Notes: Household survey-based Gini and p90/p10 measures use the same definitions as employed by the UK’s official income distribution statistics (source:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

QSSPN: Dynamic Simulation of Molecular Interaction Networks Describing Gene Regulation, Signalling and Whole-Cell Metabolism in Human Cells.

Advertisements

Fig. 1. Spectrograms. The illustration shows example spectrograms and waveforms for stimuli used. Panel A shows examples for the prosody condition (‘You.

Table 1 Patient characteristics of attendees of the influenza vaccination, irrespective of AF status From: Yield of screening for atrial fibrillation in.

Fig. 8 The two cases for the terminal edge e<sub>0</sub>

FIG. 2.— Phylogenetic tree and divergence time estimates for mtDNA sequences of Przewalski's and domestic horses. The results of analysis carried out in.

Figure 1 Proportion of criteria chosen (as percentages, grouped into issues). From: Developing national obesity policy in middle-income countries: a case.

Figure 2. Number of cases required in a Mendelian randomization analysis with a binary outcome and a single instrumental variable for 80% power with a.

J Exp Bot. 2017;68(17): doi: /jxb/erx352

Figure 1. Fertility and gender equity: three hypothetical dynamics according to the level of the Gender Gap over time. Note: the three scenarios differ.

Ex.1 (a) (i) opening of Besard; (ii) opening of Fuhrmann, (b) opening of Banchieri From: Musical texts and information retrieval: the case of the early.

Fig. 5. Experiment with known solution from Section 8

Figure 4. Boxplot showing the extent of tangential xylem discolouration (top) and cambial dieback (bottom) in trees (n = 5 per treatment) that were wounded.

Fig 1 The CONSORT participant flow diagram for primary endpoints.

Figure 3: MetaLIMS sample input.

Figure 1 An overview of the study design.

Figure 1 Study flow chart.

Figure 2. The graphic integration of CNAs with altered expression genes in lung AD and SCC. The red lines represent the amplification regions for CNA and.

From: Learning by Working in Big Cities

Fig. 1 Nodes in a conceptual knowledge graph

Figure 1: Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema as indicated by the arrows. From: Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema after successful.

Figure 4. Dry biomass of leaves of P. tamarugo (white columns) and P

From: Shadows of Teichmüller Discs in the Curve Graph

From: Magnetism and rotation in relativistic field theory

Figure 1: Newspaper sales October 2000–December 2010 (daily newspapers) through Audit Bureau of Calculations. Figures derived from

Figure 1. The Vicsek set graphs $G_0$, $G_1$, $G_2$.

From: Expanding polyhedral universe in Regge calculus

Fig. 1 Stages of development of P

Figure 1: (A, frontal) and (B, lateral) Final result, 4 months post-operative, after right breast reconstruction using combined TRAM flap and LDMF. From:

From: Introducing the PRIDE Archive RESTful web services

Figure 1 Overall analysis approach.

Fig. 1. RUbioSeq pipelines for exome variant detection and BS-Seq analyses. Dark gray boxes correspond to the main steps of the pipelines. Light gray boxes.

Fig. 3 Basic floral anatomy of Hemerocallis

Figure 3: Full-body skeletal scintigraphy.

Fig. 3. Transcriptomic analysis of high- and low-flavonol producers (HFPs and LFPs) by Affymetrix GrapeGen Chip. Assignment of the probe sets exclusively.

Figure 1. The flow chart illustrates the construction process of anti-CRISPRdb, and the information that users can obtain from anti-CRISPRdb. From: Anti-CRISPRdb:

Source: ISTAT. Consumer Price Statistics (Servizio delle statistiche ai prezzi al consumo). Notes: Prices are inflation adjusted and normalized to the.

Source:Zimnisky (2014). From: An Autopsy of Cooperation: Diamond Dealers and the Limits of Trust-Based Exchange Journal of Legal Analysis. Published online.

Figure 1. Percentage of infants with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay antibody concentrations ≥0.1 IU/mL against diphtheria (day 127) and ≥0.35 μg/mL.

Abstract From: Lung transplantation after ex vivo lung perfusion in two Scandinavian centres Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. Published online October 29, 2018.

Characteristics LAM Results Total (%) Statistic P-Value Positive (%)

Figure 1. Evaluation the sensitivity and specificity value of urine LAM and sputum AFB Procedure using GeneXpert as the Reference (Gold Standard) From:

Serum Cholesterol levels mg/dl Frequency P

All Psychosis Patients

Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PDc) estimated for each of 23 cohorts by MasterBayes ... Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PDc)

Figure 2. Effect of gradually decreasing photoperiod on PHA response in Siberian hamsters. Asterisk (*) indicates statistical significance at P﹤0.05, determined.

Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected numbers of exon boundaries aligning to boundaries of domain and disorder ... Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected.

Figure 1. Comparison of weighted estimates of diarrhoea prevalence in children under five by country between PMA Figure 1. Comparison of weighted.

Figure 4. The mean of spermatocyte of various treatment groups

Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot of cumulative incidence of cancer onset following dermatomyositis diagnosis stratified ... Anti-TIF1-Ab: anti-transcriptional.

Characteristics LAM Result Total (%) 95% CI Odds ratio

Point estimates with ... Point estimates with 95% CI. HR: hip replacement; KR: knee replacement. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.

FIGURE 1 Participant flow diagram. Exercise Counseling Clinic (ECC).

Figure 1. Mean concentration–time profiles of ascending doses of ivermectin in (a) PSAC and (b) SAC. Weight-dependent ... Figure 1. Mean concentration–time.

Figure 1 Nelson-Aalen estimates of the cumulative incidence rates for patients on versus off IST. ON = optic neuritis; ... Figure 1 Nelson-Aalen estimates.

FIGURE 1 Malta: a plate-style food guide

Figure 1. A, Crude incidence rates per 100 person-years of follow-up and 95% confidence intervals for each solid organ ... Figure 1. A, Crude incidence.

Overall Classification Accuracy = 87.86%

FIGURE 1 Study consort diagram

Land cover Class Area % Sand Water bodies

Land cover class in (Ha)

Figure 4. Classified landsat image 2016

Figure 1. Uncertainty reduction, value creation, and appropriation in two case studies. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Land cover class in 2016 (%) Land cover class 2006 (Ha) l

Figure 1 Patient disposition

Figure 3. A basic scheme of a part of the cross-section of the experimental setup implemented for the measurements of asymmetric reduction of weight of.

Figure 1. Excess cost of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) compared with methicillin-susceptible S. ... Figure 1. Excess cost of methicillin-resistant.

Figure 1. Prevalence of parasitic infection and anemia among the children. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.

Figure 1. GWAS Catalog associations for coronary artery disease plotted across all chromosomes. Associations added ... Figure 1. GWAS Catalog associations.

Figure 1 Mechanisms of mitral regurgitation.

Fig. 1. Examples of plots of NanoPlot and NanoComp

Presentation transcript:

Notes: Household survey-based Gini and p90/p10 measures use the same definitions as employed by the UK’s official income distribution statistics (source: spreadsheet accompanying Belfield et al. [2015]). Tax return-based top 1% share measure derived by the authors from Alvaredo et al. [2015]). See Section 2 for further details. From: Top incomes and inequality in the UK: reconciling estimates from household survey and tax return data Oxf Econ Pap. Published online September 01, 2017. doi:10.1093/oep/gpx041 Oxf Econ Pap | © Oxford University Press 2017This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Notes: For further details, see Section 2. From: Top incomes and inequality in the UK: reconciling estimates from household survey and tax return data Oxf Econ Pap. Published online September 01, 2017. doi:10.1093/oep/gpx041 Oxf Econ Pap | © Oxford University Press 2017This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Source: Authors’ calculations using FRS, HBAI, SPI, and WID data (see main text). There are no SPI data for 2008/09. From: Top incomes and inequality in the UK: reconciling estimates from household survey and tax return data Oxf Econ Pap. Published online September 01, 2017. doi:10.1093/oep/gpx041 Oxf Econ Pap | © Oxford University Press 2017This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Source: Authors’ calculations using FRS, HBAI, SPI, and WID data. From: Top incomes and inequality in the UK: reconciling estimates from household survey and tax return data Oxf Econ Pap. Published online September 01, 2017. doi:10.1093/oep/gpx041 Oxf Econ Pap | © Oxford University Press 2017This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Source: Authors’ calculations based on FRS, HBAI, SPI, and WID data. From: Top incomes and inequality in the UK: reconciling estimates from household survey and tax return data Oxf Econ Pap. Published online September 01, 2017. doi:10.1093/oep/gpx041 Oxf Econ Pap | © Oxford University Press 2017This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Notes and sources: As for Fig. 5. From: Top incomes and inequality in the UK: reconciling estimates from household survey and tax return data Oxf Econ Pap. Published online September 01, 2017. doi:10.1093/oep/gpx041 Oxf Econ Pap | © Oxford University Press 2017This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Sources: As for Fig. 5. From: Top incomes and inequality in the UK: reconciling estimates from household survey and tax return data Oxf Econ Pap. Published online September 01, 2017. doi:10.1093/oep/gpx041 Oxf Econ Pap | © Oxford University Press 2017This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Notes and sources: As for Fig. 7. From: Top incomes and inequality in the UK: reconciling estimates from household survey and tax return data Oxf Econ Pap. Published online September 01, 2017. doi:10.1093/oep/gpx041 Oxf Econ Pap | © Oxford University Press 2017This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Sources: As for Fig. 5. From: Top incomes and inequality in the UK: reconciling estimates from household survey and tax return data Oxf Econ Pap. Published online September 01, 2017. doi:10.1093/oep/gpx041 Oxf Econ Pap | © Oxford University Press 2017This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Notes and sources: As for Fig. 7. From: Top incomes and inequality in the UK: reconciling estimates from household survey and tax return data Oxf Econ Pap. Published online September 01, 2017. doi:10.1093/oep/gpx041 Oxf Econ Pap | © Oxford University Press 2017This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Notes and sources: As for Fig. 7. From: Top incomes and inequality in the UK: reconciling estimates from household survey and tax return data Oxf Econ Pap. Published online September 01, 2017. doi:10.1093/oep/gpx041 Oxf Econ Pap | © Oxford University Press 2017This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Notes and sources: As for Fig. 7. From: Top incomes and inequality in the UK: reconciling estimates from household survey and tax return data Oxf Econ Pap. Published online September 01, 2017. doi:10.1093/oep/gpx041 Oxf Econ Pap | © Oxford University Press 2017This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.