Effect of Axial Length Measurement Method on Refractive Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Real World Comparison of Partial Coherence Interferometry and Immersion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eye Clinic, Hospital of Legnago, Verona, Italy
Advertisements

IN THE NAME OF GOD.
Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas with LENSTAR LS 900® Tsunekazu Hamada Hamada Eye Clinic, Osaka, Japan Disclosure statement of.
Accuracy of Predicted Refractive Error in Resident-Performed Cataract Surgery Using Partial Coherence Interferometry Nickolas P. Katsoulakis, M.D., Paul.
A simple and accurate method of alignment for toric intraocular lens implantation using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). Kazuno Negishi,
Development of an Apple iPhone IOL Calculator Application for Cataract Surgery Rony Gelman, MD 1, Richard E. Braunstein, MD 1 1 Department of Ophthalmology,
Yüksel Totan, Ramazan Yaĝcı, Zeynel Arslanyılmaz, Uĝurcan Keskin The authors have no financial interest.
Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens G. Rubiolini M.D. Italy Disclosure of finanacial interest Author's research is partially funded.
INTRA-OCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION IN POST- REFRACTIVE SURGERY ASIAN EYES USING THE HAIGIS-L FORMULA Dr Daphne Han, FRCS Dr Wei-Han Chua, FRCS Dr Peter.
Choosing the Proper Power for the IOL
IOL power calculation after refractive surgery A. Peyman, MD.
1 Clinical Performance of the Crystalens® AO Guy M. Kezirian, MD, FACS.
Retrospective Comparison of 3177 Eyes Implanted with Presbyopic IOLs Carlos Buznego MD Elizabeth A. Davis MD, FACS Guy M. Kezirian MD, FACS William B.
Phacoemulsification with Goniosynechialysis in the Management of Refractory Acute Angle-closure Glaucoma Ghasem Fakhraie*, MD, Mahmoud Jabbarvand, MD,
Placement of Toric Intraocular Lens and the Long-term Change in the Axis of Corneal Astigmatism after Sutureless Cataract Extraction by Phacoemulsification.
JAIRO E. HOYOS, MD MELANIA CIGALES, MD Instituto Oftalmológico Hoyos Barcelona - SPAIN.
Daycase Cataract Surgery Audit 20 th of April, Singleton Hospital.
Hong Kong Eye Hospital Biometry Audit 2012 SN60WF IOL Dr. Rose Chan
Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,
Hong Kong Eye Hospital Ms Frenchy Chiu Dr Victoria Wong IOL master
Hong Kong Eye Hospital Biometry Audit 2011 SN60WF IOL Dr. Rose Chan Resident, Hong Kong Eye Hospital.
Biometric Accuracy in High Hypermetropes and Myopes
Occurrence of Retinal Detachment After Cataract Surgery Peter Jeppesen MD, PhD and Thomas K. Olsen, MD, DMSc Department of Ophthalmology Århus University.
Phacoemulsification some Basic Ideas…
INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION BY IMMERSION A-SCAN BIOMETRY VERSUS CONTACT A-SCAN BIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS BEFORE CATARACT SURGERY Burak Bilgin**, M.D.,
Sonia Yoo, MD 1 Fernanda Piccoli, MD 1 Artur Schmitt, MD 1 Takeshi Ide, MD 1 Tsontcho Ianchulev, MD 2 Authors have no financial interest in this subject.
Effect of Aspherical Intraocular Lens on Blue-on-Yellow Perimetry  No eye had intraoperative complications. At 12 months after surgery, all the lenses.
Phoebe D. Lenhart, M.D. 1, Amy K. Hutchinson, M.D. 1, Michael J. Lynn, M.S. 2, Scott R. Lambert M.D. 1 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University,
EVALUATION OF REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES AFTER IOL IMPLANTATION
Jamie Ng, Marcus Tan, Lennard Thean National University Health System
Partial Coherence Interferometry Failure Rate in a Teaching Hospital Leslie A. Wei 1,2, BA, Nickolaus P. Katsoulakis 2, MD, Theodoros Filippopoulos 3,
The Effect of Corneal Anterior Surface Eccentricity on Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery Choul Yong Park MD 1 Sung Jun Lee MD 1 Prabjot Channa MD 2 Roy.
Adriana S. Forseto1, MD Walton Nosé1,2, MD
IOL Calculations Based on Partial Biometry in Humanitarian Missions Joseph Schmitz, MD Kimberly Davis, MD, FACS Scott McClatchey, MD The authors have no.
Sherman W. Reeves, MD, MPH 1,3,4 ; Jacob A. Kozisek, OD 1,2 ; Noumia Cloutier-Gill, OD 1,2 ; David R. Hardten, MD 1,2,3,4 Accuracy of Scheimpflug Imaging.
Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.
Inadvertent Insertion of an Opposite- Side Tecnis ZM900 Multifocal IOL Wilson Takashi Hida, M.D. Celso Takashi Nakano; Jonathan Lake;
Minimizing Risk in Visian ICL Implantation.
Toric IOLs: wavefront aberrometry and quality of life Mencucci Rita Giordano Cristina, Stiko Ermelinda, Miranda Paolo, Eleonora Favuzza, Ugo Menchini Authors.
COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF OCULAR BIOMETRY USING A NEW NON-CONTACT OPTICAL LOW COHERENCE REFLECTOMETER David Goldblum 1,3, Kaspar Rohrer 1, Rudolf Waelti.
Simulated Experiments on IOL Power Calculation Using Anterior Segment OCT Dong Hyun Jo, M.D., 1,2 Mee Kum Kim, M.D., 1,2 Won Ryang Wee, M.D. 1,2 1 Department.
Corneal shape and corneal aberrations after MicroIncision Cataract Surgery (MICS) NOCHEZ Y, BUREL B, MAJZOUB S, PISELLA PJ C.H.U.
John P Berdahl M.D.* David R. Hardten M.D., F.A.C.S.* *No relevant financial disclosures.
Poster# P36 Comparison of Techniques of Measuring Anterior Chamber Depth and Corneal Curvature in Indian Eyes Sujata Das, MS, FRCS Anjula Kumari, B.Optom.
Vinohrady Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic Vinohrady Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD,
0 Femtosecond-Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery: Is it living up to the hype? 117 th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Press Briefing.
Intraocular Lens Outcomes: Comparison of Technologies and Formulas Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC Research Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology Storm.
Changes of Axial Length After LASIK Surgery: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study
Suppressive effect of combined treatment of orthokeratology and 0
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
Premium IOL May be one way to achieve the visual goals of selected patients I describe some pearls for premium IOL implantation to help ensure that we.
Corneal Pachymetry in Prediction of Refraction After Cataract Surgery
From: Key Developments for Partial Coherence Biometry and Optical Coherence Tomography in the Human Eye Made in Vienna Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci ;57(9):OCT460-OCT474.
Refractive outcomes of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry versus optical biometry alone for intraocular lens power calculation Zina Zhang MD1, Logan.
The authors have no financial interest.
Aug 11, 2017 Comparison of predictive accuracy on Partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and swpt-source optical coherence tomographry (SS-OCT) Choun-Ki.
Eye clinic of the 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
Nienke Visser, Tos T.J.M. Berendschot, Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts
MP Weikert, M Shirayama, L Wang, DD Koch
Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.
Comparison of corneal powers obtained from four different devices
Poster Number: P90 Category: Intraocular Surgery (Cataract and Refractive) Optimization of IOL Power Calculation Constants: By Unit or by Surgeon? Nathaniel.
Comparison of Autokeratometry and Manual Keratometry
IN THE NAME OF GOD.
versus 2.75mm Incision Phacoemulsification
Factors Potentially Affecting the Accuracy of Methods to Calculate Effective Refractive Power After Keratorefractive Surgery Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR,
Biometry before catarct surgery
Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
The authors have no financial interest
Michael Goodman, Alexandra Paul and Andrew Hsu
Presentation transcript:

Effect of Axial Length Measurement Method on Refractive Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Real World Comparison of Partial Coherence Interferometry and Immersion Ultrasound. Nathaniel Knox Cartwright & Derek Tole Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom Financial Disclosure: none

Background Partial coherence interferometry (PCI) has become the clinical gold standard for axial length (AL) measurement but cannot be used in all eyes Intraindividual comparisons of PCI and immersion ultrasound (IUS) have found they result in postoperative refractive equivalence after cataract surgery This contrasts with the clinical situation for PCI users who only use IUS as a second line measurement method The purpose of this study was to compare refractive outcomes after cataract surgery when PCI is used for AL measurement with when IUS is used due to PCI failure

Cohort 2544 phacoemulsification and Akreos Adapt AO (Bausch & Lomb) IOL implantations No copathology Uncombined and uncomplicated surgery Postoperative subjective refraction Corrected distance visual acuity ≥6/12 (20/40) IOLMaster (software version 3, Carl Zeiss Meditec) keratometry performed in all PCI AL measurement attempted in all but IUS used if this was not possible 10 MHz

Optimisation Process Hoffer Q, Holladay 1 and SRK/T formulae entered in code into Freemat (http://freemat.sourceforge.net/) Optimised biometry formula constants calculated by 2 methods To give an overall mean deviation from predicted postoperative refraction of zero (zero method) As recommended in the IOLMaster manual, that is as the mean of the all personalised constants excluding those > 2 SD from overall mean (Zeiss method)1 1. IOL Master Software Version 3.xx User Manual.http://www.doctor-hill.com/iol-master/docs/iolmaster_3.pdf (downloaded 17/0/2008).

Partial coherence interferometry Comparison of Groups Immersion ultrasound Partial coherence interferometry p value (unpaired t-test) Number 224 (9.9 %) 2047 (91.9 %) Mean axial length/ mm 23.51 (SD ±1.64) 23.56 (±1.39) 0.61 Mean mean corneal power/ D 43.85 (±1.47) 43.80 (±1.51) 0.67 Mean intraocular lens power/ D 20.9 (±4.4) 20.6 (±3.9) 0.27 Postoperative spherical equivalent/ D -0.17 (±1.11) -0.10 (±0.87) 0.29

Results: Zero method Unpaired t-test: PCI V IUS all p>0.05 Hoffer Q predicted Anterior Chamber Depth Holladay 1 Surgeon Factor SRK/ T A Constant IUS 5.34 1.59 118.62 PCI 5.33 1.57 118.65

Results: Zeiss method Unpaired t-test: PCI V IUS all p<0.05 Hoffer Q predicted Anterior Chamber Depth Holladay 1 Surgeon Factor SRK/ T A Constant IUS 5.22 (SD ±0.27) 1.59 (±0.49) 118.60 (±0.67) PCI 5.22 (±0.27) 1.58 (±0.48) 118.61 (±0.68)

Zeiss method Zero method Hoffer Q Holladay 1 SRK/T PCI IUS Mean error -0.26 (±0.80) -0.34 (±0.75) -0.09 (±0.76) -0.18 (±0.70) -0.11 (±0.72) -0.21 (±0.67) Mean absolute error 0.44 (±0.77) 0.49 (±0.66) 0.33 (±0.69) 0.39 (±0.61) 0.31 (±0.66) 0.38 (±0.59) % ± 0.25 D 42.8 37.1 64.5 54.9 64.2 51.8 % ±0.50 D 74.4 70.1 85.3 82.6 87.8 83.9 % ± 1.00 D 93.5 91.1 94.6 92.4 95.5 92.9 Zero method Hoffer Q Holladay 1 SRK/T PCI IUS Mean error 0.00 (±0.83) 0.00 (±1.02) 0.00 (±0.82) 0.00 (±0.84) 0.00 (1.02) Mean absolute error 0.51 (±0.65) 0.58 (±0.84) 0.56 (±0.84) 0.52 (±0.66) % ± 0.25 D 36.3 37.5 37.7 36.1 35.6 35.3 % ±0.50 D 62.8 59.8 64.8 62.9 63.3 % ± 1.00 D 88.7 86.0 89.1 88.6 88.9 83.6

Conclusions Optimised biometry formula constants (BFC) varied according the method by which they were calculated When the Zeiss optimisation method was used, AL measurement by IUS following PCI measurement failure did not require use of different BFC and did not worsen refractive outcomes Additionally, the Zeiss optimisation method resulted in a lower mean absolute error than when the zero method is used