Research Methodology: Instruments and Procedures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Research Methods in Unit 3 Psychology
The Research Consumer Evaluates Measurement Reliability and Validity
Research Ethics Levels of Measurement. Ethical Issues Include: Anonymity – researcher does not know who participated or is not able to match the response.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
Methodology Tips for Constructing Instruments. Matching methods to research paradigm MethodQuantitativeQualitative Written Instrument Standardized Instrument.
Sampling and Data Collection
Quantitative Research
CORRELATIO NAL RESEARCH METHOD. The researcher wanted to determine if there is a significant relationship between the nursing personnel characteristics.
Perception between Regular and Sped teachers in Handling Children with Intellectual Disability: Basis for a Specialized Training Program for Teachers by.
Development of Questionnaire By Dr Naveed Sultana.
Proposal Writing.
Assessment Report Department of Psychology School of Science & Mathematics D. Abwender, Chair J. Witnauer, Assessment Coordinator Spring, 2013.
Development of Evaluation Instruments based on ICT Skills Standards for Teachers (ISST) 7th May, 2014.
Performance Appraisal Notes & Concept Main features Applications of results of appraisal Potential benefits/advantages Potential complications.
McGraw-Hill © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Nature of Research Chapter One.
Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition, or past practice. The importance.
Action Research March 12, 2012 Data Collection. Qualities of Data Collection  Generalizability – not necessary; goal is to improve school or classroom.
Scientific Process ► 1) Developing a research idea and hypothesis ► 2) Choosing a research design (correlational vs. experimental) ► 3) Choosing subjects.
CHAPTER III IMPLEMENTATIONANDPROCEDURES.  4-5 pages  Describes in detail how the study was conducted.  For a quantitative project, explain how you.
Evaluating a Research Report
WELNS 670: Wellness Research Design Chapter 5: Planning Your Research Design.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY. WHAT IS RESEARCH METHODOLOGY?  In this section, the researcher must state the type of research, its meaning, and how it is applicable.
The Research Enterprise in Psychology
The Literature Search and Background of the Problem.
HOW TO WRITE RESEARCH PROPOSAL BY DR. NIK MAHERAN NIK MUHAMMAD.
Chapter 3 should describe what will be done to answer the research question(s), describe how it will be done and justify the research design, and explain.
Review of Research Methods. Overview of the Research Process I. Develop a research question II. Develop a hypothesis III. Choose a research design IV.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Scientific Method A blueprint for experiment success.
Evidence-Based Practice Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition,
The effects of Peer Pressure, Living Standards and Gender on Underage Drinking Psychologist- Kanari zukoshi.
Methods of Data Collection Survey Methods Self-Administered Questionnaires Interviews Methods of Observation Non-Participant Observation Participant Observation.
Introduction to Research. Purpose of Research Evidence-based practice Validate clinical practice through scientific inquiry Scientific rational must exist.
Title of your Study Your Name Date of your defense.
HCS 465 OUTLET Experience Tradition /hcs465outlet.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Action Research for School Leaders by Dr. Paul A. Rodríguez.
The Basics of Social Science Research Methods
BED210 Basics of Research S.Y.B.Ed
Issues in Evaluating Educational Research
Planning my research journey
Part Two.
Chapter 6 Collecting Data Susan, Sharen, Dolla
Quantitative and Qualitative data
The Literature Search and Background of the Problem
Ghulam Muhammad Ashrafi SHAFFAQ YOUSAF
Qualitative Data Collection: Accuracy, Credibility, Dependability
RESEARCH METHODS 8-10% 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 750$
Review Time: Management of Learning (MOL)
AND WAYS TO SYSTEMATICALLY COLLECT IT
Pre-Activity: 1. Recap? 2. Research Says?
Chapter 2 Sociological Research Methods
Questionnaires and interviews
The Scientific Method in Psychology
Finding Answers through Data Collection
Chapter Eight: Quantitative Methods
© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
First study published in JOGS.
Data and Data Collection
Pre-Activity: 1. Recap? 2. Research Says?
Farris Child Dan Chandler
Review Time: Management of Learning (MOL)
Instructions for Using the Program Evaluation Toolkit
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY Step X Step Detail of Procedures The Who…..
Chapter 2: Studying Social Life: Sociological Research Methods
Example of IRB Application and Resulting Research Paper
Validity.
1.1 – Social Science Research Methods
The Relationship between Social Skills and Academic Achievement of Universitas Klabat Students Ate Gueen L. R. Simanungkalit
Psychological Experimentation
Presentation transcript:

Research Methodology: Instruments and Procedures

Competencies Describe the research instrument & terms – addendum 2. plans data collection procedure- CS_RS12-IIa-c-5 3. plans data analysis using statistics and hypothesis testing (if appropriate) - CS_RS12-IIa-c-6

Activity: Q and A ( Simple Recall) 1. What do you remember about Research Instrument? What are the ensures of good instrument? 2. What is Research Procedure and what should be stated in this part? 3. What is Definition of Terms? And what are the terms to be defined and how do you suppose to define them?

The Research Instruments   Tools refer to the questionnaire or data gathering instrument to be constructed, validated and administered. Tools can also be interview guide and/ or checklist. If the instrument is prepared by the researcher, it should be tested for validity and reliability. However, if the instrument is standardized, the student should indicate its description as to its items, scoring and qualification. The researcher must explain its parts, and how the instrument will be validated. The instrument to be used should be appended (except for standardized). For validated tool (borrowed). Cite the source. If it will be modified discuss the mode of modification and validate it.

Research Instruments To get the appropriate data needed, the researcher will have questionnaires with four (4) parts. Part I will ask for the profile of the respondents. The tool for profile was made by the researcher; it will determine the age, gender, civil status, highest educational attainment, average monthly income, and years of service. Part II is the tool to determine the level of performance of the college professors. This will be the performance evaluation tool that Western Leyte College of Ormoc, Inc. is using to appraise their college professors. Part III is the tool that will be used to get the level of OCB is a standardized questionnaire. The five-factor, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour scale developed by Podsakoff and Mackenzie will be utilized in the study. The five organizational citizenship behaviour factors include altruism, courtesy, sportsmanship, conscientiousness and civic virtue.

Part IV will determine the level of Organizational Cynicism Part IV will determine the level of Organizational Cynicism. Organizational Cynicism Scale (OCS) which was developed by Brandes, Dharwadkar and Dean (1999) and modified by Erdost et al (2007) will be used. Part V will determine the level of Work Locus of Control among the respondents. The 16-item questionnaire was developed by Paul E. Spector in 1988. The researcher has modified the tools that will be used to determine the levels of performance, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, Workplace Spirituality, Organizational Cynicism, and Work Locus of Control and made it into a 4-point Likert scale so as to eliminate the bias and for convenience in the statistical analysis of the data. Some of the terms were also contextualized based on the locality. A validation tool was used to assess its practicality and validity. It was assessed by the adviser as an expert in the filed of Organizational management.

Research Procedure - Explain the process of the research Research Procedure - Explain the process of the research. - explain the preliminary preparation: 1. Approval letter from the principal 2. Selection of respondents 3. Construction and validation of the tool 4. orientation of the respondents 5. administration of the tool 6. Retrieval of the tool 7. In-Depth Interview and coding 8. statistical treatment

Research Procedure Gathering of Data After acquiring all the formal permission that the researcher must acquire from the Graduate School and the locale where the data will be collected, she will then delve into the gathering of the data needed on the profile, performance, organizational citizenship behaviour, workplace spirituality, organizational cynicism, and work locus of control of the respondents. For this, the researcher is allotting one (1) month to gather and compile all the data needed.

The researcher will self-administer the questionnaire The researcher will self-administer the questionnaire. Although the research instrument is quantitative in nature, the researcher deemed it a need to give twenty (20) per respondent per interview. This is done so that each question can be explained in layman’s terms by the researcher in case some respondents might have difficulty understanding. This is also done to ensure that all items are answered and answered correctly. For the level of performance, the researcher will retrieve the performance evaluation results of the professors after permission has been given. The interpretation of the institutional tool will used to correlate with the other variables.

For qualitative data, an indepth interview will be done choosing only 5 representative from the teachers. The representative must fully expressed their willingness to participate and should sign the informed consent. The indepth interview will be done in the school at about 30 mins per session. Data will be coded and interpreted through themes. A 10 minutes documentary video will also be prepared based on the concept of the problem, findings and conclusion.

Definition of terms: - go back to your title, statement of the problem and sub problems and highlight the following to be defined: 1. Independent variable 2. Dependent variable 3. Descriptive term : Effect, perception, etc. 4. in the sub problems, define the sub-variables

The terms should be defined operationally, use the local or environment to contextualize the definition: example: behavior – this is the way a person or animal acts or in response to a stimulus behavior – in the study, the term is use to describe the physical, emotional or social reaction of the subject (Gr 11 students of STEC) related to aggression.

The terms should be alphabetize The terms should be alphabetize. Include in the term the proposed program. If its experimental include pre-post test, control and experimental groups and intervention.

Application - Write up: (1 hr) Go to your group and do the write up on Instruments and research procedures