The Ontological Argument: An Introduction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The ontological argument is based entirely upon logic and reason and doesn’t really try to give a posteriori evidence to back it up. Anselm would claim.
Advertisements

Arguments for The Existence of God Ontological Cosmological Teleological Ontological Cosmological Teleological.
Ontological Argument for God Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
The Ontological Argument
Reasoning Automated Deduction. Reasonable Arguments Argument: An attempt to demonstrate the truth of a conclusion from the truth of a set of premises.
Phil 1000 Bradley Monton Class 2 The Cosmological Argument.
Phil 1000 Two weeks on God, with Professor Bradley Monton.
Is Religion Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding The ontological argument The cosmological argument The teleological argument (from design)
Is Belief in God Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding A posteriori arguments (based on experience): The teleological argument (from design) The cosmological.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. A BASIC INTRODUCTION. THIS MUST BE USED AS A STARTING POINT : OTHER SHEETS, TEXT BOOK AND INFORMATION WILL BE NEEDED TO HAVE.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
God and the Enlightenment Mr. Bach Accelerated World History.
Deductive vs. Inductive Logic This course is about deductive logic. But it is important to know something about inductive logic.
Proof and Probability (can be applied to arguments for the existence of God)
Ontological Argument. Teleological argument depends upon evidence about the nature of the world and the organisms and objects in it. Cosmological argument.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Arguments for The Existence of God Ontological Cosmological Telelogical Ontological Cosmological Telelogical.
Anselm’s Ontological Argument STARTER TASK: ‘Fools say in their hearts, “There is no God”’ Psalm 14:1 Copy this statement down. What do you think it is.
WEEK 3: Metaphysics Natural Theology – Anselm’s Ontological Argument.
The Ontological Argument
Ontological Argument (Ontological is from the Greek word for being, named by Kant) Learning Objectives To know the specification content To know the meaning.
Philosophy of Religion Ontological Argument
The Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
KNOWLEDGE AND CERTAINTY (Part 1)
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1
Gaunilo’s response the stage one of Anselm’s argument
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
The Ontological Argument
The ontological argument
Arguments for The Existence of God
Philosophy MAP 2 and new topic The Idea of God
Unit 2: Arguments relating to the existence of God.
Challenges to the OAs The different versions of OA are challenged by:
A Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
Criticisms of the Ontological Argument
The existence of God: introduction
The ontological argument: an a-priori argument (ie, deductive rather than inductive) Anselm ‘God’ is that being than which nothing greater can be conceived’;
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
Descartes’ ontological argument
Other versions of the ontological argument
The Ontological Argument Ontological
The Ontological Argument: St. Anselm’s First Argument
Draw the most perfect holiday Island you can imagine...
The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument
Kant’s objection to ontological arguments
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
On your whiteboard (1): 1. What is innate knowledge? 2. What were Plato’s arguments for innate knowledge? 3. Was he right? Explain your answer.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Explore key ideas in the ontological argument. (8 marks)
The Ontological Argument Aim: To explore the attributes of God.
Explore the use of a’priori reasoning in the ontological argument
1 A The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument
Describe this object: Does it help describe it further by saying it exists?
The Big Picture Deductive arguments - origins of the ontological argument Deductive proofs; the concept of ‘a priori’. St Anselm - God as the greatest.
The Ontological Argument
What makes these things different?
The Ontological Argument
Omnipotent Deity Atheist Agnostic Omnibenevolent Polytheist Analogy
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Clarify and explain the key ideas. A’priori Deductive
Clarify and explain the key ideas. A’priori Deductive
By the end of today’s lesson you will:
Ontological Argument – challenges against
Arguments for The Existence of God
Explore the weaknesses of the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Clarify the key ideas Logic Definition Premises Outline opinion Flawed
Presentation transcript:

The Ontological Argument: An Introduction 12 September 2018 Starter Task: What is greater? Learning Outcomes: ALL will be able to explain the Ontological argument. MOST will be able to analyse the strengths and weakness of the ontological argument SOME will be able to explain the significance of the ontological argument in the context of the other arguments for the existence of God

A priori or a posteriori knowledge? This triangle has 3 sides. (a priori) The nearest station to Latimer is Kettering station. (a posteriori) The sun will rise tomorrow. The apple I am going to eat for lunch is a fruit. Jesus was the son of God. Learning Outcomes: ALL will be able to explain the Ontological argument. MOST will be able to analyse the strengths and weakness of the ontological argument SOME will be able to explain the significance of the ontological argument in the context of the other arguments for the existence of God

Write down three examples of each A priori – a proposition based on a definition and the use of logic alone, no experience needed. A posteriori – a proposition based upon experience alone. Write down three examples of each Learning Outcomes: ALL will be able to explain the Ontological argument. MOST will be able to analyse the strengths and weakness of the ontological argument SOME will be able to explain the significance of the ontological argument in the context of the other arguments for the existence of God

A definition of God Take a couple of minutes to think of a definition of God. Make a list of the attributes of the attributes of God. Would your God have to exist as part of it’s definition? Learning Outcomes: ALL will be able to explain the Ontological argument. MOST will be able to analyse the strengths and weakness of the ontological argument SOME will be able to explain the significance of the ontological argument in the context of the other arguments for the existence of God

Perfection = ?

Anselm says God is “that than which nothing greater can be conceived” “you can’t imagine anything greater than God” “God is perfect in every way”

Anselm Says: + If God is perfect in every way he must exist in reality If he existed only in the mind we could imagine a more perfect God – one that existed in the mind and in reality God + God

Ontological Argument in a nutshell Something is greater if it exists than if it doesn’t. If God is the greatest thing imaginable, he must exist. For if he didn’t, you could imagine something greater – something with all his qualities, but which did actually exist. Learning Outcomes: ALL will be able to explain the Ontological argument. MOST will be able to analyse the strengths and weakness of the ontological argument SOME will be able to explain the significance of the ontological argument in the context of the other arguments for the existence of God

Inductive and deductive arguments Experience Teleological Cosmological Moral All the other arguments for the existence of God are inductive – they can at best only give a highly probable conclusion. Inductive arguments are based upon a posteriori knowledge – knowledge derived from (after) experience. Learning Outcomes: ALL will be able to explain the Ontological argument. MOST will be able to analyse the strengths and weakness of the ontological argument SOME will be able to explain the significance of the ontological argument in the context of the other arguments for the existence of God

Inductive/deductive cont’d… A deductive argument is based upon a priori knowledge. The conclusion is implied directly by the premises, i.e. flows directly from them. If the premises are true and the structure is valid, then the conclusion must be true. The Ontological Argument is the only deductive argument for the existence of God. → This means ontological arguments are the only arguments that could… prove God’s existence conclusively

http://www. youtube. com/watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCXvVcWFrGQ&playnext=1&list=PLC59655AA14BB1541 Learning Outcomes: ALL will be able to explain the Ontological argument. MOST will be able to analyse the strengths and weakness of the ontological argument SOME will be able to explain the significance of the ontological argument in the context of the other arguments for the existence of God