Comparing hydropathic interactions between Phenylalanine and Tyrosine

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assignment of PROSITE motifs to topological regions: Application to a novel database of well characterised transmembrane proteins Tim Nugent 6 Month.
Advertisements

Protein Structure.
1 Introduction to Sequence Analysis Utah State University – Spring 2012 STAT 5570: Statistical Bioinformatics Notes 6.1.
Proteins and Polypeptides
Structure Prediction. Tertiary protein structure: protein folding Three main approaches: [1] experimental determination (X-ray crystallography, NMR) [2]
Protein Structure, Databases and Structural Alignment
Visualizing Protein Structures. Genetic information, stored in DNA, is conveyed as proteins.
Garnier-Osguthorpe-Robson
Protein Presentation: Keratin Group: Mike Dibley Chris Geiger Noel Barkhooy.
Computational Biology, Part 10 Protein Structure Prediction and Display Robert F. Murphy Copyright  1996, 1999, All rights reserved.
. Protein Structure Prediction [Based on Structural Bioinformatics, section VII]
Data Mining Text mining, e.g.: Structures at specific resolution Structures by negative staining Structures by vitrification Mining structural data, e.g.:
Beta-amyloid precursor protein
Protein Structure Prediction Dr. G.P.S. Raghava Protein Sequence + Structure.
Macromolecular structure
Scott Hollingsworth (Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Oregon State University) Mentor: Dr. P. Andrew Karplus (Department Of Biochemistry & Biophysics,
Introduction to Protein Structure
3-Dimensional Structure of Proteins 4 levels of protein structure:
Proteins. Proteins? What is its How does it How is its How does it How is it Where is it What are its.
Protein Structure and Function 1 , 2 , 3 , 4  Structure Viewing, interpreting structure Protein Characterization BIO520 BioinformaticsJim Lund.
Levels of Protein Structure
Topic 7.5 Proteins (AHL).
Representations of Molecular Structure: Bonds Only.
Mrs. Einstein Research in Molecular Biology. Importance of proteins for cell function: Proteins are the end product of the central dogma YOU are your.
Protein Strucure Comparison Chapter 6,7 Orengo. Helices α-helix4-turn helix, min. 4 residues helix3-turn helix, min. 3 residues π-helix5-turn helix,
Biological-Engineering for Beginners Biochemistry II: Proteins Leigh Casadaban and Alina Gatowski July 26, 2009.
November 18, 2000ICTCM 2000 Introductory Biological Sequence Analysis Through Spreadsheets Stephen J. Merrill Sandra E. Merrill Marquette University Milwaukee,
Introduction to Protein Structure Prediction BMI/CS 576 Colin Dewey Fall 2008.
PROTEINS The final product of the DNA blueprint Hemoglobin.
BIOLOGICALLY IMPORTANT MACROMOLECULES PROTEINS. A very diverse group of macromolecules characterized by their functions: - Catalysts - Structural Support.
Polish Infrastructure for Supporting Computational Science in the European Research Space EUROPEAN UNION Examining Protein Folding Process Simulation and.
Bioinformatics 2 -- lecture 9
Protein Structure and Bioinformatics. Chapter 2 What is protein structure? What are proteins made of? What forces determines protein structure? What is.
Specific Defenses of the Host Part 2 (acquired or adaptive immunity)
Proteins Structure Predictions Structural Bioinformatics.
Protein Structure Prediction Dr. G.P.S. Raghava Protein Sequence + Structure.
Rad54: The Motor of Homologous Recombination.
IgSF.
. Nonpolar (hydrophobic) Nonpolar (hydrophobic) Amino Acid Side Chains
Comparison of Exemplars of Rotamer Clusters Across the Proteinogenic Amino Acids
Comparison of Phenylalanine v
Protein Structure Prediction
Prediction of protein structure
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
A Proposed Structure for Transmembrane Segment 7 of G Protein-Coupled Receptors Incorporating an Asn-Pro/Asp-Pro Motif  Karel Konvicka, Frank Guarnieri,
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Phosphorylation of a tyrosine residue in mGluR1a-CT1 by Fyn.
Rosetta: De Novo determination of protein structure
AnchorDock: Blind and Flexible Anchor-Driven Peptide Docking
The Crystal Structure of the Human Hepatitis B Virus Capsid
Protein structure prediction.
Human Leukotriene C4 Synthase at 4.5 Å Resolution in Projection
Loyola Marymount University
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Accounting for side-chain flexibility in protein-ligand docking: 3D Interaction Homology as an approach of quantifying side-chain flexibility of Tyrosine.
Pan-Cancer Analysis of Mutation Hotspots in Protein Domains
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages (July 1994)
William Welch, Shana Rheault, Duncan J. West, Alan J. Williams 
Accounting for side-chain flexibility in protein-ligand docking: 3D Interaction Homology as an approach of quantifying side-chain flexibility of Tyrosine.
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
G protein coupled receptors
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Chloe Jones, Isabel Gonzaga, and Nicole Anguiano
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
The Relation between α-Helical Conformation and Amyloidogenicity
Protein structure prediction
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Comparing hydropathic interactions between Phenylalanine and Tyrosine Sam Portillo BNFO 300 Comparing hydropathic interactions between Phenylalanine and Tyrosine

Homology Modeling – Begins with Amino Acid Sequence

Comparative search to find similar protein in structure database

Predicted Structure

Ahmed et al. (2015) uses “hint!” Developed by Drs. Glen Kellogg and Donald Abraham at VCU

Ahmed et al. (2015) uses “hint!” Developed by Drs. Glen Kellogg and Donald Abraham at VCU Quantifies hydropathic interactions between molecules

Ahmed et al. (2015) uses “hint!” Developed by Drs. Glen Kellogg and Donald Abraham at VCU Quantifies hydropathic interactions between molecules Uses experimental data on previously determined structures

Four classes of interactions “Hydropathy” Four classes of interactions

1. Favorable Hydrophobic Interactions1

1. Favorable Hydrophobic Interactions

2. Unfavorable Hydrophobic Interactions2

2. Unfavorable Hydrophobic Interactions3

3. Favorable Polar Interactions4

4. Unfavorable Polar Interactions5

Visualization of the classes

Ahmed et al. methods Ramachandran plot of 30,000 Tyrosines

Beta sheets form at -135, 135. Alpha helices form from (-90,-15) to (-35,-70)

HINT scoring Box is 20 Å3

HINT basis map Once mapping methods are applied, a 3D representation of the interactions is produced

Map-map similarity is calculated

Clustering with k-means

Tyrosine forms a limited number of 3D conformations

Phenylalanine v. Tyrosine

Chess square d4 predicts alpha helix structure

Highest residue counts in chess squares

Highest residue counts in chess squares

Ulmschneider et al. (2001) calculates Amino acid frequencies in alpha helices

Amino acid frequencies in alpha helices Extracellular Space Cytosol Amino acid frequencies in alpha helices

Amino acid frequencies in alpha helices Extracellular Space Cytosol Amino acid frequencies in alpha helices

Structure conservation among amino acids

References https://dna02.wikispaces.com/file/view/dna_molecule.gif/228169598/396x316/dna_molecule .gif http://myhome.sunyocc.edu/~weiskirl/phospholipid.gif https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lm-dAvbl330 https://revisionscience.com/a2-level-level-revision/chemistry-level-revision/bonding-and- structure/hydrogen-bonding Adapted from https://snipcademy.com/binf/img/lessons/pairwise-alignments/pam/hvsa.svg Ahmed MH, Koparde VN, Safo MK, Neel Scarsdale J, Kellogg GE. 3D interaction homology: The structurally known rotamers of tyrosine derive from a surprisingly limited set of information- rich hydropathic interaction environments described by maps. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma. 2015;83(6):1118-1136. doi:10.1002/prot.24813. Ulmschneider MB, Sansom MSP. Amino acid distributions in integral membrane protein structures. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1512(1):1-14. doi:10.1016/S0005-2736(01)00299-1.