Syntax Lecture 1: X-bar Theory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linguistics Lecture-12: X-bar Theory; Adjuncts and Complements
Advertisements

CAS LX 522 Syntax I Week 3b. Constituents.
Lecture 4: The Complementiser System
Lexical Functional Grammar History: –Joan Bresnan (linguist, MIT and Stanford) –Ron Kaplan (computational psycholinguist, Xerox PARC) –Around 1978.
Dr. Abdullah S. Al-Dobaian1 Ch. 2: Phrase Structure Syntactic Structure (basic concepts) Syntactic Structure (basic concepts)  A tree diagram marks constituents.
Parameters of Word Order
Chapter 3: Formal Translation Models
Syntax Lecture 3: The Subject. The Basic Structure of the Clause Recall that our theory of structure says that all structures follow this pattern: It.
Lect. 11Phrase structure rules Learning objectives: To define phrase structure rules To learn the forms of phrase structure rules To compose new sentences.
Models of Generative Grammar Smriti Singh. Generative Grammar  A Generative Grammar is a set of formal rules that can generate an infinite set of sentences.
P HRASES & CLAUSES D AY 6, S EPT. 10, 2012 Introduction to Syntax ANTH 3590/7590 Harry Howard Tulane University.
X-Bar Syntax - an overview. Constituents again… Determine the constituent structure of the following two sentences The long hot summer which everyone.
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 14, Feb 27, 2007.
Extending X-bar Theory DPs, TPs, and CPs. The Puzzle of Determiners  Specifier RuleXP  (YP) X’ – requires the specifier to be phrasal – *That the book.
Parsing arithmetic expressions Reading material: These notes and an implementation (see course web page). The best way to prepare [to be a programmer]
IV. SYNTAX. 1.1 What is syntax? Syntax is the study of how sentences are structured, or in other words, it tries to state what words can be combined with.
Syntax Lecture 5: More On Wh-movement. Review Wh-movement: – Moves interrogative ‘wh’-phrase – from various positions inside the IP – to the specifier.
Lecture E: Phrase functions and clause functions
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 12, Feb 13, 2007.
ENGLISH SYNTAX Introduction to Transformational Grammar.
Culture , Language and Communication
Chapter 3 Describing Syntax and Semantics
Section 11.3 Features structures in the Grammar ─ Jin Wang.
 Chapter 4 Noun Phrases Transformational Grammar Engl 424 Hayfa Alhomaid.
◦ Process of describing the structure of phrases and sentences Chapter 8 - Phrases and sentences: grammar1.
TYPES OF PHRASES REPRESENTING THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF PHRASES 12/5/2016.
3.3 A More Detailed Look At Transformations Inversion (revised): Move Infl to C. Do Insertion: Insert interrogative do into an empty.
Syntax II. Specifiers Specifiers tell us more information about nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs and prepositions The, a, this, three, some, many etc.
Welcome to the flashcards tool for ‘The Study of Language, 5 th edition’, Chapter 8 This is designed as a simple supplementary resource for this textbook,
Chapter 4 Syntax a branch of linguistics that studies how words are combined to form sentences and the rules that govern the formation of sentences.
King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 1 King Faisal University.
Formal Languages and Automata FORMAL LANGUAGES FINITE STATE AUTOMATA.
Natural Language Processing Vasile Rus
Lecture 6: More On Wh-movement
Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation
Linguistics 1 Syntax Week 2 Lectures 3 & 4.
Lecture 4: The Complementiser System
Week 3b. Merge, feature checking
An Introduction to the Government and Binding Theory
Lecture 3: Functional Phrases
Lecture 3 Krisztina Szécsényi
Syntax Lecture 9: Verb Types 1.
BBI 3212 ENGLISH SYNTAX AND MORPHOLOGY
Exponents Scientific Notation
Automata and Languages What do these have in common?
Limits and Continuity The student will learn about: limits,
Lecture 12: Summary and Exam
Chapter Eight Syntax.
Part I: Basics and Constituency
A FIBONACCI-TREE MODEL OF COGNITIVE PROCESSES
Structural relations Carnie 2013, chapter 4 Kofi K. Saah.
Instructor: Nick Cercone CSEB -
CSCI 5832 Natural Language Processing
BBI 3212 ENGLISH SYNTAX AND MORPHOLOGY
Chapter Eight Syntax.
Introduction to Computational Linguistics

Language Variations: Japanese and English
Pointer to Structures Lesson xx
X-bar Schema Linguistics lecture series
Bottom-Up Parsing “Shift-Reduce” Parsing
Compilers Principles, Techniques, & Tools Taught by Jing Zhang
Teori Bahasa dan Automata Lecture 9: Contex-Free Grammars
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Principles and Parameters (I)
Discrete Maths 13. Grammars Objectives
Structure of a Lexicon Debasri Chakrabarti 13-May-19.
Lecture 2 Krisztina Szécsényi
Faculty of Computer Science and Information System
Presentation transcript:

Syntax Lecture 1: X-bar Theory

2 Basic rules X2  Y2 X1 X1  X0 Y2

2 Basic rules X2  Y2 X1 X1  X0 Y2

2 Basic rules X2  Y2 X1 X1  X0 Y2

The Meaning of X and Y X and Y are category variables They stand for any category: N, V, A, P, etc. The rules are therefore very general: They govern phrases of any category

The difference between X and Y In the rules, X appears on both sides of the arrow: Whatever category X stands for on one side, it will stand for the same category on the other This means that a phrase of category X will always contain a constituent (ultimately a word) of category X This word is called the head of the phrase The Y is a non-head constituent It can be of any category, but it doesn’t have to be the same as X

The difference between X and Y Head

An Important Consequence All phrases have heads There is only one place a head can go In the head position So:- For every phrase there is a head and for every head there is a phrase

What are the numbers all about? The head (X0) is at the bottom of the tree X0 is a word X2 is at the top So X2 = XP X1 is smaller than a phrase, but bigger than a word The numbers just mark the level: Word (0) – intermediate (1) – phrase (2) Every phrase has these three levels

How come there is not just one phrase? Words which head phrases have different properties – they have different categories for one thing. If a noun heads a phrase, it will be a noun phrase If a verb heads a phrase, it will be a verb phrase Etc.

How come there is not just one phrase?

How come there is not just one phrase?

How come there is not just one phrase?

How come there is not just one phrase?

Projection We say that the properties of the phrase are projected from the lexical head Each level is therefore called a projection level X0 is the zero level projection X1 is the intermediate projection X2 is the maximal projection

The Complement Position X1  X0 Y2 This rule introduces the head AND a phrase which follows it This phrase is called the complement Heads and complements have a very special relationship The head determines what the complement will be by placing restrictions on it If the head does not take a complement, the position does not appear

The Complement Position Head selects a complement Head does not select a complement

The Complement Position

The Specifier Position X2  Y2 X1 This rule introduces the intermediate projection AND a phrase that precedes it This phrase is called the Specifier The appearance of the specifier is not determined by the head, but specifiers are not always present

The Specifier Position Phrase with a specifier Phrase without a specifier

The Specifier Position

Four possible structures

A simple demonstration

A simple demonstration

A simple demonstration

A simple demonstration NP analysis DP analysis

A simple demonstration Which of these structures is correct? This has been a much debated question since the 1980s We will return to this issue in another lecture

Notational Variants There have been other ways used to represent these ideas: The bar notation: X0 = X X1 = X (pronounced ‘X-bar’) X2 = X (pronounced ‘X-double bar’) The prime notation: X X’ X’’

X-bar theory Because the bar notation was the first one to be used (Chomsky 1970), the general theory of phrase structure is known as ‘X-bar Theory’ Because the prime notation is easiest to type, it is the most common one used All three notations express exactly the same concepts

Summary Head Complement Specifier obligatory word in every phrase determines the category of the phrase selects for complements Complement optional phrase following the head (as determined by the head) restricted by the head sister to the head Specifier optional phrase preceding the head sister to the intermediate projection (X’)