Ciara R. Wigham, 15 Dec. 2010. Initiation 1. simple (elementary) 2. complex (episodic, instalment, provisional, dummy, proxy) Refashioning 1. request.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing the CCSS 8:30-8:40 Introductions & quick background
Advertisements

Reference Resolution And Cognitive Grammar Susanne Salmon-Alt Laurent Romary Loria - Nancy, France ICCS-01 San Sebastian, May 2001.
1 Examining Supervisors and University Support for School Psychology Interns Wendy Cochrane, Kathleen Salyers, & Yi Ding The University of Toledo NASP.
Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau.
Cooperative Learning National-Louis University SEC 524 Spring 2010 Structures that Support Reading, Writing, and Thinking.
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Build Their Vocabularies, and Talk Well With Partners
Providing Effective Feedback
Effective Supervision
Syntactic Complexity and Cohesion
Transition IEP Using Your IEP to Plan for Your Life After High School
USE OF REGIONAL NETWORKS FOR POLICY INFLUENCE: THE HIS KNOWLEDGE HUB EXPERIENCE Audrey Aumua and Maxine Whittaker Health Information Systems Knowledge.
A Simplification of The 4C-ID Model Presented by Team 3 Ramon Garcia Leon Hudson Fabian Salcedo   EDTC 6321 Fall 2009.
The 4C-ID Model Presented by Team 3 Ramon Garcia Leon Hudson Carlos Martinez Fabian Salcedo   EDTC 6321 Fall 2009.
CCRS QUARTERLY MEETING CCRS QUARTERLY MEETING ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS GRADES 6-12
1 Instructional Routines: Effective and Efficient Teaching.
Conducting a Comprehensive Needs Assessment. Objectives Identify the components of a comprehensive needs assessment Classify the types of data collected.
Center for Curriculum Materials in Science AAAS, Michigan State University, Northwestern University, University of Michigan KSI 2006 Strand 2: Teacher.
Marzano Causal Model: A Framework for Teaching and Learning
Overview  Background  Working definition of language minority students  Context: Educational and language policy in the US/ Teacher certification 
1 Flexible Learning Options FLO 2008 Department of Education & Children’s Services.
Strategies for Increasing Independence in the Workplace Wendy Homlish Bonnie N. Young CLIU 21 AT Consultants.
Skill Presentation Chapter 7.
Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context Snedeker and Trueswell (2003) Psych 526 Eun-Kyung Lee.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
(c) Frey & Fisher, 2008 TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY Focused Instruction Guided Instruction “ I do it ” “ We do it ” “ You do it together.
Grounding in Communication Herbert H. Clark and Susan E. Brennan.
STARTALK: Preparing Russian Teachers for the 21st Century Day 1.
Cross-cultural Communication and Negotiation
Module 4: Building Community Leadership Capacity Leadership and Effective Communication Unit II: Effective Communication.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Language Production & Comprehension: Conversation & Dialog.
LIN1180/LIN5082 Semantics Lecture 3
Communication Skills Anyone can hear. It is virtually automatic. Listening is another matter. It takes skill, patience, practice and conscious effort.
To Beat or Not To Beat? Beat Gestures in Direction Giving Chris Brandhorst & Mariët Theune University of Twente.
Introduction, History and Overview. Welcome CIRCLES’ Goals and the Path to Get There.
Common Ground Linguistic referents are established w/in a “domain of interpretation”, which includes context –One component of context = Common Ground.
Characteristics of Blue comm. Friendly Helpful Expresses emotions Optimistic Foster harmony Takes time to relate Empathetic Creative Indirect Reads between.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
SPED 568 Collaboration Skills in Special Education SPED 568.
University of Washington STARTALK: Preparing Teachers for the 21st Century Day 1 July 8, 2015.
Collaborative Learning. (c) Frey & Fisher, 2008 TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY Focused Instruction Guided Instruction “ I do it ” “ We.
Discourse 2 – Multi-speaker interaction LO: to understand key features of conversational analysis and be able to analyse spoken texts Starter: imagine.
Interdisciplinary Writing Unit: Narrative Kim Stewart READ 7140.
Instructional Scaffolding. What is a scaffold? What does a scaffold do? What are some characteristics of scaffolding?
Language. Phonetics is the study of how elements of language are physically produced.
Dept. of Computer Science University of Rochester Rochester, NY By: James F. Allen, Donna K. Byron, Myroslava Dzikovska George Ferguson, Lucian Galescu,
1 Natural Language Processing Lecture Notes 14 Chapter 19.
Referring to Objects with Spoken and Haptic Modalities Frédéric LANDRAGIN Nadia BELLALEM & Laurent ROMARY LORIA Laboratory Nancy, FRANCE.
Three Basic Functions are generally noted: there is perhaps nothing more subtle than language is, and nothing has as many different uses. Without a doubt,
Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding Torsten Jachmann Herbert H. Clark and Meredyth A. Krych Seminar „Gaze as function of.
Discourse & Dialogue CS 359 November 13, 2001
LANGUAGE IMPAIRED. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Language Impaired (LI) An impairment in the language system is an abnormal processing or production of: Form including.
Hullo Folks! How are you going? Let’s continue our adventure to the World of Language in Use With the Pragmatics Ranger E. Aminudin Aziz.
E5 – An Instructional Model in a P-6 Mathematics classroom Andrea Hillbrick.
Grounding and Repair Joe Tepperman CS 599 – Dialogue Modeling Fall 2005.
Planning a Drama- Oriented Second Language Course Week 13 Language in context.
ACCET 2014 Presented by: Brenda Nazari-Robati The Language Company Lynore M. Carnuccio The Language Company.
DEIXIS Deixis belongs within the domain of pragmatics because it directly concerns the relationship between the structure of languages and the contexts.
Introduction to Logic Common Forms and Functions of Language
The Interpersonal Mode
Meta-analysis of methods to change implicit bias
MEANING-MAKING IN AAC INTERVENTION
Deixis and distance  .
Forms of Communication
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue
Evaluation of WMM.
The Paraphrasing Strategy
DEIXIS Deixis belongs within the domain of pragmatics because it directly concerns the relationship between the structure of languages and the contexts.
Collaborative Learning
Presentation transcript:

Ciara R. Wigham, 15 Dec. 2010

Initiation 1. simple (elementary) 2. complex (episodic, instalment, provisional, dummy, proxy) Refashioning 1. request for expansion 2. rejection (direct or indirect) Acceptance 1. explicit 2. implicit basic exchange Clark and Wilkes-Gibbs (1986) B Provide instructions for procedures to be performed on the object. C Check task-status to ensure the actions have the desired effect. A Collaborators come to mutual agreement on the objects to be manipulated: *collaborative physical tasks

 Helper: now these fork looking things down here.  Worker: uh?  H:the metal fork things at the bottom  W:okay  H: those should go on the wheel axle inside of the nuts on the axle.  W: Ok  H: are they on ok?  W: yep, all set. A: Object identification Request for expansion Expansion Explicit acceptance B: Procedural statement C: Monitor comprehension, task status

Fussell et al (2004:279) A ABC BC B Grounding phase

 Instruct partner to add new objects to the domain (introduce new linguistic and semantic contexts)  Refer to objects already introduced in dialogue (anphora)  Refer to an object that is present in shared domain but not part of linguistic context deictic references (of place)

identifying “this one” informing “the cube in front of me” acknowledging “go to it” (Levelt, 1989) a relatum systema coordinate system A primary deictic reference: the speaker = relatum + origin of the coordinate “the block behind me” A secondary deictic reference: speaker = origin of coordinate system but relatum is some other object “the cube behind the red cube”

 Referring act is successful if an addressee identifies the intended referent from the distractors  Assumption that pointing acts are used only if ‘proper’ means of referring do not suffice (Piweck, 2007:2): Lester et al, 2009 – only include a pointing act if a pronoun cannot be used to refer to object Claassen (1992) only resorts to pointing acts if no purely verbal means of identification can be found Van der Sluis and Krahmer (2001) pointing as last course of action; pointing act only if the object is sufficiently close and a purely verbal referring act would be too complex.

 Half of all referring acts include pointing  not a fall-back strategy  Speakers more frequently point when object is not part of domain focus (Grosz, 1977) Object referred to in proceeding utterance Object adjacent to an object referred to in proceeding utterance Object in area speaker explicitly directed addressee's attention e.g. “if you look at the bit in the front” Cremers, 1994 focussing expression Dutch speakers, build structure in shared workspace that is same as that of instructor, only builder allowed to move lego blocks, analysis 20 dialogues

10 pairs Dutch speakers, Instructor-builder, Blocks four colours, three sizes, four shapes Four categories of referential expressions:  1. Reference to physical object - colour (97,3%, size, shape (17,8%)  2. Reference to the location of the object in the domain ‘transition of attention’ (new region) - location with respect to participants –hardly every accompanied by pointing gestures - location with respect to other objects - never accompanied by pointing gestures  3. Reference to the orientation of the object in building domain – no gestures  4. References to the history which was developed in course of actions (7.1% utterances) – few accompanying gestures. When used in references to objects that were talked about before and located in domain.

locution- spoken component alone a movement excursion –body parts employed in a gesture (pl. sucession of) home position  gesture  home position nucleus gesture phrase gesture unit or retraction Kita (1993) – sustained end of stroke may contain more than one gesture phrase Often coincide with idea units  semantic coherence or “co-expressiveness” (McNeill, 1992:23) Sacks and Schegloff (2002) often conjunction with nucleus semantic sense conjunction of two different modes of expression multimodal act

 McNeill coding system (1992) [(preparation) (pre-stroke hold) stroke (post-stroke hold) (retraction)] () = optional element [] = gesture unit and it seemed that [is kissing the man’s nose] DEICTIC-regulatory-index finger pointing at his nose []onset and offset of movement Analysis - relevant type of gesture and primary functionality