Cities and PIPA Why Should We Participate? What Do We Need?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forecasting Significant Incidents in Gas Fields Test Case: Barnett Shale, Fort Worth, Texas by Jerry Lobdill, physicist and Ch. E. (ret.)
Advertisements

PIPA Bringing Guidance to Local Communities Perspective of the Nat’l League of Cities and Nat’l Assoc. of Counties Chuck Lesniak Environmental Policy Mgr.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Presentation to NACo Environment, Energy and Land Use Steering.
2010 PODS User Conference Houston, Texas October 28, 2010 PHMSA Update John A. Jacobi, P.E. CATS Manager, SW Region.
Federal department of environment, transport, energy and communications ETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN Risk Assessment on Pipelines: the.
Demonstration Grant PARTNERS FOR PIPELINE SAFETY WEB PAGES Develop interactive and informative webpage for residents, property owners, contractors and.
GulfSafe Notification System GULF
Unregulated Low-Stress Hazardous Liquid Pipelines Mike Israni & John Gale Aug 5, 2009.
Increased Pipeline Safety Through Shared Planning Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans, LA November 15, 2007.
SB 490 Amendments to the Kansas Underground Utility Damage Prevention Act Effective January 1, 2003.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Liquid/Gas Pipeline Advisory Committee Meetings Joint Session.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Safety Update Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety.
Public Awareness and Pipeline Safety Pipeline Safety Trust November 15, 2007 Dan Kirschner Executive Director.
Safety procedures in sport
The most precious commodity in your organisation?
Event Name/Date Presented by: Name/Title/Organization Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH IN GHANA Ghana has a mixed economy dominated by agriculture, commerce, service and industry.
Process Safety Incidents- Discussion of Hub Oil 1999 Accident
City of Leesburg Public Awareness Program March 2008.
Crude Oil and Ethanol by Rail: Reducing Risk and Improving Emergency Response.
Pipeline Safety Trust Fort Worth Natural Gas Production Issues John W. Pepper Project Manager Office of Pipeline Safety Southwest Region, Houston, Texas.
Protecting Communities Co-Chairs Cathy Pratt- City of St. Peters Greg Ford- Williams Gas Pipeline;INGAA.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA) Steve Fischer.
Protecting Communities Task Team Update Las Vegas January 14, 2009.
Planning Zones to Protect People Near Pipelines Chuck Lesniak City of Austin Watershed Protection Department.
Pipeline Safety & Development Changes File # ZON Proponent Carl Weimer, Whatcom County Council Docketed Unanimously by the Whatcom County Council.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Chairman David Porter Commissioner Christi Craddick Commissioner Ryan Sitton September 15-17, 2015.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
1 November 3, 2006 David Knoelke API Public Awareness Committee Chair (BP Pipelines N.A.) Greater Public Involvement – What does that mean?
An ordinance amending the County’s zoning and land use regulations to increase pipeline safety Adopted July 27, 2010.
New Orleans, Louisiana November 20 & 21, 2008 Pipeline Safety What More Needs To Be Done? Presented by Carl Weimer, Executive Director.
Pipeline Safety in Michigan Jennifer McKay Policy Director Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council City of Boyne City Commission Meeting April 25, 2016.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM RECENT PIPELINE INCIDENTS FLORIDA NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION (FNGA) OPERATING & MARKETING CONFERENCE ROD WALKER PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT.
Hazardous materials awareness Chapter 1, intro to hazardous materials.
Market Failures and The Role of Government. Market Failures Market failure – can occur when any of the following five conditions are significantly altered.
Presentation to Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 18 & 19, 2015.
REDUCING RISKS THROUGH EFFECTIVE SAFETY COMMITTEES OAMR Conference September 23, 2016 Sharlene P. Stephens Risk Management Specialist City of Ashland.
Risks and Hazards to Consider Unit 3. Visual 3.1 Unit 3 Overview This unit describes:  The importance of identifying and analyzing possible hazards that.
Office of the State Fire Marshal Pipeline Safety Division

Last Part of Chapter 23.
TML Gas/Oil and Water Conference Overview and Key Information
Safety Committee Formation
Safety procedures in sport
Legal Issues in Connecticut: Environmental Issues 2006 Connecticut Commercial Real Estate Conference November 9, 2006 Andrew N. Davis, Ph.D., Esq.
Business Risk Marketing Co-op.
Enforcement of Floodplain Management Regulations
Local Governments in Texas
Annexation and Suburban Development
Legal Status of Cities GOVT 2306, Module 11.
Make the pic clearer, name & university Oshin Paranjape
Annexation and Suburban Development
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA)
UA Road Transport Safety Forum Hazard & Effects Management Program
GulfSafe Notification System
COVER.
Mitigation Strategy “The long-term blueprint for reducing the potential losses identified in the risk assessment. The mitigation strategy includes the.
Pipeline Safety Update Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Alan K. Mayberry, P.E. Deputy Associate Administrator for Field Operations.
Emergency Action Planning & Emergency Preparedness
By The Data Protection Commissioner
Introduction to: National Response Plan (NRP)
Safety Self-Inspections
COVER.
BANKRUPTCY INTRODUCTION.
Dam Management District Overview
In – House Training S h e n s h i p .c o m.
European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP)
System Safety Regulation
U. S. Department of Transportation
Unit 14 Emergency Planning IS 235
Presentation transcript:

Cities and PIPA Why Should We Participate? What Do We Need? Betty Dunkerley Mayor Pro Tem Austin, Texas Cities and PIPA Why Should We Participate? What Do We Need?

Why Cities? Austin is probably typical of other cities There are 446 miles of hazardous liquids and natural gas lines in Austin’s jurisdiction In Austin (2003) within 500’ of a hazardous liquids line 8” dia. or greater 2,600 buildings 3,200 platted lots 7000 acres Austin has 446 miles of hazardous liquids (refined fuel, natural gas liquids) and natural gas pipelines in our jurisdiction (full purpose and ETJ). We’ve had 3 significant accidents involving crude oil and natural gas liquids lines. All were due to development along the pipelines. Occurred in the 1970’s and ‘80’s, none since.

Austin Pipelines

Why Cities? Cities: Have the greatest public safety and economic impacts from accidents Have the greatest risk of third party damage to pipelines Are responsible for emergency response and will be in control of first response to accidents Generally control and plan new development Have little control over pipeline placement or operations Cities have the highest probability of accidents, the highest consequences of accidents, and have little or no ability to regulate or otherwise control pipelines because of preemption by state and federal law.

Cities and PIPA Historically, cities have been reactive, not proactive where pipelines are concerned Emergency responders, much less policymakers, may not know where the pipelines are, what’s in them, or who operates the pipelines Generally, an accident has to occur before a city gets informed and takes action to protect their community Most cities only take notice of pipelines when there is an accident. Austin was involved in a lawsuit that raised our level of awareness and resulted in enacting an ordinance to regulate development along pipelines to protect the community and the pipelines.

Cities and PIPA Line location information is poor, often off by hundreds of feet or more Operators are reluctant to share information about their operations, inspection, and maintenance Developers aren’t aware of the implications of the presence of pipelines and fear drawing attention to pipelines on or near their property Federal law only requires pipeline operators to submit line location with an accuracy of +/- 500’. High land and home prices drives development up against pipeline ROW unless someone prevents it.

We’re hopeful PIPA can help Cities and PIPA To help plan for new development and manage the interface between pipelines and existing development, cities need: Information on risk assessment and risk management Communication and coordination between communities, operators and regulators Historically, cities have had great difficulty getting information on pipeline operations, risk, and locations. Cities often have little pipeline expertise and must rely on the pipeline companies and the Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS). Austin has been fortunate to be able to hire an independent consultant to help us. We’re hopeful PIPA can help