RDQ 6 Designing, Conducting and Reporting PBIS Evaluation Discussion Leaders: Rob Horner, University of Oregon, Jake Olsen, California State University.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -

Advertisements

School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior.

Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –

Using the PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) E-12

Measuring Performance within School Climate Transformation Grants

Computer Applications for Monitoring Student Outcomes: Behavior Rob Horner University of Oregon

Current Status and Emerging Directions for PBIS

Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE

Aligning Educational Initiatives

1 Implementing a Three-Tiered State Evaluation Structure Bob Putnam The May Institute Karen Childs University of South Florida 2009 National PBIS Leadership.

Coaching PBIS Implementation Coaching PBIS Implementation Rob Horner org.

Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)

1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,

SWIFT School Wide Integrated Framework for Transformation

Professional Development and Technical Assistance: The National Blueprint for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral.

MU Center for SW-PBS College of Education University of Missouri Missouri SW-PBS Annual Reporting pbismissouri.org.

Fall Data Review Continuous Improvement Work Day School Leadership Teams Fall 2014.

9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.

School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory

Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University.

Oregon RTI The Who, What & How of Participation in

A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.

Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)

Four Core Functions of Coaching in PBIS Rob Horner org.

Scaling-Up Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) SPDG National Meeting miblsi.cenmi.org.

E VALUATION FOR S CHOOL - WIDE PBIS Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina: Charlotte Rob Horner University of Oregon December 9, 2011.

DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SWPBS Rob Horner and Bob Algozzine.

Providing Technical Assistance for Evidence-based Practices Rob Horner OSEP TA-Center on PBIS

“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,

Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.

“Kids are here to maintain our humility.” Dr. Rob Horner

District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.

Evidence-based Practices: A Technical Assistance Perspective Lou Danielson, Chair Brian Cobb, Susan Sanchez, Kathleen Lane, Rob Horner

OSEP Project Director’s Meeting: Establishing, Sustaining and Scaling Effective Practices Rob Horner University of Oregon OSEP TA Center on PBIS

These slides were taken from: Practice Profiles Melissa Nantais, Ph.D. Professional Learning Coordinator Michigan’s Integrated Behavior & Learning Supports.

State and District-level Role in Implementation, Scaling and Sustaining PBIS Session A-3 Washington Leadership Discussion Rob Horner University of Oregon.

Aligning PBIS to Achieve Educational Excellence Rob Horner University of Oregon Acknowledge: George Sugai, Lucille Eber, Susan Barrett, Justyn Poulos,

Aligning Educational Initiatives Rob Horner University of Oregon.

District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.

V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.

“Are We at Fidelity?”: Annual Evaluation and Action Planning.

School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.

RDQ 5 District Coaching Capacity Discussion Leader: George Sugai, University of Connecticut.

Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett

Compilation of Slides for Data Measures

D1- Leveraging PBIS Implementation Leader Presenters: Rob Horner, University of Oregon Caryn Ward, University of North Carolina (SISEP) Key Words:

RDQ 17 Using the Alignment Brief to Build Priority for Wellness Discussion Leaders: Susan Barrett, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network.

Current Issues Related to MTSS for Academic and Behavior Difficulties: Building Capacity to Implement PBIS District Wide at All Three Tiers OSEP conference.

RDQ 9 Enhancing Family Engagement in PBIS Discussion Leaders: Andy Garbacz, University of Wisconsin-Madison Mark Weist, University of South Carolina.

Interconnected Systems Framework PA PBS Network Professional Learning Community Webinar #2 April 11, 2017.

PBIS: Using the PBIS Framework to Implement Effective Practices

RDQ 2 Aligning & Integrating Mental Health & PBIS Discussion Leaders: Kelly Perales, Katie Pohlman & Erin VanAcker, Midwest PBIS Network (IL)

RDQ 15 Urban Implementation: Networking & Dialogue for Leaders of PBIS in Large Urban School Districts Discussion Leader: Steve Goodman, Michigan’s.

State and District Role in

Using PBIS to Support Social/Emotional and Academic Needs

Multi-tier System of Supports

TFI Wordle This presentation is intended to introduce the PBISApps site and the types of data teams will be working with. The teams will take their first.

Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.

RDQ 19 PBIS as a Driver of Inclusive School Reform Discussion Leaders: Kimberli Breen & Melinda Mitchiner, University of Kansas.

Multi-tier System of Supports

Oregon Coaches’ Training School-wide PBIS

Aligning Educational Initiatives

Assessing Where You Are To Know Where to Go Next

RDQ 18 Utilizing Tier III Resources for Support Discussion Leaders: Bob Putnam, May Institute (MA) & Lauren Evanovich, University of South FLorida.

School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)

Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

RDQ 13 Supporting Classroom PBIS Practices & Systems Discussion Leaders: Brandi Simonsen & Jennifer Freeman, University of Connecticut.

Establishing District Level Support for PBIS Implementation

Selecting Practices that Work

How SBIRT Efficiently Meets the Needs of Middle and High School Students within the PBIS Framework

Presentation transcript:

RDQ 6 Designing, Conducting and Reporting PBIS Evaluation Discussion Leaders: Rob Horner, University of Oregon, Jake Olsen, California State University Long Beach

Designing, Conducting and Reporting PBIS Evaluation RDQ 6 Designing, Conducting and Reporting PBIS Evaluation Purposes of Session Identify Evaluation Questions, Evaluation Measures, Evaluation Reporting Formats, and Uses of Evaluation Outcomes for implementing, scaling and sustaining PBIS.

Guiding questions: What Evaluation stakeholders are you working with? The PBIS Evaluation Blueprint is focused around the following questions: Which of these fit your context? What other questions do you recommend? What measures do you use to address these questions? a. What is the process being used to train and support PBIS Implementation? b. Is PBIS being Implemented with fidelity across Tier I, II & III core features? Is implementation of PBIS associated with improved social behavior for students? How is behavior measured? Is implementation of PBIS associated with improved academic outcomes for students? Is implementation of PBIS associated with improved district capacity? How have evaluation results been used to leverage scaling up of PBIS implementation?