The Impact of Health IT Adoption: Are We Measuring the Right Outcomes?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chronic disease self management – a systematic review of proactive telephone applications Carly Muller Dean Schillinger Division of General Internal Medicine.
Advertisements

"How's our impact?: Developing a survey toolkit to assess how health library services impact on patient care" Alison Weightman July 2008.
David P. Taylor, MS 1,2, Nathan C. Hulse, PhD 1,2, Grant M. Wood 2, Peter J. Haug, MD 1,2, Marc S. Williams, MD 1,2 1 University of Utah, Salt Lake City,
Understanding the pathway: barriers to data collection and onward referral to specialist hepatitis C services for PWUD in London.
Deepthi Rajeev, MS, MSc Department of Biomedical Informatics University of Utah Evaluating the Impact of Electronic Disease Surveillance Systems On Local.
Contextual Inquiry of Enteric Disease Outbreak Investigation Processes to Improve Visualization Capacity for Public Health Surveillance Jonathan Anderson,
Methods Design The IDST (see Figure 1) is designed as an online questionnaire. Like questions based on patient presentation are grouped together with a.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4
Theresa Tsosie-Robledo MS RN-BC February 15, 2012
What is a Systematic review?. Systematic review  Combination of the best research projects in a specific area Selecting Identifying Synthesizing  Health.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Skills for the Future: Informatics Skills for Information Professionals Jillian M. Ketterer 1, Nora.
IDR Snapshot: Quantitative Assessment Methodology Evaluating Size and Comprehensiveness of an Integrated Data Repository Vojtech Huser, MD, PhD a James.
Evaluating the Quality and Safety of Patient-Facing Mobile Apps May 7, 2015 David W. Bates, MD, MSc Chief Innovation Officer and Chief, Division of General.
© VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY 2009 B I O M E D I C A L I N F O R M A T I C S A System to Improve Medication Safety in the Setting of Acute Kidney Injury Intervention.
Perceptions of Medicaid Beneficiaries Regarding the Usefulness of Accessing Personal Health Information and Services through a Patient Internet Portal.
Examining the Influence of the Toyota Production System Patient Safety Curriculum On the Clinical Judgment Ability of Nursing Students Jennifer Olszewski,
Security and Privacy Practices for Electronic Health Records Joseph W. Hales, PhD, FACMI Intermountain Healthcare Salt Lake City, UT.
Development, Selection, and Adoption of Clinical Research Eligibility Representation Standards and Screening Methods: Current and Future Directions fall.
NHII 03 Safety and Quality Group A David W. Bates, MD, MSc Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Partners Healthcare System David W. Bates, MD, MSc Brigham.
HIT can be incorporated into simulation scenarios and used for usability testing, training, and evaluation. A multidisciplinary team, dedicated simulation.
Acknowledgements Contact Information Objective An automated annotation tool was developed to assist human annotators in the efficient production of a high.
Investigators’ Responsibilities in Conducting Human Subjects Research Dept. of Regulatory Affairs April 18, 2012.
Outcomes Tier 2 – PI-LDP Course Tier 3 – ATP or mini-ATP Tier 1 – ACT Program Three Tiers of QI TrainingAbstract DEVELOPMENT OF FACULTY MENTORS IN QUALITY.
Identify a Health Problem Qualitative Quantitative Develop Program -theory -objectives -format -content Determine Evaluation -design -sampling -measures.
Acknowledgements Contact Information Anthony Wong, MTech 1, Senthil K. Nachimuthu, MD 1, Peter J. Haug, MD 1,2 Patterns and Rules  Vital signs medoids.
5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can not be combined together at one time -
Integrating a Federated Healthcare Data Query Platform With Electronic IRB Information Systems Shan He IPHIE 2010.
Metadata-Centered Development for a Community Registry System Andrew Waters, BS 1, Julie Frund, BS 1, Michelle Smerek, BS 1, Anita Walden, BA 1, Guilherme.
The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges Salt Lake City, UT June 3 rd – 7 th, 2007 New Jersey Mandatory EDRS Fax Hybrid - Interim.
EARLY CAREER PRIZE WINNER 2014: UPDATE ON PROGRESS Benjamin Brown Health eResearch Centre, Farr Institute for Health Informatics Research University of.
Design and implementation of a web-based patient portal linked to an electronic health record designed to improve medication safety: the Patient Gateway.
Discussion A considerable number of patients do not identify a PCP when admitted for inpatient care, and not all follow-up appointments take place with.
Value of Pharmacy Services January 31 st (A), 2011 J. Hirsch, Ph.D. SSPPS – 207 Introduction to Health Care Systems and Policy.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 11 Specific Types of Quantitative Research.
ISSUES IN NURSING INFORMATICS Barbara Ann Ybañez.
Linking Electronic Health Records Across Institutions to Understand Why Women Seek Care at Multiple Sites for Breast Cancer Caroline A. Thompson, PhD,
Figure 1. Data Flow Diagram of Davis County School Absenteeism Surveillance System. Shuying Shen, MStat 1,2,3 ; Nicole Stone, MPH 4 ; Brian Hatch, MPH.
Automating Maintenance of Care Team Relationships from Electronic Health Administrative Data to Decrease Variability of Care Coordination using the Health.
TEACHING BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS LIBRARY AS PARTNER Evelyn B. Morgen, Director UConn Health Center Library
Prepared by: Iris Abigail B. Navallo, RN MSN-MHPN CNIS 5807.
Improving PCOR Methods: Causal Inference
Preliminary Themes Related to the Stakeholder Engagement for Automated Data Acquisition for Heart Failure Megha Kalsy, MS1, Natalie Kelly, MBA3, Jennifer.
Proctor’s Implementation Outcomes
Florence F. Odekunle, MD, MS, PhD (c)
Development and Effectiveness of a Multi-layered
Dawn Drahnak, DNP, RN, CCNS, CCRN, Courtney Boast, BS
The DELTA2 Study: Summary of Methodology and Results
Improving PCOR Methods: Causal Inference
Idealized Natural A Systematic Yet Flexible Systems Analysis Framework
Automated Vocabulary Maintenance System for the Open Access, Collaborative Consumer Health Vocabulary Kristina M Doing-Harris, BCompSci, MA, MS, PhD; Qing.
the National Diabetes Prevention Program in the Community
Clinical Informatics 101 Training in Family Medicine
Design, Testing, and Use of a Pre-Visit Questionnaire to Improve CF Care Brooke Moore, M.D., MPH Pediatric Pulmonologist.
HI 5354 – Cognitive Engineering
Jacee Robison1, MS, BSN, RN; Jia-Wen Guo2, PhD, RN
Shan He, PhD Intermountain Healthcare
Design and Development of mHealth Applications S81 Scott McGrath, MS
Managing Clinical Information: EHR Terms and Architecture
FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS
Continuing Professional Development Knowledge Market
Medication Use Pattern Mining for Childhood Pneumonia Using Six Year Inpatient Electronic Medical Records in a Shanghai Hospital, China Chunlei Tang, PhD1,2,3,
Opportunities to Pursue a Clinical and Translational Career at Penn Emma A. Meagher, MD Vice Dean for Clinical Research & Chief Clinical Research Officer.
Performance Comparison Among Major EHR Systems
Research Methods:Overview
Translation into Practice
Marketing a Masters of Healthcare Informatics (MHI) Degree Program​​
Key Building Blocks Evaluating Community Coalitions & Partnerships
Larrabee’s Quality of Nursing Care Theory
AHRQ EPC Series on Improving Translation of Evidence into Practice for the Learning Health System: Introduction  Celia Fiordalisi, MS, Amanda Borsky,
Pilot Projects Informational Webinar June 1, 2015
Presentation transcript:

The Impact of Health IT Adoption: Are We Measuring the Right Outcomes? Tiago K. Colicchio1, MBA, MS, Guilherme Del Fiol1, MD, PhD, Watson A. Bowes III1,2 MD, MS, Julio C. Facelli1, PhD, Debra L. Scammon3, PhD, Scott P. Narus1,2, PhD 1Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; 2Medical Informatics, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT ; 3David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT Introduction Although Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems adoption has increased in the U.S., our understanding of how they impact care outcomes is still limited. A contributing factor to this gap is the use of a narrow set of study-specific measurements. We investigated if measures reported in prior studies provide a comprehensive coverage of processes likely impacted by health IT interventions. Methods We interviewed Intermountain Healthcare leaders to collect suggestions of relevant measures for assessing health IT interventions. We combined Intermountain’s suggestions with the most commonly reported measures from the literature [1]. The combined list was included in two online surveys sent to informatics experts who suggested additional relevant measures (Figure 1). Conclusion Intermountain leaders and national informaticists suggested several measures that have not been reported in the literature. Most suggestions assess productivity and safety care processes, which deserve more attention in future evaluations. We used measures from our inventory in a pilot evaluation of a large commercial EHR implementation and propose a replicable methodology for real-time monitoring of health IT adoption [3]. References Colicchio TK, Facelli JC, Del Fiol G, Scammon DL, Bowes WA, Narus SP. Health information technology adoption: Understanding research protocols and outcome measurements for IT interventions in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2016 Oct;63:33–44. Colicchio TK, Del Fiol G, Scammon DL, Bowes WA, Facelli JC, Narus SP. Development and classification of a robust inventory of near real-time outcome measurements for assessing information technology interventions in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2017 Sep;73;62–75. Colicchio TK, Del Fiol G, Stoddard JG, Narus SP. Evaluation of a systematic methodology to detect in near real-time performance changes during electronic health record system implementations: a longitudinal study. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 (Accepted). Results Intermountain leaders suggested 54 measures that were combined with 37 measures from the literature. Eleven additional measures were suggested by 112 informatics experts, producing a final inventory of 102 measures classified into 16 types of measurements (Figure 2) [2]. Acknowledgements This study was supported by Intermountain Healthcare. JCF has been partially funded by NIH Award Number 1ULTR001067. Contact Information tiago.colicchio@utah.edu