Looking for information?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOURCES finding & evaluating them. Evaluating the AUTHORITY of a source – what questions should we ask? Is the author or organization identified? What.
Advertisements

Research & The Library Prepared for Political Science 100 Dr. Claudia Schaler September 26, 2013 Suzanne van den Hoogen, MLIS.
Websites vs. Databases Glenforest Secondary School Library Resource Centre Primary Source: M. Rosettis, St. Augustine.
1 Internet Detective Searching for Clues Evaluating Web Sites C. Johnson.
Evaluating Web Sites BTT Mr. Garel. Evaluating Web Sites not all information found on the World Wide Web is accurate and not all web sites, no matter.
Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library
Have You Evaluated??? Is that site good enough to cite???
The Internet How to decide which website will be useful for your project.
Database Discovery: Exploring Search Strategies used in Multiple Databases Library Research Tool Kit Workshop May 5, 2015 Suzanne van den Hoogen, MLIS.
Evaluating the Internet. Why is the internet (the free web) both a “good” and “bad” place to find information for a scholarly paper? “Good” Source “Bad”
Evaluating Websites… The truth is out there - but so is the lie..
Evaluating Websites Do you trust everyone to tell you the truth? Osama bin Laden, Terrorist Was one of FBI’s 10 Most Wanted Fugitives Reward:
The CRAAP Test Your guide to website evaluation Ms. Mitchell Ms. Mitchell English 9H.
Databases vs the Internet. QUESTION: What is the main difference between using library databases and search engines? ANSWER: Databases are NOT the Internet.
5 Point Check List  The 5 Point Check List or the CRAAP Test is a good way to identify if a website is:  worthy of using with students  or with any.
CRAAP Test: Meriam Library California State University, Chico
The CRAAP Way to Evaluate Credibility AP Capstone Research Mr. Linton.
Evaluating Internet Web Sites Remember: 1.Anyone can create an Internet web site. 2. Not all information you find on the Internet is accurate or objective.
6 Criteria for Evaluating a Website! Ms. Fauss ens/Evaluating%20Websites.pdf.
Research skills (cont.) Source evaluation. By the end of the lesson you will be able to: evaluate sources using relevant criteria evaluate sources using.
Website Evaluation "Clip art licensed from the Clip Art Gallery on DiscoverySchool.com“
Evaluating Sources.
Evaluating of Information
6 Criteria for Evaluating a Website!
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
CRAAP Test: Meriam Library California State University, Chico
Research and Information Fluency
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
Do Now: January 21, 2015 Sentence Composing Tools: Adjective Clause Take Notes: -What is an adjective clause? Provide multiple examples -What’s the difference.
Conducting Credible Internet Research: C.A.R.S.
Marvin Library Web Page
The 5 A’s of Website Evaluation
Are my Sources Reliable?
Using Credible Internet Sources
Evaluating Web Resources
Evaluating Sources.
4 Criteria for Web Evaluation ELEMENTARY (BASIC)
SOURCES finding & evaluating them
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
Evaluating Websites The Good, the Bad, and the Misleading!
Chapter 3: The Research Process
The CRAAP Test.
How to use other people’s information to make yourself look smart!!!
Evaluating Websites.
ABCs of Website Evaluation
Web Evaluation The C. R. A. A. P. Test.
Safe and Effective Web searchING
Evaluating Information
C. Schwartz, LMS December 2016
The quest to find good information on the internet.
Today we’re going to talk about resources that you definitely know how to find… Websites Have them name some things, make a list on the board of why.
Evaluating Websites Using CRAAP 
Evaluating web sites Authority Accuracy Objectivity Currency Coverage
Today’s Goal Today’s objective is that you learn how to be critical in selecting the sites you are getting information from. You will learn how to analyze.
Searching for Information Without Losing Your Cool!
Created by Karen Christensson Adapted by the SAISD Librarians
Internet Use.
Evaluation of Sources PSYCH 111 Spring 2017.
The CRAAP Test WORKSHEET
Searching the Web.
The CRAAP Test Your guide to web site evaluation
Evaluating Internet Resources
Mini Research Project Evaluating Sources.
Evaluate It- Lesson 1.
Evaluating Websites The CRAAP Test: Don’t Surf the Net Without It! CRAAP Test: Meriam Library  California State University, Chico.
CRAAP.
Conducting Credible Internet Research: C.A.R.S.
Evaluating Website Credibility
Presentation transcript:

Looking for information? Where do you usually search for information? What’s your favourite search engine? How do you decide if a website contains ‘good’ information? How did you decide whether to use a site or not?

Currency : the timeliness of the information The C.R.A.P. Test Currency : the timeliness of the information Reliability : the accuracy and correctness Authority : the sources of information Purpose : the reason the web site exists

Currency How recent is the information? When was the information posted/published? Has it been revised or updated recently? Is the information current? Does your topic require current information, or will older sources work? Are the links functional?

Reliability What kind of information is included in the website? Where does the information come from? Is the information supported by evidence? Do the contents match what you already know about the subject? Is the content fact or opinion? Is the information balanced or biased? Does the site provide references to the sources of its information?

Authority Who is the author/creator of the site? Is the author an authority in the subject? What are their credentials (education, qualifications, experience)? Can you contact them? Who is the publisher/sponsor of the site? Does the URL of the site determine the nature of the site? e.g. .edu, .ac.uk, .org, .gov, .com, .co.uk

Purpose/Point of View What is the intent of the site? Is it to persuade, sell, entertain, inform, or teach? Is there advertising on the site? Is the author presenting fact or opinion? Is the information objective and free from bias? What is the domain (.edu, .org, .gov, etc.) and how does this influence the purpose/point of view?

What is scholarly information? Different from most information on the web Written by subject experts Vetted before you see it Peer reviewed – read, evaluated and agreed upon by panel of experts Accurate, valid and correct In most cases – unbiased, free of commercial, political, social and personal bias Important to understand that the information sources you use are appropriate to the level of work you are undertaking. At this level you must be using scholarly information. Anyone can post on the web, may not be fact checked. May be correct, may be full of errors

What does scholarly information look like online? 2. The name of the publisher may be in the url 3. Click on the title of the journal to find out more 1. Look for the logo or name of the publisher

What does scholarly information look like online? 2. The Editorial board will give us more information 1. This journal is peer reviewed

What does scholarly information look like online? Names of Editors and their institutions suggests that this journal is scholarly.

What does scholarly information look like online? 1. It is often in PDF format 2. Find out about the Author’s credentials 3. Look for references

What does scholarly information look like online? Scholarly information will always contain references

Scholarly Information How do you find it online? Online library databases E-library Directory of Open Access Journals SpringerOpen Journals University Repositories Google Scholar Databases – best place to start – high quality, vetted and already evaluated Google Scholar

Examples http://iopscience.iop.org/2043-6262 http://irishgothichorrorjournal.homestead.com/ http://www.doaj.org/ 2 very different looking sites, both scholarly and peer reviewed. Discovery via DOAJ – news bulletin – how many sites added and how many removed as not up to scholarly standard. Can’t rely on design but look at clues in content Name of publisher – logo – url Title of journal – usually got journal in it More info about journal – link to journal or about journal peer reviewed, editorial board, credentials of authors, names of scholars Link to PDF or full text – not always in PDF format Skim item – substantive, not brief Bibliographies/reference list – scholarly info always cites sources