ATMOSPHERIC MONITORING AND CALIBRATIONS PLANS WITH CTA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite Observing SATellite 29 March 2011 Hyper Spectral Workshop The ACOS/GOSAT Experience David Crisp JPL/CALTECH.
Advertisements

The MAGIC telescope and the GLAST satellite La Palma, Roque de los Muchacos (28.8° latitude ° longitude, 2225 m asl) INAUGURATION: 10/10/2003 LAT.
Calibration for LHAASO_WFCTA Yong Zhang, LL Ma on behalf of the LHAASO collaboration 32 nd International Cosmic Ray Conference, Beijing 2011.
The EvK2 Pyramid and the AERONET network “Atmospheric Brown Cloud" Characterization via Sunphotometer Observations G.P. Gobbi, F. Barnaba, and F. Angelini.
Aerosol radiative effects from satellites Gareth Thomas Nicky Chalmers, Caroline Poulsen, Ellie Highwood, Don Grainger Gareth Thomas - NCEO/CEOI-ST Joint.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
HiRes Usage. Outline ● Shower energy ( Size, dE/dx ) ● Atmospheric profile ( stdz76, radiosonde) ● Rayleigh Scattering ● Aerosols Model ( density, variability.
Page 1 1 of 20, EGU General Assembly, Apr 21, 2009 Vijay Natraj (Caltech), Hartmut Bösch (University of Leicester), Rob Spurr (RT Solutions), Yuk Yung.
Systematics in the Pierre Auger Observatory Bruce Dawson University of Adelaide for the Pierre Auger Observatory Collaboration.
LIDAR network F.Fierli, C. Flamant, F. Cairo. Scientific Task for SOP ● provide the aerosol content before convection episodes to improve the estimate.
ESTEC July 2000 Estimation of Aerosol Properties from CHRIS-PROBA Data Jeff Settle Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading.
On A Large Array Of Midsized Telescopes Stephen Fegan Vladimir Vassiliev UCLA.
Improving Uncertainties of Non-Contact Thermometry Measurements Mark Finch Fluke Calibration.
The Atmosphere Layers Composition. Composition of “air” - What’s in it? Stable Components: N 2 78% O 2 21% CO 2 < 1% 100%
Simulator for the observation of atmospheric entries from orbit A. Bouquet (Student, IRAP) D. Baratoux (IRAP) J. Vaubaillon (IMCCE) D. Mimoun (ISAE) M.
Lidar remote sensing for the characterization of the atmospheric aerosol on local and large spatial scale.
EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.
Atmospheric Monitoring in the TA experiment
Report of the Working Group Calibration, Monitoring and Site Conveners: Conveners: M. Teshima, B. Khélifi Members: Members: J. Cortina, R.G. Lopez, M.
© TAFE MECAT 2008 Chapter 6(b) Where & how we take measurements.
1 of 26 Characterization of Atmospheric Aerosols using Integrated Multi-Sensor Earth Observations Presented by Ratish Menon (Roll Number ) PhD.
Atmospheric Aerosol Measurements at the Pierre Auger Observatory The Pierre Auger Observatory operates an array of monitoring devices to record the atmospheric.
–thermometer –barometer –anemometer –hygrometer Objectives Recognize the importance of accurate weather data. Describe the technology used to collect.
Gus Sinnis Asilomar Meeting 11/16/2003 The Next Generation All-Sky VHE Gamma-Ray Telescope.
The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is a cubic kilometer detector at the geographic South Pole. We give an overview of searches for time-variable neutrino.
Data collected during the year 2006 by the first 9 strings of IceCube can be used to measure the energy spectrum of the atmospheric muon neutrino flux.
Hybrid measurement of CR light component spectrum by using ARGO-YBJ and WFCTA Shoushan Zhang on behalf of LHAASO collaboration and ARGO-YBJ collaboration.
The Auger Observatory for High-Energy Cosmic Rays G.Matthiae University of Roma II and INFN For the Pierre Auger Collaboration The physics case Pierre.
June 6, 2006 CALOR 2006 E. Hays University of Chicago / Argonne National Lab VERITAS Imaging Calorimetry at Very High Energies.
A new method for first-principles calibration
High-energy Electron Spectrum From PPB-BETS Experiment In Antarctica Kenji Yoshida 1, Shoji Torii 2 on behalf of the PPB-BETS collaboration 1 Shibaura.
Markarian 421 with MAGIC telescope Daniel Mazin for the MAGIC Collaboration Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München
Detecting Air Showers on the Ground
High-precision timing discussion 1 David Berge University of Amsterdam & Nikhef GRAPPA Gravitation AstroParticle Physics Amsterdam Research Priority Area.
Muon calibration: a brief introduction. Maria Concetta Maccarone INAF IASF/Palermo Italy M.C. Maccarone, Central Calibration Facilities / CTA Calibration.
Remote sensing: the collection of information about an object without being in direct physical contact with the object. the collection of information about.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Markus Gaug, Site Climatology at ORM, CCF F2F meeting Barcelona 1 20/06/20161 Markus Gaug, UAB Site Climatology at ORM What we already know...
Atmospheric Monitoring for the MAGIC Telescopes Markus Gaug 1,2, Michele Doro 1,2,3, Daniel Garrido 1,2, Christian Fruck 4 for the MAGIC Collaboration.
Studies of Systematics for Dark Matter Observations John Carr 1.
What is Electromagnetic Energy?
Future Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes:
The Atmosphere Layers Composition.
On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration
Muons in IceCube PRELIMINARY
Weather monitoring status and ORM
Systematic uncertainties in MonteCarlo simulations of the atmospheric muon flux in the 5-lines ANTARES detector VLVnT08 - Toulon April 2008 Annarita.
Department of Space Physics: Detached Laboratory at Lomnický štít (LS)
Atmospheric Aerosol Characterization using
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Ray Spectrum Measured by HiRes Experiment
performance requirements technical specifications
Electron Observations from ATIC and HESS
Pierre Auger Observatory Present and Future
Cherenkov Telescope Array
ATMOSPHERIC MONITORING AND CALIBRATIONS PLANS WITH CTA
Update on Advancing Development of the ROLO Lunar Calibration System
Validation of Satellite-derived Lake Surface Temperatures
HAWC Science Survey of 2p sr up to 100 TeV energies Extended Sources
The Atmosphere Weather and Climate
Calibrating Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes with the LAT
Future plans and world trend
Unfolding performance Data - Monte Carlo comparison
Dark Matter Limits From The Galactic Halo With H.E.S.S.
Dorothee Coppens.
Current Status of ROLO and Future Development
Mike Pavolonis (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR)
Hubble’s Law.
M. De Graaf1,2, K. Sarna2, J. Brown3, E. Tenner2, M. Schenkels4, and D
Benefits of ACTRIS for Implementation of EMEP monitoring strategy
Studies and results at Pierre Auger Observatory
Presentation transcript:

ATMOSPHERIC MONITORING AND CALIBRATIONS PLANS WITH CTA Michele Doro (michele.doro@pd.infn.it) University and INFN Padova GAG Meeting, 2015/03/27

Why IACTs need atmospheric calibration

What’s with the atmosphere The atmosphere is the place where The gamma-ray has the first interaction with atmospheric molecules The electromagnetic and hadronic showers take place The Cherenkov light is transmitted to the ground Goal is <8% uncertainty in the energy reconstruction M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

What’s with the IACT All three aspects are influenced by atmospheric conditions and this is reflected in the data On the energy threshold On the energy bias and resolution On the effective area On the spectral reconstruction On the reconstruction of the gamma-ray direction And on the observatory handling Reduce to a minimum data taken under non-optimal conditions and later thrown away during the analysis Smart scheduling? E.g. a) move to a source better visible under current observation conditions, b) move to a source that does not require so low energy threshold c) move to a source that does not require precision pointing M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Energy resolution M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

How do aerosol layers influence IACT data? Does the height of the aerosol overdensity matter? A MC study was made (Garrido+ 2012) now ongoing for CTA (INFN PD, NA, TO) 3 models Changing global density Changing “cloud” altitude Changing “cloud” density Comparison between Wrong MC Good MC Correction method M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Main outcomes of the study By using the correct MC (including hazy atmosphere) one get back the correct energy and flux information Location of the aerosol or cloud overdensity: Below the electromagnetic shower (~10km above the ground), A simple total transmission parameter is sufficient for data reconstruction At the level of the e.m. shower effect on data is not linear anymore Above the e.m. shower, no effect on data M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Variable “cloud” position Energy threshold Using correct MC, energy and flux reconstruction is correct, at the only expense of a larger energy threshold Higher global density Variable “cloud” position Garrido et al., Proc. 33rd ICRC, Nr. 465, arXiv: arXiv:1308.0473 M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Up to >6 km a.s.l.: Ethr = E0 / T (400 nm) e.g. Energy Threshold ground 14 km 10 km 6 km Up to >6 km a.s.l.: Ethr = E0 / T (400 nm) Garrido et al., Proc. 33rd ICRC, Nr. 465, arXiv: arXiv:1308.0473 M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

e.g. energy Bias 14 km 10 km 6 km ground Up to >6 km a.s.l. (until 5 TeV): (Erec-Eγ)/Eγ = (T-0.73)/0.73 (can be corrected using only total atmospheric transmission) Garrido et al., Proc. 33rd ICRC, Nr. 465, arXiv: arXiv:1308.0473 M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Up to >6 km a.s.l. (until 5 TeV): Aaerosols/Aref = 0.45+0.75*T e.g. effective area 14 km 10 km 6 km ground Up to >6 km a.s.l. (until 5 TeV): Aaerosols/Aref = 0.45+0.75*T Garrido et al., Proc. 33rd ICRC, Nr. 465, arXiv: arXiv:1308.0473 M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Conclusion When the clouds or aerosol layer is at the shower development region or above, the total extinction is no longer a useful parameter It is therefore important to know the differential atmospheric tranmission. We need instruments with height resolution! M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

On the right way… When taking full Lidar information into account, spectral retrieval is possible (Gaug,FruckMAGIC) INFN-TO + INFN-PD repeating exercise for CTA M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

CTA WP M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

COM-CCF-ATMO

CCF-Board

Activities Group formed in Dec 2013 First review in March 2014 www.cta-observatory.org/indico/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=623 (several documents produced) Letter of intent for the LIDAR: COM-CCF:130509 TDR submitted: most complete document on our activities Sharepoint page: portal.cta-observatory.org/wg/com/ccf/ M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

CTA Strategy

Tasks envisaged by atmospheric devices TASK 1 Site Climatology: Characterization of the site and instruments and method validation TASK 2 Off-line data selection: certify quality of data and control of background systematics TASK 3 Off-line data correction: reduce the amount of data loss by correction of hazy-atmosphere data TASK 4 On-line smart scheduling: online monitoring of energy threshold, selection of best targets in the sky TASK 5 Weather forecast, alerts and protection: rain sensors, forecasts, alerts for lightning, etc. M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Instruments and methods

Cettina Maccarone SPIE M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Cettina Maccarone SPIE M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Cettina Maccarone SPIE M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Cettina Maccarone SPIE M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Cettina Maccarone SPIE M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Cettina Maccarone SPIE M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Implementation of the strategy MD+ 2015 http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05481

Responsible table #1 M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Responsible table #1 M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Conclusion Atmospheric calibration along with instrumental construction care can guarantee energy resolution < 8% Atmospheric monitoring and calibration plans are very articulate and include several instruments and methods Activities will start at the site well before the first telescope are installed All-Sky Camera ARCADE Lidar Ceilometer? Main problem is manpower, we are missing people involved and responsibles. In case you are interested don’t hesitate to contact us M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

BACKUP

Networks CTA instruments Global Network Coverage in remote sites Non-commercial instruments Global Network Data validation Feedback We may want to make contact (Aeronet, ACTRIS, etc) M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07

Result 2 In case the aerosol overdensity or cloud is below the electromagnetic shower, simple correction methods can be used to restore correct energy and flux reconstruction Garrido et al., Proc. 33rd ICRC, Nr. 465, arXiv: arXiv:1308.0473 M. Doro - Atmospheric Calibration for CTA - LST Meeting Padova 2014.07.07