Views for The LTE-Advanced Requirements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMT-Advanced Technical Requirements Summary of status after 22 nd Meeting of WP8F.
Advertisements

GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications Evolution of TD-SCDMA China Communications Standards Association (CCSA) Chicago, May 29th to 2nd June,
Evolution road of 3GPP-LTE
1 3GPP LTE presentation 3GPP TSG RAN Chairman 3GPP TSG RAN Chairman 3GPP LTE presentation Kyoto May 22rd 2007.
1 Uplink Resource Allocation in LTE-A Relay Enhanced Cellular Networks Master’s Thesis Seminar Presented by: Anzil Abdul Rasheed Master’s Program – Radio.
LTE-A Carrier Aggregation
Aida BotonjićTieto1 LTE Aida Botonjić. Aida BotonjićTieto2 Why LTE? Applications: Interactive gaming DVD quality video Data download/upload Targets: High.
N AME OF THE T OPIC : Prepared by: Sayed Mahfuz Mahmud Istiyak Ahmed M.Sc. Engr.(CSE), Summer 2011 ID No: Department of CSE United International.
Third-generation mobile communication started in ITU (International Telecommunication Union) at1980s. The evaluation criteria set the target data rates.
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Supervisor: Prof. Jyri Hämäläinen Instructor: M.Sc Zhong Zheng A part of NETS2020 project Ying Yang
Consideration on Technical Candidates for IMT-Advanced
Growth in Mobile Broadband and its Implication for Spectrum
LTE rollout: spectrum challenges
GSC-19 Meeting, July 2015, Geneva 3GPP and The Road to 5G Erik Guttman, 3GPP SA Chairman, Consultant to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Document No:GSC-19_302.
LTE Architecture KANNAN M JTO(3G).
1© Nokia Siemens Networks Confidential Realities of LTE Deployment Bill Payne Head of Innovation Team CTO Office.
All Rights Reserved, Copyright©2008, FUJITSU LIMITED. and FUJITSU LABORATORIES LIMITED. REV Technology Considerations for LTE-Advanced 3GPP TSG.
© 2006 Sprint Nextel WP5D Meeting Results
1 LTE standards Status for this work in 3GPP and what next for the Future Francois COURAU 3GPP TSG RAN Chairman.
LTE Mobility. Top right corner for field-mark, customer or partner logotypes. See Best practice for example. Slide title 40 pt Slide subtitle 24 pt Text.
1 Workshop on ICT Technologies & Standards for NGN, 3G, and FMC Nov 9-10, 2006Brasilia, Brazil 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) and System Architecture Evolution.
Doc.:IEEE /0821r3 Submission July 2008 Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Some Ambiguities about Throughput Conditions in PAR Date: Authors:
3GPP2 LTE Workshop SEOUL, Korea, 27 th– 28 th June GPP LTE Status Status Source Source 3GPP TSG RAN Chairman 3GPP TSG RAN Chairman ETSI TC MSG Chairman.
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion On Basic Technical Aspects for HEW Date:
Huawei Technologies 1 Technology changes. Communication lasts. AIE Requirements and Competitions.
第四代行動通訊系統 (4G)-- Long Term Evolution Advanced (LTE Advanced)
Submission May 2016 H. H. LEESlide 1 IEEE Framework and Its Applicability to IMT-2020 Date: Authors:
LTE/SAE Fundamentals Course. O BJECTIVES After completing this module, the participant should be able to: Understand the reasons driving to the LTE/SAE.
PRESENTED BY : P:MARREDDY07681A0453 WIRELESS SYSTEM WIRELESS SYSTEM.
3GPP Network Slicing Georg Mayer, 3GPP CT Chairman, Huawei
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2017
5 G.
Delivering the standards and spectrum to fuel 5G
LTE Long Term Evolution
Long Term Evolution (LTE) and System Architecture Evolution (SAE)
5G MOBILE TECHNOLOGY TECHNICAL SEMINAR
“An Eye View On the Future Generation Of Phones”
A glimpse into the future, looking beyond 2025
2 ATIS 5G OVERVIEW ATIS launched its 5G Ad Hoc in 2015 to advance regulatory imperatives, deliver an evolutionary path, address co-existence of technologies,
ARQ Proxy for Cross-Layer Error Control Optimization in 3G LTE
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
TSG-RAN Workshop on Radio mobility MOB
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2017
LTE Mobility LTE Mobility.
LTE Long Term Evolution
3GPP TSG RAN Meeting #67 Shanghai, China, 9 – 12 March, 2015
WF on UE mandatory channel bandwidth for NR bands
Evaluation Model for LTE-Advanced
Motivation for WI on "LTE-based V2X Services"
Long Term Evolution (LTE)
5G Communication Technology
4G and 5G: Present and Future of Mobile Network
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
Mobile Synchronization Trends 4G to 4.5G to 5G
5G Architecture Standardization Landscape in 3GPP
5G Micro Cell Deployment in Coexistence with Fixed Service
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
TESTNG TECHNIQUES FOR NB-IOT PHYSICAL LAYER
IMT-Advanced Report Tech Requirements Outline
WF on LTE-NR Coexistence
IMT-Advanced Technical Requirements
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) and System Architecture Evolution (SAE)
Discussion on IMT-2020 mMTC and URLLC
Current Status of submission about EUHT
Comparing Mobile WiMAX with HSPA+, LTE, and Meeting the Goals of IMT-Advanced February 2009 Presentation for Orlando MWG F2F Doug Gray
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2018
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date: September, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Views for The LTE-Advanced Requirements 3GPP TSG RAN IMT Advanced Workshop REV-080003 Shenzhen, China, April 7 – 8, 2008 Views for The LTE-Advanced Requirements Agenda Item: 2.2 Manufacturers views Source: Nokia & Nokia Siemens Networks

Outline Requirements from ITU-R IMT-A process Mobile Internet Outlook LTE-Advanced Optimization for Nomadic / Local Area LTE-Advanced Requirements - Suggested Upgrades to 25.913 Conclusions

IMT-A Requirements: Requirements from ITU-R IMT-A process Mobile Internet Outlook LTE-Advanced Optimization for Nomadic / Local Area

Status on IMT-A: Outcome from ITU-R WG5D meeting in January The technical minimum requirements to IMT-A are given in draft IMT.TECH from ITU-R WG5D #1 in January to be finalized in WG5D #2 in June The following minimum requirements are defined (values still largely open): Cell spectral efficiency Peak data rate (=peak spectral efficiency) Bandwidth Cell edge user throughput Latency Mobility Handover VoIP capacity

Draft IMT-A Minimum Requirements Summary Draft values Comments Cell spectral efficiency Base coverage Urban DL: [2.1] b / s / Hz /cell UL: [1.5] /[1.2] b / s / Hz / cell Downlink – 4x2, Uplink – 2x4 / 1x4 Peak data rate (=peak spectral efficiency) DL: [7/10] b / s / Hz UL: [2.5/5] b / s / Hz Downlink – 4x4, Uplink – 2x4 Bandwidth [20/40] MHz. Extensions up to 100 MHz Cell edge user throughput DL: [0.06] b / s / Hz / user UL: [0.03] b / s / Hz / user Latency [100 ms] Control plane [10ms] User Plane From idle to active state One-way transit time Mobility Up to 350 km / h Handover Intra Frequency [25/30]ms Inter Frequency [tbd] VoIP capacity [40] active users / MHz / cell Maximum number of users per cell ? Note: “Red” numbers in [ ] are draft number to be agreed in ITU-RWG5D #2 in June

Mobile Internet Outlook Internet traffic volume is increasing exponentially – doubling approximately each 6-12 months ~ x100-1000 increase in data volume can be expected within the next decade Large fraction of Internet services will go mobile Low flat-rate tariffs for mobile data services have just started the mobile data tornado Cost per bit reduction must follow the trend in user traffic volume increase Real user data rates 10-50 Mbps at “preferred” user locations (home, work, coffee shops, centers, airport, hotel) 1-10 Mbps everywhere else. 80-90% traffic volume generated in indoor and hot-spot Nomadic scenarios One secure subscription / identification ({U}SIM) Best connected everywhere Subscription portability Transparent mobile / nomadic connectivity (Wide Area / Local Area) Local decentralized services: Local WEB cacheing, proxy and content servers to achieve low response time and minimize backhaul transmission Location and context aware services

LTE-Advanced Optimization for Nomadic / Local Area EUTRA/EUTRAN is close to fulfilling the minimum requirements for high mobility wide area coverage Focus needed on improvements for nomadic and local area (LA) scenarios Backwards compatible solutions may not seize all (local area) optimization opportunities and new deployment options, e.g. Optimization of numerology for low mobility LA Optimization of physical and data link layers for High data rate High spectral efficiency Low mobility Reduced network complexity for LA Low number of users per cell (not VoIP optimization centric) Support of uncoordinated LA eNB deployment Support of flexible spectrum use and spectrum sharing Support of relays

LTE-A Requirements Suggested Upgrades to 25.913

6. LTE-A Capability-Related Requirements Peak Data Rate IMT.TECH set requirements to minimum bandwidth and peak spectral efficiency. We anticipate a research target of 1 Gbps for DL and 500 Mbps for UL in 100 MHz BW, but at this stage we do not suggest this stretching target as a system requirement. Suggested requirements: Peak spectral efficiency of 15 bits/s/Hz in DL and 7.5 bits/s/Hz in UL Scalable bandwidth exceeding 20 MHz, potentially up to 100 MHz Latency C-plane Latency: 100 ms (Similar to 25.913) U-Plane Latency: 5 ms (Similar to 25.913) Supported number of users C-plane Capacity: 400 users in active state (potentially less for LA) (Similar to 25.913)

7. LTE-A System Performance Requirements User throughput IMT-A set minimum requirements to user throughput (in terms of spectral efficiency) We anticipate significantly higher targets for UL and slightly higher for DL Suggested requirements: DL [tbd] bits/s/Hz (numbers from IMT.TECH can potentially be used) UL [tbd] bits/s/Hz (numbers from IMT.TECH can potentially be used) Spectrum efficiency IMT-A set minimum requirements to spectrum efficiency Mobility: Similar to 25.913 Coverage: Similar to 25.913 with increased attention to improved indoor coverage solutions Further Enhanced MBMS: Similar to 25.913 Network synchronization: Similar to 25.913. Option of loose “air-interface” synchronisation

8. LTE-A Deployment-Related Requirements Deployment Scenarios LTE-A should in general be considered to be a backwards compatible enhancement to E-UTRA / E-UTRAN LTE-A Local Area solution should also be considered for standalone deployment, e.g. with no previous wide area E-UTRA / E-UTRAN, but with interworking with existing UTRAN and/or GERAN coverage Spectrum flexibility Scalable bandwidth exceeding 20MHz, potentially up to 100MHz Channel bonding should be considered Necessity of channel aggregation and possible target bands should be carefully evaluated Solutions for both paired and unpaired operation Spectrum deployment Similar to 25.913 New IMT-A bands (total IMT bands) The potential of flexible spectrum usage mechanisms to enable FSU within the same Radio Access Technology between operators Co-existence and interworking with 3GPP RAT

9. LTE-A Requirements for E-UTRAN Architecture and Migration Similar to 25.913 Advanced E-UTRAN shall be backwards compatible with E-UTRA, potentially enhanced with new functionalities and architecture elements if justified by performance enhancements or cost reduction. Increased focus on decentralized network architecture, especially for nomadic/local deployment solutions

10. LTE-A Radio Resource Management Requirements Enhanced support for end-to-end QoS Requirements similar to 25.913 Efficient support for transmission of higher layers Support of load sharing and policy management across different radio access technologies Increased focus on advanced E-UTRAN Wide Area / Local Area deployment scenarios

11. LTE-A Complexity Requirements Complexity requirements for overall system Requirements similar to 25.913 Simplified operability by introducing additional automated functionalities Complexity requirements for UE Avoid setting mandatory requirements to UE’s which are in practice optional to the E-UTRAN and not supported by the majority of E-UTRAN vendors

12. LTE-A General requirements Cost-related requirements Requirements similar to 25.913 Advanced E-UTRA/E-E-UTRAN should have increased focus on cost reduction solutions Backhaul cost reduction Cost per bit reduction OPEX and CAPEX reduction by automatic and autonomous network configuration and operation Service-related requirements Similar to 25.913 Increased focus on new service scenarios

Conclusions LTE Advanced shall meet or exceed the IMT-Advanced minimum capabilities. Requirements for LTE Advanced shall not be less than those contained in TR25.913. Advanced E-UTRA / E-UTRAN shall be based on E-UTRA / E-UTRAN evolution. Non-backwards compatible elements can be studied as part of LTE-A SI, but subject for evaluation in RAN level. Main focus on Requirements: Nomadic / Local Area deployment scenarios Increased focus on cost reduction solutions Peak spectral efficiency of 15 bps/Hz (DL) and 7.5 bps/Hz (UL) Enhanced average cell capacity of [tbd] (DL) and [tbd] (UL) Enhanced (cell edge) user throughput of [tbd] (DL) and [tbd] (UL) Scalable bandwidth exceeding 20 MHz, potentially up to 100 MHz Spectrum flexibility