Solo mission operations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From ordering to online access - The four scenarios Paris, October 2010.
Advertisements

ESOC | Chris Watson | ESA/ESOC | Page 1 SOC-Instrument Team interfaces CHRIS WATSON ESAC.
Early Help & Stronger Families Executive Group – April 2014 Hannah Needham - Head of Early Help and Partnerships Debbie Herbert.
RSOC System Testing Status - 1 RSOC System Test Concept –Covered in RO-EST-PL-5013 –Status to be presented at key system reviews (GSRR) Connectivity Tests.
GLAST LAT ProjectMonthly Status Review - ISOC, 1 September GLAST Large Area Telescope WBS 4.1.B Instrument Science Operations Center Monthly Status.
Ubiquitous Process Modelling Tool (Template and examples for usage) provided by: Dr. Thomas Richter, TELIT, University of Duisburg-Essen for usage of particular.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0643r0May 2008 Terry L Cole (AMD)Slide 1 WG Technical Editor’s Mid-Plenary Report (May) Date: Authors:
Next Steps National Research Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
Consortium Meeting La Palma October PV-Phase & Calibration Plans Sarah Leeks 1 SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – PV Phase and.
SOWG # 6, 20/01/2015 ESAC Agenda  Finalization of the service 20 specifications  Test plans for the service20 at spacecraft level  Instruments.
Planetary Missions Division Dvk, 16 Jul 2002 Interfaces - presented at the SWT #10 To clarify the situation with interfaces, formats, etc. Summary: There.
Data Standards Development August 29, Topics 1.Current Status 2.What was delivered for Build 2c 3.How was IPDA supported 4.What mission support.
18 th GIST Meeting 14 th –16 th May 2003 Ground Segment (GGSPS) Report 1 GERB Ground Segment B.C.Stewart RAL.
Wrap up and the road to formulation Brussels, 29 January 2016.
7. LTP PLANNING EXERCISE: RESULTS Planning outcome Lessons learned from Planning Exercise.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use HSO-OP - Solar and Planetary Missions Division Solar Orbiter Instrument Operations, Data Handling and FDIR Ignacio.
ISWG 25 Jan 2016 Report to SOWG 26 Jan 2016 Burst mode planning ESAC analysis of EPD close/far data taking strategy; probably ok Implies we can be a bit.
20 July 2004 LAL/IN2P3 – CERN meeting on CNGS horns Presentation by K. Elsener 1 OUTLINE 1.Status 2.Preliminary conclusions of the CNGS Review Board (30.
ESOC | Chris Watson | ESA/ESOC | Page 1 SOC-Instrument Team interfaces CHRIS WATSON ESAC.
ESAC | Chris Watson | ESA/ESAC | Page 1 “Day in the life” testing of LL VMs CHRIS WATSON ESAC.
Component D: Activity D.3: Surveys Department EU Twinning Project.
1 Single Entry Model (SEM) Go-Live TAC Update May 7, 2009.
REGISTRAR’S OFFICE INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE. OUTLINE The Registrar’s Office Role The Student’s Role: pre-departure The Student’s Role: after you arrive.
The road to the first E2E tests
OASIS Next Generation Project Summary
RSOC Overview at SWT #26, 11/12 June 2009
Instrument Teams to SOC Test Specifications
Implementation Review Team Meeting
Richard Carr, ESAC, January 2015
PDS4 Data From The Rover RSP Archive Concept Review 28 September 2017
Using Unifrog to complete your UCAS application
SOC-Instrument Team interfaces
IOR and E_FECS ICDs CHRIS WATSON ESAC.
Annual Report of the DWP Experiment 9th CAA Operations Review
Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations
Solar Orbiter Instrument Testing by MOC-SOC
AIXM 5.2 – WIP AIXM CCB – Webex 09 MaY 2017.
Current SOC-Ground System Integration Schedule (Jan )
IC network selection process
Rationale, Key Processes and Roles
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
SKADS Controller’s Meeting Timeline Annual Financial Report
X-ray Pump-Probe Instrument
University of Wisconsin at Madison
ICD-11 Review Process Overview
SPR&I Regional Training
Reliability Standards Development Plan
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
April May April May June July July June August Sept August
Psychology Learner Quick Start Guide:
Proposal Processing Wake Forest University Health Sciences
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Paid Family & Medical Leave
Teacher name August phone: Enter text here.
Presentation by SAI Pakistan
SWE 2.0 – Current Status of Standards
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
The Transformation of A Small Company Into A Golden Legend
Review plan of the nature reporting – update 6
Xoserve IX Refresh Customer Update 05/03/2019.
3 Week A: May 1 – 19 3 Week B: May 22 – June 9
TGad Editor Report Date: Authors: March 2011 April 2007
Database SIG APNIC19 24 February 2005, Kyoto, Japan
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
AIXM 5.2 – WIP AIXM CCB – Webex 29 March 2017.
Habitat Changes and Fish Migration
Lunar Calibration Workshop Status of the preparation
East Hall under construction
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Habitat Changes and Fish Migration
Presentation transcript:

Solo mission operations Sylvain Lodiot SOWG 10, ESAC 12/07/2017

Instrument state model status Instrument procedure status MIB database Outline MOC Status Open points from SOWG 9 Instrument state model status Instrument procedure status MIB database Instrument commissioning EDDS/GFTS

MOC Status MCS D3 (final) October 2017 MPS D3 (final) April 2017 Migration to ops lan Feb 2018 (L-12m) Simulator D2 (closed loop) July 2017 Simulator D3 (final) December 2017 SVT0 (PFM) 29/30 August 2017 Other SVTs/IGSTs TBC SVT1 (PFM) Feb-May 2018 L-12m - L-9m FOP issue 1 Dec 17 (SVT 1 -2m)

Open Points from SOWG 9 Commanding Guidelines: TCs with Group repeaters All issues have been addressed PDOR tool The Bepi PDOR tool will not be made available for Solo Instrument teams need to be able to provide PDORs directly to MOC This IF (PI -> MOC) will be tested with every single PI

Instrument procedure inputs (from SOWG 9) At SOWG 9, MOC and SOC insisted big time on the need for inputs from the instrument teams Progress has nevertheless been very slow New approach initiated by MOC Define instrument state models satisfying MOC and SOC needs This is needed for MOC MPS (power, mode transitions) This allows to derive which (routine/planning) procedures are needed Next slides report status of: State models Routine/planning procedure inputs Engineering/contingency procedures

Instrument state model status MOC eng Instrument Status JLP EUI No news since 23/06/17, HV to be added? STIX Pending confirmation of final model from 28/06 HV to be added? MP SPICE Done, HV included pending power figures, due date was 16/06 EPD Done, pending HV DL SWA SOLO-HI New proposal sent 01/06/17, no news since ME PHI New model to come; no news MAG Done SL METIS No news since 20/06/17, HV to be added? RPW Need to converge on state model ASAP

Instrument nominal/planning procedure status MOC eng Instrument Comments JLP EUI Need to converge on state model/work on procs ASAP STIX Procedure inputs expected 28/06, no news MP SPICE Procedure inputs expected by end July EPD Work on MP now; may run in SVT0 DL SWA Only example procedures provided, no complete set SOLO-HI Work on DL now; may run in SVT0 ME PHI MAG Procedure inputs expected end June, no news SL METIS Some input provided months ago; mapping to new state model pending; significant work still RPW Some input provided last week. Link to state model missing; further work required

Instrument engineering/CRP status MOC eng Instrument Status JLP EUI STIX MP SPICE EPD DL SWA SOLO-HI ME PHI MAG SL METIS RPW

MIB database (1) ADS format is SIS/SRDB MOC can provide instrument specific SIS extracts if required All MOC tools work in MIB format (MIB ICD 6.9) SIS is converted to MIB format (MIB ICD 6.2) MOC then performs MIB fine tuning as needed Differences between ICD 6.2 and 6.9 known and minor Will be handled by fine tuning if needed MIB ASCII files are sent to SOC This will be via GFTS when available SOC passes on the ASCII files to the instrument teams

MIB database (2) Latest database provided on 28/06/2017 is derived from MAS 4.45

Commissioning MOC work will start towards the end of 2017 (JLP coordinating) Target is to have an advanced timeline in FOP issue 1 Work will start from the inputs already available to MOC Teams will be contacted individually

EDDS/GFTS Both systems will be installed around L-12m MOC GFTS Files will be pushed/pulled by MOC from various in and out-trays MOC EDDS; MOC will need: IP addresses (as seen from outside your firewall, if any) SFTP username used to deliver EDDS responses Contact information (full name, phone, email, company name)