 15 with an effective date of October 15, 2009

General Update Segregated Funds CLIFR’s view is that the current Standards of Practice imply a different determination of the term of the liability for fully guaranteed contracts compared to those with no material guarantees The change clarifies that The term of the liability for both types of contracts would end at the balance sheet date if the liability would otherwise be negative Extension to recover DAC The term of the liability would be extended beyond that date to the date that maximizes the liability, at an appropriate level of aggregation

General Update Segregated Funds CLIFR’s view is that the current Standards of Practice guidance on term of the liability needed to be adjusted to recognize the impact of hedging The change allows both the value of the liability and the value of its associated hedge to be considered when applying the term of the liability constraints.

General Update Segregated Funds CLIFR is participating in new ASB “designated group” to potentially move some of the educational material in the Educational notes and other guidance into the SOP Key areas Stochastic modeling principles Addition of “Whole Contract” and “Bifurcated Method” Stochastic model calibration criteria Assumptions for additional policyholder options

Group Life and Health Valuation of Group Life and Health Policy Liabilities Revising May 2000 Research Paper On Group Life and Health valuation considerations Currently in translation and expected to be published in the next couple of months

Group Life and Health Similar content to original Research Paper Updated to reflect current standards and Group Practices Some additional guidance provided on CALM impact of 3855 Clarification and expansion of section on ERR

Calibration of Stochastic Interest Rate Models Phase 1 – Long term interest rates Has been approved by CLIFR Expect to send to Practice Council for final approval in October Publish late Fall 2009 Phase 2 – Short and medium term interest rates Includes correlation between short, medium, and long-term interest rates Expected completion in 2010

Calibration of Stochastic Interest Rate Models Later phases Credit spreads Other markets Correlation of interest rates with equities Correlation of interest rates with currencies

Calibration of Stochastic Interest Rate Models Two significant events since most of work on Phase 1 was completed Financial crisis Publication of calibration criteria by the AAA

Calibration of Stochastic Interest Rate Models Financial Crisis Long-term rates are the lowest seen in a half century A combination of extremely low rates and high rate volatility that appears unique in modern financial history CLIFR believes that recent events confirm the appropriateness of the calibration approach The actuary should be cautious if liabilities are sensitive to short term exposure to high volatility

Calibration of Stochastic Interest Rate Models In May 2009, the AAA published A fully parameterized stochastic model, and Stochastic scenario sets AAA will also provide a tool to generate any number of scenarios with any initial yield curve

Calibration of Stochastic Interest Rate Models AAA vs. CIA approach AAA used a different approach to develop the criteria Criteria derived in the current low rate environment may be broadly consistent for some products (such as products with exposure to low long term interest rates) This may not be true for all products or all interest rate environments Calibration Criteria from other countries To use other countries calibration criteria need to demonstrate that they are broadly consistent with the criteria in the CIA educational note

Tax note Future Income and Alternative Taxes Educational Note Tax changes substantively enacted in March 2009 Note will be updated to be consistent with federal tax changes Expected to be published in Fall 2009

2009 Fall Letter Status Expect to send to Practice Council for final approval in October Publish Fall 2009

2009 Fall Letter – Section 1 Experience Studies Expect to refer to 2001-2004 Annuitant Mortality Experience (March 2009) 2005-2006 Mortality Study – Canadian Standard Ordinary Life Experience (September 2009) LTD termination study to be published this year with 1997-1998 experience

2009 Fall Letter – Section 2 Insurance Mortality Similar to last year Any mortality improvement offset in MfAD Additional guidance Best practice to incorporate mortality improvement from mid point of the study to valuation date

2009 Fall Letter – Section 3 Annuity Mortality Similar to last year just changed effective date of new mortality improvement rates (October 15, 2010)

2009 Fall Letter – Section 4 Scenario Assumptions – Interest Rates Repeat reminder to test premiums for default risk at 50% and 200% of those at balance sheet date Note the lower bound used in the prescribed scenarios is dropping Situations where stochastic results can be used

2009 Fall Letter – Section 4 Can hold CTE(60) to CTE(80) of the stochastic results if: Reserves are not sensitive to short- and medium-term interest rates Stochastic interest rate model meets the Phase 1 calibration criteria Stochastic interest rate model doesn’t include spreads. If spreads are included then must hold at least Scenario 9 (old guidance)

2009 Fall Letter – Section 5 Value of Minimum Interest Guarantees and Embedded Options Guidance unchanged from previous years Still appropriate in continued low economic environment May not be captured by deterministic scenarios, consider stochastic testing

2009 Fall Letter – Section 5 (old) Considerations for Amounts on Deposit and Claims Provisions under AcSB Section 3855 Financial Instruments Deleted Still valid, but has appeared enough times

2009 Fall Letter – Section 6 Implication of AcSB Section 3855 Financial Instruments on Future Income and Alternative Taxes Tax legislation now substantively enacted Previous guidance on what to do in the interim now withdrawn Reminder of application of 5 year grade in period

2009 Fall Letter – Section 7 Equity Returns Reintroduced from 2007 Fall Letter Guidance on long term assumption for deterministic valuation Impact of 2008 results on 30 year average return Possibility some guidance around calibration of models for stochastic valuation