University IT Strategy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Advertisements

Public engagement and lifelong learning: old wine in a new bottle, or a blended malt? Paul Manners Director, National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement.
Today’s Speakers  Diane Dagefoerde, CIO, Arts and Sciences, The Ohio State University  Butch Juelg, Associate Vice Chancellor, Technology Services,
Joint Unit Liaison Meeting 1 INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY SERVICES Transforming U-M: Joint UL Meeting July 21, 2009.
Human Resources Update Academic Senate Coordinating Committee February 2, 2015.
Current trends in data centre outsourcing
May 7, 2012 | 9:00 – 9:30 am | Wasserstein Hall Ivy Plus Opening Remarks.
1. 2 IT innovations in specialized areas where competitors will have difficulty copying Excellence in design of processes and activities and how they.
AICPA/CIMA IT Overview Information Technology Overview.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: University of Bath Roadmap for EPSRC Catherine Pink Institutional.
More Competitive, Lower Cost How Standardization Fuels Growth
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
Division of Information Technology Chuck Shomper Vice Chancellor / Vice President September 5, 2003 We are IT Building the IT Community... Together.
© 2012 Citrix | Confidential – Do Not Distribute Prepare by reviewing the Selling & Positioning deck and leveraging the Solution Selling Reference Card.
Information Technology Services Strategic Directions Approach and Proposal “Charting Our Course”
Strategic Planning Update Board of Trustees Academic Affairs and Student Life Committee February 6, 2009 Joseph A. Alutto Executive Vice President and.
Microsoft and Symantec
1 Alma SMART Collaborative Networks Collaboration Made Simple.
Information Technology Assessment conducted by BerryDunn Consulting for the UA System March 9, 2015.
Information Technology Assessment Findings Presented to the colleges of the State Center Community College District.
Redmond Police Functional Plan Update Council Study Session January 14, 2014.
Head in the Clouds: Real-world experiences and recommendations for moving technology infrastructure to the cloud #14NTCclouds.
Superior Infrastructure – Phase One Lenora Chapman & Michelle Stevenson Presenting.
Workshifting Transform your business – empower your people.
Information Technology Proprietary and Confidential © Copyright 2007 – Peralta Community College District.
Moving Towards Information Literacy Through Data Governance
University IT Strategy
Joint CIO Council and HR Deans & Directors Meeting
Beyond Financial Aid (BFA) – Lumina Foundation Funded Research
Welcome and Introduction January 11, 2017
IT Governance and Management Structure
“Reflections on collaborating with the GRCTC 2 Years on”
Creating or Enhancing Skills-Based Training Programs:
Collaborative Innovation Communities: Bringing the Best Together
Lunchtime Staff Meeting: Strategy development update – final stages
Strategy for Complex Networking, IT, & Telecommunication Decisions
Leading the way to a “Green-er” Campus
All IT Staff Meeting September 18, 2013
Higher Education’s 2016 Top 10 IT Issues: Divest, Reinvest,
Demonstrating the Value of the Legal Team:
Creating or Enhancing Skills-Based Training Programs:
A10 Networks vThunder Leverages the Powerful Microsoft Azure Cloud Platform to Offer Advanced Layer 4-7 Networking, Security on a Global Scale MICROSOFT.
Garrett College moving forward
How to prepare for the End of License of Windows Server 2012/R2
University IT Strategy
Practical Healthcare Innovation  (and the rapid development and implementation of an Innovation Center) Julie Reisetter, VP, Innovation.
BOARD of GOVERNORS State University System of Florida
How does the Branding fit into ECC Excels???
Head in the Clouds: Real-world experiences and recommendations for moving technology infrastructure to the cloud.
Enterprise Risk Management
Information Technology Policy Institutional Data Policy
Strategic uses of Web Content Management Systems
Brian Voss, Chief Information Officer April 5, 2006
Application Portfolio Optimization
Capex to Opex: Are You Ready?
Assistant Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
Information Technology Services Strategic Directions
Battle Card: Why Cloud Partner go do’s
Sandy Macdonald Director of IT Services
Information Technology Services Strategic Directions
From The Outside Looking In To The Inside Looking Out
Strategic Planning in Dynamic Times
Microsoft Motion business architecture methodology
MAZARS’ CONSULTING PRACTICE Helping your Business Venture Further
Growing SUNY’s Research and Innovation Enterprise
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Brian Robinson, Deputy HR Director
The EDUCAUSE 2019 Top 10 IT Issues
2019 Alumni Leadership Conference
Process Improvement Advisory Team (PIAT)
Presentation transcript:

University IT Strategy 9/16/16

IT Strategy http://u.osu.edu/ITStrategy The most important message for today… “Feedback is a gift, please be generous” “Today is more conversation than presentation”

WHO CONTRIBUTED DIRECTLY? IT Strategy http://u.osu.edu/ITStrategy WHO CONTRIBUTED DIRECTLY? Timothy Smith, Chief Information Officer – ASC John Link, Chief Information Officer, Student Life Catherine Bindewald, Chief Information Officer, Vet Information Systems Marsha Henfer, Chief Information Officer, College of Engineering Jim Null, Chief Information Officer, Athletics & Business Advancement Ronald Salyers, Sr Director of IT, Office of Academic Affairs Brian Newcomb, Director of Technology, Process & Data Solutions, Office of Human Resources David Kieffer, Sr Director Enterprise Applications, OAA Mike Hofherr, VP and CIO, OAA Diane Dagefoerde, Deputy CIO, OAA Bob Corbin, Sr Director Infrastructure, OAA Helen Patton, Chief Information Security Officer, OAA Steve Fischer, Sr Director, Bl and Analytics, OAA Robert Griffiths, AVP Distance Education, OAA Matt DeVore, Chief Information Officer, CFAES Michael Chakerian, Sr Systems Manager, CFAES Tracey Richardson, Sr Director, Service Management Office, Office of Academic Affairs Joe Roush, Chief Information Officer, College of Education and Human Ecology Additional feedback was provided by the members of the IT Partnership Council.

IT Strategy http://u.osu.edu/ITStrategy WHERE WE ARE TODAY

HOW WE GOT HERE… VERSION 1 VERSION 2 VERSION 3 VERSION 4 IT Strategy http://u.osu.edu/ITStrategy HOW WE GOT HERE… VERSION 1 VERSION 2 VERSION 3 VERSION 4

IT Strategy http://u.osu.edu/ITStrategy IS THIS A STRATEGIC PLAN? The IT Strategy is not a strategic plan. It is a common commitment to coordinate investments across these 7 areas during planning activities by each unit or by groups of partnering units.

IMPROVED TECHNOLOGY EXPERIENCE IT Strategy http://u.osu.edu/ITStrategy IMPROVED TECHNOLOGY EXPERIENCE FOUNDATION The quality of the faculty, staff and student experience should be a primary driver when making investments in technology.

IT Strategy http://u.osu.edu/ITStrategy ENVIRONMENT The larger environmental context that shapes how investments are made in the 7 areas requires that we: Ensure that IT investments create value for students, faculty and staff Collaborate as members of the IT community to adopt, improve and communicate the strategy Support President Drake’s vision to reduce operating costs and to generate new revenues

Empower Teaching Innovation IT Strategy http://u.osu.edu/ITStrategy INVESTMENT AREAS Mobile First Empower Teaching Innovation Advance Research Lean IT Effective Risk Mgmt Develop Talent Analytics Embracing mobile devices as the primary way people interact with the university. Ensuring a seamless mobile experience both on and away from campus. Analytics are an important consideration for the data available within individual systems and how they fit into the entire OSU data ecosystem. Helping units to leverage services and tools that advance adoption of technology-empowered courses and program delivery models. Technology solutions should enhance the reputation of Ohio State as a national leader in research to increase our ability to attract top faculty and students. Focusing on people, processes, and technology in order to reduce waste, variability, and inflexibility. Ensure compliance with regulations, information integrity, confidentiality and availability. Our ability to continually deliver innovative technology solutions depends on the knowledge and skillsets of our IT staff

IT Strategy http://u.osu.edu/ITStrategy WHAT’S NEXT? The IT Strategy is based on the input of the university community and leaders. You have an opportunity to design our path forward.  OUR SHARED CHALLENGE Phase out on-campus server rooms and data centers. Make wireless the primary connection method for faculty, staff, and students. Have at least one staff member in each unit attain Lean IT Foundation certification. OUR ASK Create a roadmap for how your unit will contribute to at least 4 of the 7 investment areas in the IT Strategy. Server Room Challenge Ohio Task Force on Affordability and Efficiency https://www.ohiohighered.org/sites/ohiohighered.org/files/uploads/affordability-efficiency/Summary_Action-Steps-to-Reduce-College-Costs.pdf Students Benefit! Access and affordability via efficiency savings. Recommendation 5E | Data centers: Institutions must develop a plan to move their primary or disaster recovery data centers to the State of Ohio Computer Center Why? Reduce risk (common disaster recovery sites, prevent data loss, increase security, be resilient against external attacks) Simplify infrastructure (virtualize, reduce footprint, evaluate workloads) Invest in the right things (no more capex for local server rooms) Prepare for future cloud services (pay only for what you use, increase flexibility) OCIO completed this in August 2015 ($2.3M, 100+ racks moved). Operations are stable; co-location services are available. Data Center Operating Costs - $200k less per year over FY13. Estimated ~$1m less than projected FY16 to stay at KRC Infrastructure Servers/Storage operating costs – Moving to converged reduced costs by ~$1M per year Power consumption – cut in half (430Kw to ~220Kw) Tier III data center – OSU data center was considered Tier 1 or less Fewer OSU Staff – from 5.25 to <1. Estimated as high as 9 FTE to build and operate an OSU data center. Reduced Racks – from over 190 to under 130 Deferred Maintenance – eliminate the need for $4M in deferred maintenance Capital construction costs – eliminated the need to invest >$40M in potential new data center(s) construction Reduced Risk – Inadequate data center facilities was considered one of the greatest risks to OSU business systems Colocation list as of September 2016: Customer                                                            Billing through September 2016 (racks + power) Arts & Sciences                                                 ($12,411.55) Athletics                                                              ($8,151.45) Education Human Ecol                                   ($5,389.13) FAES                                                                      ($6,149.42) Libraries                                                               ($3,331.23) Med Center                                                        ($83,322.44) ODEE                                                                     ($4,835.48) Research                                                             ($48,983.75) Social Work                                                        ($1,919.32) Student Life                                                        ($600.00) OCIO ODEE MITS customer are consuming OCIO services that are located in the SOCC