Stone column YZ.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educational Resource Library
Advertisements

foundations are generally grouped into two categories:
Chp12- Footings.
ENGINEERING MATERIAL PROPERTIES (CE1303)
UNIQUE SOILS (BASIC PRINCIPLE & IMPROVEMENT METHOD) Session 11 Course: S Ground Improvement Method Year: 2010.
4.3 STONE OR SAND COLUMNS IN SOFT CLAYEY MATERIALS :
Foundations Purpose – To transfer weight of structure (including live loads) to the ground within allowable settlement criteria.
SOFT SOIL (PROBLEMS & STABILISATION METHOD) Session 2 - 7
Chapter (1) Geotechnical Properties of Soil
 Abandon the site and locate the structure elsewhere  Design deep foundations to carry the weight of the structure to competent stratum  Redesign the.
  AN-najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil engineering Department Prepared by: Eng. Imad A. F. Jarara’h. Submitted.
Foundation Fundamentals GSD 6204 Building Technology Harvard Graduate School of Design.
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS Spread footings Mat (Raft) foundations Square
CE 486 DEEP COMPACTION Name : Ali Hamood Al-teeb. ID :
Shallow Foundation Settlement
Basic Civil Engineering-Foundation
Bearing Capacity Theory
SOIL, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Foundation Engineering CE 483
FOUNDATION.
EXTERNAL STABILITY The MSE wall system consists of three zones. They are: 1. The reinforced earth zone. 2. The backfill zone. 3. The foundation soil zone.
Session 5 – 6 BEARING CAPACITY OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION
Details of Construction Lecture-2 “Shallow Foundation”
FOOTINGS. FOOTINGS Introduction Footings are structural elements that transmit column or wall loads to the underlying soil below the structure. Footings.
Bearing Capacity ظرفيت باربري.
4.4 SOIL NAILING SOIL NAILING IS A REINFORCEMENT METHOD TO REINFORCE THE GROUND WITH STEEL BARS OR STEEL BARS IN GROUT FILLED HOLES. IT IS MAINLY USED.
FOUNDATION Engineering Design of shallow foundation
Properties, Handling and Mixing of Particulate Solids By Sidra Jabeen Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology Lahore.
Bearing Capacity from SPT and PLT
Modern GROUND IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR HIGHWAYS
CE 482 Examples.
Foundation Loads Dead Load Live Load Wind Load
1 Pile Groups Most pile foundations contain group of piles instead of single pileThe supporting capacity of a group of ‘n’similar piles in many cases (not.
BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL Session 3 – 4
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.
Deep Replacement Presented by: M. Taromi
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ( ). 1. BHOL SUFIYAN [ ] 2. CHAVDA KRUNAL [ ] YEAR: 2 ND SEM: 3 RD CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PRESENTED.
Prepared by:- Barham Jalal
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Course : CE 6405 – Soil Mechanic
Compaction Of Soil GANDHINAGAR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Group Members
Soil Improvement.
BHAGWAN MAHAVIR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
The Engineering of Foundations
FE: Geotechnical Engineering
FOOTING AND FOUNDATION
Soil Mechanics-II STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN SOILS DUE TO SURFACE LOADS
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS BY, Babariya Ashish Gondaliya Ronak Gondaliya akshay Javiya hardik
Ground improvement techniques
CHAPTER FOUR LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE. 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Definitions of Key Terms 3.2 Lateral Earth Pressure at Rest 3.3 Active and Passive Lateral Earth.
SOIL, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
PREPARED BY SK SOHEL, CE-3RD YEAR GUIDED BY JAYASHREE SENGUPTA
WHAT IS LIQUEFACTION.
Arch205 Materials and building construction 1 foundation
Arch205 building construction foundation
Component or parts of a building
Structure II Course Code: ARCH 209 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.
AIN NIHLA KAMARUDZAMAN Ext: 8968
Classification, Engineering Properties & Consolidation Methods
Decision Tree for the Selection of Appropriate Ground Improvement Technique in the Arabian Gulf Region Bashar Tarawneh, Ph.D., P.E Associate Professor.
Find: Bearing Capacity, qult [lb/ft2]
Example 3.1 A square foundation is 1.5m x 1.5m in plan. The soil supporting the foundation has a friction angle ǿ = 20o, &
SHALLOW FOUNDATION Session 5 – 10
Soil Mechanics-II Soil Stabilization and Improvement
Graduation Project Bracing system for deep excavation.
Civil Engineering Dept.
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Foundation
Structural Design I Course Code: CIVL312 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.
Bearing Capacity of Layered Soils.
Presentation transcript:

Stone column YZ

What is Stone Column? stone columns are a ground improvement technique to improve the load bearing capacity of the soil. The stone column consists of crushed coarse aggregates of various sizes. The ratio in which the stones of different sizes will be mixed is decided by design criteria.

What is Stone Column? (Cont.) Vibro-Replacement Stone Columns extends the range of soils that can be improved by vibratory techniques to include cohesive soils. Densification and/or reinforcement of the soil with compacted granular columns or “stone columns” is accomplished by either top-feed or the bottom-feed method. Cohesive, mixed and layered soils generally do not densify easily when subjected to vibration alone. The Vibro-Replacement Stone Column technique was developed specifically for these soils, effectively extending the range of soil types that can be improved with the deep vibratory process. With Vibro- Replacement Stone Columns, columns of dense, crushed stone are designed to increase bearing capacity, reduce settlement, aid densification and mitigate the potential for liquefaction, and improve shear resistance.

The Vibro-Replacement Stone Column Process! 1. Reduces shallow foundation settlement. 2. Increases bearing capacity, allowing reduction in footing size. 3. Mitigates liquefaction potential. 4. Provides slope stabilization. 5. Permits construction on fills. 6. Permits shallow footing construction. 7. Prevents earthquake-induced lateral spreading.

Stone Column Construction methods! The two primary methods of Vibro Stone Column construction are: Wet, Top Feed Method (Replacement and Displacement). 2. Dry, Bottom Feed Method (Displacement).

Stone Column Construction (cont.) **Wet, Top Feed Method (Replacement and Displacement): In this technique, jetting water is used to remove soft material, stabilize the probe hole, and ensure that the stone backfill reaches the tip of the vibrator. This is the most commonly used and most cost-efficient of the deep vibratory methods. However, handling of the spoil generated by the process may make this method more difficult to use on confined sites or in environmentally sensitive areas.

Stone Column Construction (cont.) **Top-Feed Construction Method:

Stone Column Construction (cont.) **Dry, Bottom Feed Method (Displacement): This technique uses the same vibrator probes as standard Vibro-Replacement Stone Columns, but with the addition of a hopper and supply tube to feed the stone backfill directly to the tip of the vibrator. Bottom Feed Vibro-Replacement is a completely dry operation where the vibrator remains in the ground during the construction process. The elimination of flushing water in turn eliminates the generation of spoil, extending the range of sites that can be treated. Treatment is possible up to a depth of 80 feet and is not inhibited by the presence of groundwater.

Design of Stone Columns using Heinz J. Priebes method Basic principle Load distribution and lateral support from the stone column & surrounding stiffened ground on an area basis are considered to give an improvement factor. The improvement factor indicates increase in compression modulus and the extent to which the settlement is reduced by the column ground improvement. The design method refers to the improving effect of stone columns in a soil which is otherwise unaltered in comparison to the initial state. i.e. the installation of stone columns densities the soil between.

The following idealized conditions are assumed in the design: • The column is based on a rigid layer • The column material is uncompressible • The bulk density of column and soil is neglected. Hence, the column can not fail in end bearing and any settlement of the load area results in a bulging of the column which remains constant all over its length

Determination of the Basic Improvement Factor no : improvement factor A : unit cell area Ac : The area of collumn

Relation between the improvement factor n0, the reciprocal area ratio A/AC and the friction angle of the backfill material, ϕc.

Consideration of Column Compressibility The compressibility of the column material can be considered in using a reduced improvement factor n1 which results from the formula developed for the basic improvement factor, n0 when the given reciprocal area ratio A/AC is increased by an additional amount of Δ(A/AC).The Reduced Improvement Factor is calculated by using the following equation, n1

Variation of Additional amount on the area ratio with the ratio of the constrained moduli

Consideration of the Overburden 1)The neglect of the bulk densities of columns and soil means that the initial pressure difference between the columns and the soil which creates bulging, depends solely on the distribution of the foundation load P on columns and soil, and that it is constant all over the column length. 2)The consideration of external loads the weights of the columns Wc and of the soil Wc which possibly exceed the external loads considerably decreases the pr. Difference and the bulging is reduced. 3)The pressure difference is a linear parameter in the derivations of the improvement factor, the ratio of the initial pressure difference and the one depending on depth expressed as depth factor fd - delivers a value by which the improvement factor n1 increases to the final improvement factor n2 = fd × n1.

The depth factor

Variation of Influence factor, y for different values of friction angles

Shear Values of Improved Ground The shear resistance from friction of the composite system can be determined by using the following equation: The cohesion of the composite system depends on the proportional to the loads using the following equation

Proportional Load on Stone Columns for different values of friction angles.

Settlement of improved Ground The design ensues from the performance of an unlimited column grid below an unlimited load area. The total settlement which results for this case at homogeneous conditions, is readily to determine on the basis of the foregoing description with n2 as an average value over the depth d is given by the following equation: Wherw: p : stress of foundation load; d: improvement depth; Ds : constrained modulus of soil The settlement of the ground with out improvement is 25.1cm which is more than that of settlement with improvement of 5.1cm.

Variation of settlement ratio with d/D ratio of Single Footing

Variation of settlement ratio with d/D ratio of Strip Footing

Bearing capacity of improved ground Safety factor against bearing capacity of the soil can be determined using using the following equations Factor of Safety Against Bearing capacity= σ0f/P

Design Example Design stone columns for an embankment with the following properties: Top width of embankment= 5.0m with 1:1 slope on both sides. Surcharge on embankment=20kPa; Unit Wt. of embankment fill= 20KN/m3 with depth of stone column= 6.0m. Given friction angle of column material= 40o; Cohesion=20kpa; Friction angle of soil= 0 degrees; μs=1/3; Column diameter=0.75m; Unit Wt. of Soil=16 KN/m3. Square Foundation is on embankment (B=1,5)

Step1) Basic Improvement factor(no) given by: Kac= Tan2(45-c/2)= 0.217 Area of Column, Ac= 0.785*0.752 =0.441 Area of unit Cell, A= 1.5*1.5= 2.25 μs=0.33 By substituting the above values in no, we get basic improvement factor as, no= 2.30

Step2) Determine Reduced improvement factor(n1) The compressibility of the column material can be considered in using a reduced improvement factor n1 which results from the formula developed for the basic improvement factor n0 when the given reciprocal area ratio A/AC is increased by an additional amount of Δ(A/AC). Assuming constrained modulus Ratio, Dc/Ds=100, we get ΔA/Ac=0.05 and substituting, we get. Reduced Improvement factor, n1=2.28

Step3) The depth factor ƒd=2.01. ƒd = Depth factor due to overburden. n2=improved factor (with overburden constraint) n2=ƒd*n1 =2.01*2.28 =4.58

Step4) Determine improved shear values m’=0.561; Tan=(2*0.578*tan 40 +(1- 0.578)*Tan0) = 47 deg rees The cohesion of the composite system depends on the proportional to the loads using the following equation. C’=8.44kPa c‘= (1-0.561)*20

Step6) Determine the bearing capacity of the soil. Factor of safety against bearing capacity=104.226/60.0=1.73