A Study of the Stigmatization of AAVE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Are our results reliable enough to support a conclusion?
Advertisements

Statistics : Statistical Inference Krishna.V.Palem Kenneth and Audrey Kennedy Professor of Computing Department of Computer Science, Rice University 1.
Section 9.1 ~ Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing Introduction to Probability and Statistics Ms. Young.
12.1 Inference for A Population Proportion.  Calculate and analyze a one proportion z-test in order to generalize about an unknown population proportion.
Significance Testing Chapter 13 Victor Katch Kinesiology.
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Tests. The logic behind a confidence interval is that if we build an interval around a sample value there is a high likelihood that.
Introduction to Inference Estimating with Confidence Chapter 6.1.
T T07-01 Sample Size Effect – Normal Distribution Purpose Allows the analyst to analyze the effect that sample size has on a sampling distribution.
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Active Learning Lecture Slides For use with Classroom Response Systems Introductory Statistics: Exploring the World through.
Math 1040 Intro To Statistics Professor: Zeph Allen Smith Presented by: Nellie Sobhanian.
Example 10.1 Experimenting with a New Pizza Style at the Pepperoni Pizza Restaurant Concepts in Hypothesis Testing.
Unit 8 Section : z Test for a Mean  Many hypotheses are tested using the generalized statistical formula: Test value = (Observed Value)-(expected.
Chapter 7 Estimation Procedures. Basic Logic  In estimation procedures, statistics calculated from random samples are used to estimate the value of population.
Chapter 6 USING PROBABILITY TO MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT DATA.
Confidence Intervals: The Basics BPS chapter 14 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
Introduction to Inferece BPS chapter 14 © 2010 W.H. Freeman and Company.
Correct decisions –The null hypothesis is true and it is accepted –The null hypothesis is false and it is rejected Incorrect decisions –Type I Error The.
Confidence intervals: The basics BPS chapter 14 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
Summary A confidence interval for the population mean, is constructed using the formula: sample mean ± z multiplied by σ/√n where σ is the population.
Business Statistics for Managerial Decision Farideh Dehkordi-Vakil.
© Copyright McGraw-Hill 2004
1 Chapter 8 Interval Estimation. 2 Chapter Outline  Population Mean: Known  Population Mean: Unknown  Population Proportion.
Introduction to inference Estimating with confidence IPS chapter 6.1 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
Statistics The big picture.... Populations We want to learn about a population. A population is any large collection of objects or individuals, such as.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Chapter Hypothesis Tests Regarding a Parameter 10.
Numeracy & Quantitative Methods: Level 7 – Advanced Quantitative Analysis.
Class Six Turn In: Chapter 15: 30, 32, 38, 44, 48, 50 Chapter 17: 28, 38, 44 For Class Seven: Chapter 18: 32, 34, 36 Chapter 19: 26, 34, 44 Quiz 3 Read.
Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition
Survey: How Old Is Too Young?
Statistical analysis.
EMPA P MGT 630.
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Unit 4 – Inference from Data: Principles
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
ESTIMATION.
Introduction to inference Estimating with confidence
Point and interval estimations of parameters of the normally up-diffused sign. Concept of statistical evaluation.
Unit 5: Hypothesis Testing
How confidence intervals work
Statistical analysis.
Inferences About Means from Two Groups
Week 11 Chapter 17. Testing Hypotheses about Proportions
Confidence intervals: The basics
Chapter Nine Part 1 (Sections 9.1 & 9.2) Hypothesis Testing
Daniela Stan Raicu School of CTI, DePaul University
Essential Statistics Introduction to Inference
POLLS AND SURVEYS What ARE they thinking?.
Topic 1: Statistical Analysis
Lecture: statistical significance.
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Alex Dinn Larry Hedden Scott Kennedy
Confidence intervals: The basics
What are their purposes? What kinds?
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Survey: How Old Is Too Young?
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
(This presentation may be used for instructional purposes)
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Objectives 6.1 Estimating with confidence Statistical confidence
Objectives 6.1 Estimating with confidence Statistical confidence
NHS DUDLEY CCG Latest survey results August 2018 publication.
Presentation transcript:

A Study of the Stigmatization of AAVE A Language Study- Southeastern Louisiana University By: Blake Cox & Adam DiBenedetto

Introduction The English language– develops Dialects– many language varieties form Dialects and vernaculars– linguistically equal But are they considered equally appropriate in different settings?

The Purpose of the Study Is AAVE stigmatized based on its grammatical deviations from SAE? Based on the survey results, what implications can be made about the use of AAVE in the academic setting?

Summary: Demographics & Parameters People of different genders People of different races Students & Professors Students & Professors of different fields of study (English, Education, Kinesiology, Communications, Biology, Sociology, etc.) All participants from SLU (academic setting)

Summary of the Study Measured Results Numerical Values Avg. Rate of Seriousness of Errors (AAVE) = 3.811688 Avg. Rate of Seriousness of Errors (SAE) = 3.271429 Difference between the above averages = 0.540259 Summary of the Study 20-question survey Each question contains an “error” Participants rank errors (1-5) Each question requires an answer Summary of results is drawn

Difference of Averages Implications Difference of Averages T-test Results Approximately 0.54 Determines whether 2 data sets are “statistically significant” Measured Results Numerical Value Difference between averages 0.540259

T-test Results T-test value 0.05 marks the criterion for “statistical significance” Any p value > 0.05 is NOT statistically significant Our results had a p value of 0.0690 We cannot confidently say that our means are caused by anything other than chance Though Diff. of Avgs ≈ 0.54, t-test implies not enough evidence of a conscious choice by respondents

Answering the Questions Is AAVE stigmatized based on its grammatical deviations from SAE? Based on results, the analyses show that while the averages of the respondents’ rankings differ by approximately 0.54, the t- test calculation deems the results of the study, based on the p value that was calculated, “not statistically significant.” Therefore, results don’t indicate stigmatization of either language variety Based on the survey results, what implications can be made about the use of AAVE in the academic setting? Based on the results of the study, the difference between the rankings of the seriousness of the “errors” in AAVE and SAE cannot exactly be considered indicative of stigmatization of a language variety. This particular academic setting does not indicate that AAVE is stigmatized.