First 10 minutes to fill out online course evaluations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reaction-Diffusion Modelling of Pattern Formation. Charlotte E. Jupp*, Ruth E. Baker, Philip K. Maini. Centre for Mathematical Biology, University of Oxford.
Advertisements

Pattern Formation in a Reaction-diffusion System Noel R. Schutt, Desiderio A. Vasquez Department of Physics, IPFW, Fort Wayne IN.
Jochen Triesch, UC San Diego, 1 Pattern Formation Goal: See how globally ordered spatial structures can arise from local.
MSc GBE Course: Genes: from sequence to function Brief Introduction to Systems Biology Sven Bergmann Department of Medical Genetics University of Lausanne.
Inferring regulatory networks from spatial and temporal gene expression patterns Y. Fomekong Nanfack¹, Boaz Leskes¹, Jaap Kaandorp¹ and Joke Blom² ¹) Section.
Turing Patterns in Animal Coats Junping Shi. Alan Turing ( )  One of greatest scientists in 20 th century  Designer of Turing machine (a theoretical.
Chapter 18 Interpolation The Islamic University of Gaza
Pattern Formation Patrick Lucey.
Parabolic PDEs Generally involve change of quantity in space and time Equivalent to our previous example - heat conduction.
Exponential Notation Significant Figures
Logarithms are important in many applications of mathematics to everyday problems, particularly in biology, engineering, economics and social science.
Post-trancriptional Regulation by microRNA’s Herbert Levine Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, UCSD with: E. Levine, P. Mchale, and E. Ben Jacob.
1 COMS 161 Introduction to Computing Title: The Digital Domain Date: September 6, 2004 Lecture Number: 6.
Principles of Extrapolation
Introduction to Physics Science 10. Measurement and Precision Measurements are always approximate Measurements are always approximate There is always.
Pattern formation in nonlinear reaction-diffusion systems.
Data Analysis Applying Mathematical Concepts to Chemistry.
Measurement and Significant Digits. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> object | | | | cm ruler How do we record the length.
Arthur Straube PATTERNS IN CHAOTICALLY MIXING FLUID FLOWS Department of Physics, University of Potsdam, Germany COLLABORATION: A. Pikovsky, M. Abel URL:
Interpolation - Introduction
Welcome to Physics 313 Professor Henry Greenside Department of Physics.
What happens when valve is opened between
Data Modeling Patrice Koehl Department of Biological Sciences

of Temperature in the San Francisco Bay Area
Department of Mathematics
Significant Figures.
Chapter 14 Inference on the Least-Squares Regression Model and Multiple Regression.
Large Margin classifiers
How to Find the Square Root of a Non-Perfect Square
Schedule for next few weeks
BUSINESS MATHEMATICS & STATISTICS.
Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Ligand-receptor binding as a chemical reaction
At the backboard: linear stability analysis of differential equations and of partial differential equations Cases to discuss: One-variable differential.
Class discussion: How should we define a “pattern”?
Two talks this week and next on morphogenesis
Weekly problem solving session
How to read data off a log axis
What is rate equation for [E] for two coupled substrate-enzyme reactions with same enyzme?
of Temperature in the San Francisco Bay Area
Simple Linear Regression - Introduction
Statistical Methods For Engineers
1 Department of Engineering, 2 Department of Mathematics,
1 Department of Engineering, 2 Department of Mathematics,
Assigning and Propagating Uncertainties
1 Department of Engineering, 2 Department of Mathematics,
Matching Models to Data in Modelling Morphogen Diffusion
COMS 161 Introduction to Computing
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Reaction & Diffusion system
A. Delon, Y. Usson, J. Derouard, T. Biben, C. Souchier 
Topic 11: Measurement and Data Processing
Bicoid by the Numbers: Quantifying a Morphogen Gradient
Answer Grid – 3 & 4 Step Equations
Arijit Maitra, Ken A. Dill  Biophysical Journal 
Combinations with repetitions allowed
Critical Timing without a Timer for Embryonic Development
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
SKTN 2393 Numerical Methods for Nuclear Engineers
Stochastic Pacing Inhibits Spatially Discordant Cardiac Alternans
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Warm-up ~ Happy Wednesday!!
Fernando D. Marengo, Jonathan R. Monck  Biophysical Journal 
Satomi Matsuoka, Tatsuo Shibata, Masahiro Ueda  Biophysical Journal 
Stochastic Pacing Inhibits Spatially Discordant Cardiac Alternans
Probing the Limits to Positional Information
CISE-301: Numerical Methods Topic 1: Introduction to Numerical Methods and Taylor Series Lectures 1-4: KFUPM CISE301_Topic1.
The Bicoid Morphogen System
Measurements and Calculations
Presentation transcript:

Physics 414: Introduction to Biophysics Professor Henry Greenside December 5, 2017

First 10 minutes to fill out online course evaluations http://assessment.trinity.duke.edu/students-course-evaluations Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95

French flag model of how fruit fly embryo sets up precise reproducible structures: a morphogen gradient Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95

At the blackboard: mathematics of a point source, diffusion, and uniform degradation leads to a puzzle: length scale does not depend on size of domain Bicoid is first morphogen in temporal development that shows a pattern, starts off successive morphogen patterns. How to get what seems to be exponential spatial profile? Anterior source + diffusion + uniform degradation of Bicoid protein product gives exponential. Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95

Compare exponential with lambda for different fly species D and lambda should be about same for all species Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95 Decay constants lambda from fitted exponentials to Bicoid gradients. Lambda increases approximately linearly with embryo size contrary to prediction of diffusion-decay model.

Fitting exponential to data (xi, yi): least-squares fit a straight line to (xi, ln(yi)) Mathematica Fit function handles a general linear basis: Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95

At the blackboard: solution to lambda(L) scaling puzzle, assume Bcd degradation occurs only in nuclei Key biological insight: although fly embryos differ by factor of five in length, they have the same number of nuclei over that length. So if degradation occurs only inside nuclei, get decay length that varies with embryo length L. Can use finite-difference numerical method to find approximate solutions to diffusion-degradation equation with given boundary conditions. Set degradation term -k b to zero in cytosol. Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95

1D simulation of diffusion and decay with source using finite differences on uniform space-time grid Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95

Results of 1d simulations regarding establishment of bicoid gradient, scaling with embryo size Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95

Spatial patterning of Bicoid and Hunchback Bicoid is green Hunchback is red DNA is blue Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95

Establishment of the Hunchback profile Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95 Fig 20.7

Use statistical physics and Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC) model to deduce Hunchback profile from the Bicoid gradient (Fig 20.8) Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95

Pattern formation in cyanobacterium Anabaena: how to get regularly spaced heterocysts Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95

Solution: diffusive inhibitor RGSGR peptide Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95

Turing’s insight: diffusion can induce instability of otherwise spatially uniform chemical reactions, leading to cellular patterns. Now called a “Turing instability: Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95 Alan Turing 1912-1954

A famous paragraph about how best to create a theoretical model of some physical phenomenon Answer is 0.05. The green dot is about 2/3 of the way between 0.01 and 0.1 so the 0.01 value is multiplied by 10^(2/3) = 100^(1/3). Since 4^3 = 64 and 5^3 = 125, 100^(1/3) is less than but closer to 125, so estimated value is 5 * 0.01 = 0.05. To two significant digits, 100^(1/3) = 0.47. Where some tickmarks would lie 0.02 Log[10,2] = 0.3 or about 1/3 from the left 0.03 Log[10,3] = 0.48 or about 0.5 0.04 Log[10,4] = 0.60 0.05 Log[10,5] = 0.70 0.06 Log[10,6] = 0.78 0.07 Log[10,7] = 0.85 0.08 Log[10,8] = 0.90 0.09 Log[10,9] = 0.95

One-minute End-of-class Question