New Theory and Efficacy of Corneal Cross Linking ____________________________ J.T. Lin, Ph.D New Vision, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy (TG-PRK) for Keratoconus (KC) With Simultaneous Collagen Cross-Linking (CXL): Excimer Laser Simon Holland.
Advertisements

Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy (TG-PRK) and Simultaneous collagen cross-linking (CXL) in Post-LASIK Ectasia Using 2 High-Resolution Excimer.
Refractive Surgery Challenges and their most modern approach D. Alexopoulos MD,DO
Corneal collagen cross-linking: 2014 and beyond
Seite 1 Peripheral optimized CXL and high power Peripheral optimized CXL and high power Theo Seiler Theo Seiler I nstitut für R efraktive und O phthalmo-
Fick’s Laws Combining the continuity equation with the first law, we obtain Fick’s second law:
GUSTAVO TAMAYO MD CLAUDIA CASTELL MD
29/01/05www.drmathys.be BSCRS 2005 P R K in 2005 Bernard Mathys, MD Brussels.
Recent increased marketing efforts have led some consumers to question if a new procedure called “”Intralase LASIK" is somehow a superior option to.
ADVANCED SURFACE ABLATIONS Postoperative pain Late visual recovery Risk of Haze Risk of corneal ectasia Unpredictable flap induced aberrations Epithelial.
Paradox of Corneal CXL and Infectious Keratitis: To Do or Not to Do? None of the authors have any financial disclosure to make Vishal Vohra,MS (Presenting.
Ömür Uçakhan-Gündüz, MD Betül N. Bayraktutar, MD
Untraviolet Riboflavin Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus – Initial Results J Brady, W Power, W Lee The Authors have no financial interetsts in the subject.
Northern Colorado Eye Center Continuing Education Event Corneal Collagen Cross-linking September 20, 2014 S. Lance Forstot, MD, FACS Corneal Consultants.
Instructional course IC 1 Corneal cross linking therapy: Operative technique Auhor: Kristina Mikek, Slovenia Co. Authors : Carina Koppen, Belgium Zoltan.
Corneal melting after collagen cross-linking for keratoconus Journal of Medical Case Reports,2011 By Ibrahim almahuby Dr.Georgios Labiris.
Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) ALIREZA PEYMAN, MD ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.
EPITHELIUM-ON CORNEA COLLAGEN CXL FOR KERATOCONUS: INCREASING PATIENT COMFORT WITHOUT SACRIFICING EFFICACY WORLD CORNEA CONGRESS VII SAN DIEGO 2015.
Laser Vision Correction for Myopia, Myopic Astigmatism, Hyperopia and Hyperopic Astigmatism with CustomVis Solid State Laser (213nm) THE ROYAL AUSTRALIAN.
Refractive stability - Usually 1-3 months after operation - The lower the correction, the sooner refraction will be stable myopia < -3 D : 1 month myopia.
LASIK What are the Limits ?
PRK Enhancement with Mitomycin - C after LASIK - a case series
Evaluation of Bactericidal and Fungicidal Activity of Riboflavin Plus UVA Irradiation for Corneal CXL Authors Ashok Sharma, Cornea Centre, Chandigarh,
Effects of IOP Lowering Agents on Myopic Regression after Refractive Surgery Lim, Taehyung M.D., Hong, So Jin M.D., Cho, Beom Jin M.D., Ph.D. Chung Kyu-Hyung.
UVA/riboflavin for infectious keratitis. Prospective randomized double blind trial. Early experience. Erik Letko, MD 1 ; Francis W. Price, MD 1 ; Carlindo.
Prof. A. John Kanellopoulos, MD 1 Long-term Safety and Efficacy of High-Fluence Collagen Crosslinking of the Vehicle Cornea in.
Elias F. Jarade, MD, FICS. Corneal and Refractive Surgery Service, The Dubai Mall Medical Center, Dubai- U.A.E. Tel: ; Mob
Collagen cross-linking (CXL) for keratoconus (KC) with simultaneous topographical-guided photorefractive keratectomy (TG-PRK) Simon Holland, MD, FRCSC,
Pachymetric changes during corneal collagen cross-linking and effect of hydroxipropylmethylcellulose on corneal thickness Faik Oruçoğlu (Orucov) Kudret.
Results of Collagen Crosslinking followed by posterior chamber toric implantable collamer lens implantation in patients with Keratoconus & High Myopia.
The authors have no financial interest in this work Riboflavin/ UVA Combination For Acanthamoeba Isolates. Evaluation of in Vitro Cysticidal Antiamoebic.
Comparison of Early Outcome of Topo-guided Photo-refractive Keratectomy Between Two Refractive Lasers Purpose: Evaluation of topography-guided photorefractive.
Choice of Treatment Protocol for Cross-linking
Alex P. Lange The author has no financial interest to disclose.
Corneal collagen cross-linking: 2015 and beyond Dr Elsie Chan Consultant Ophthalmologist, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital Honorary Fellow, CERA, University.
Faik Orucov*, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ.
المدينة الطبية الجامعية University Medical City Is customized excimer ablation combined with CXL in irregular corneal topography safe and predictable ?
Poster produced by Faculty & Curriculum Support (FACS), Georgetown University School of Medicine LASIK Combined with Corneal Cross-linking in Eyes with.
Lasers in Ophthalmology. Anatomy of eye The cornea is a transparent tissue in the front part of the eye. It is a curved spherical structure that is responsible.
Demographic and visual outcomes on keratoconus patients with failed “epi- on”C3R cross-linking procedures Yaron S. Rabinowitz M.D. Oana Dumitrascu M.D.
Laser assisted Corneal normalization in Ectatic disorders
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine,
Evaluation of Topography-guided LASIK and Simultaneous Collagen Cross-linking in the Management of Post-LASIK Ectasia Diana Ng, MD1 Anastasios John Kanellopoulos,
Crosslinking for Microbial Keratitis To Treat or not to Treat?
Collagen Cross-Linking with Photoactivated Riboflavin (PACK-CXL) for the Treatment of Advanced Infectious Keratitis with Corneal Melting Ophthalmology.
In Vivo Confocal Microscopy after Corneal Collagen Crosslinking
Topo-Guided Crosslinking for Keratoconus
Low intensity versus high intensity CXL
CORNEAL EPITHELIAL IMAGING
Osmotic Riboflavin and transepithelial CXL
Prophylactic collagen cross-linking (pCXL) in high risk (HR) LASIK
Influence of UVA-Riboflavin corneal collagen cross-linking on biomechanical properties of keratoconic eyes David Zadok MD, Yakov Goldich MD, Yaniv Barkana.
ASCRS 2016 New Orleans, Louisiana
Accelerated CXL is not proven yet
Crosslinking with Simultaneous Implantation of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus: Safe and Efficacy Author: Luiz Antonio de Brito Martins.
From: Corneal Cross-Linking with Riboflavin and UV-A in the Mouse Cornea in Vivo: Morphological, Biochemical, and Physiological Analysis Trans. Vis. Sci.
Management of Keratoconus using KeraSoft IC
Collagen cross-linking (CXL) for keratoconus (KC) with simultaneous topographical-guided photorefractive keratectomy (TG-PRK) Simon Holland, MD, FRCSC,
Collagen Crosslinking for Corneal Ectasia
Samir I. Sayegh, MD, PhD, FACS 1
Effects of corneal collagen crosslinking on Ocular Response Analyzer waveform-derived variables in keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia Spatial treatment.
Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ keratomileusis
No financial interest for all authors
Three-Year Follow-up after LASIK in Eye with Extremely Thin Corneal Bed Hidemasa Torii, MD, Kazuno Negishi, MD, Murat Dogru, MD, Takefumi Yamaguchi, MD,
Elena Albé MD Paolo Vinciguerra MD, Silvia Trazza, MD
Pachymetry Fluctuations During Corneal Crosslinking (CXL)
Mohamed Abdelrahman Awadalla,FRCS Magrabi Eye Hospital Cairo - Egypt
Shorter Duration, Higher Ultraviolet A Irradiation (UVA) Fluence Collagen Cross-linking (CCL) for Keratoconus (KCN) Frank A. Killian, MD and A. John Kanellopoulos,
Comparing Endothelial Cell Density after Sub-Bowman’s Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy for the Treatment of Myopia Ryan T. Smith, MD Daniel.
EFFECT OF CORNEAL THICKNESS ON SELECTIVE LASER TRABECULOPLASTY
Presentation transcript:

New Theory and Efficacy of Corneal Cross Linking ____________________________ J.T. Lin, Ph.D New Vision, Inc. Taiwan 3ya-2013

Summary Historical of CXL Debating issues (safety, Dresden protocol) Dynamic of CXL Kinetic of type-I & type-II (role of oxygen) 5.Minimum corneal thickness 6. Efficacy & optimal protocols * References: (papers by JT Lin): Cornea(8, 2017) PlosOne (7, 2017) Ophthalmology Res (7,2017) IOVS (4,2016); JRS (8,2016) IJO (10,2015).

CXL Milestones (1) Biomechanical studies on KC patient 1980 Biomechanical studies on KC patient 1998 Seiler , University hospital Dresden.and Spoerl starts research on biomechanics of eye tunic. 1994 Improved corneal stability 1995 Evidence of crosslink effect 1996 First experimental result 1997 Therapy test in rabbit First patient treated 1999 enzymatic resistance after CXL

CXL Milestones (2) 2000 First UV LED (370nm) device in market 2002 Study toxic threshold of EC and KC cells 2003 First clinical study published (wollensak et al) First report about epi-on CXL (Pinelli et al) 2006 Stromal demarcation line (Seiler) 2007 Calculation of diffusion of riboflavin (Spoerl) 2008 CXL by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Mazzotta) CXL in endothelial decomp, bullous keratopathy (Ehlers) PACK-CXL (Iseli) First clinical trial in Australia (Wittig-Silva) 2009 Hypoosmolar riboflavin solution for thin corneas(Hafezi) Topography guided PRK and CXL (Kanellopoulous) 2010 Investigation of the riboflavin film (Wollensak) Systemic treatment of keratitis (Makdourni)

CXL Milestones (3) 2011 Iontophoresis for riboflavin application (Vinciguerra) 2012 Acce2018lerated CXL AVEDRO (Celik) 2013 Kinetic model of CXL (oxygen dependent) (Richoz), 2014 Antibacterial efficacy of PACK-CXL (Hafezi) First dynamic model for ribo depletion (Lin) 2015 Laser scan device for focal cross-linking, First CXL UV-pen device (New vision Inc, patented, Lin) High power (18, 45 mW) CXL devices (Mlase, Avedro) 2016 First dynamic theory for CXL type-I efficacy profiles and new criterion for CXL safety (Lin), FDA approval for Avedro KXL (3 mW). Also CFDA approval. 2017 Kinetic model for type-II CXL (Kling & Hafezi). Kinetic model for combined Type-I and –II (Lin) Optimal efficacy and New Protocols (Ln) First animal study for thin and thick corneas (Kling, Hafezi)

Debating issues of CXL: Safety criterion [5.4 J/cm^2, 400 um thickness] (2) Thin corneas (<350 um, safe ?) (4) Dresden (2003) protocol (too much RF drops during CXL) Effective dose (with rib films) (5) Accelerated CXL validation of BR law? (6) Optimal protocol. (fast and efficient)

UV light New dynamic mechanism Experiment setup Power meter B2 solution (0.005%) 10 mm

Measured data * Transmitted light intensity Time (min.) More UV light transmission for t>0 Dynamic spectra of B2 Transmitted light intensity Time (min.) * JT Lin (published in IJLREC, 2013)

Dynamic intensity A(t) = 2.3[ (a-b)C(t) + bCoF +Q] Our new finding (Lin, pub. IBME, 2013) I = Io exp (-Az) A(t) = 2.3[ (a-b)C(t) + bCoF +Q] diffusion F(z)=1-o.5z/D conventional For t=0 only, A=52( 1/cm) for Co=0.1 % A=79 to 41, mean 61 (if F=1) F<1, z=200 um, A = 67 to 43.5 , mean 54 z=400 um, A = 55.5 to 37.8, mean 47 Smaller A, higher Intensity.

Dynamic of Riboflavin concentration (depletion for t >0) Initial (t=0) RF depletion starts from surface (z=0). Time (0 to 120 seconds) Initial (t

CXL Theories developed Conventional theory Schumacher, (2012) Mrochen, Seiler et al (JOVS, 35:726,2012) Assumptions: linear theory, simplified constant concentration (C) Errors: overestimates effective dose (4.0 J/) E* = 5.4J/cm^2 Z*= 400 um (cornea thickness) FIXED parameters Modern theory J.T. Lin (2015) (JRS/2015, JOVS/2016) Nonlinear, dynamic theory of C (z,t) Safety critera [C, D, E’, z] E* = (2.5 – 10.5) J Z* = (200 – 450) um C = 0.1 – 0.3%

CXL safety formulas (Lin, 2016) Safety dose E*=Ed exp(A’z) Ed: endo cell damage threshold (at z=400 um) (2) Minimum Corneal thickness z* = (1/A) ln (E*/Ed) (3) Safety Concentration Co = ln (E*/Ed)/ (2.3mbGz) For Co = 0.1, 0.2, , 0.5% (curves 1, 2 ..5)

kinetic of CXL type-I & Type-II Oxygen is required for type-II, but not absolutely needed in type-I .

kinetic of CXL type-I & Type-II Oxygen is required for type-II, but not absolutely needed in type-I .

CXL Efficacy type-I & Type-II* S1 = sqr [ Co/aI] exp (Az) type-II S2 = (1-b/[O]) Co [ 1 – exp (-apE)] Same dose, s.s. High Intensity, low type-I, Efficacy Faster Oxygen depletion, but same tpe-II efficacy as low intensity. [Q2] profile on surface (z=0) & at z=100 um. For I = 3,9,10, 30,45 mW

Corsslink efficacy (type-I) S = sqr [ (4KCo)/(aI)] exp (Az) Inverse proportional to the UV light intensity (I) proportional to RF Co, and depth (z)

How to optimize CXL , fast and efficient ? High power, faster procedure (small T* ) but higher risk (2) High concentration, deeper CXL depth (3) Longer illumination time, deeper CXL, (4) Higher intensity, faster depletion, but lower efficacy. How to optimize CXL , fast and efficient ? OPTIMAL parameters: 30 mW, 20 sec, 0.1%,

multi-step-method (MSM) Super-position of Efficacy profiles. Depth (z) Define: THE ISSUES: DropF= Frequency of RF drops (during UV exposure) Dresden Proto: DropF = 10 to 15 (too much reduction), Effective dose = 5.4 x0.8= 4. 3 J (b) Modern proto: DropF = 0, low efficacy in high intensity multi-step-method (MSM) Super-position of Efficacy profiles. Eff = 1 –exp [- (S1+ S2 +S3)] Depth (z)

Proposed Optimal CXL Lin-code 3-24 (8,8,8) 9 - 8 (2.5, 2.5, 3.0) multi-step-method (MSM) Hgh effective dose, Fast procedure, High efficacy Lin-code DropF=2, effective dose =4.3 J (or 5.4x0.8) (a) I = 3.0 (mW/cm^2) 3-24 (8,8,8) 0 8 16 24 min. 9 - 8 (2.5, 2.5, 3.0) 18 - 4 (1.3, 1.3, 1.4) 30 – 2.4 (0.8, 0.8, 0.8 Each drop waiting for 1 min. allowing enough diffusion depth.

The new trends Combined techniques: sequential or simultaneous CXL + PRK (2009, same day is better than following day ..) CXL+ LASIK (2011, 2013, more stable, less aberrations) CXL+ femtosecond-flap (less regression, prevent corneal ectasia) CXL+ ICR CXL + CK (3 months, still have regression) CXL+ phakic IOL CXL+ OK (more stable, long term) CXL (on cornea) to correct low myopia; change of corneal front curvature (due to thickness deceasing, K value, K=377/r, drops, r increases) CXL (on sclera) to stop abnormal axial length growth. CXL+ RGP/OK lens CXL (on trabecular meshwork, cell pores 3 x increase, glaucoma, Shang-dong U. Ref: X. Fan. International J ophthalmology 2014,7:157-162

CXL-pen (Lin, patented, 2014) High-power (30-50 mW) Spot size: 4 to 12 mm Scanning mode for customized CXL KC and PACK

IONTOFOR RF device for epi-on enhance PACK-CXL applying an electrical current to increase its mobility across a surface. procedure by reducing the soaking phase from 30 minutes to 5 min. No epithelium removal is needed. 電流刺激儀(法國製造),增強核黃素在角膜內的滲透深度。 同時也能縮短術前等候時間從30分鐘到5分鐘,特別是應用於epi-on的情況 22