BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics Guido.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Local agri-food networks and environmental effects in Brittany Brussels workshop 8 June 2010 Fédération Régionale des Centres dInitiatives pour Valoriser.
Advertisements

SCIENCE,SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE E.U.
REGIONAL (TERRITORIAL) DEVELOPMENT
1 Reflections on the future Cohesion Policy DG Regional Policy European Commission.
Partnerships: influencing local economic and employment development Brussels, October 9th, 2007 Gabriela Miranda Policy Analyst OECD, LEED Programme.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development.
The political framework
1 The Europe 2020 Strategy and the Challenge of an Integrated Territorial Approach Philip McCann University of Groningen Special Adviser to the European.
Guide to statistics in European Commission Development Co-operation
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
URBACT II Building Healthy Communities 1 st Steering Group Meeting Brussels, 9-10 June 2008 An overview.
WAVE is weak in that it: has no defined planning horizon has serious internal inconsistencies fails to set Wales place within the global context relies.
SOCIAL POLIS Vienna Conference Vienna, May 11-12, 2009 Working Group Session “Urban labour markets and economic development” Building a “Social Polis”
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR RESEARCHERS. Output 1: Current economic interdependence between the two communities assessed and recommendations for reinforced.
A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR AGRICULTURE & RURAL LIFE IN THE AMERICAS: AGRO 2015 Plan AGRO – AMÉRICAS: a new hemispheric dynamic POSITIONING AGRICULTURE.
Zuzana Sarvasova National Forest Centre Zvolen
Cyprus Project Management Society
RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES IN BULGARIA Nedka Ivanova UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, November 2005 Rural Development.
Presentation of the workshop results to the plenary session A) Strengthening rural entrepreneurship by connecting the local production with other economic.
“Smart” territorial development Investment Days. FAO December 2014, Rome.
Ⓒ Olof S. Evaluating agricultural and rural policies: an EU Commission perspective for CAP2020 Tassos Haniotis, Director Economic Analysis, Perspectives.
1 Bulgaria Delegation. 2 Societary evaluation context Globalization Increasing complexity of governance Better governance Global competition Budget deficits.
ALTERNATIVE LIVELIHOODS IN AFGANISTAN What role can rural credit play?
 Sustainable development : one of the most important features of modern society, meeting our needs without threatening the needs of future generations.
Nic Lampkin Institute of Rural Sciences
Agricultural Policy Analysis Prof. Samuel Wangwe Executive Director REPOA 28 th July 2012.
Meeting of the CEI Working Group on Agriculture – Rome, 22 May 2006 FAO’s Technical Assistance Framework for Trust Funds in the Western Balkans 2006 –
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Rural Regions Dr Patricia O’Hara.
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Guido Van Huylenbroeck
Lisbon strategy, competitiveness and ERA Maja Bucar Centre of International Relations Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana
International Workshop Sustainable development: Products, consumption, promotion and place marketing T HE ATTRACTIVENESS OF SMART AND GREEN COMMUNITY IN.
Information by the Managing Authority on thematic evaluation of EU structural funds in Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European.
Ignacio Seoane Unit AGRI F6: Bioenergy, biomass, forestry and climate change EU Forestry Strategy Screening of Chapter 27, Brussels 5 April 2006.
Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic MEETING OF DIRECTORS GENERAL “Territorial Cohesion” The Implementation of Action 1.1a (Urban –
ESPON 2.1.5: Territorial Impacts of European Fisheries Policy Third Interim Report Prepared for the Salzburg Seminar March 2006 Ove Langeland, Norwegian.
Antonis Constantinou Director, Rural Development Programmes II DG Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission DEVELOPING A VISION ON THE FUTURE.
Deborah Roberts Arkleton Centre for Rural Development Research University of Aberdeen, Scotland Partners: Federal Institute for Less-Favoured and Mountainous.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
ALPINE SPACE Margarita Jančič MOP - DEZI Kranj,
IRS Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning Sabine Zillmer ESPON Pre-accession aid impact analysis - Third Interim Report - ESPON.
Bio-Science Engineering Department of Agricultural Economics Development strategies for peri-urban farming BVLE symposium Valerie Vandermeulen Promotor:
Methodology for preparing national cotton strategies in Africa Alexander Sarris Director, Commodities and Trade Division Food and Agriculture Organization.
R&D STRATEGIES IN SUPPORT OF INDUSTRIAL TRANSFORMATION Arm.Dpt. ROMANIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ARMAMENTS DEPARTMENT 01 November 2007.
ESPON 2.1.5: Territorial Impacts of European Fisheries Policy Final Revised Report Prepared for the Espoo Seminar November 2006 Ove Langeland, Norwegian.
Loretta Dormal Marino Deputy Director General DG for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission IFAJ Congress 2010 – Brussels, 22 April 2010.
Evaluation of equal opportunity measures in the Hungarian Operational Programmes Monitoring and evaluation of Roma projects and policies 30 November 2010,
Business Development RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTION TO POLICY DEVELOPMENT Lerato Mmutlana CSIR Strategic Business & Relationship Manager: Government.
Hukou Identity, Education and Migration: The Case of Guangdong
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
ONTOLOGIES FOR URBAN REGENERATION: OPPORTUNITIES AND WEAKNESS FOR THEIR DEVELOPMENT IN COHESION POLICIES FOR CITIES. Francesco Rotondo Department of Architecture.
How does cohesion policy support rural development Ex-post evaluation of ERDF support to rural development: Key findings (Objective 1 and 2)
WORKSHOP 3 AGRICULTURE IN THE OUTERMOST REGIONS. Introduction (1) Agriculture is a critical sector in the economy of the EU's outermost regions. Agricultural.
Regional Policy Future of Cohesion Policy and Investments in Health Christopher Todd, Head of Unit, Slovakia European Commission, Directorate General for.
Social economy as an opportunity to deal with local problems
Suriname: What Policy Reforms Work Best for Diversification
Regional Research-driven clusters as a tool for strenghthening regional economic development: the FP7 Regions of Knowledge Programme and its synergies.
University of agribusiness and rural development
Commission of the UE Genedec project (FP )
AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITIES BY YEAR 2030
Workshop 3 – Social and Governance November 2006
ENI CBC Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin
How the proposed new delivery model for the CAP will provide the ground for the further development of Smart Villages’ approaches? Beata Adamczyk European.
Evaluation network meeting Brussels, September 22, 2009
European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde, UK
Social services for the active inclusion of disadvantaged people
The CAP post-2013: statistical needs in the field of rural development
Connecting Cohesion Policy With Rural Development?
Director Generals meeting in Maastricht
Presentation transcript:

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics Guido Van Huylenbroeck Rural development in Flanders: a scientific assessment

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics Content What does rural development means? Role of agriculture Strategies Assessment of passed rural development actions (general + Flanders) Lessons for the future: a territorial approach Conclusions

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics Definition of rural development Hodge (1986) : An overall improvement in the welfare of rural residents and in the contribution which the rural resources make more generally to the welfare of the population as a whole This emphasizes the new position of rural areas in European society: rural areas fulfil multiple functions essential for urbanised populations (yellow: production, green: nature and blue : residence services) Rural development is then about how rural areas can better perform their functions and so can not be seen independent from urban processes. So rural development is then not only about economic growth, but also about economic and social cohesion and integrity It has also a prospective dimension: the dynamics of rural areas in terms of possible and desired evolutions.

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics Role of agriculture in rural development Agriculture produces both commodity and non-commodity outputs (multifunctionality). The direct economic contribution of agriculture is declining, but the value/significance of other outputs increasing. This value can be Direct: higher prices for houses in rural areas or increase in tourism activities or accommodation prices (Vanslembrouck et al)) indirect: higher well-being and thus better performance of such regions Role of agriculture in the functioning of the rural system (systemic approach) should be analysed.

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics Following strategic stages can be distinguished in time: : Modernisation of agricultural sector : Integrated agricultural policies (agro-environmental regulations, cross compliance) 00 - ? : Territorial and bottom-up approaches This means a gradual shift from sector approaches to territorial approaches However for evaluation of the past, we should refer to the old paradigm as that was the leading paradigm for passed policies. Strategies to rural development

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics Evaluation of rural development policies In general it is not easy to measure the contribution of rural development policies to local economic development Reasons: - Lack of good methodologies (regional I.O.- analysis not yet well developed) - Lack of (adequate) data - Small contributions in comparison with general economic conditions

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics General evaluation results In general scientific studies are not conclusive on the contribution of EU Rural development policies. Most RD programmes evaluations only show a slight impact on economic dynamics of territories (Schmitt et al., 2003). The problem of non-focussing and lack of a coherent local framework is often mentioned. Most RD policies focus on offsetting weaknesses/ disadvantages (income, environmental or territories) and not on a dynamic economic development.

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics Evaluation of Flemish PDPO - Economic impact: Impact on employment and stabilisation of rural population: nihil to very small Impact on income in agriculture: limited positive but a positive incentive to diversification of incomes (AEMs, other diversification) Investment support gives higher survival possibilities for starting farms No or very small chain and territorial competitiveness approaches (low multiplier effects) - Environmental impact: Main focus on reduction of negative impacts difficult to assess, no clear objectives regarding role of nature and environmental resources in territorial development

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics - General impact Low coordination among measures with as a result no or very low synergy effects on both development of agriculture as local development (no chain approach and no local territorial approach). Low multiplier and spill over effects between sectors because of lack of coherence in vision and actions. Spatial and horizontal/vertical dimension is mostly lacking. Still high dead weight payments (paying for status quo). This questions benchmarking. - Importance of PDPO (and other RD initiatives): Mind shift Small contribution to promoting new role of agriculture Evaluation of Flemish PDPO

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics Lessons for a new RD-approach In the midterm evaluation recommendations and also in the new EU approach a more territorial approach is promoted. Leading principles of this approach should be: Pursuing a policy of territorial economic development and not only one of offsetting (environmental, income or territorial) disadvantages Policies based on existing linkages between rural and urban (certainly in our densely populated context) Differentiated approach according to role of a territory in the coming decades at regional and global level This requires a territorial approach focussing on strengths and opportunities for rural activities in a specific region (see Ramos, 2005)

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics The territorial approach (1)

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics The territorial approach (2)

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics The territorial approach (3)

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics The territorial approach (4)

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics The territorial approach (5)

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics Can territorial approach work ? Internationally some good examples such as Parmagiano region (It), Produits terroires (Fr), Pata Negra in South Spain Own research in the peri-urban region around Brussels shows that local context can make difference in diversification and AEMs uptake Success requires good SWOT analysis at regional level Need of building social (confidence and capacity for collective action) and human (knowledge for leading processes and systems) capital Need for new institutions (reinforcing local policy level) and methods (e.g. discours approach)

BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics Conclusions Rural development questions the role of agriculture in society. Support to agriculture and rural areas/sectors will in future increasingly be motivated by their contribution to the whole (urban) population. RD-strategies should be able to strengthen this contribution and thus the economic development of regions (multiplier and spill over effects). Territorial approach can be basis of such (bottom-up) RD policy.