Proposal for the LHCb Italian Tier-2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
31/03/00 CMS(UK)Glenn Patrick What is the CMS(UK) Data Model? Assume that CMS software is available at every UK institute connected by some infrastructure.
Advertisements

Status GridKa & ALICE T2 in Germany Kilian Schwarz GSI Darmstadt.
Resources for the ATLAS Offline Computing Basis for the Estimates ATLAS Distributed Computing Model Cost Estimates Present Status Sharing of Resources.
Distributed IT Infrastructure for U.S. ATLAS Rob Gardner Indiana University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National.
Title US-CMS User Facilities Vivian O’Dell US CMS Physics Meeting May 18, 2001.
08/06/00 LHCb(UK) Meeting Glenn Patrick LHCb(UK) Computing/Grid: RAL Perspective Glenn Patrick Central UK Computing (what.
Claudio Grandi INFN Bologna CMS Operations Update Ian Fisk, Claudio Grandi 1.
November 7, 2001Dutch Datagrid SARA 1 DØ Monte Carlo Challenge A HEP Application.
Farm Management D. Andreotti 1), A. Crescente 2), A. Dorigo 2), F. Galeazzi 2), M. Marzolla 3), M. Morandin 2), F.
Computing Infrastructure Status. LHCb Computing Status LHCb LHCC mini-review, February The LHCb Computing Model: a reminder m Simulation is using.
INTRODUCTION The GRID Data Center at INFN Pisa hosts a big Tier2 for the CMS experiment, together with local usage from other HEP related/not related activities.
3rd June 2004 CDF Grid SAM:Metadata and Middleware Components Mòrag Burgon-Lyon University of Glasgow.
Status of LHCb-INFN Computing CSN1, Catania, September 18, 2002 Domenico Galli, Bologna.
LHCb computing in Russia Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow) Russia-CERN JWGC, October 2005.
Data Import Data Export Mass Storage & Disk Servers Database Servers Tapes Network from CERN Network from Tier 2 and simulation centers Physics Software.
Fermilab User Facility US-CMS User Facility and Regional Center at Fermilab Matthias Kasemann FNAL.
INFN Computing for LHCb Domenico Galli, Umberto Marconi, and Vincenzo Vagnoni Genève, February 15, 2001.
Computing for LHCb-Italy Domenico Galli, Umberto Marconi and Vincenzo Vagnoni Genève, January 17, 2001.
CDF Offline Production Farms Stephen Wolbers for the CDF Production Farms Group May 30, 2001.
What is cache memory?. Cache Cache is faster type of memory than is found in main memory. In other words, it takes less time to access something in cache.
7April 2000F Harris LHCb Software Workshop 1 LHCb planning on EU GRID activities (for discussion) F Harris.
The LHCb Italian Tier-2 Domenico Galli, Bologna INFN CSN1 Roma,
The PHysics Analysis SERver Project (PHASER) CHEP 2000 Padova, Italy February 7-11, 2000 M. Bowen, G. Landsberg, and R. Partridge* Brown University.
The LHCb CERN R. Graciani (U. de Barcelona, Spain) for the LHCb Collaboration International ICFA Workshop on Digital Divide Mexico City, October.
EGEE-II INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks Implementation and performance analysis of.
May Donatella Lucchesi 1 CDF Status of Computing Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova.
Outline: Status: Report after one month of Plans for the future (Preparing Summer -Fall 2003) (CNAF): Update A. Sidoti, INFN Pisa and.
NA62 computing resources update 1 Paolo Valente – INFN Roma Liverpool, Aug. 2013NA62 collaboration meeting.
Large scale data flow in local and GRID environment Viktor Kolosov (ITEP Moscow) Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow)
David Stickland CMS Core Software and Computing
MC Production in Canada Pierre Savard University of Toronto and TRIUMF IFC Meeting October 2003.
ATLAS Distributed Computing perspectives for Run-2 Simone Campana CERN-IT/SDC on behalf of ADC.
1 LHCb computing for the analysis : a naive user point of view Workshop analyse cc-in2p3 17 avril 2008 Marie-Hélène Schune, LAL-Orsay for LHCb-France Framework,
LHCbComputing Computing for the LHCb Upgrade. 2 LHCb Upgrade: goal and timescale m LHCb upgrade will be operational after LS2 (~2020) m Increase significantly.
LHCb Current Understanding of Italian Tier-n Centres Domenico Galli, Umberto Marconi Roma, January 23, 2001.
Belle II Computing Fabrizio Bianchi INFN and University of Torino Meeting Belle2 Italia 17/12/2014.
WLCG November Plan for shutdown and 2009 data-taking Kors Bos.
A proposal for the KM3NeT Computing Model Pasquale Migliozzi INFN - Napoli 1.
Status Report on Data Reconstruction May 2002 C.Bloise Results of the study of the reconstructed events in year 2001 Data Reprocessing in Y2002 DST production.
BaBar & Grid Eleonora Luppi for the BaBarGrid Group TB GRID Bologna 15 febbraio 2005.
ATLAS – statements of interest (1) A degree of hierarchy between the different computing facilities, with distinct roles at each level –Event filter Online.
Dynamic Extension of the INFN Tier-1 on external resources
Workload Management Workpackage
Domenico Galli, Bologna
Report from WLCG Workshop 2017: WLCG Network Requirements GDB - CERN 12th of July 2017
Belle II Physics Analysis Center at TIFR
SuperB and its computing requirements
Pasquale Migliozzi INFN Napoli
evoluzione modello per Run3 LHC
FileStager test results
Western Analysis Facility
LHCb Software & Computing Status
The COMPASS event store in 2002
LHCb computing in Russia
LHCb Computing Model and Data Handling Angelo Carbone 5° workshop italiano sulla fisica p-p ad LHC 31st January 2008.
Philippe Charpentier CERN – LHCb On behalf of the LHCb Computing Group
Dagmar Adamova (NPI AS CR Prague/Rez) and Maarten Litmaath (CERN)
Off-line & GRID Computing
Infrastructure for testing accelerators and new
ALICE Computing Model in Run3
ALICE Computing Upgrade Predrag Buncic
Computing Infrastructure for DAQ, DM and SC
TYPES OFF OPERATING SYSTEM
R. Graciani for LHCb Mumbay, Feb 2006
Status of LHCb-INFN Computing
Collaboration Board Meeting
Gridifying the LHCb Monte Carlo production system
LHCb thinking on Regional Centres and Related activities (GRIDs)
Development of LHCb Computing Model F Harris
The LHCb Computing Data Challenge DC06
Presentation transcript:

Proposal for the LHCb Italian Tier-2 Domenico Galli, Bologna INFN CSN1 Roma, 17.5.2005

Proposal for the LHCb Italian Tier-2. 2 Aim of LHCb Tier-2s In the LHCb Computing Model Tier-2s are used for Monte Carlo production. In the LHCb Computing Model Analysis is not performed on Tier-2s. A LHCb Tier-2 consists in a PC-farm with a small disk buffer (3 TB in steady state) used as a temporary cache until data transfer to Tier-1. LHCb-Italy proposes to build 1 Tier-2 hosted at Bologna-CNAF, together with Italian Tier­1. In previous presentations these Tier-2 resources were kept together with Tier-1 resources; now, following referees’ suggestion, they have been kept apart since they have to be approved by CSN1. Proposal for the LHCb Italian Tier-2. 2 Domenico Galli

Why LHCb Analysis at Tier-1? LHCb analysis jobs consist in selecting the events (stripped DST) stored at Tier-1 to focus on one particular analysis channel: Typical analysis jobs run on a ~106 event sample. Some analysis jobs will run on a larger ~107 event sample. Average event reduction of a factor of 5. Analysis input is completely stored at each Tier-1. Analysis output (20-200 GB) can be processed by a small Tier-3 facility. Available at each Tier-1 Available at each Tier-1 Selected DST+RAW 119 TB Event Tag Collection 20 TB Physics Analysis n-tuple / User DST + User TAG Typical: 20 GB Large: 200 GB Local Analysis Proposal for the LHCb Italian Tier-2. 3 Domenico Galli Paper

Why LHCb Analysis at Tier-1? (II) Comparison between 2 models: Analysis job at Tier-2: Analysis job at Tier-1: Data accessed at Tier-1 per analysis job are the same. But the second is faster and less expensive in terms of hardware, infrastructure, staff resources and WAN load. Tier-1 Tier-2 DST+RAW+TAG 139 TB Buffer Output 20-200 GB 139 TB WAN LAN Tier-1 DST+RAW+TAG 139 TB Output 20-200 GB 139 TB LAN Proposal for the LHCb Italian Tier-2. 4 Domenico Galli

Why LHCb Analysis at Tier-1? (III) This model would allow maximum flexibility in moving resources back/forth between Tier-2 and Tier-1 to optimize resource exploitation. E.g.: resources can be moved from Tier-2 to Tier-1 to satisfy peak analysis request, or vice versa in case on peak Monte Carlo request. In this sense the distinction between Tier-1 and Tier-2 LHCb resources evaporates… Proposal for the LHCb Italian Tier-2. 5 Domenico Galli

Overview of Italian LHCb Computing Resources CNAF LAN LHCb Tier-3 WAN Tier-1 (reconstruction, stripping, analysis) LHCb Tier-2 (Monte Carlo) Gateway Proposal for the LHCb Italian Tier-2. 6 Domenico Galli

LHCb Tier-2 Size and Cost We are sizing the Italian Tier-2 to be 15% of the total Tier-2 resources of the whole LHCb collaboration. 15% = Italian fraction of CORE funds 15% = fraction of Italian physicists with respect of the total involved in the LHCb experiment. Proposal for the LHCb Italian Tier-2. 7 Domenico Galli

LHCb Tier-2 Size and Cost (II) Strictly according to current LHCb Computing Model 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 total CPU [€/Si2k] 0.58 0.38 0.25 0.17 0.12 Disk [€/GB] 2.25 1.40 0.88 0.55 0.34 CPU running [MSi2k] 0.69 1.15 Disk running [TB] 1 2 3 CPU replacement [MSi2k] 0.35 Disk replacement [TB] CPU to be acquired [MSi2k] 0.46 Disk to be acquired [TB] CPU cost [k€] 196.5 132.4 117.1 56.1 43.3 545.5 Disk cost [k€] 2.2 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 5.4 Total cost [k€] 198.7 133.8 118.0 56.7 43.7 550.9 Proposal for the LHCb Italian Tier-2. 8 Domenico Galli

LHCb Tier-2 Size and Cost (III) However the Computing Model is not Bible! It is only a raw estimate of the needs, based on today knowledge and understanding. If additional resources will be available in the forecoming years for the LHCb Tier-2, these could result precious. Furthermore these resources could be moved back and forth to/from Tier-1 on need, to allow most optimized usage. Proposal for the LHCb Italian Tier-2. 9 Domenico Galli