Figure Legend: From: Binocular combination of luminance profiles

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(12):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
Advertisements

From: What limits performance in the amblyopic visual system: Seeing signals in noise with an amblyopic brain Journal of Vision. 2008;8(4):1. doi: /8.4.1.
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(13):22. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Davida Teller Award Lecture 2013: The importance of prediction and anticipation in the control of smooth pursuit eye movements Journal of Vision.
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
From: Focus information is used to interpret binocular images
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(7):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Responses of the human visual cortex and LGN to achromatic and chromatic temporal modulations: An fMRI study Journal of Vision. 2010;10(13):13. doi: /
From: Color signals in the primary visual cortex of marmosets
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):3. doi: /4.9.3 Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
From: What are the units of storage in visual working memory?
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(13):27. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(9):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Neural bandwidth of veridical perception across the visual field
From: Breaking object correspondence across saccades impairs object recognition: The role of color and luminance Journal of Vision. 2016;16(11):1. doi: /
From: Event-related potentials reveal an early advantage for luminance contours in the processing of objects Journal of Vision. 2011;11(7):1. doi: /
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
Figure Legend: From: The modern Japanese color lexicon
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The attenuation surface for contrast sensitivity has the form of a witch's hat within the central visual field Journal of Vision. 2012;12(11):23.
Figure Legend: From: Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
From: Motion processing with two eyes in three dimensions
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(9):9. doi: /9.9.9 Figure Legend:
From: Nonlinearities in color coding: Compensating color appearance for the eye's spectral sensitivity Journal of Vision. 2006;6(9):12. doi: /
From: Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Contextual effects on real bicolored glossy surfaces
From: Does spatial invariance result from insensitivity to change?
Figure Legend: From: Comparing integration rules in visual search
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(6):4. doi: /4.6.4 Figure Legend:
From: Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination
From: Surface color perception and equivalent illumination models
From: Three-dimensional motion aftereffects reveal distinct direction-selective mechanisms for binocular processing of motion through depth Journal of.
From: Perceptual entrainment of individually unambiguous motions
From: What #theDress reveals about the role of illumination priors in color perception and color constancy Journal of Vision. 2017;17(9):4. doi: /
Date of download: 11/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Journal of Vision. 2005;5(11):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(12):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Rat performance on visual detection task modeled with divisive normalization and adaptive decision thresholds Journal of Vision. 2011;11(9):1. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(14):2. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Latitude and longitude vertical disparities
From: Linear–nonlinear models of the red–green chromatic pathway
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(1):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The psychometric function: The lapse rate revisited
From: Rapid visual categorization of natural scene contexts with equalized amplitude spectrum and increasing phase noise Journal of Vision. 2009;9(1):2.
From: What's color got to do with it
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(10):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Date of download: 12/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(15):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):1. doi: /4.9.1.
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: What predicts the strength of simultaneous color contrast?
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(7):20. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(3):28. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The absolute threshold of cone vision
Figure Legend: From: The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: StarTrek Illusion—General object constancy phenomenon?
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Analysis of human vergence dynamics
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(3):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry
Figure Legend: From: The color constancy of three-dimensional objects
Presentation transcript:

Figure Legend: From: Binocular combination of luminance profiles Journal of Vision. 2017;17(13):4. doi:10.1167/17.13.4 Figure Legend: Binocular luminance summation of luminance discs with asymmetric contour information. (A) A sample from Experiment 1 of equal-luminance increment contour when the two eyes view two discs without concentric circles, luminance increment (8 cd/m2) from a dark background (0.2 cd/m2). The thick black curve indicates the model prediction using the same LoG filter, contrast space weight function (CSWF), and flat CSF as in Experiment 1. Dashed black curve (overlapped with the thick black curve) indicates the prediction using the same LoG filter and CSWF as in Experiment 1, but using non-flat CSF in the model. Dashed magenta and green curves (also overlapped with the thick black curve) indicate the model predictions using a smaller or a larger LoG filter than that in Experiment 1, while using the same CSWF and flat CSF. Solid blue and red curves indicates the prediction using the same LoG filter and flat CSF but a different CSWF with a slower (blue) or more rapid (red) dropping rate in space weight when going away from the fovea. The dashed red curve (overlapped with the solid red curve) indicates the prediction using a rapid-dropping CSWF and a non-flat CSF while the LoG filter is the same as in Experiment 1. (B) Equal-luminance increment contour when the two eyes view two discs with a concentric circle only in one eye (e.g., LE) (Experiment 2a). The codes for model prediction curves are the same as in (A )(the dashed magenta curve is overlapped with the thick black curve). (C) Equal-luminance increment contour when the two eyes view two discs with circles at different locations of the disc in the two eyes. One eye's circle (e.g., LE's) is in the upper and the other eye's circle (e.g., RE's) is in the lower half of the disc, and the luminance inside the upper circle is the target luminance on which the brightness match was performed (Experiment 2b). The codes for model prediction curves are the same as in (A) (the dashed magenta and green curves are overlapped with the thick black curve). (D) The disc size effect on binocular luminance summation. One eye (e.g., RE) views the luminance, fixed at 72 cd/m2, of a large square of 14° x 14° on the dark background (0.2 cd/m2), and the other eye (e.g., LE) views a central disc of variable size (1°, 3°, 5°, 7°, 9°, 11°, 13° in diameters), with luminance fixed at 12 cd/m2, plus a surrounding square of 14° × 14°, with luminance fixed at 3.7 cd/m2, on the dark background (0.2 cd/m2). The luminance of the reference (same incremental luminance in both eyes) was adjusted to match the brightness of the test disc region. The binocularly matched luminance of the central disc was measured and plotted as a function of the disc diameter. The codes for model prediction curves are the same as in (A) (the dashed magenta and green curves are overlapped with the thick black curve). Date of download: 12/27/2017 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2017. All rights reserved.