Annex 3: Patient Tracking (or Tracing) Procedures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary data from the LTFU Study Thursday 23rd Feb 2012 At FACES Conference Hall.
Advertisements

Risk factors and true outcomes of children lost to follow-up from antiretroviral therapy in Lilongwe, Malawi C. Ardura Gracia, H. Tweya, C Feldacker, S.
How Do I Evaluate Workflow?
Testing People Scientifically.  Clinical trials are research studies in which people help doctors and researchers find ways to improve health care. Each.
Orientation on HIV care and ART Recording and Reporting System.
Module 5: Data Collection. This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire.
Failure to Initiate ART, Loss to Follow-up and Mortality among HIV-infected Patients during the pre-ART period in Uganda Elvin H. Geng 1, Winnie Muyindike.
National Quality Center (NQC)1 RW Grantees in Washington, DC Presentation “Recapture Blitz”
Matthew Lamb ICAP-M&E Barriers to Retention and Factors Associated with LTF in HIV Programs The literature and ICAP.
Sub module 3 Pre-ART and ART registers. Purpose of registers Key individual information for: Facilitating patient management by the identification of.
No Success without Retension John F. Kennedy Medical Center 11-Jun-16 JFK-ESTHER1.
From Aggregate Indicators to Impacting Patients - Data Use to Inform Treatment and Improve Care Ian Wanyeki Track 1.0 Implementers Meeting Dar Es Salaam.
WHO The World Health Survey HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE
A FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRESCRIPTION PROGRAM
2017.
The Role and Responsibilities of the Clinical Research Coordinator
Søren Marker Jensen, MD, coordinating investigator
Differentiated Monitoring & Evaluation
Patient Participation meeting Monday 11 February 2013
OOH Transport Considerations
Pick Ups & Job Management
OLD PROCESS FLOW FOR NEW PATIENT REGISTRATION
2016.
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
UMRG 3rd Learning Session: July 19th, 2012
2017.
Road Map In this presentation, you will learn:
Protocol References Section Title 6.2 Entry Visit 5.1
Howard Brown Health, Chicago
Protocol References Section Title 6.2 Entry Visit 5.1
The Assessment Process Part II
Principles of Effective Documentation
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
A COLLABORATIVE APPROACH TO ESTABLISH PREDICTORS
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Module 6: Using the Child and Adolescent Flipcharts
Section III: The Interdisciplinary Team and Family Members
Recognizing medical/physical impairments
OLD PROCESS FLOW FOR NEW PATIENT REGISTRATION
Community patient tracking by Lay Community Health Workers (CHWs) is an effective strategy towards the 2nd & 3rd 90 Morapedi Boitumelo M.
Guidance on Pediatric Transplant Recipient Transition & Transfer
How we use Your Health Records
When Residents Threaten to Harm Themselves - An Ombudsman’s Guide
2016.
Adolescent HIV Care and Treatment
Participant Retention
Module 4 OVC_HIVSTAT Orphans and Vulnerable Children
Annex 7: Patient Tracking Procedures
Wootton Medical Centre High Street, Wootton Northampton NN4 6LW
MRA Member Summary, Open Conditions & Clinical Inference
BE MORE INVOLVED IN YOUR HEALTH CARE
OVC_HIVSTAT HIV Risk Assessment Prototype.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Coordinating Medical Care VNA Community Healthcare
How Do I Evaluate Workflow?
2015.
Performance and Quality Improvement
Performance Indicators
TRACE INITIATIVE: Practical Scenarios
Human Subjects Research
CAAAN:The Cornell Alumni Admissions Ambassador Network
Discrepancy Management
TRACE INITIATIVE: HIV Testing Services (HTS)
Module 6: Case Report Form (Chart Abstraction)
Illustrative Cluster Detection and Response Strategy
CAAAN:The Cornell Alumni Admissions Ambassador Network
OLD PROCESS FLOW FOR NEW PATIENT REGISTRATION
Adherence Learning Lab: Community Conference Pre-Work
Presentation transcript:

Annex 3: Patient Tracking (or Tracing) Procedures Tracking Patients Lost to Follow-up: Step1 – Review of Paper Charts/Files

Three Objectives of Evaluating Paper Charts Confirm patient should be tracked Find patient information with which to identify and contact patient Document process as well as information needed for tracking

No tracking: Patient has died (not LTFU) If there is documentation that the patient has died? Sometimes deaths are “informally” recorded on the charts If the patient has died, then we no longer consider the patient lost to follow-up If the patient has died, try and find information about the date of death Document death and date of death

No Tracing: Patient has transferred If there is a documented transfer that falls on or after the date of the last visit, the patient is considered transferred out. Of note, patients may transfer out and then come back, at which point they might be lost again So the presence of a transfer out, if followed by a routine clinical encounter, does not really indicate a transfer out. Please record the date of transfer

No tracing: Patient is still in care Patient is in care: patient returned between sampling and In some cases missing visit information leads to a patient appearing “lost” when the patient was not lost. In these cases, document last recorded visit date

No Tracing: Patient in not in CCP On occasion you may be given a patient who is not in the CCP Last visit date preceded CCP start date Not an adult In these instances, patient is also considered not lost to follow up and should no longer be traced Documentation of not member of the CCP in the study forms.

Tracing needed but not possible No contact information No phone numbers No geographical locating information No social contacts No way to look for the patient

Tracing needed: record information Patient characteristics Sex, age, occupation, height, treatment supporter identity, education level, marital status Care characteristics Date of enrollment, length of time in care, ART status These are recorded as notes and not study “data” per se

Abstraction of locator information Information needed to locate patient Phone Contact number, treatment supporters numbers Geographic information Location of residence, location of work, other information

Paper Tracing: Wrap up Frequently information in the chart which is not in the electronic records Tracing starts with records review Iterative process sometimes

Tracking Patients Lost to Follow-up: Step 2 – Phone Only Tracking

What is “Phone-only” tracking? After charts are reviewed tracking begins with phone-only tracking In most cases this will be followed up in-person tracking In person tracing may involve phone calls We define phone-only tracking to end when any attempt to contact the patient in person in the field begins When the tracker leaves the facility

Phone Only Tracking - Workflow Process Map Five decision points Will review each in detail Field tracking always occurs unless the patient is found to be dead Exit from this workflow must go through LTFU-Q

Contact patient on the phone? Attempt to contact patient on the phone If patient is contacted, administer LTFU-Q Current care status (if possible) reasons for switch or stop of care is possible (if possible) Patient is still tracked in the field, however, as some questions cannot be administered without consent Current care and reasons are repeated in a field conversation, even if already solicited on the phone Quality of person-to-person communication is higher

Contact any informant on the phone? If no contact with patient, the question at the end of a working day is whether any person (s) were contacted with new information about the patient outcome If yes, then proceed to next question… If no (cannot find anyone with updated information about patient), document unsuccessful phone tracing and start field tracing

Is patient reported dead by an informant? If someone is contacted with knowledge of the patient outcome, does this informant report the patient to have died? If yes, then document outcome and tracing for this patient is over. If no, then proceed to next question

If patient is not known to have died, is all contact potential exhausted> If patient is not reported to be dead, the question becomes whether all information about the patient’s potential contact exhausted? Exhausted is after repeated searching of charts and other sources as well as information found in the field If the answer is yes, then document and commence field tracing If no, then proceed to next question

If tracing is ongoing, is the period over? If the tracing period if over, even if the patient is not known to be dead and there is still contact information available, then tracing will end. The LTFU questionnaire should be filled.

Phone Tracing Objectives Obtain as much information as we can through the phone Patient outcomes Vital status In care status Reasons for out of care or transfer Patient contact information New phone numbers New geographic information Document what we have learned through tracing Align forms with process

Tracking Lost Patient using Phone and In-person/Field Contact

Field Tracking Flow Chart

Tracing Basics Spare no efforts in tracing the patients Important to ascertain outcomes in a high fraction of patients traced When is a case closed? When patient’s vital status has been proved to be dead When patient has been found and refuses to give audience/ consent to study staff When study closes Outcome ascertainment Vital status For patients who are alive, we want to know if they are in care elsewhere or not For patients who are in care elsewhere We want to know why For patients who are not in care

Tracking for Sampling vs. Tracking for routine clinical purposes Sampling Study Routine Large numbers Optimal intensity per patient Shortly after last scheduled visit Effort distributed over all lost Small numbers Long after last visit More intensive efforts among the few sampled

Docket for a Tracker A list of open cases No hard rules but should be modest 3 to 10 people you are actively looking for Team should follow the order on the list

In person contact objectives Patient or supporters phone numbers Determine vital status Determine updated care status if possible Opportunity to meet in person to discuss reasons, administer surveys, and in some cases obtain biological specimens

In Person Tracking: Transportation Cheapest and most practical mode of transport for ease of replication in future: On foot Bicycle/motor bike Public transport (Bus or Taxi) or, In special cases, project vehicle

Initial Contact Verify it’s the actual client & then introduce yourself Explain purpose of your visit Offer brief counseling to offer adherence support Get consent Discuss about missed appointment (ascertain reasons for missing appointment / current care status) Administer survey Thank the client before leaving

Multiple Tracking Targets Each tracker will be actively tracking at least 3 to 10 clients Individual open cases must be properly documented for ease of tracking progress Trackers must plan their tracking strategically to promote cost effectiveness

Ascertaining updated care status if found in person We want to know if they are still in care If they are in care Reasons for switch If the patient is not in care Reasons for stopping care

Find that patient has died Death date Approximate is better than missing Try to ascertain date of death – you have more information at your disposal at that point than at any point down the line Care at the time of death Had the patient seen a doctor or nurse before death? Reasons for death Mutually exclusive and exhaustive classification: If seen by a health care provider, reported cause of death from professional

Find the patient alive – in person – not in care Patient found through the tracking process but answers no to the question: “Have you seen any doctor, nurse or other professional health worker (e.g., pharmacist) for the monitoring or treatment of HIV since your last visit we have on file which was [X date] at the [original clinic]?” Move away Date of moving somewhere else Reasons for stopping care Long list of reasons, mark all that apply We do not read each reason The approach to obtaining this information is conversational Can probe on dimensions Structural; psychosocial; clinic-based

Find patient in person, in care elsewhere Patient in care Answers yes to the question “Have you seen any doctor, nurse or other professional health worker (e.g., pharmacist) for the monitoring or treatment of HIV since your last visit we have on file which was [X date] at the [original clinic]?” Where? Location or program receiving care When? Date of moving somewhere else Why? Reasons for switching sites Long list of reasons, mark all that apply Medication gap Other surveys

Find informant – reports patient is alive Patient alive but the only information we seek to record about patients is whether they have moved You may record additional process information such as new phone numbers etc. Moved?