Monitoring of minimal residual disease among multiple myeloma patients after autologous stem cell transplantation Fidan Akhundova, Larisa Mendeleeva, Irina.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MGUS (interpreting the test you didnt order) Family Medicine Review Course 2011 Christian Cable, MD, FACP.
Advertisements

Minimal Residual Disease in Hematologic Neoplasms Lloyd M. Stoolman, M.D. Professor of Pathology and Director, Clinical and Research Flow Cytometry Laboratories.
Quality Control in Immunophenotyping Dr. N. Varma Prof. & Head – Hematology Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh.
Staff Oncologist, Mayo Clinic Arizona
DFS - 85,0±6,8% (n=108; ev=6) STANDARD-RISK GROUP (SR) if available FC MRD < 0,1% or M1/ M2 marrow on day 15 HIGH-RISK GROUP (HR) IR and, if available.
Long-Term Biological Variation of Serum Protein Electrophoresis M-Spike, Urine M-Spike, and Monoclonal Serum Free Light Chain Quantification: Implications.
Korde N et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 2105.
李啟誠, 朱崧肇, 蔡喜修, 許淑敏, 謝馨慧 Michael R. Loken
Corre J et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 180.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Pei Lin, MD Department of Hematopathology UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease Principles and Applications.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Multiple Myeloma Precursor Disease JAMA. 2010;304(21):
Multiple Myeloma March 13, 2012 Suzanne R. Fanning, DO Greenville Health System.
Value of MRD to Predict PFS in MM: Results From IFM/DFCI 2009
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells against CD19 for Multiple Myeloma Alfred L. Garfall, M.D., Marcela V. Maus, M.D., Ph.D., Wei ‑ Ting Hwang, Ph.D., Simon.
A European Collaborative Study of 230 Patients to Assess the Role of Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Upfront Treatment of Patients with.
Minimal Residual Disease(MRD) detections by Flow Cytometry in Acute Leukemia 혈액학파트 안 미 숙.
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage* of ASH 2015, December 5-8, 2015, Orlando, Florida First-in-Human Trial: BCMA- Targeted CAR.
Patient history 70 year-old male with macrocytic anemia for 10 years, became transfusion dependent. Splenectomy for refractory anemia: 670gm B12, folate,
Spanoudakis E, Papoutselis M et al.
MRD testing: which platforms, which patients?
BCT Bortezomib Consolidation Trial
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Multiple Myeloma
19-28z CAR T-Cell Efficacy and Toxicity in Adults With R/R B-Cell ALL
Korde N et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 732.
Monitoring of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia
Materials and methods:
IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) for Multiple Myeloma (MM) in the Era of New Drugs Phase III study of lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone.
Phase III EMN02/HO95 MM Trial: Upfront ASCT Prolongs PFS vs Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone in Newly Diagnosed MM CCO Independent Conference Coverage*
JONCKHEERE, Stijn 1; STEUR, Elise 1; BILLIET, Johan 1
Phase II Study: Pembrolizumab Plus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone Active in R/R Multiple Myeloma New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage.
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
KEYNOTE-023: Pembrolizumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Shows Promising Activity and Safety in R/R MM CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016.
ASCT for AL Seok Jin Kim
Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease by Real-Time Quantitative PCR of Wilms’ Tumor 1 Expression in Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia after Allogeneic.
Image 1 Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in consecutive bone marrow (BM) samples from a patient with relapse (A) and a patient still in remission.
Figure 2 Percentage of CD19+/CD34+ cells with decreased CD81 median fluorescence intensity (MFI;
Patient Characteristic
Please note this program will include a discussion of off-label treatment and investigational agents not approved by the FDA for use in the United States.
MRD in Myeloma: the Future is Here
Attal M et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8018.
A B C Supplementary Figure 1 Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6
Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis and Treatment
A young patient with multiple myeloma
Clinical Challenges in the Transplant-Eligible Patient With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.
by Qin Huang Blood Volume 122(1):6-6 July 4, 2013
Clinical efficacy and management of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD38 and SLAMF7 in multiple myeloma by Niels W. C. J. van de Donk, Philippe Moreau,
Content of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Autologous Stem Cell Grafts Predict Survival after Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma  Egil S. Blix, Anders.
“Update” on “solitary” plasmacytoma
Residual Cancer Lymphocytes in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia After Therapy Show Increased Expression of Surface Antigen CD52 Detected Using.
Noninvasive Molecular Monitoring in Multiple Myeloma Patients Using Cell-Free Tumor DNA  Giulia Biancon, Silvia Gimondi, Antonio Vendramin, Cristiana.
Content of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Autologous Stem Cell Grafts Predict Survival after Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma  Egil S. Blix, Anders.
Erythroid leukemia evolving from multiple myeloma
The Level of Minimal Residual Disease in the Bone Marrow of Patients with Multiple Myeloma before High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Blood Stem Cell Transplantation.
What is the best frontline regimen for CLL patients
Selective Purging of Human Multiple Myeloma Cells from Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Grafts using Oncolytic Myxoma Virus  Eric Bartee, Winnie M.
Multiple Myeloma in Serologic Complete Remission after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Impact of Bone Marrow Plasma Cell Assessment by Conventional.
Dendritic Cell Therapies for Hematologic Malignancies
What’s New in Data Management & Reporting- FAQs & Answers
B7.2−/− Mature Dendritic Cells Generate T-Helper 2 and Regulatory T Donor Cells in Fetal Mice after In Utero Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation  Swati.
Ravindra Majeti, Christopher Y. Park, Irving L. Weissman 
Kinetics of engraftment of CD34− and CD34+ cells from mobilized blood differs from that of CD34− and CD34+ cells from bone marrow  Catherine M Verfaillie,
Second Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation as Salvage Therapy for Multiple Myeloma: Impact on Progression-Free and Overall Survival  Victor H. Jimenez-Zepeda,
Feasibility of minimal residual disease studies by multiparametric flow cytometry for acute myeloid leukemia in a developing country by Lorena Lobo de.
Residual Cancer Lymphocytes in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia After Therapy Show Increased Expression of Surface Antigen CD52 Detected Using.
Abnormalities of the Bone Marrow Immune Microenvironment in Patients with Prolonged Isolated Thrombocytopenia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell.
Clinical Challenges in the Transplant-Eligible Patient With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for POEMS Syndrome
Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma
CD123 CAR T cells for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring of minimal residual disease among multiple myeloma patients after autologous stem cell transplantation Fidan Akhundova, Larisa Mendeleeva, Irina Galtseva, Olga Pokrovskaya, Evdokiya Urnova, Elena Parovichnikova, Valeriy Savchenko Research Center for Hematology (Moscow, RU) Introduction Results Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) immunophenotyping (IF) can be a sensitive method for analyzing the plasma cells (PCs) compartment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), allows discrimination between myelomatous and normal PCs. 1 patient achieved complete response (CR) before SCM, that was confirmed by immunofixation (IMF) and by morphology (0,8 % BMPCs) and was MRD (-) by MFC. 4 patients were in very good partial response (VGPR) (trace secretion in serum and/or urine M-protein and 0-1,2 % BMPCs), among 3 of them was MRD (+) by IF, in 1 case MRD was undetectable. Partial response (PR) was achieved in 1 patient (serum M-protein-13 g/l; 3,5 % BMPCs) and MRD (+) by IF (table). IF of BMC among 4 patients after ASCT confirmed achievement of stringent complete response (sCR): absence of abberant antigen expression CD 19, CD 117, CD 56 on cells with coexpression 138/38, absence of M-protein in serum and urine, 0-0,5 % PCs in BM. There were 1 patient in CR before SCM and 3 patients with VGPR. Another patient with VGPR before SCM still had the same data after ASCT: trace secretion in serum; 1,2 % BMPCs and MRD (+).Only 1 patient in PR after ASCT hasn't get responder rate: without having any changes in serum M-protein, he was otherwise MRD negative due to a few-celled BM. Purpose The aim of this study was evaluation of residual tumor cells in bone marrow by MFC. Materials and methods In this study 6 patients with MM were screened, age 33-66 (M-55). IF of bone marrow cells (BMC) was performed before stem cell mobilization (SCM) and after 2-6 months after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). SCM included cyclophosphamide 4g/m2 plus G-CSF 5 µg/kg/day. Prior ASCT conditioning included melphalan200mg/m2. Quantification of neoplastic cells was perfomed by using Beckman Coulter FC-500 flow cytometer. IF studies were perfomed on erythrocyte-lysed BM aspirate samples: CD 138 FITC/CD 38 PE/CD 19 PerCP; CD 138 FITC/CD 38 PE/CD 117 PerCP (c-cit) Cy 5.5; CD 138 FITC/CD 38 PerCP Cy 5.5/ CD 56 PE (monoclonal antibodies BD). Minimal residual disease (MRD) was estimated according to abberant antigen expression CD 19, CD 117, CD 56 from gate with coexpression CD 138/38. The analysis was based on at least 50,000 events. Threshold level of cells with abnormal antigen expression of CD 138/CD 38 population was 10 %. The IF results were compared with immunofixation and morphology studies. Conclusions Immunophenotyping of bone marrow cells among MM patients by multiparameter flow cytometry allows to identify stringent CR after ASCT. Before ASCT gate G gate B gate B Efficiency of ASCT Table 1. № patient S.F.M. BM plasma cells % Response SPEP and UPEP + IF MFC MRD 1. F.A.Z., 55 y.o. Before ASCT After ASCT 3,5 % 0,8 % PR SPEP 13 g/l SPEP 6,4 g/l + 2. K.L.V., 59 y.o. absent VGPR CR Traces UPEP - 3. S.O.I., 54 y.o. 0,5 % 4. G.G.A., 59 y.o. 1,2 % 0,4 % Traces SPEP and UPEP Traces SPEP 5. D.Z.I., 55 y.o. 6. B.V.V., 43 y.o. 1 2 3 4 5 gate B gate B gate B gate B 6 7 After ASCT 8 9 gate N gate G gate N 10 11 12 13 14 gate N gate N gate N gat e N 15 16 18 17 Figure 1. Office address: National Research Center For Hematology, Noviy Zykovskiy pr., 4A, Moscow, 125167,Russia. E-mail: mlp@blood.ru Flow cytometry analysis of MRD from patient S.O.I. with MM before and after ASCT.