Engaging Students in Quality Processes at UJ

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Learning and Teaching, Assessment and Moderation
Advertisements

Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
View of an Internal Panel Member Evaluation and Re-Validation Panel Member Carol Reid Ulster Business School Wednesday 2 October 2013.
Enhancing Student Engagement – what are we talking about? Graham Gibbs Research Centre for Student Engaged Educational Development.
‘Colin, I need to speak to you some time about my own CPD - I’ve been so busy that I just haven’t had time to think about myself… ’. ‘The most important.
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
Delivering Guidance in a Group Setting: optimising the potential for personal learning and development in a group context Jane Westergaard Senior Lecturer.
Improving Students’ understanding of Feedback
Measuring Learning Outcomes Evaluation
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Involving the Whole Organization in Creating or Restructuring a Volunteer Program Louise DeIasi DeCava Consulting.
1 “So who wants to lead a mathematics department?” Developing Future Secondary Subject Leaders for Mathematics – Collaborative Action Research Project.
LOGO Internal Quality Assurance Model: Evidence from Vietnamese Higher Education Tang Thi Thuy, Department of International and Comparative Education,
Individual versus representational: Community, engagement and belonging Student Unions and the Changing Nature of Student Leadership in the UK SRHE 2 June.
@sparqs_scotland Course Rep Training name of trainer associate trainer | sparqs.
Effective collaboration Session 1 – A professional community.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
1 Unit 1 Practicalities of classroom partnerships Presenter’s name XX.XX.XX.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
The Quality Standards for resource provisions For deaf children and young people in mainstream school.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Facilitate Group Learning
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Course Representation Newport USW Sites 2014/15. An Excellent Student Experience? Examples of a an excellent student learning experience? – Taught by.
Initial Project Aims To increase the capacity of primary schools in partnership with parents to implement a sustainable health and sexuality education.
Strategies for blended learning in an undergraduate curriculum Benjamin Kehrwald, Massey University College of Education.
KEVIN SMITH & KIM HORTON JULY 2015 Educational research and teaching Wales.
Uib.no UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Your Classroom Robert Gray, PhD University of Bergen 17 November 2015 Program for.
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
Pedagogy supplants technology to bridge the digital divide. Mat Schencks Lisette Toetenel Institute of Educational Technology and Technology Enhanced Learning,
Introducing SRC Creator: Jonathan McEvoy Engineering Department Southern Regional College.
Student engagement in quality: an introduction for staff
THE BSCS 5E INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL: CREATING TEACHABLE MOMENTS
SCHOOL BASED SELF – EVALUATION
Learning Without Borders: From Programs to Curricula
Faculty Use and Knowledge of Best Practices in the Online Environment
Teaching and Supporting Adult Learners
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
MYP planning: the unit planner
Planning (secondary version)
Mapping pedagogical practices through a framework on FYRE
The Year of Core Instruction
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners
Introductions… Who am I? Why am I here?. Programme Leaders Developing Academic Leadership and Innovative Practice.
B.A. 4 Placement Overview (Placement 1) 4th October 2016
Chartered College of Teaching
What are the impact of changes to lesson observation and feedback processes on teachers’ attitudes and practice? Why this? The new process. What did we.
Logo slide English/Arabic
Academic representative Committee CHAIR training
Responsibilities and engagement of an external examiner
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Developing a new model for employability
Assessment feedback of Hospitality students by industry stakeholders during Work-integrated learning. Beverley Seager Cape Town Hotel School Cape Peninsula.
European TRAINING FOUNDATION
Spelling and beyond Literacy Toolkit HGIOS
For further school friendly materials visit
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners Literacy
Dr Camille B. Kandiko Howson Academic Head of Student Engagement
What have we learned, where do we need to go?
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
PSHE at Key Stages 1 – 2 Guidance on Assessment, Recording and Reporting If it is not assessment for learning – why are we doing it? Assessment must.
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
FLIPPED CLASSROOM PRESENTED BY Dr.R.JEYANTHI Asst.Professor,
Achievement for All Alternative title page suitable for Structured Conversation training in primary school. INTRO: Ask the School Champion to introduce.
Planning a cross- curricular topic
Levels of involvement Consultation Collaboration User control
Presentation transcript:

Engaging Students in Quality Processes at UJ 24 October 2017 Presenter Mthuthuzeli Vongo: University of Johannesburg

Overview Purpose of the presentation Definition of student engagement Why student engagement? Case study: University of Johannesburg Methodology Findings Conclusion Discussion

Purpose of the presentation To initiate a discussion on ways to enhance student experience through participating in quality processes To share the UJ case study To invite inputs from colleagues on best practice .

Definition of student engagement Student engagement is: “ a student’s academic commitment and application (Horstmanshoff and Zimitat, 2007, citing Astin, 1984) and shown in time and energy devoted to activities that are educationally purposeful”. “the time and effort students devote to activities that are empirically linked to desired outcomes of college and what institutions do to induce students to participate in these activities (Kuh, 2001, 2003, 2009a)” Engagement is influence by different role players (i.e. students, lecturers and the institution).

Why student engagement? Student engagement is crucial to the quality of any university’s teaching and learning Students are a largely untapped source of rich and original ideas Often overlooked when developing the experience of those very students (Lincoln University) By taking opportunities to be involved with quality processes and providing feedback on their experience, students are not only influencing their own studies but that of future students

Why student engagement? (continued) “students are not experts in either subject matter or pedagogy. How can they possibly help me explore or design learning and teaching? (Cook-Sather, Bovill and Felten, 2014:15) ” BUT Underpinning student engagement is a stable system of student representation at programme, departmental and institutional levels Student Representatives (SR) are supposed to engage in curriculum development, quality assurance and in making sure that their wider student experience is enhanced.

Why student engagement? (Continued) SR sometimes lack the support and training to do so effectively, or Lack of clarity of expectations to do so confidently Engaging students in particularly complex university business, such as quality management, requires additional knowledge and support in order to contribute fully

Why student engagement? (Continued) Universities need to make sure that all such opportunities are backed up with good training and support that gives students transferable skills which they can use in their working lives

Case study: University of Johannesburg At the University of Johannesburg: Students participate in programme reviews only as interviewees They do not participate in the development of the Self-Evaluation Report (SER) Prior to or during the site visit, students who have been nominated by the department to be interviewees get briefed by CAPQP about their role of being interviewees and the quality processes of UJ

Methodology Two sets of questionnaires were distributed to 50 student interviewees at the quality review in the Faculty of Science and College of Business and Economics One questionnaire had 2 questions and this was handed out to students before meeting the panel Before meeting the panel , the questions were about what they expect their role to be and whether they thought students should play a role during review and a justification was required Another questionnaire with 3 questions , after meeting the panel

Methodology (Continued) After meeting the panel, they were required to 1) describe their experience with the panel 2) to tell whether the interview met their expectations and 3) how they thought they could contribute to the quality of the programme for which they are registered

Findings Before the interview with panel What do you expect your role to be in this interview with the panel? Reflect on experience as student Give feedback on whether a programme is structured in support of students Feedback on how the programme is facilitated To improve where there is a gap Comment on how lecturers treat students in the programme Provide panel with precise information on how the module is being taught

Expectation on role Identify possible gaps in the modules To give proper feedback on how lecturing, assessments and other activities related to learning.

Should students play a role ? All students were in support of this statement Selected Justifications: Justification 1 “Because they (students) are the ones who are mostly affected by any gaps that may be in the programme. Furthermore, their participation will ensure that their complaints are heard and attended to appropriately”

Should students play a role? Justification 2 “ students are relevant people who can provide a clear guide as to how well they understand and what can be done to improve the quality of learning”

After the interview with the panel. In few words, describe your experience with the panel. Friendly, helpful, insightful, positive, extremely interesting, interesting, yet a bit troubling, professional, impressive, overwhelming

After the interview with the panel (cont.) Did the interview meet your expectations? The majority of the students stated that the interview met their expectations. The few who felt it did not, stated issues like “only focused on two modules and not the whole programme ”

After the interview with the panel. Now that you have been part of this interview with the panel, how do you think you can contribute to the quality of the programme for which you are registered? Improve the quality of the programme Giving feedback on academic experience Raising concerns regarding modules

Conclusion Students have insights into teaching and learning that can make the practice more engaging, effective and rigorous Faculties can draw on students’ insights not only through collecting student responses but also through collaborating with students to study and design teaching and learning together Partnerships between students and faculties can change the understanding and capacities of both sets of partners- making us all better teachers and learners

Discussion How do you involve your students in quality? How should we support and train the students in quality matters?

Thank you