CDR Project Summary and Issues

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
Advertisements

24 September 2002Paul Dauncey1 Trigger issues for the CALICE beam test Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK.
28 February 2003Paul Dauncey - HCAL Readout1 HCAL Readout and DAQ using the ECAL Readout Boards Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK.
20 Feb 2002Readout electronics1 Status of the readout design Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Basic concept Features of proposal VFE interface issues.
2 October 2003Paul Dauncey1 Paris Summary Part 2 and Status of UK Electronics/DAQ Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK.
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
5 Feb 2002Electronics changes1 Possible changes to electronics Paul Dauncey Imperial College Some ideas on iterations to the design: Reduce number of uplinks?
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
4 Dec 2001First ideas for readout/DAQ1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Contributions from all of UK: result of brainstorming meeting in Birmingham on 13.
Calice ECAL Readout Hardware Status report Adam Baird ECAL Meeting 26 Sept 2003 LLR-Ecole Polytechnique.
DAQ WS03 Sept 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Trigger o Reminder: DAQ Trigger vs Particle Trigger o DAQ Trigger o Particle Trigger 1) Possible.
LCWS Apr 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE Readout1 CALICE ECAL Readout Status Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group: A. Baird, D. Bowerman,
29 January 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE DAQ1 UK ECAL Hardware Status David Ward (for Paul Dauncey)
10 th November 2004Daniel Bowerman1 Dan Bowerman Imperial College Calice Meeting - UCL 10 th November 2004 Electronics Status For the Imperial, Manchester,
2 April 2003Paul Dauncey - CALICE DAQ1 First Ideas For CALICE Beam Test DAQ Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK for IC, Manchester, RAL, UCL.
Status and planning of the CMX Philippe Laurens for the MSU group Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger General Meeting, CERN May 24, 2012.
21 January 2003Paul Dauncey - UK Electronics1 UK Electronics Status and Issues Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Leo Greiner IPHC testing Sensor and infrastructure testing at LBL. Capabilities and Plan.
14 Sep 2005DAQ - Paul Dauncey1 Tech Board: DAQ/Online Status Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
11 October 2002Matthew Warren - Trigger Board CDR1 Trigger Board CDR Matthew Warren University College London 11 October 2002.
ECFA Sep 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE Readout1 CALICE ECAL Readout Status Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 CERC Front End FPGA Development by Osman Zorba 12 May 2004 O. Zorba CALICE 12/05/2004.
Hardware proposal for the L2  trigger system detailed description of the architecture mechanical considerations components consideration electro-magnetic.
CMX status and plans Yuri Ermoline for the MSU group Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger Joint Meeting CERN, October 2012,
CSC Endcap Muon Port Card and Muon Sorter Status Mikhail Matveev Rice University.
Status and planning of the CMX Wojtek Fedorko for the MSU group TDAQ Week, CERN April , 2012.
25 Feb 2005Paul Dauncey1 TB Review: DAQ Paul Dauncey Imperial College London For Imperial, RAL, UCL.
March 9, 2005 HBD CDR Review 1 HBD Electronics Preamp/cable driver on the detector. –Specification –Schematics –Test result Rest of the electronics chain.
Costas Foudas, The Tracker Interface to TCS, The CMS Silicon Tracker FED Crates What goes in the FED Crates ? What do we do about the VME controller.
1 October 2003Paul Dauncey1 Mechanics components will be complete by end of year To assemble ECAL, they need the VFE boards VFE boards require VFE chips.
5 February 2003Paul Dauncey - Calice Status1 CALICE Status Paul Dauncey Imperial College London For the CALICE-UK groups: Birmingham, Cambridge, Imperial,
23 October 2003Martin Postranecky, UCL CALICE CERC Testing Page 1 PRODUCTION BOARDS TESTING 1)9x PCBs 2)16x SCSI each = 144x Connectors 3)~ 70x SCSI Cables.
LCWS Apr 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE Readout1 CALICE ECAL Readout Status Paul Dauncey For CALICE-UK electronics group: A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey,
Bottom half – ch 0-5 placed & routed FE PS PROC FIFO TRIG OSC RX/SHAP ADC DAC VME.
CSC ME1/1 Patch Panel Interconnect Board (PPIB) Mikhail Matveev Rice University February 27, 2013.
Peter LICHARD CERN (NA62)1 NA62 Straw tracker electronics Study of different readout schemes Readout electronics frontend backend Plans.
11 October 2002Paul Dauncey - CDR Introduction1 CDR Introduction and Overview Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
4 November 2002Paul Dauncey - Electronics1 UK Electronics Status Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
TDC/TEL62 update M. Sozzi NA62 TDAQ WG meeting Bruxelles – 9/9/2010.
Outline Upgrade status of the ECAL/HCAL HV control mezzanine board;  Firmware design,  Setup for making functional tests and validation FPGA firmware.
CMX: Update on status and planning Yuri Ermoline, Wojciech Dan Edmunds, Philippe Laurens, Chip Michigan State University 7-Mar-2012.
19 Apr 2007DAQ Readiness1 Paul Dauncey. 19 Apr 2007DAQ Readiness2 DAQ hardware layout ? More CRCs New HCAL stage May not be used.
ECAL electronics schedule JFMAMJJASONDJFMAM Prototype 2 boards Design Layout Fabrication and assembly Testing, including VFE prototype tests Production.
MADEIRA Valencia report V. Stankova, C. Lacasta, V. Linhart Ljubljana meeting February 2009.
Technical Review: DAQ/Online
HCAL DAQ Path Upgrades Current DCC Status New DCC Hardware Software
CALICE Readout Board Front End FPGA
14-BIT Custom ADC Board Rev. B
Current DCC Design LED Board
CALICE(-UK) Status Paul Dauncey 28 Apr 2004 Paul Dauncey.
HCAL Data Concentrator Production Status
Activities so far Meeting at Imperial, Paul and Matt
Clock & Control Card Status 29 July Martin Postranecky/Matt Warren
ALCT Production, Cable Tests, and TMB Status
CERC Front End FPGA Development Progress Report by Osman Zorba
PRODUCTION BOARDS TESTING
UK ECAL Hardware Status
ECAL electronics schedule
CALICE Readout Front End FPGA Development
Clock & Control Card Status 29 July Martin Postranecky/Matt Warren
XFEL 2D Pixel Clock and Control System Train Builder Meeting, UCL 11 May 2010 Erdem Motuk, Martin Postranecky, Matt Warren, Matthew Wing,
PRODUCTION BOARDS TESTING
Lehman 2000 Project Timeline
TSF Upgrade Project Overview Resources Plans and Timetable
Trigger issues for the CALICE beam test
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
RPC FEE The discriminator boards TDC boards Cost schedule.
sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3a Review WBS 1.5.3: CalElec Digitizers
Paul Dauncey Imperial College London
Presentation transcript:

CDR Project Summary and Issues Paul Dauncey Imperial College London 11 October 2002 Paul Dauncey - CDR Summary

Paul Dauncey - CDR Summary Cost estimates Readout boards 2 prototypes, 15 system and 5 spare production Cost £2600/board = £59k Trigger boards 1 prototype, 2 system and 1 spare production Cost £1200/board = £5k Test board 1 board = £3k Infrastructure NRA = £2k, cables = £3k PC/disk = £12k, PCI-VME = £7k, VME crates = £10k Total infrastructure = £34k System total = £101k FY02/03 = £20k, FY03/04 = £81k 11 October 2002 Paul Dauncey - CDR Summary

Readout board schedule N D J F M A S Prototype Design PDR Layout and fabrication VFE-PCB tests Testing Production Redesign FDR 11 October 2002 Paul Dauncey - CDR Summary

Trigger board schedule N D J F M A S Prototype Design PDR Layout and fabrication Testing Production Redesign FDR 11 October 2002 Paul Dauncey - CDR Summary

Engineering and technical effort Readout board: 18 months engineering design 3 months Manchester (Dave Mercer) 10 months Imperial (Dave Price, Osman Zorba) 5 months missing Trigger and test boards: 6 months engineering design each 5 months UCL (Martin Postranecky, Matt Warren) 7 months missing Layout and fabrication: 5 months technical If approved, need missing effort from RAL ID Engineering design: 12 months effort, from Jan 2003 to Mar 2004 One person at 0.8FTE, could be project lead engineer Technical: 5 months effort, mid and late 2003 11 October 2002 Paul Dauncey - CDR Summary

Paul Dauncey - CDR Summary Feasibility issues Is project possible given within cost, schedule and effort? Still possible to adjust (slightly) proposal figures for cost and effort Schedule set by end date, which may move later Is system able to meet requirements? Will it run at anywhere near 1 kHz? Will the noise be low enough? Is it flexible enough to deal with HCAL options? Is the system testable enough to debug the boards? Configuration data all read/write Configuration data readback on event data path DAC internal loopback to ADC’s Calibration circuit on VFE-PCB’s Test board is “inverted readout board” to check all signals on cables Is firmware feasible within time and components? 11 October 2002 Paul Dauncey - CDR Summary

Some remaining design choices Chosen VME but VME data rate (~20 MBytes/s) is limit of readout speed; is PCI/PXI a better choice? Pros: faster by factor 2-3, innovative, less expensive (?) Cons: No experience, possible mix of PCI and VME in system 6U readout board very tight for space Six IDC 40-pin connectors might not fit on front panel: use back? 9U? Components might not fit on board: double sided? 9U? Reduce to five cables per readout board? Needs 18 boards How many cables per slave FPGA? Two-to-one would increase I/O pins by 57 but halve number of FPGA’s Should trigger or readout boards give event VME interrupts? Single interrupt simpler but need to poll for sequence completion Trigger board stand-alone or simple rider on readout board? Rider would reduce cost, second slave trigger board would not be mounted 11 October 2002 Paul Dauncey - CDR Summary

Some unsolved problems VFE-PCB “LVDS” problem VFE chip has PMOS input stage; they want to run this 0V to –5V rather than +5V to 0V to reduce noise. All “LVDS” signals then offset by –5V from standard; e.g. quiescent level at –3.8V rather than +1.2V Should the VFE-PCB convert to standard level or readout board convert from offset level? Use alternative signal: ECL? Connector/cable set choice VFE-PCB has 4.5mm thickness constraint on combined PCB/connector Proposed SHL connector needs cables soldered, cannot be mounted two deep on front panel and has a maximum of 20 pins Trigger specification: how much logic goes inside the board? Overdesign to accommodate all possible combinations of external logic? 11 October 2002 Paul Dauncey - CDR Summary

We would like to hear your thoughts! Proposal will be resubmitted on 18 Nov Must specify total equipment cost and RAL ID effort What are the main things we need to do/fix before then? Cost? Main cost is readout boards How can we be sure 6U is sufficient? Are fabrication and assembly costs reasonable? Main component cost is ADC’s How do we determine whether these are usable? Effort? Most effort goes into FPGA firmware How do we determine if we have allowed sufficient effort for these designs? Is there enough left over for the rest of the designs? 11 October 2002 Paul Dauncey - CDR Summary