Clinical Practice Guidelines and Document Submission

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Advertisements

POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Module 1: System Overview, Expectations, and Goal Setting.
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
SAM LPLP Provider Training Program June 27, 2014Helena, Montana.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Educator Effectiveness: Connecting Coursework to Career Success / End of Year Self-Assessment May 15, 2014.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Building Teacher Effectiveness A Lab School Protocol.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data Overview of the SLO Process April 7,
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Teacher & Administrator Standards October 21, 2011.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Educator Evaluation Information Edward Everett School Laura Miceli, Principal September 24, 2014.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Revision of Initial and Continued Approval Standard Guidelines for Educational Leadership Programs Presentation to FAPEL Winter Meeting Tallahassee, FL.
April 10, A year of mentoring required to move from the initial to the professional license: Initial teaching Initial school specialist Initial.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Standard 1 School Library Media Coordinators Demonstrate Leadership Staff development documentation Newsletters Conference documentation Websites School.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Adoption Teacher & Administrator Standards December 1, 2011.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Vermont’s Core Teaching & Leadership Standards. 13-member, teacher majority, policy-making board appointed by the Governor What is the VSBPE?
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Culminating Workshop for Field Experiences.  EDU 5601: Introduction/Foundation to School Administration and Leadership : 25 hours of pre-practicum experience.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Educator Effectiveness System Overview
8th Grade IB Community Projects
Developing 21st Century Classrooms: Connecting the Dots IV
Project–Based Learning
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
CLASS KeysTM Module 3: Self-Assessment and Reflection Spring 2010
State Board of Education Progress Update
Teaching by Design in Elementary Mathematics
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
William E. Dugger, Jr. Shelli D. Meade
Buena Vista School District April 3, 2017
Colorado Department of Education
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
PEP Webinar for Employees Review Cycle
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
2010 NEASC Self-Study and Evaluation Visit
Presentation transcript:

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Document Submission April 18. 2014

ELCC-NCATE Assumptions Embedded in Standards Improving student achievement is the central responsibility of school leadership. The practice of school leadership is well-established as its own research-based body of knowledge. The preparation of school leaders requires overt connections and bridging experiences between research and practice. The preparation of school leader requires comprehensive, field- based practice in and feedback from the field over an extended period time in powerful clinical learning experiences.

COLORADO PRINCIPAL QUALITY STANDARDS (CPQS) “ Great principals take responsibility for the success of every student in their school.” The CPQS: Outline the knowledge and essential skills required of an excellent principal. Identify the complex components of high-quality leadership. Are the core of the principal evaluation process. Are a tool for self-reflection, goal setting and professional growth. Are aligned with the ELCC-NCATE Standards

ALPS Clinical Practice Requirements High quality clinical experiences in Building-Level Leadership Connecting research to leadership “practices” in schools Bridging content knowledge to clinical practice experiences

Principal Licensure Candidate Performance Review ELCC-NCATE STANDARDS Educational Leadership Policy Standard: ISLLC 2008 Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium ELCC (Educational Leadership Consortium) NCATE (National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education) Presented in 2010 COLORADO PRINCIPAL QUALITY STANDARDS The Great Teachers and Leaders Act SB-191 in May of 2010 The statewide Principal Quality Standards provide shared understanding of the essentials of great leadership - A Common Vision. Excellent principals are responsible for the collective success of their schools, including the learning, growth, and achievement of both students and staff.

Clinical Practice PLC Final Log Deadline for submission is July 7, 2014 Deadlines Approved PLC Logs are in Canvas Submission of Log on April 30, 2014 Submission of Log on May 31, 2014 Submission of Log on June 30, 2014 Final Log submitted in LIVETEXT on or before July 7, 2014. Accumulation of all monthly submissions Approval from Site Supervisor Accounting hours for each Standard and Element addressed Rubrics for Grading Comprehensive collection of Clinical Practice field experiences. Minimum Total of 400 Clinical Practice Hours of Experiences Accounting of CP Hours Records showing the distribution across the 7 Colorado Principal Quality Standards Records showing the distribution across the 17 identified CP Standards and Elements

Principal Licensure Candidate Reflections Deadline for Submission July 11, 2014 Deadlines Approved reflections are in Canvas Submission on April 30, 2014 Submission on May 31, 2014 Submission on June 30, 2014 All Reflections are to be submitted in LIVETEXT on or before July 12, 2014. Accumulation of 17 CP Reflections Rubrics for grading PLC Reflections include: Calendar referenced experiences References to CP field experiences Awareness through acquiring concepts, information, definitions and procedures Understanding through interpreting, integrating and using information Application of knowledge and skills to a specific problem or opportunity

Principal Licensure Candidate Evaluation Deadline for Submission is July 14, 2014 Deadlines Submission of UCD Self Evaluation on or before June 30, 2014 Submission of State Performance Review to Site Supervisor on or before July 3, 2014. Submission of Site Supervisor evaluation on or before July 10, 2014. All Evaluations are to be submitted in LIVETEXT on or before July 14, 2014. Rubrics for grading PLC Evaluation includes: UCD Performance Review UCD Peer Performance Review Conference CPQS Self-Evaluation Field Site Supervisor Performance Review UCD CP Supervisor Conference

Performance Reviews are a part of the Overall Clinical Practice Evaluation Use as a point of reference your anticipated growth in terms of awareness, knowledge and understanding of leadership after beginning ALPS Records your growth and development for the future Bridges the gap between your current reality to your vision of the future Incorporates feedback from others Allows you to continuously create goals and professional opportunities Focus is on your future leadership development Evaluation Process for establishing the effort and energy you placed in the ALPS Clinical Practice Field Experiences A “snap shot” or reference of your current reality using research-based leadership assessment in an educational environment Records the feedback from a field or site supervisor References to other leaders that have guided you during the CP experiences Provides documentation of your participation in ALPS

Performance Review Workshop April 19, 2014 1 to 4 p.m. CPQS Rubrics Review CPQS Standards and Elements Peer Review Documents or Artifacts Having a Crucial Conversation with your Site-Supervisor

Class Evaluation 1. Discussion of Expectations 2 Class Evaluation 1. Discussion of Expectations 2. Check Relevancy of Rubrics 3. Modification of Deadlines