SHRM Survey Findings: Workplace Violence

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHRM Survey Findings: 2014 Strategic Benefits— Flexible Work Arrangements January 22, 2015.
Advertisements

June 23, 2011 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce.
SHRM Poll: 2012 Holiday Schedules ©SHRM 2011 November 30, 2011 SHRM Poll: 2012 Holiday Schedules.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Flexible Work Arrangements December 18, 2013.
SHRM/Globoforce Survey: Employee Recognition Programs, Fall ©SHRM 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Fall 2012 In collaboration.
The Use of Criminal Background Checks in Hiring Decisions ©SHRM 2012 July 19, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Background Checking—The Use of Criminal Background.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Communicating Benefits January 10, 2013.
June 13, 2011 SHRM Poll: Relief Efforts for Victims of the Japan Earthquake and Tsunami.
April 12, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Winter 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce.
July 12, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Work/Life Balance Policies.
July 12, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Technology and Its Impact on Employees During Nonworking Hours.
February 2012 SHRM Poll: Smoking Policies in the Workplace.
SHRM Survey Findings: Virtual Teams July 13, 2012.
May 9, 2011 SHRM Poll: Staff Levels and the Use of Contingent and Part-time Workers.
February 29, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Workplace Violence.
August 31, 2011 SHRM Poll: Disaster Planning in Organizations 10 Years After the Sept. 11 Terrorist Attacks.
January 24, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Financial Education Initiatives in the Workplace.
October 6, 2010 SHRM Poll: Ethics Officers in Organizations.
Sponsored by AETNA June 29, 2011 SHRM Poll: The State of Consumer-Directed Health Plans in the Workplace.
SHRM Poll: Employee Discount Programs February 15, 2012.
August 16, 2011 SHRM Poll: Managing Employee Absences.
February 28, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Workplace Bullying.
March 25, 2011 SHRM Poll: Organizational Whistle-blowing—Reporting Unethical and Illegal Behavior in the Workplace.
SHRM/DATIA Poll: Drug Testing Efficacy ©SHRM 2011 September 7, 2011 SHRM Poll: Drug Testing Efficacy In collaboration with and commissioned by the Drug.
SHRM Poll: Military Employment February 20, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees January 10, 2013.
June 6, 2011 SHRM Poll: Succession Planning. Succession Planning ©SHRM 2011 Key Findings 2  What percentage of organizations currently have succession.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees January 10, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Wellness Initiatives December 18, 2013.
December 1, 2011 SHRM Poll: 2011Holiday Parties Holiday Parties ©SHRM 2011 Key Findings 2  Do organizations plan to have a 2011 end-of-year or.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California— Wellness Initiatives April 23, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: Virtual Teams
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Fall 2012
SHRM Survey Findings: Employing People With Disabilities : Practices and Policies Related to Retention and Advancement In collaboration with and commissioned.
SHRM Poll: Military Employment
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 Holiday Schedules
SHRM Survey Findings: The Use of Office Pools
SHRM Survey Findings: Business Operations During the Current Flu Season February 13, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees December 18, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: An Examination of How Social Media Is Embedded in Business Strategy and Operations January 2012.
SHRM Poll: Performance Management and Other Workplace Practices
SHRM Poll: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Recruiting and Skill Gaps November 7, 2011.
SHRM Poll: Military Employment
SHRM Poll: Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employees
SHRM Poll: Managing Employee Absences
SHRM Survey Findings: The Workplace Impact of Domestic and Sexual Violence and Stalking February 1, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Holiday/Year-End Activities
SHRM Survey Findings: 2012 Holiday/Year-End Activities
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Communicating Benefits January 10, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Winter 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce April 12, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California—Health Care
SHRM Poll: Smoking Policies in the Workplace
SHRM Survey Findings: Workplace Bullying
SHRM Survey Findings: Vacation’s Impact on the Workplace
SHRM Survey Findings: Employing People With Disabilities: Practices and Policies Related to Recruiting and Hiring Employees With Disabilities In collaboration.
SHRM Poll: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Manufacturing Industry 2012 Update June 22, 2012.
SHRM Poll: Disaster Planning in Organizations 10 Years After the Sept
SHRM Survey Findings: Background Checking—The Use of Criminal Background Checks in Hiring Decisions July 19, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Wellness Initiatives December 18, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Technology and Its Impact on Employees During Nonworking Hours July 16, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Hiring of 2012 University/College Undergraduates and Postgraduates July xx, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Health Care December 18, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees April 23, 2014.
SHRM Poll: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Overall Financial Health and Hiring November 22, 2011.
SHRM Poll: Employee Suggestion Programs
SHRM Survey Findings: Social Media in the Workplace
SHRM Survey Findings: The Hiring of 2012 University/College Undergraduates and Postgraduates July 12, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees December 18, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees April 23, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Fall 2012
Presentation transcript:

SHRM Survey Findings: Workplace Violence February 29, 2012

Definitions Workplace violence: Assaults and other violent acts or threats that occur in or are related to the workplace and entail a substantial risk of physical or emotional harm to individuals or damage to company resources or capabilities. Workplace violence may involve employees, clients and vendors of the affected organization as well as those who do not have a relationship with the organization but who may know the intended victims. Target: The person toward whom the threat of violence is directed.

Key Findings Are organizations experiencing workplace violence? Over one-third (36%) of organizations reported incidents of workplace violence. Compared with two years ago, most organizations indicated that incidents of violence had either stayed about the same (45%) or decreased in frequency (40%), while 15% reported an increase in frequency. To whom are threats of violence typically reported? The majority of organizations reported that threats of violence are reported to the HR department/function head (83%) or to the threatened employee’s direct supervisor (68%). How do or would organizations respond to threats of violence from an employee? The top four responses were: the response depends on the specific circumstance (61%), zero tolerance policy (immediate termination) (47%), a written warning (31%) and suspension (29%). What are the costs of workplace violence? The three most common costs associated with workplace violence were management time/expense (55%), productivity loss (37%) and staff replacement costs resulting from turnover caused by the incident (34%).

Workplace Violence Incidents of Violence in the Workplace Incident Reporting Response to Incidents Effects of Violence on Employees Costs of Violence to the Organization Workplace Culture

Has your current organization ever experienced an incident of workplace violence? Note: Respondents who answered “not sure/don’t know” were excluded from this analysis.

Differences based on organization staff size Has your current organization ever experienced an incident of workplace violence? Comparisons by organization staff size Larger organizations (2,500 or more employees) are more likely than smaller organizations (1-499 employees) to have experienced an incident of workplace violence. Small organizations Large organizations Differences based on organization staff size 1 to 99 employees (12%) 100 to 499 employees (33%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (62%) 25,000 or more employees (91%) Larger organizations > smaller organizations

Has your current organization experienced an incident of workplace violence? Note: Respondents who answered “not sure/don’t know” were excluded from this analysis.

Have incidents of violence in your organization...? Note: Only respondents whose organizations had experienced an incident of workplace violence in the past five years were asked this question in the 2011 survey. Respondents who answered “not sure/don’t know” were excluded from this analysis. For 2011 data, the question asked about incidents of violence “compared with two years ago” whereas for 2003 data, the question asked about incidents of violence “since January 1, 2000”.

  Through what channels or to whom within your organization are threats of violence typically reported? Note: n = 69. Only respondents whose organizations had experienced an incident of workplace violence in the past five years were asked this question. Percentages do not total 100% due to multiple response options.

Through what channels or to whom within your organization are threats of violence typically reported? Comparisons by organization staff size Larger organizations (2,500-24,999 employees) are more likely than smaller organizations (500-2,499 employees) to typically report threats of violence to other management-level staff (nonexecutive). Smaller organizations Larger organizations Differences based on organization staff size 500 to 2,499 employees (14%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (67%) Larger organizations > smaller organizations Smaller organizations (1-99 employees) are more likely than larger organizations (2,500-24,999 employees) to typically report threats of violence to executive-level staff. Small organizations Large organizations Differences based on organization staff size 1 to 99 employees (57%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (6%) Smaller organizations > larger organizations Larger organizations (25,000 or more employees) are more likely than smaller organizations (100-2,499 employees) to typically report threats of violence to a hotline or other reporting system. Smaller organizations Larger organizations Differences based on organization staff size 100 to 499 employees (12%) 500 to 2,499 employees (21%) 25,000 or more employees (78%) Larger organizations > smaller organizations

  How does or would your organization respond to threats of violence from an employee? Note: Respondents who answered “N/A, the organization has not had threats of violence from any employee” were excluded from this analysis. Percentages do not total 100% due to multiple response options.

How does or would your organization respond to threats of violence from an employee? Comparisons by organization sector Government agencies are more likely than publicly owned for-profit organizations to respond to threats of violence with mandatory anger management training. Publicly owned for-profit Government Differences based on organization sector 2% 27% Government > publicly owned for-profit Government agencies are more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations to respond to threats of violence with paid administrative leave. Privately owned for-profit Government Differences based on organization sector 5% 27% Government > privately owned for-profit Government agencies are more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations to respond to threats of violence with reassignment to another department or area. Privately owned for-profit Government Differences based on organization sector 3% 23% Government > privately owned for-profit

How does or would your organization respond to threats of violence from an employee? (continued) Comparisons by organization sector (continued) Publicly owned for-profit organizations or privately owned for-profit organizations are more likely than government agencies to respond to threats of violence with a zero tolerance policy (immediate termination). Publicly owned for-profit Privately owned for-profit Government Differences based on organization sector 57% 51% 18% Publicly owned for-profit, privately owned for-profit > government

  Who is responsible for handling the organization’s response to threats of violence from an employee? Note: Respondents who answered “N/A, no set responsibility” were excluded from this analysis. Percentages do not total 100% due to multiple response options.

Who is responsible for handling the organization’s response to threats of violence from an employee? Comparisons by organization staff size Smaller organizations (100-499 employees) are more likely to report that executive-level staff is responsible for handling the organization’s response to threats of violence, compared with larger organizations (2,500-24,999 employees). Small organizations Large organizations Differences based on organization staff size 100 to 499 employees (46%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (21%) Small organizations > large organizations Larger organizations (2,500 or more employees) are more likely to report that legal counsel is responsible for handling the organization’s response to threats of violence, compared with smaller organizations (1-99 employees). Small organizations Large organizations Differences based on organization staff size 1 to 99 employees (8%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (38%) 25,000 or more employees (47%) Large organizations > small organizations Larger organizations (2,500 or more employees) are more likely to report that the security department is responsible for handling the organization’s response to threats of violence, compared with smaller organizations (1-99 employees or 500-2,499 employees). Small organizations Large organizations Differences based on organization staff size 1 to 99 employees (3%) 500 to 2,499 employees (10%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (31%) 25,000 or more employees (40%) Larger organizations > smaller organizations

Who is responsible for handling the organization’s response to threats of violence from an employee? (continued) Comparisons by organization sector Publicly and privately owned for-profit organizations are more likely to report that the HR department/function is responsible for handling the organization’s response to threats of violence, compared with government agencies. Publicly owned for-profit Privately owned for-profit Government Differences based on organization sector 95% 93% 71% Publicly owned for-profit, privately owned for-profit > government Government agencies are more likely than nonprofit organizations to report that legal counsel is responsible for handling the organization’s response to threats of violence. Nonprofit Government Differences based on organization sector 14% 42% Government > nonprofit

  In your opinion, how have incidents of violence in your workplace affected the employees in your organization? Note: Only respondents whose organizations had experienced an incident of workplace violence were asked this question. Percentages do not total 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates response choice was not available in the 2003 survey.

In your opinion, how have incidents of violence in your workplace affected the employees in your organization? Comparisons by organization staff size Larger organizations (25,000 or more employees) are more likely to report that incidents of workplace violence resulted in complaints about decreased trust in management, compared with smaller organizations (100-499 employees). Small organizations Large organizations Differences based on organization staff size 100 to 499 employees (7%) 25,000 or more employees (60%) Large organizations > small organizations Larger organizations (25,000 or more employees) are more likely to report that incidents of workplace violence resulted in complaints about decreased morale, compared with smaller organizations (100-499 employees). Small organizations Large organizations Differences based on organization staff size 100 to 499 employees (10%) 25,000 or more employees (70%) Large organizations > small organizations Larger organizations (500-2,499 employees) are more likely to report that incidents of workplace violence resulted in complaints about a decreased sense of safety, compared with smaller organizations (100-499 employees). Small organizations Large organizations Differences based on organization staff size 100 to 499 employees (10%) 500 to 2,499 employees (52%) Large organizations > small organizations

Which of the following costs associated with incidents of workplace violence has your organization experienced? Management time/expense of being distracted from focusing on managing business operations 55% Productivity loss (e.g., slower production) 37% Staff replacement costs due to turnover caused by the incident 34% Increased training expenses 31% Increased security expenses 28% Incident debriefing with affected employees Turnover-related expenses 27% Increased communications cost (e.g., meetings, equipment) Increased legal expenses/higher utilization of legal staff 20% Increased HR expenses 19% Increased absenteeism 17% Lawsuit-related expenses 15% Temporary hiring costs 14% Increased EAP/psychiatric services expenses 11% Note: n = 85. Only respondents whose organizations had experienced an incident of workplace violence were asked this question. Percentages do not total 100% due to multiple response options.

Which of the following costs associated with incidents of workplace violence has your organization experienced? Comparisons by organization staff size Smaller organizations (1-99 employees) are more likely than larger organizations (100-2,499 employees) to report that they experienced temporary hiring costs associated with incidents of workplace violence. Small organizations Large organizations Differences based on organization staff size 1 to 99 employees (50%) 100 to 499 employees (7%) 500 to 2,499 employees (5%) Small organizations > large organizations Larger organizations (25,000 or more employees) are more likely than smaller organizations (500-2,499 employees) to report that they experienced turnover related expenses associated with incidents of workplace violence. Small organizations Large organizations Differences based on organization staff size 500 to 2,499 employees (10%) 25,000 or more employees (60%) Large organizations > smaller organizations Smaller organizations (1-99 employees) are more likely than larger organizations (100-2,499 employees) to report that they experienced increased legal expenses/higher utilization of legal staff associated with incidents of workplace violence. Small organizations Large organizations Differences based on organization staff size 1 to 99 employees (63%) 100 to 499 employees (4%) 500 to 2,499 employees (10%) Small organizations > larger organizations

Differences based on organization staff size Which of the following costs associated with incidents of workplace violence has your organization experienced?(continued) Comparisons by organization staff size (continued) Larger organizations (25,000 or more employees) are more likely than smaller organizations (500-2,499 employees) to report that they experienced increased HR expenses associated with incidents of workplace violence. Small organizations Large organizations Differences based on organization staff size 500 to 2,499 employees (5%) 25,000 or more employees (50%) Larger organizations > smaller organizations

Demographics

Demographics: Organization Industry Manufacturing 22% Health care and social assistance 12% Professional, scientific and technical services Finance and insurance 10% Educational services 8% Transportation and warehousing 6% Public administration Retail trade 5% Construction of buildings; heavy and civil engineering construction; specialty trade contractors 4% Accommodation and food services 3% Wholesale trade Administrative and support and waste management and remediation services Religious, grant-making, civic, professional and similar organizations Mining Arts, entertainment, and recreation 2% Real estate and rental and leasing Utilities Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting Information, publishing industries 1% Management of companies and enterprises Repair and maintenance Personal and laundry services 0% Private households Other services except public administration Note: n = 326. Percentages do not total 100% due to multiple response options.

Demographics: Organization Sector

Demographics: Organization Staff Size Note: n = 319. Percentages do not total 100% due to rounding.

Demographics: Other Is your organization a single-unit company or a multi-unit company? Does your organization have U.S.-based operations (business units) only or does it operate multinationally? Single-unit company: A company in which the location and the company are one and the same. 34% Multi-unit company: A company that has more than one location. 66% U.S.-based operations only 77% Multinational operations 24% n = 327 n = 331 Are HR policies and practices determined by the multi-unit corporate headquarters, by each work location or both? What is the HR department/function for which you responded throughout this survey? Multi-unit headquarters determines HR policies and practices 49% Each work location determines HR policies and practices 4% A combination of both the work location and the multi-unit headquarters determine HR policies and practices 47% Corporate (companywide) 64% Business unit/division 18% Facility/location n = 226 n = 226 Note: Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

SHRM Survey: Workplace Violence Methodology Response rate = 15% Sample composed of 401 randomly selected HR professionals from SHRM’s membership. Margin of error +/- 5% Survey fielded May 9-27, 2011 For more poll findings, visit www.shrm.org/surveys Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/SHRM_Research