Gerard Mulder Smart Wells Global Implementation Leader,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Basics of Business Continuity Presented by Mary F. Sandy, CBCP Business Continuity/Disaster Recovery Class DePaul University ©Mary F. Sandy, 2006.
Advertisements

The Nominal Group Technique Chapter 42 Research Methodologies.
Importance of Land use management on the Flood Management in the Chi River Basin, Thailand Kittiwet Kuntiyawichai Bart Schultz Stefan Uhlenbrook F.X. Suryadi.
A review of UNEP’s work on Green Economy indicators Nairobi, 2 July 2013 Andrea M. Bassi, Ph.D. UNEP Consultant, Founder and CEO, KnowlEdge Srl.
The Relationship between Nuclear Safety, Security and Safeguards
The Business Value of Using Sensors Atul Arya, BP plc Presented at the 2008 IBM Almaden Institute.
SC2 meeting 24 November 2014 Security Measures and Resources Toolbox
UK WIR The UK Experience Christopher Royce Anglian Water Services.
COMP8130 and COMP4130 Adrian Marshall Verification and Validation Risk Management Adrian Marshall.
Environmentally Conscious Design & Manufacturing (ME592) Date: March 10, 2000 Slide:1 Environmentally Conscious Design & Manufacturing Class 3: Hazard.
Risk Management Infection prevention and control (IP&C) professionals have, amongst other things, duty to identify unsafe and hazardous IP&C practices.
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO RISK IDENTIFICATION 2.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
CP methodology adapted to Stockholm Convention Swedish International Development Agency S ESSION 9.C United Nations Environment Program Division of Technology.
MONITORING PROJECTS: QUALITY AND RESULTS. DAY ONE ASSESSMENT DAY TWO DESIGN DAY THREE MONITORING MORNING Intro. Training Intro. Assessment Intro. DesignIntro.
Energy Audit- a small introduction A presentation by Pune Power Development Pvt. Ltd.
Overview of Oil & Gas Sector The following slides are not a tutorial but merely an overview of the various phases involved in an oil & gas development.
Deltex Medical Group plc AGM 28 April 2011 Ewan Phillips.
1 HPHT Equipment Development Process Presented by Jim Raney Based on the work from 6HP.
SS28: Cooperative Systems II: Bits, Bytes, and Brakes Mike Schagrin US Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office International Harmonization.
VTT-STUK assessment method for safety evaluation of safety-critical computer based systems - application in BE-SECBS project.
Guidance Notes on the Investigation of Marine Incidents
WHAT IS SYSTEM SAFETY? The field of safety analysis in which systems are evaluated using a number of different techniques to improve safety. There are.
Engineering Risk Assessments and Risk Communication Sarah Arulanandam, Hazard and Risk Group RWDI West Inc. DISCLOSURE OF MATERIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES:
Uncertainty management in Statoil (Risk and opportunity management)
Enterprise Risk Management and the Actuarial Profession 2004 CAS Annual Meeting November 14-16, 2004.
1 Emergency Management and Risk Analysis for Hazardous Materials Transport Shashi Nambisan Professor of Civil Engineering Dept of Civil & Environmental.
Proposed Supply Chain Risk Management Process Flow Supply Chain Risk Leadership Council 20 April 2009 DRAFT.
BENCHMARKING For Best Practices. What is Benchmarking A method for identifying and importing best practices in order to improve performance A method for.
Road case - Svensk Leca. Introduction q The Swedish National Road Authority (“Vägverket”) has performed LCA of three alternative light weight materials.
J. G. Weisend II Deputy Head of Accelerator Projects April 2, 2014 Actions at ACCSYS Resulting from the Recommendations of the Annual Review.
5.2 Recommended projects The gaps suggested in this report are suggested as the basis for further discussions and generation of project proposals. A stratigraphic.
PRESENTATION ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE “NEW GENERATION” CORRECTIONAL FACILITY PROTOTYPES Department of Correctional Services 17.
Risk management and disaster preparedness
Produced Water Reinjection Performance Joint Industry Project TerraTek, Inc. Triangle Engineering Taurus Reservoir Solutions (DE&S) E-first Technologies.
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Gullfaks Village 2010 IOR Challenges.
Independent, integrated thinking.
RLV Reliability Analysis Guidelines Terry Hardy AST-300/Systems Engineering and Training Division October 26, 2004.
1 1 Presenter / date if required Independent, integrated thinking.
REGIONAL MEETING ABOUT THE PREPARATION AND RESPONSE OF HEALTH SERVICES TO AN INFLUENZA PANDEMIC GROUP 3: SPANISH SPEAKING HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT.
Schlumberger / Client Confidential
Introduction It had its early roots in World War II and is flourishing in business and industry with the aid of computer.
Disaster Recovery Planning (DRP) DRP: The definition of business processes, their infrastructure supports and tolerances to interruptions, and formulation.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
Stracener_EMIS 7305/5305_Spr08_ Reliability Centered Maintenance Analysis (RCMA) Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow Leadership in Engineering.
ON “SOFTWARE ENGINEERING” SUBJECT TOPIC “RISK ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT” MASTER OF COMPUTER APPLICATION (5th Semester) Presented by: ANOOP GANGWAR SRMSCET,
AWTC – Seminar Outline 2004 Seminar content outline Advanced Wells – Lessons Learned and Future Directions/Opportunities –Application status and experience.
Managing Project Risk – A simplified approach Presented by : Damian Leonard.
Day 1 Session 1 Day 1Introductions Economics and accounting Building a basic project cash flow Economic and risk indicators The.
FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS - FMEA
Seminar On Energy Audit Submitted To: Submitted By:
3rd International Scientific Conference on "Energy and Climate Change"
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
Advanced benchmarking for utility improvement
Network Science in NDSSL at Virginia Tech
Project Activity and Risk Planning
Surveillance. Public Health Approach Surveillance What is the Problem ? Problem Risk Factor Identification : What Is the Cause ? Intervention Evaluation.
Subsea gas release seminar
רכש בתחרות או ספק יחיד הערכת הצעות של ספקים
Software Project Management (SPM)
Pacific Power Seismic Preparedness Update
A RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT REVOLUTION
Model Problems of Compound Flight
Pathway Risk Analysis: NAPPO RSPM 31 (2012)
Department of Correctional Services
M. Vanuzzo, M. Carcassi. Università di Pisa
European Innovation Partnership on Water
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
New Exploration Gas Prospect
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of Smart Well Technology for the Rosetta Phase II Development Gerard Mulder Smart Wells Global Implementation Leader, Shell International E&P B.V. FORCE Seminar on Advanced Wells, 21 April 2004, Stavanger First presentation at OMC 2003, Ravenna, March 26, 2003

Contents Introduction Completion options Reservoir simulation results Reliability and Risk analysis Conclusions

Rashid Gas Field Rashid-3 Rashid-1 Rashid-2 Development lease 25 Km NOT NORMALLY MANNED PLATFORM 6 PRODUCERS MINIMUM FACILITIES WHP 4 PRODUCERS ? 24”TWO PHASE EXPORT LINE TO ROSETTA PRODUCTION FACILITY 10KM 20” INFIELD LINE SUBSEA DEVELOPMENT?

Conventional - platform Smart – platform or subsea Well Completion Options Conventional - platform Conventional - subsea Smart – platform or subsea

Target Reservoirs and Wells Conventional wells Smart wells Rashid-1 D1, D 1 two-zone selective Rashid-2 F2, F1, F 3 single-zone 2 three-zone selective D1, D, C 1 three-zone selective Rashid-3 1 or 2 single-zone OR 1 two-zone non-selective

Reservoir Simulation Results Uncontrolled commingling of multiple reservoirs is not recommended; control/selectivity is required to: Avoid potential cross-flow Shut-in water producing reservoirs Comparison Smart versus Conventional: Rashid-1: similar recoveries Rashid-2: 2 Smart wells on F-sands give similar recoveries as 3 conventional wells Rashid-3: Smart well recovers 16-23% more gas

Reliability and Risk Analysis Establish a life-cycle plan for each well and completion option (construction  production  abandonment) Consider each individual step and element in detail, and Perform a failure mode analysis - identify causes, effects, probabilities and consequences Calculate risk (RMA/FMECA) Calculate “risk-Dollars” Identify and rank critical issues

Well Cost, Risk and Exposure

Production and Construction Risk

Intervention and Lost Production Risk

SSD / ICV and Gravel Pack Risk

Conclusions Commingling requires flow control Risk and reliability analysis allows: Identification of dominant risks Quantitative comparisons between the options Smart wells offer attractive Phase II development opportunity (considering recovery and risked costs)