Global Agenda of Action In Support of Sustainable Livestock Sector Development Focus Area 1: Closing the Efficiency Gap.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19-20 September 2013, IBGE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Advertisements

Global Implementation Strategy for SEEA
Working Group 3 Thematic Clustering. VALUE ADDED of the thematic cluster approach Roles and Activities Information Sharing Networking Creating new partnerships.
The UN-REDD Programme 1 st Policy Board Meeting 9-10 March 2009.
Transport Study to support an impact assessment of the Urban Mobility Package on SUMPs CoR Meeting June 13 DG MOVE.
TVET working group contributions. What are the possible options for obtaining decent living and working conditions without joining the informal economy?
Western Balkans and Europe 2020 Western Balkans and Europe 2020 Towards Convergence and Growth – Draft Conclusions Brussels, March 2011.
Focus Area 1 Closing the efficiency gap Ernesto Reyes, Chair, FA1.
International Civil Aviation Organization Nancy Graham Director - Air Navigation Bureau 28 October 2011 Symposium on RSOOs Meeting Outcomes.
Focus Area 2 Restoring value to Grasslands Ottawa October 2013 Liz Wedderburn Alexandre Ickowicz Ilse Kohler-Rollefson Barry Boubakary Ben Henderson.
The Smart Specialisation Platform
Academia Work to date October 15, What concrete engagement? o For good research engagement: clear focus needed. o Identify overlap and synergy,
The way we work – Issues and Options. SUSTAINABILITY: PRACTICE CHANGE EVIDENCE UNDERSTAND PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES TOOLS GUIDANCE (RULES) INCENTIVES.
Presentation of the workshop results to the plenary session A) Strengthening rural entrepreneurship by connecting the local production with other economic.
Role of RAS in the Agricultural Innovation System Rasheed Sulaiman V
GAA – Breakout Group Notes. What concrete engagement will you bring to the Agenda? Will accept FAO’s invite to participate as equals – future impact also.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool Alessandra Alfieri UNSD.
Works of EGTT and NAPA Process Technologies Needs Assessments Innovative Financing Adaptation Technology.
The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.
Environmental sustainability: a feed and livestock industry perspective Nick Major EU Food SCP RT Plenary meeting 20 November 2013.
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
The OECD sustainable manufacturing toolkit Sustainability and US Competitiveness Summit October 8, 2009 Michael Bordt Structural Policy Division Directorate.
1 Taking the Next Steps: Facilitating MEA Implementation with Cleaner Production Status and Potential for Future Activities.
Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.
State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources The Global Strategy for the Management of Farm Animal Genetic Resources.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
UNDP-GEF Adaptation 0 0 Impact of National Communications on Process of Integrating Climate Change into National Development Policies UNFCCC Workshop on.
DEVCO Approach Paper Research & Innovation for Food and Nutrition Security / Sustainable Agriculture.
Regional Integration Cluster Olivier Hartmann - SSATP.
Research Quality Assessment following the RAE David Sweeney Director, Research, Innovation, Skills.
Sustain and Enhance Cooperation on Sustainable Development between Europa and Southeast Asia Cluster Workshop at the ASEAN-EU STI DAYS 2015 Tools to support.
Adaptation knowledge needs and response under the UNFCCC process Adaptation Knowledge Day V Session 1: Knowledge Gaps Bonn, Germany 09 June 2014 Rojina.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
1 Improving Statistics for Food Security, Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development – Action Plan for Africa THE RESEARCH COMPONENT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
1 Global livestock markets: outlook, policies, and future challenges Nancy Morgan, Livestock Economist FAO/World Bank.
UNDP Handbook for conducting technology needs assessments and Preliminary analysis of countries’ TNAs UNFCCC Seminar on the development and transfer on.
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
Trade Union Training on employment policies with a focus on youth employment 11 July, 2007 Turin, Italy.
WP 9: 1 st Planning meeting summary Clarification between WP members of common objectives: Workshop planning and logistics with time- line Planning for.
Integrating GEF in Environment and Sustainable Development Plans and Policies - – Jamaica’s Experience GEF CSP Sub-regional Workshop for Caribbean Focal.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.
African Development Bank Tunis, Tunisia March, 2011 Dr. Anthony NYONG Manager, ORQR.3 SESA Workshop AfDB’s Green Growth Strategy: What Role can SESA.
Global public policy network on water management Water and Climate Change Adaptation – Key Messages for COP-15 gppn.
SESSION 3: SETTING PRIORITIES – COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE AND OPTIONS ANALYSIS.
Building Statistical Capacity to Monitor Development Francesca Perucci United Nations Statistics Division UNSD-SADC Statistics Project First Meeting of.
Puget Sound Partnership Action Agenda: Roadmap to Completion.
WORKSHOP 3 AGRICULTURE IN THE OUTERMOST REGIONS. Introduction (1) Agriculture is a critical sector in the economy of the EU's outermost regions. Agricultural.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
UCLG’s Capacity and Institution Building Annual Meeting Integration of the 2030 Agenda in programming of CIB members Tim Kehoe May 19, 2016.
Presented by: Alice Willett, UK Presented to: FAO; 18 October 2016, Rome, Italy Animal Health and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity Network.
Kick Off Meeting Largs, Scotland
Integrated policy frameworks
Baltic Sea Region Urban Forum for Smart Cities
Institutional Strengthening Support
13 / 07/ 2016 SAI Platform Rice Project Group and GRA Priorities.
Livestock – compelling figures
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Nancy Graham Director - Air Navigation Bureau 28 October 2011
Building Statistical Capacity UNSD perspective
Working Group 3 Thematic Clustering
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
Presentation transcript:

Global Agenda of Action In Support of Sustainable Livestock Sector Development Focus Area 1: Closing the Efficiency Gap

GAA-FA 1 Presentation of Programme Status Three FA1 Working Group meetings Developed Framework for Natural Resource Use Efficiency – Development of Metrics – Inventory of Livestock Projects – Analysis of Livestock Information Systems Process has been established, but will also be refined. – Current task is not to revisit what will be done – Current task is to seek support for framework – Current task to Define the Scope

GAA-FA 1 Presentation of Programme Status Natural Resource Use (NRU) Efficiency will be now include analysis of Economic Implications, Social Impacts, Environment, and Animal Welfare. – Are there mechanisms to assess Economic, Social, Environment, and Animal Welfare impacts of proposed NRU Efficiency solutions. – Measures must be easy to collect in the field. – Measures must also be science based and defendable – Must have guidance on integrating assessment with core programming – Selection of measures need to be done quickly so as not to hold up process Selection of proto-type Pilot Project in a Target Country – Some GAA members already have demonstration projects operating that are beyond the Pilot stage. – Existing projects should already have basic measures in place that can be built upon.

GAA-FA 1 Presentation of Programme Status Reflect or Measure Impacts? – Focus remains on measuring NRU Efficiency – Are Economic, Environmental, Social and Animal Welfare impacts also to be measured? – Can impacts be reflected without completed full measurements? Measures will be made on NRU Efficiency, as well as Economic, Environmental, Social and Animal Welfare impacts. Additional measurements will be added based on the unique aspects of each Pilot.

GAA-FA 1 Evolution of Program Efficiency Matrix and NRU Metrics – Presented to meeting for review and approval – Confirmation that consultation has been open for 2 months – Limited additional changes are required – but will be accepted for a short period of time – Main process is to clean the Metrics to remove duplication or overlaps – Goal is to develop a base set of simple indicators that can be measured in the field. Results need to be easily read and understood. Next Steps – One week consultation on existing Matrix and Metrics – Then develop final species-specific versions for application to Pilots – Then present information system platform Next Consultation – Early in 2014 meeting will be convened to review and confirm the final proto-type methodology tied to a sample project.

GAA-FA 1 Region and Species Selection Criteria Promote regional/local interventions through efficient practices across the livestock sector (Piloting, Projects, Initiatives) – What are the selection criteria: High Current Production, Site of Future Growth, Existing Initiative Adaptation? Target pilot activities where highest potential NRU Efficiency Gains are possible – Consider potential transferability and scalability. – Select sites with highest “demand” for improving NRU Efficiency – adding value to existing industry or government priorities. May lead to Dairy in India or Beef in Russia/Customs Union – Align with existing incentives being offered for Environmental Improvement May lead to existing programs in Latin America – Using GLEAM and Agri-Benchmark databases to target, once the criteria has been confirmed.

GAA-FA 1 Pilot and Project Selection Criteria Number of Stakeholders Involved Scalability – Namibia, Communal Farms Close to the Value Chains and Markets Where Work Has Been Completed – ILRI, Livestock and Fish – EBLEX, Integrated Species LCA – NOVUS, Sustainable Poultry in Brazil – Agri Benchmark, Comparative Cost of Production Seeking Win-Win-Win Examples that Serve as Catalysts GAA Stakeholders Are Encouraged to Proposal Pilots

GAA-FA 1 Pilot and Project Selection Criteria Scope of Piloting will be to test in 1-2 sites – Review and revision will be required before expansion Actual results of measurements in the field must be presented to the next MSP in one year Importation of existing projects must allow for FA1 Stakeholders to Measure and Assess NRU Efficiency changes

GAA-FA 1 Objectives Facilitate exchange of information/linkages between stakeholders, livestock initiates and projects – Electronic Networking Methods to avoid required attendance in Rome – Create Central Portal for storage and presentation of information and projects (Support Group)

GAA-FA 1 Early Implementation of Pilot(s) Funding must be allocated to allow initial pilot(s) to be selected, designed, implemented, and reported. – To date, most work has been contributed in-kind by stakeholders – Funding from donors will required. – Coordination will be required from Support Group and existing GAA donors

GAA-FA 1 Programme Evolution: Lessons from Panels and Break-out Sessions (1) Linkage to FA2 – Restoring Value to Grassland – NRU Efficiency and Forage Production are Linked Explore Synergy between FA1-FA2 – Structural Mechanisms – Avoid Duplication and Leverage Advances Explore Linkage with LEAP – Many shared stakeholders – Focused solely on Environmental Sustainability Metrics GHG, followed by Land Use, Nutrient Use, Water, Biodiversity – Technical Process Closely Related to FA1 – LEAP will provide many tools for use by FA1 – FA1 may assist LEAP to prioritize next areas to study

GAA-FA 1 Programme Evolution: Lessons from Panels and Break-out Sessions (2) Industry initiatives such as Global Dairy Agenda for Action (Dairy Sustainability Framework) – Not necessarily for Pilots – May assist on structure and methods Use of industry players to serve as Peer-to-Peer Teaching – Actual producers share with and teach others to catalyze further practice change.

GAA-FA 1 Additional Relevant Strategies, Partners, and Activities Strategies and Activities Links with OIE on impacts such as Animal Welfare and Food Safety Payment for Environmental Services (PESS) – Direct incentives create Practice Change faster through economic signals FA1 is open to receive additional Project/Pilot Proposals Partners Consumer Goods Forum (Large Retail) – Practice Change will be highly valued and is a point of differentiation Consumer representation is important

GAA-FA 1 How current/future Programme Catalyzes Practice Change: Evidence – Dialogue --Tools Pilot Activities/Proof of Concept Prototype Projects/Demonstration Units Workshops/Communication Links Between Initiatives and Focus Areas Peer-to-Peer “Farmer” Learning – Industry Mentorship has been very effective – Roles for external (transfer) and internal (propagate) mentors Economic Incentives – Markets and Governments both have a role