Reasoning Chapter 15.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Thinking: Chapter 10
Advertisements

From the Courtroom to the Classroom: Learning About Law © 2003 Constitutional Rights Foundation, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved.
D EDUCTIVE R EASONING By Kari Fowler. W HAT IS D EDUCTIVE R EASONING ?  Opposite of Inductive Reasoning  In Deductive Reasoning you are taking something.
Understanding the art of Persuasion
How do people influence you? A means of convincing people: to buy a certain product to believe something or act in a certain way to agree with a point.
BELL RINGER Discuss the following questions with a partner and write down your answers: 1. Why do you think its important for scientists to be curious?
Reason “Crime is common, logic is rare” - Sherlock Holmes.
Debate 101 Brand. Class Rules We are respectful We are considerate We listen the first time We will be present We are responsible What are some of the.
Philosophy 104 Chapter 8 Notes (Part 1). Induction vs Deduction Fogelin and Sinnott-Armstrong describe the difference between induction and deduction.
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 13 Experiments and Observational Studies.
How to start writing your Informational Speech
Questions.
Part 4 Reading Critically
Chapter 9: Critical Thinking
How to compose a message to a teacher
Persuasive Messages Module Twelve McGraw-Hill/Irwin
What is Inductive Reasoning?
Bell Work Describe a situation in which you may want to plan out what you are going to say ahead of time.
How can I find a topic for my research report?
Giving and Receiving Feedback
Introduction to Rhetorical Grammar
Author’s Viewpoint and Strength of an Argument
How do people influence you?
SELECTING DEBATE PATTERNS, ATTACKING FALLACIES, & REFUTATION
A. Cecile J.W. Janssens, PhD Professor of Translational Epidemiology
HOW TO WRITE YOUR BODY PARAGRAPHS
Deductive and Inductive
Scientific Method notes and flow chart
Or: how to win the internets
Paragraph 1 Give arguments for the opposite point of view Paragraph 2
Chapter 17 Methods of persuasion.
Chapter 9 Persuasion.
Errors in Reasoning.
Questions 2 and 3 Identification and Analysis
Topical Potential in American Civil and Criminal Court Trials by: Ramia Fu’ad Abdulazez Mirza (Ph.D.)
THE QUESTIONS—SKILLS ANALYSE EVALUATE INFER UNDERSTAND SUMMARISE
Let’s look at how this is done.
Listening vs. Hearing Did you know that we listen at words per minute, but think at words per minute.
Thesis Statements.
Chapter 4: Inductive Arguments
MM6007 Research Method in Management Theory Building Theory.
8/28/15 Today I will explain the steps to the scientific method
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Errors in Reasoning.
Chapter 9: Critical Thinking
Chapter 3 Speech Ethics.
Non-Fiction Questioning Stance & Signposts
The Argumentative Essay
Academic Vocabulary Week #1.
SOAPSTone SOAPSTone Video.
Classic Persuasive Appeals: Rhetoric
Higher RMPS Lesson 4 Kantian ethics.
Developing Refusal Skills
Developing Arguments for Persuasive Speeches
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3a Evaluating an argument
Methods of Persuasion Chapter 17.
Critical Thinking Lecture 11 Inductive arguments
Argument Moves from what is know to what is unknown
Persuasive Essay.
Communication Styles for Men and Women
Grammar – Unit 47 Reported speech 1 (He said that…)
Friends or Lovers? Unit 2.
Courtroom to Classroom:
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Argumentation & Persuasion
Summarizing, Quoting, and Paraphrasing: Writing about research
Doing Derivation.
Presentation transcript:

Reasoning Chapter 15

So what is Reasoning?... The process in which we look for reasons to believe, conclude, act, or feel a certain way. This is important because you cannot simply say, “because I’m right” or “You’re a stupid head” in your speech. What two types of fallacies are demonstrated above?

First type Inductive Reasoning Induce- to bring about, produce, or cause Inductive reasoning starts by looking at specific examples, related to our topic. Analyzing these examples CAUSES us to PRODUCE a rule or conclusion.

EXAMPLE Do not write…listen During your research you find several scientific studies that say students performed much higher on tests after eating Milky Way candy bars. By Inductive reasoning, you produce the conclusion that eating Milky Way bars increases your chances of scoring higher on tests.

Deductive Reasoning Deduce- to obtain a conclusion from something known or assumed Deductive Reasoning = Generally accepted conclusion + application to specific examples The above is used to show that the conclusion does apply to the specific situation

Okay, let’s clarify this See deductive reasoning is best used when you are trying to make a change on a local level. For example, Women did not always have the right to vote. In 1872, Susan B. Anthony illegally voted in the election. Here is how she used deductive reasoning to support her case

Her case She used Constitutional Preamble…”We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union…” Her argument was that the constitution calls for the rights of “We the people”, not “We the male citizens”.

Result She was convicted. But her argument was the foundation for the Civil Rights movement and the later Woman’s movement. Both of which Succeeded.

Reasoning From Sign Reasoning from sign means that we make a conclusion based on something we observe. For example, if you call your friend and they don’t answer, you might conclude that they are busy.

Be Careful with Sign However, while your conclusion might make sense, it is not necessarily right. Your friend just might be screening their phone calls because they don’t like you.

Causal Reasoning matter of cause and effect Causal Reasoning can be very useful if you are trying to prevent an issue. Here you are looking to avoid an effect by eliminating or fixing the cause. Be careful here though too. You must make the case clear that your cause that you want to fix or eliminate absolutely positively without a doubt is the cause of the negative effect.

For Example Let’s take Global climate change, formerly known as global warming. You want to stop it. So you make the case that we must stop putting toxins in the air. Your cause…well could be many things. Could be car pollution, nuclear waste, industrial waste, etc… That is a valid causal argument.

Analogy So what’s an analogy? Well, an analogy is a comparison between two things, that conveys a specific message. Example: If you were to make a very good point during a class discussion, I might say that you knocked that one out of the park. What am I saying about your point? (yes answer that)

Precisely I am saying that your point was excellent. Analogies can be useful in conveying emotion or simplifying a topic so that your audience can understand.

Vocabulary list Test on Tuesday Deduce* Induce* Convey- to express Reasoning* Infer- to conclude or judge from reasoning. *these words are in your notes.