Simulation Framework Progress Update - Nov. 2000

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.:IEEE /223r1 Submission March 2002 J. del Prado and S. Choi, Philips Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited Javier del Prado and.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /571r0 CC/RR Model and Simulations November, 2001 Matthew Sherman & Wei Lin, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 CC/RR Model and Simulations.
Doc.: IEEE /133 Submission March 2001 G. Chesson, A. Singa - Atheros Slide 1 VDCF Simulations Greg Chesson, Aman Singla,
Doc.: IEEE /1192r5 Submission MAC calibration results comparison Date: Authors: Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)Slide 1 October 2014.
IEEE EDCF: a QoS Solution for WLAN Javier del Prado 1, Sunghyun Choi 2 and Sai Shankar 1 1 Philips Research USA - Briarcliff Manor, NY 2 Seoul National.
Doc.: IEEE /229r0 Submission 07/2000 Jim Lansford, MobilianSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE / PCF Modeling Observations Nov 2000 November 2000 Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide Modeling Observations.
November 2000 Jin-Meng Ho, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /363 Submission Traffic Descriptions For E Performance Simulation Jin-Meng.
Doc.: IEEE /372r1 Simulation Framework Progress Update - Nov November 8, 2000 Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 Simulation Framework.
IEEE e Performance Evaluation
MAC calibration results comparison
Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 September 2003
Evaluation Criteria and Traffic Models Status Update
Sleep States in IEEE ax Simulation Scenarios
Liaison Report Date: Authors: November 2009
Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios
Summary of Power Save Calibration Results
Simulation Metrics, & Criteria Ad Hoc Chairs Perspective Jan. 2001
PCF Model Progress Update Jan. 2001
Quantification of Capture Effect in Near-Far Scenarios
On the Need for Efficiency in the QoS Solution
EDCF TXOP Bursting Simulation Results
“ Radio Measurements in Support of WLAN Management”
CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited
TGe “Fast-Track” Proposal
Radio Measurements Ad-Hoc Group
Enhanced Channel Access Joint Proposal
Proposed Normative Text Changes Concerning QoS IBSS
TGe “Fast-Track” Proposal
PCF Model Progress Update Nov 2000
Remaining incoherence in Comparison Criteria
TGn Simulation Methodology Validation Proposal
Texas Instruments Incorporated
EC LMSC Policy and Procedures Update
OFDMA performance in 11ax
doc.: IEEE /xxx Authors:
January 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group report]
EDCF / EPCF Comparisons
TGn FRCC Jan 2004 Report Adrian P Stephens
Directed Multicast Service (DMS)
QoS Poll Modifications Allowing Priority
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
Submission Title: [MAC Performance enhancements for Alt-PHY]
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
TGe Consensus Proposal
November 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group report]
Mesh Media Access Coordination Ad Hoc Group Report Out
Simulation Effort Required to Satisfy the n Comparison Criteria
Proposed ERTS & ECTS Mechanisms
Proposed ERTS & ECTS Mechanisms
TGe Metrics & Criteria Ad Hoc Group Summary Report
Motion to Reconsider on MSDU Lifetime limits
TGe Metrics & Criteria Ad Hoc Group Summary Report
MAC applicability for WirelessHUMAN
Should Parameterized QoS be Optional
5-GHz Unified Protocol (5-UP) Proposal OFDM Extensions for a
Enhanced-DCF Wireless MAC Protocol: Some Simulation Results
Proposed Normative Text Changes Concerning Interruptive Polling
Submission Title: [TG3 Opening Report 17Sept01]
Evaluation of RR over EDCF
Joint Processing MU-MIMO – Update
Performance Comparison of Dynamic OFDM with n
Proposed Normative Text Changes Concerning Distributed Admissions
Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios
TGad Task Group Document Open Items
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks
Proposed Normative Text Changes Concerning Poll Responses
Should Parameterized QoS be Optional
Srinivas Kandala Sharp Labs
TGn FRCC Jan 2004 Report Adrian P Stephens
Presentation transcript:

Simulation Framework Progress Update - Nov. 2000 Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx November 2000 Simulation Framework Progress Update - Nov. 2000 Author: Matthew Sherman AT&T Labs - Research 180 Park Avenue Florham Park, NJ 07932 973-236-6791 mjsherman@att.com Date: November 6, 2000 Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research John Doe, His Company

Participants Since September Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx November 2000 Participants Since September Participant Company # mtgs /5 Keith Amann Spectralink 2 Greg Chesson Atheros 4 Sunghyun Choi Phillips Research 3 Jin-Meng Ho TI 4 Srini Kandala Sharp Labs 4 John Kowalski Sharp Labs 1 Utku Moral OPNET 5 Greg Parks ShareWave 1 Mike Rudnick Sharp Multimedia 2 Taylor Salman OPNET 2 Matthew Sherman AT&T Labs 5 Mattew Showmaker TI 1 Aman Singla Atheros 3 V.Srinivasa Somayazulu Intel 1 Khaled Turki TI 4 Thierry Walrant Philips Consumer 1 Total Attendance: 12+10+9+5+7 =43 Ave. # participants: 8.6 Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research John Doe, His Company

Review of Prior Documents Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx November 2000 Review of Prior Documents Key Documents: IEEE 802.11-00/265r1: A Simulation Framework for Evaluation of 802.11 QoS MAC Enhancements IEEE 802.11-00/196r2: TGe Metrics & Criteria ad hoc group summary report Other documents of Interest: IEEE 802.11-00/0320r2: September 20 Simulation Ad Hoc Group Minutes IEEE 802.11-00/0324: Simulation Framework Progress Update IEEE 802.11-00/0318 Simulation Model for PCF Slides IEEE 802.11-00/0319 Request for Guidance on Simulation Models Many other documents of interest referenced in 00/265 and 00/196 Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research John Doe, His Company

New Documents of Interest Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx November 2000 New Documents of Interest IEEE 802.11-00/0342r4: Ongoing Simulation, Metrics, and Criteria Ad Hoc Group Minutes.doc IEEE 802.11-00/0349r1: Models for MPEG2 and Video Conferencing IEEE 802.11-00/0363: Traffic Descriptions For 802.11E Performance Simulation IEEE 802.11-00/0XXX: Status on 802.11 PCF model as of 11/6/00 IEEE 802.11-00/0XXX: NS Simulations (Greg) IEEE 802.11-00/0XXX: Khaled’s Simulations Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research John Doe, His Company

Framework Software to Date Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx November 2000 Framework Software to Date Baseline DCF Models with Fixes OPNET See OPNET’s Wireless LAN October ‘00 Model PCF/DCF MAC AT&T Labs See 00/0XXX for latest status Channel Model Intel Out of date with current receiver model PHY Overhead Model Philips Only compatible with October Baseline DCF and Multi-source models PCF and 802.11a versions planned MPEG Source Models Sharp Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research John Doe, His Company

Framework Software to Date (cont.) Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx November 2000 Framework Software to Date (cont.) Multi-source node / MAC model OPNET Allows separate per stream address and priority label Enhanced MAC Statistics OPNET Jitter, global, per stream, per burst Raw Packet Generator Source OPNET Needed for Self Similar Packet Generation Model 3 Scenario OPNET Based on page 21 of 00/0196r2 Modified Model 3 Scenario TI Includes additional data streams Not yet operable Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research John Doe, His Company

Where to find Software Baseline DCF Models with Fixes (October models) Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx November 2000 Where to find Software Baseline DCF Models with Fixes (October models) Available as part of current OPNET installation PCF / DCF MAC Contact Matthew Sherman (mjsherman@att.com) Currently under NDA NS Models Contact Greg Chesson (greg@atheros.com) All other software on OPNET 802.11 FTP site Address is: http://www.opnet.com/80211/ Username: 80211 Password: wlan Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research John Doe, His Company

Review of Status as of Sept. ‘00 Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx November 2000 Review of Status as of Sept. ‘00 Decided to create simulation framework (May ‘00) Apples to Apples comparison of QoS MAC performance Baseline 802.11 model for comparison Selected simulation tools - OPNET (June ‘00) Some work in NS Started development of source models and baseline MAC (PCF/DCF) models (June ‘00) Criteria & Metrics document issued (Sept ‘00) IEEE 802.11-00/196r2: Simulation / Metrics and Criteria ad hocs merge (Sept ‘00) Start to address turning Metrics & Criteria into scenarios Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research John Doe, His Company

Progress as off Nov ‘00 Have first “Completed” Scenario (Model 3) Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx November 2000 Progress as off Nov ‘00 Have first “Completed” Scenario (Model 3) Still some “gluing” of pieces to do Have second scenario in works (Modified Model 3) Adds several data streams to Model 3 Seems near completion Greatly Enhanced statistics available in DCF MAC Had per station Added, global, Per Stream, Jitter, per burst Most enhancements in PCF MAC as well No per burst yet Various MAC “tweaks” Packet size fix, etc. Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research John Doe, His Company

Progress as off Nov ‘00 (cont.) Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx November 2000 Progress as off Nov ‘00 (cont.) Improved source models Multi-stream model Individual priority and destination per stream Improved MPEG models Single stream only Refined Video Conferencing model Uses existing Multi-stream model Raw Packet Generator source Allows Self similar traffic PHY overhead model 802.11b on DCF only MAC model Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research John Doe, His Company

“Model 3” (From 00/196r3?) AP ST1 ST2 ST3 ST4 ST5 November 2000 Stream1 - Voice 1 1: Add Stream1 - Voice 1 2: Wait One Second 3: Add Stream 2 - Voice 2 4: Wait One Second 5: Add Stream 3 - MPx 6: Wait One Second 7: Add Stream 4 - MPEG2 1 8: Wait 10 Seconds 9: Add Stream 5 - Bulk 1 10: Wait 10 Seconds 12: Add Voice 3 Stream3 - MPx 1 Stream2 - Voice 2 ST2 ST3 Stream4 - MPEG2 1 Stream5 - Bulk 1 ST4 ST5 Stream6 - Voice 3 Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research

“Modified Model 3” (From 00/363) November 2000 “Modified Model 3” (From 00/363) STA1 Voice 0_2 STA2 Priority levels: Data = 0 LP_Data = 1 MP_Data = 2 HP_Data = 3 MPEG2 = 4 VC = 5 Voice = 6 LP_Data 1_0 LP_Data 0_1 MP_Data 2_3 Voice 0_1 MP_Data 3_2 AP/PC VC (Video Conferencing) 0_3 STA3 Data_3_0 Data_0_3 MPEG2 4_3 HP_Data 0_5 HP_Data 5_0 Voice 0_4 STA5 STA4 Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research

Open Issues Other scenarios to code Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx November 2000 Open Issues Other scenarios to code Proposed EMACs to drop in scenarios Turn over in group Drifts from original directions Scenario definitions OPNET vs NS IEEE / ETSI Simulations Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research John Doe, His Company