Court Expert System in Germany -Overview-. Who is an Expert? No definition in German law but defined in jurisprudence No definition in German law but.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
Advertisements

The jury system Chapter 12.
Ch. 5-3 Civil Procedure.
Legal Issues Final Review. Multiple Choice What is the situation in which a lawyer sues another lawyer for a serious error that caused a client to lose.
3-2 Federal Court System By Kaitlyn Flanagan and Lindsey Hill.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Discovery: Overview and Interrogatories Litigation and Procedure.
ENFORCEMENT OF DISPUTE BOARD DECISIONS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Dr Erhard Böhm Baier Böhm Attorneys at Law, Vienna DRBF 6th Annual International Conference,
1 EXPERT EVIDENCE The evidential value of the expert’s testimony will depend on the expertise of the expert. Reference should be made to the qualifications,
INSURANCE CLAIMS IN MEXICO INSURANCE CONTRACT 1.Insurer shall be a company duly authorized to carry out business as an Insurer in accordance to Federal.
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
Chapter 4 Researching the Law.
Unit A-Business Law Essential Standard 1.00
Research into Criminal Hearing Procedures in Britain 2014.
1 LAND REGISTRAR’S STATUS IN EUROPE 1. 2 GENERAL OVERVIEW 25 ELRN’s CP contributions - 23 MS different organizations different systems different profiles.
By Aidan, Lochie, Curtis. WORKPLACE DISPUTES  Negotiation: Is a method of compromising disputes within a workplace. This easygoing approach usually.
Negligence Chapter 8. Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning Objectives Define and identify elements of negligence. Explain concepts: –Duty –Standard.
CHAPTERCHAPTER McGraw-Hill/Irwin©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Rules of Construction NINENINE.
 Judge  Prosecutor  Defense Attorney 2 Copyright Texas Education Agency (TEA)
2 Copyright and Terms of Service Copyright © Texas Education Agency, These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as the property of the.
REED SHEDD PAGNATTARO MOREHEAD
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice
Stages of an Arbitration Arbitration Week in Palestine Session #4 December 9,
Why do we need good forensic science ? A Jamieson.
BUSINESS LAW JEOPARDY All About Contracts Contract Formation Civil Procedure TORTSTHE “LAW”
Twelve Angry Men By: Reginald Rose. Discussion What is a jury? How is it chosen? What responsibility does an individual have to accept jury duty? How.
Legal Documents Some of the papers in your file cabinet... Note the word “some”. This overview is not comprehensive.
What is “a jury of your peers” in Oregon?.
TOPIC 4 UNDERSTANDING CASE LAW Mr. Mahyuddin Daud Department of Laws, CFSIIUM.
16.1 Activity, Video links, and Information
Comprehensive Volume, 18 th Edition Chapter 17: Form of Paper and Electronic Contracts.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION DISCOVERY OVERVIEW.
The Adversary System Part I Chapter 7. Learning Intention Explain the processes and procedures for the resolution of criminal cases and civil disputes.
The Legal System Chp. 30. Structure of the Legal System Trial Court – the first court to hear a case Appellate Court – has the authority to review the.
Comprehensive Volume, 18 th Edition Chapter 18: Interpretation of Contracts.
Chapter 18 The Judicial Branch. National Judiciary ► During the Articles of Confederation, there were no national courts and no national judiciary system.
1 Chapter 5: The Court System. 2 Trial Courts Trial courts listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts in disputes. There are 2 parties.
The Trial Chapter 9. Trials in the Early Modern Period Very often trial was by torture the Rack water torture other torture the Star Chamber a 15 th and.
What is the court’s expectation of doctors? British Medical Association 17 November 2006.
Types of Law Chapter 15. Types of Law Common Law- law based on court decisions and past examples rather than legal code Common Law- law based on court.
TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Chapter 18. TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Under criminal law, wrongs committed are called crimes. Under civil law, wrongs committed are called.
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH COURTS, JUDGES, AND THE LAW. MAIN ROLE Conflict Resolution! With every law, comes potential conflict Role of judicial system is to.
 Judge  Prosecutor  Defense Attorney Santa Teresa High School Intro to LPSCS.
 Judge  Prosecutor  Defense Attorney 2 Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with.
Jamie McPherson Partner – MVM Legal
CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION
Tax Court system in Germany The role of the Federal Tax Court
Courtroom Participants
Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems
The sources of English Law
AFFIDAVIT.
Law of Evidence OPINION EVIDENCE 2/12/2014 Chapter 8.
ORAL/EXTEMPORE JUDGMENTS The Hon. Dame Linda Dobbs DBE
Chapter 18 Vocabulary: The Federal Court System
Torts: A Civil Wrong.
Key terms and procedures involved in criminal cases
Law of Evidence DOCUMENTRY EVIDENCE 30/11/2014.
Criminal Cases, Civil Cases, and Juvenile Justice
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Opinion Testimony, In General
Business Law Essential Standard 1.00 Objective 1.02
Key terms and procedures involved in criminal cases
Business Law Essential Standard 1.00 Objective 1.02
Each state has its own judicial system that hears nonfederal cases
Business Law Essential Standard 1.00 Objective 1.02
SIMPLE Argument Terms.
RIGHTS, DUTIES AND LIABILITIES OF AUDITOR
Responsibilities of Key Personnel in a Civil Trial
The Expert Valuation Witness and the Different Procedural Models in European Court Proceedings . Associate Prof. (Dr. hab. Magdalena Habdas.
Business Law Final Exam
Presentation transcript:

Court Expert System in Germany -Overview-

Who is an Expert? No definition in German law but defined in jurisprudence No definition in German law but defined in jurisprudence Expert is someone who has special detailed knowledge in a certain field of professional expertise Expert is someone who has special detailed knowledge in a certain field of professional expertise Official admission not necessary, but Official admission not necessary, but Need to meet certain requirements Need to meet certain requirements

Requirements for Experts An expert must: An expert must: have special expert knowledge in a certain field have special expert knowledge in a certain field be impartial be impartial have integrity and have integrity and be diligent be diligent Publicly appointed and sworn in by Chambers of Commerce or other professional association Publicly appointed and sworn in by Chambers of Commerce or other professional association

Written expert opinions Expert is bound by the evidence order of the court Expert is bound by the evidence order of the court Structure: Structure: Heading Heading Task Task Matters of fact the opinion is based on Matters of fact the opinion is based on Conclusions, calculations, assessments Conclusions, calculations, assessments Summary of results Summary of results Signature, if applicable stamp Signature, if applicable stamp Must be comprehensible for the court Must be comprehensible for the court Court is not bound to expert findings, but has to comprehend and discuss the contents of the opinion Court is not bound to expert findings, but has to comprehend and discuss the contents of the opinion

Experts in Court Courts may collect evidence on disputed matters of fact through expert opinions Courts may collect evidence on disputed matters of fact through expert opinions Written or oral, if applicable upon oath Written or oral, if applicable upon oath Selection: Selection: Courts should prefere publicly appointed and sworn in experts Courts should prefere publicly appointed and sworn in experts If both parties agree on an expert the court is bound by this choice If both parties agree on an expert the court is bound by this choice

How can parties challenge an expert (opinion) Complaint against expert selection Complaint against expert selection Questioning the expert, demanding additions to the opinion Questioning the expert, demanding additions to the opinion Application for a decisive expert opinion Application for a decisive expert opinion Challenge the expert for the suspicion of being biased Challenge the expert for the suspicion of being biased Appeal Appeal

Expert liability Court Experts can be held liable by the parties for damages deriving from intentional or grossly negligent false expert opinions Court Experts can be held liable by the parties for damages deriving from intentional or grossly negligent false expert opinions Criminal prosecution theoretically possible Criminal prosecution theoretically possible