Overview: Introduction to LHC Overview of CMS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First results from the ATLAS experiment at the LHC
Advertisements

Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
HEP Experiments Detectors and their Technologies Sascha Marc Schmeling CERN.
1 Stefan Spanier, 22 October 2008 Research Participation in Collider Based Particle Physics Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Interactions of hadrons in the SiW ECAL (CAN-025) Philippe Doublet - LAL Roman Pöschl, François Richard - LAL CALICE Meeting at Casablanca, September 22nd.
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Endcap Muon meeting: CMU, Oct 19, 2003 J. Hauser UCLA 1 CSC Trigger Primitives Test Beam Studies Main Test Beam 2003 Goals: Verify the peripheral crate.
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
The CMS Muon Detector Thomas Hebbeker Aachen July 2001 Searching for New Physics with High Energy Muons.
S. Durkin, USCMS-EMU Meeting, Oct. 21, 2005 Critical Data Errors S. Durkin The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 20, 2005.
Study of the Optimum Momentum Resolution of CMS Experiment Presented by: Timothy McDonald Faculty Mentor: Darin Acosta.
July CMS experiment at LHC Geoff Hall Imperial College London Geoff Hall.
CMS Masterclass It’s the dawn of an exciting age of new discovery in particle physics! At CERN, the LHC and its experiments are tuning up. CMS –
Approved Plots from CMS First Beam Runs 2-October-2008.
What are we made of ? Neutrinos Building a Particle Collider The ring is 27km round and on average 100m underground CERN – LEP, LHC.
Efficiency of the CMS Level-1 Trigger to Selected Physics Channels by: Corey Sulkko Faculty Mentor: prof. Darin Acosta Funded by: National Science Foundation.
ATOMIC STRUCTURE Notes are for your personal use. Abbreviate as you see fit.
Surrounding the tracker, the calorimetry system measures with high accuracy the energy of electrons and photons as well as individual hadrons with 7500.
Introduction to CERN David Barney, CERN Introduction to CERN Activities Intro to particle physics Accelerators – the LHC Detectors - CMS.
Track-Finder Trigger at the Beam Test Results and Features Darin Acosta, Rick Cavanaugh, Victor Golovtsov, Lindsey Gray, Khristian Kotov, Alex Madorsky,
HIGHLIGHTS IN 2011 AT STAR & ALICE In-Kwon Yoo. Outline  STAR BES Results  BES runs and STAR general  Charged Meson   and   Freeze-out Conditions.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating Facility (CEBAF) at JLab in Newport News, Virginia, is used to study the properties of quark matter. CEBAF.
Introduction to CERN Activities
CMS Latency Review, 13th March 2007CSC Trigger 1 Latency and Synchronization update.
LHC The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is an accelerator with 27 km circumference. Being built on the France- Switzerland border west of Geneva. It will start.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
Track Selection Performance of the CMS Cathode Strip Chamber Track Finder and Level 1 Trigger Kristin Beck Advisors: Dan Holmes, Darin Acosta 14 August,
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set R. Burrell, G.P. Gilfoyle University of Richmond, Physics Department CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating.
M. Garcia-Sciveres July 2002 ATLAS A Proton Collider Detector M. Garcia-Sciveres Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
1 Update on CompareTFandDMBLCTs.cc Analyzer that compares LCTs read out from the Track Finder (input FIFO) with those read out through the EMU data path.
ATLAS Z-Path Masterclass Masterclass Analysis Intro.
The Summer Begins: CERN Kristin Beck University of Michigan REU at CERN2 of 10 Introductions High Technology High School Hometown:
Know How at LLR Ultra-granular calorimetry AFTER vs CHIC 1F. Fleuret - LLR11/05/ LPSC.
First results from SND at VEPP-2000 S. Serednyakov On behalf of SND group VIII International Workshop on e + e - Collisions from Phi to Psi, PHIPSI11,
CMS Masterclass It’s a time of exciting new discoveries in particle physics! At CERN, the LHC succesfully completed Run I at 8 TeV of collision.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
CMS Week, 3-7 November CSC Trigger Test Beam Report Cast of many.
Research and development toward a future Muon Collider Katsuya Yonehara Accelerator Physics Center, Fermilab On behalf of Muon Accelerator Program Draft.
CERN Large Hadron Collider
August 4th, 2011 Irene Zawisza
Lecture 18 - Detectors Detector systems
Introduction to CERN Activities
Timing/Synchronization Status
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Introduction to CERN Activities
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Study of Gamma+Jets production
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
How a Particle Detector works
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
Particle Physics at CMS
CSC Trigger Primitives Test Beam Studies
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set
Changes in Level 1 CSC Trigger in ORCA by Jason Mumford and Slava Valuev University of California Los Angeles June 11,
Particle physics.
Welcome to the CMS Virtual Visit
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
The KL reconstruction for the Belle experiment at KEK B-factory
CMS Masterclass 2017.
ACCELERATORS AND DETECTORS
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Particles going through matter
Presentation transcript:

Local Performance of the Local Cathode Strip Chamber Trigger in a Muon Beam Test

Overview: Introduction to LHC Overview of CMS Overview of Trigger Architecture Overview of Cathode Strip Chamber (CSC) Level-1 Trigger System Plots for efficiency Conclusion

LHC 14 TeV center of mass energy 27 km circumference

CMS (Compact Muon Solenoid)

CMS What is a muon? Muons are point particles identical to electrons except over 200 times more massive (105.2 MeV) The illustration shows the smaller orbit for muons in a hydrogynic atom due to their mass

CMS Why Muons? Muons are penetrating. Electrons are too light to make it through absorbers Taus are too unstable to make it through absorbers Hadrons interact strongly with matter

Trigger Architecture Need Trigger System to filter out data

Cathode Strip Chambers (CSC) Provide 3-D tracks of charged particles called Local Charge Tracks (LCT’s)

Level-1 Trigger System

Level-1 Trigger System ALCT and CLCT find 2-D tracks TMB receives and correlates these tracks to make a 3-D Correlated LCT MPC receives up to 18 LCT’s from the different TMB’s and selects the best 3 SR/SP receives the 3 LCT’s from the TMB

2004 Test Beam 100GeV muons for asynchronous run 100GeV pions for synchronous run (along with muons)

ALCT Trigger Modes Trigger Mode 0: Accelerator Pattern or Collision Pattern Trigger Mode 1: Acc. Pattern Only Trigger Mode 2: Collision Pattern Only Trigger Mode 3: Acc. Or Coll. But Acc. Pattern vetoes Coll. Coll. Pattern Acc. Pattern

Ghosts and Di-Muons Ghosts Di-muons Is the converse of a Ghost If two LCT’s are found and they don’t fit the definition of a Ghost, then it must be a TRUE di-muon Occurs when 1 muon returns two LCT’s Considered the same LCT if it occurs on the same strip AND differs by less than two wire groups

Ghost and Di-Muon Rates Di-muons Rates Ghost Rates

Angle vs. ALCT Trigger Mode

Different Collision Patterns

Coll. Pattern vs. ALCT Trigger Mode

Number of Layers Required? There Are six possible layers We can require any number of those six; the default is 4 out of six This means that if any 4 of those layers matches then it is an LCT

Minimum Number of Layers Required vs Minimum Number of Layers Required vs. ALCT Trigger Mode (for “Miss4” Pattern)

Ghost Rates for Miss4 Coll. Pattern

Conclusions Miss4 has high efficiency and provides very good discrimination against collision vs. accelerator patterns Other parameters varied: ALCT delay, with and without an iron block, old and new ALCT firmware