The Impact of the HEU to LEU Fuel Conversion on the Lifetime and Efficacy of Beryllium: The primary neutron reflector at high- performance research and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PMBR steady-state and Coupled kinetics core thermal-hydraulics benchmark test problems PBMR (Pty) Ltd. – NRG – Penn State Univ. – Purdeu Univ. - INL.
Advertisements

A2 Physics - L.O. Jones 2007 – Information gathered from Wikipedia Critical Mass.
Lesson 17 HEAT GENERATION
PHYSICS DESIGN OF 30 MW MULTI PURPOSE RESEARCH REACTOR Archana Sharma Research Reactor Services Division BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE, INDIA.
Thermal-Hydraulic Transient Analysis of the Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR) TRTR Annual Meeting September 17-20, 2007 Dr. Robert C. Nelson1,
September 24-25, 2003 HAPL meeting, UW, Madison 1 Armor Configuration & Thermal Analysis 1.Parametric analysis in support of system studies 2.Preliminary.
Characterization of the Engineering Test Reactor at the INL for Final Disposition TRTR 2007 J. R. Parry Irradiation Test Programs INL.
HTTF Analyses Using RELAP5-3D Paul D. Bayless RELAP5 International Users Seminar September 2010.
1 Radiation Environment at Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI HAPL GIMM Conference Call.
Multi-physics coupling Application on TRIGA reactor Student Romain Henry Supervisors: Prof. Dr. IZTOK TISELJ Dr. LUKA SNOJ PhD Topic presentation 27/03/2012.
Nuclear Fundamentals Part II Harnessing the Power of the Atom.
Argonne National Laboratory 2007 RELAP5 International User’s Seminar
Advanced Test Reactor.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Fission Q for 235 U + n  236 U is MeV. Table 13.1 in Krane:
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Fission 1/ v 235 U thermal cross sections  fission  584 b. 
THERMAL HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS FOR THE OREGON STATE REACTOR USING RELAP5-3D Wade R. Marcum Brian G. Woods 2007 TRTR Conference September 19, 2007.
3D Coupled Fault Modelling for the Gas- cooled Fast Reactor Jason Dunstall KNOO PhD Student (EPSRC Funded) Applied Modelling and Computation Group (AMCG)
MODELLING OF THE VVER-440 REACTOR FOR DETERMINATION OF THE SPATIAL WEIGHT FUNCTION OF EX-CORE DETECTORS USING MCNP-4C2 CODE Gabriel Farkas, Vladimír Slugeň.
Nuclear Fuels Storage & Transportation Planning Project Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies Nuclear Energy Criticality Safety Assessment for As-loaded Spent.
Development of a RELAP5-3D thermal-hydraulic model for a Gas Cooled Fast Reactor D. Castelliti, C. Parisi, G. M. Galassi, N. Cerullo (San Piero A Grado.
Chapter 4. Power From Fission 1.Introduction 2.Characteristics of Fission 3. General Features 4. Commercial Reactors 5. Nuclear Reactor Safety 6. Nuclear.
Nuclear Engineering Department Massachusetts Institute of Technology L unar S urface R eactor Group Progress Report 2 Decisions and Models Lunar Surface.
1 Kaspar Kööp, Marti Jeltsov Division of Nuclear Power Safety Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden LEADER 4 th WP5 MEETING, Karlsruhe.
Design Optimization of Toroidal Fusion Shield  Fusion Theory [BLAHBLAHBLAH] Fusion energy production is based on the collision nuclei in a deuterium and.
AN ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL FOR A HIBRID REACTOR (SUB-CRITICAL FACILITY COUPLED WITH AN ACCELERADOR) Sergio A. Pereira and Adimir dos Santos.
Advanced Heavy Water Reactor Amit Thakur Reactor Physics Design Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, INDIA.
FAST MOLTEN SALT REACTOR –TRANSMUTER FOR CLOSING NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE ON MINOR ACTINIDES A.Dudnikov, P.Alekseev, S.Subbotin.
What is a Fission Reactor?What is a Fission Reactor?  The Principles of Fission Reactors are similar to that of an Atomic Reactor  Fission Reactors.
AERB Safety Research Institute 1 TIC Benchmark Analysis Subrata Bera Safety Research Institute (SRI) Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) Kalpakkam –
Nuclear Reactors, BAU, 1st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Controlled Fission Note that  is greater than 2 at thermal energies and almost 3 at.
Physics Design of 600 MWth HTR & 5 MWth Nuclear Power Pack Brahmananda Chakraborty Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, India.
ENERGY CONVERSION MME 9617A Eric Savory Lecture 10 – Analyzing a complete plant: Energy conversion cycles Department.
Nuclear Reactors, BAU, 1st Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
MASSIMO (Measurements in Adapted Spectra of Spectral Indices and Material Oscillations): A Proposed Experimental Campaign at the NRAD Reactor.
Fusion Neutronics Activity at JAERI from October 2000 to September 2001 Peseted by Takeo NISHTANI IEA International Work Shop on Fusion Neutronics The.
Task 2.1: Review of ELSY and Conceptual design & neutronic characterization of the ELFR Industrial Plant Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors.
1 Segrè Lost … ! Nuclear Fission How much is recoverable? How much is recoverable? What about capture gammas? (produced by -1 neutrons) What about capture.
UCN Source at the NCSU PULSTAR Reactor Bernard Wehring and Albert Young North Carolina State University International Workshop on Neutron-Antineutron Transition.
Nuclear Reactors, BAU, 1st Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
EUROTRANS – DM1 Preliminary Transient Analysis for EFIT Design WP5.1 Progress Meeting AREVA / Lyon, October 10-11, 2006 G. Bandini, P. Meloni, M. Polidori.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BP#2 WITHIN FIRST CRYOSTAT AND RIGHT FLANGE OF Hg POOL INNER VESSEL ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc.
Controlling Nuclear Fission. Thermal neutrons Uranium 235 is the main fissile material which we are concerned with. Uranium-233 and plutonium-239 can.
1 Radiation Environment at Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI HAPL Meeting ORNL March.
REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL
MODUL KE ENAM TEKNIK MESIN FAKULTAS TEKNOLOGI INDUSTRI
Analyses to Support Waste Disposition of SNS Inner Reflector Plug
DCLL TBM Reference Design
Skeleton contributions to targets section
CHEM 312: Lecture 19 Forensics in Nuclear Applications
Overview of Serpent related activities at HZDR E. Fridman
Summary of session 5: Innovative Ideas and New R&D
Control Blade Design and Fabrication Improvements using Laser Welding
Fundamental Approach to TRIGA Steady-State Thermal-Hydraulic CHF Analysis National Organization of Test, Research, and Training Reactors (TRTR) Meeting.
A Methodology for Accurately Predicting the Estimated Critical Rod Positions for Hot Startups at the MURR N.J. Peters and K. Kutikkad University of Missouri-Columbia.
THERMAL HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS FOR THE OREGON STATE REACTOR USING RELAP5-3D Wade R. Marcum Brian G. Woods 2007 TRTR Conference September 19, 2007.
The University of Missouri Research Reactor
Analysis of Reactivity Insertion Accidents for the NIST Research Reactor Before and After Fuel Conversion J.S. Baek, A. Cuadra, L-Y. Cheng, A.L. Hanson,
Trade-Off Studies and Engineering Input to System Code
Jordan University of Science and Technology
JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH
Transient modeling of sulfur iodine cycle thermo-chemical hydrogen generation coupled to pebble bed modular reactor Nicholas Brown, Volkan Seker, Seungmin.
LOW-POWER RESEARCH REACTOR FOR EDUCATION AND TRAINING
Phoebus 2A, Nuclear Thermal Element
More on Fission Products
Erosion of Advanced Test Reactor Fuel Elements
Nuclear Reactors, BAU, 1st Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
Can All Research Reactors be Fueled only with LEU in the Future?
Multiphysics Simulation Story: Researching a New Fuel for the HFIR: Advancements at ORNL Require Multiphysics Simulation to Support Safety and Reliability.
Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA), Egypt
Presentation transcript:

The Impact of the HEU to LEU Fuel Conversion on the Lifetime and Efficacy of Beryllium: The primary neutron reflector at high- performance research and test reactors N.J. Peters, J.C. McKibben and L. P. Foyto University of Missouri Research Reactor Facility 1513 Research Park Drive, Columbia, Missouri 65211 – U.S.A

Facility Overview Location: University of Missouri main campus in Columbia, Missouri, USA [200 km West of St Louis] Purpose: Multi-disciplinary research and education facility also providing a broad range of analytical and irradiation services to the research community and the commercial sector. History: First achieved criticality on October 13, 1966 Initially licensed at 5 MW Uprated in power to 10 MW in 1974 Started ≥150 hours/week operation in September 1977 Submitted relicensing application in 2006 to the NRC

MURR Core Basic Reactor Parameters MURR® is a pressurized, heterogeneous, reflected, open pool-type, which is light-water moderated and cooled Maximum power – 10 MWth Peak flux in center test hole – 6.0E14 n/cm2-s Core – 8 fuel assemblies (775 grams of U-235/assembly) Excess reactivity control blades – 5 total: 4 BORAL® shim-safety, 1 SS regulating Primary Reflector – beryllium* Forced primary coolant flow rate – 3,750 gpm (237 lps) Forced pool coolant flow rate – 1,200 gpm (76 lps) Primary coolant temps – 120 °F (49 °C) inlet, 136 °F (58 °C) outlet Primary coolant system pressure – 85 psia (586 kPa) Pool coolant temps – 100 °F (38 °C) inlet, 106 °F (41 °C) outlet Beamports – three 4-inch (10 cm), three 6-inch (15 cm)

Beryllium as a Primary Neutron Reflector at Research Reactors Advantageous qualities of beryllium: Has one of the highest atom number densities (i.e., a relatively large scattering cross-section). A very small neutron absorption cross-section. Though not as efficient, also a neutron multiplier due to its small 9Be (nf, 2n) 2 4He and 9Be (γ, n) 2 4He cross-sections which increases core excess reactivity. Usage of beryllium as neutron reflector: ATR (INL)– 200MW HFIR (ORNL)– 100MW MURR (Missouri University) –10 MW Works well for high power density Research Reactors (e.g. MURR)

The MURR Beryllium Reflector Geometry: cylindrical sleeve located around the outer reactor pressure vessel at the height that contains the reactor core Material: S-200FH grade Height: 37 inches (94 cm) Outer diameter: 19 inches (48.3 cm) Sleeve thickness: 2.71 inches (6.9 cm) Present replacement schedule for MURR HEU core: 8 years of full-power operation or 26000 MWD at 10MW Based on observed stress-fracture failure of beryllium in 1981 Expected replacement schedule for proposed LEU-CD35 conversion core: ????

Limits on the Beryllium Lifetime at Research Reactors Routine replacement of beryllium due to radiation induced stress-fracture failure: Swelling stress from gas production Thermal stress from radiation (gamma) energy deposition Fuel conversion from HEU (UAlx dispersion) to LEU (U-10Mo monolithic) In accordance with the mission of the Global Threat Reduction Initiative (GTRI), the current capabilities and performance of research and test reactors must be maintained after conversion Very limited studies and measurements available! No previous studies available!

The Importance and Purpose/Intent of Investigating Beryllium Lifetime Limits Beryllium reflectors are specifically designed and fabricated to provide a critical core and desired power/flux distributions Beryllium may be a part of the actual core structural component (HFIR, ATR) or can affect operation of other core component (MURR), such that failure can compromise normal operation Until now, the development of a systematic approach to study the beryllium performance and predict the total stress as a function of megawatt days, has been lacking Specifically, the goal is to predict if there is a change in the stress vs. MWD curve, and performance, on conversion of MURR from 10MW HEU to 12MW LEU, using MCNP-coupled-ORIGEN depletion models

New Material definition Computational Methodology for Beryllium Depletion Models MONTEBURNS 2.0   MCNP5 Detailed Fluxes & Reaction Rates ORIGEN 2.2 Mass Activity Heatload Burnup 1-group Flux 1-group cross-section New Material definition MONTEBURNS 2.0 – Time-dependent, cyclic, stepwise, MCNP-coupled-ORIGEN nuclear burn-up code system (LANL)

MCNP5 MURR Core HEU/LEU-CD35 Model MURR current HEU and proposed LEU-CD35 ex-core configuration is expected to have identical geometry HEU core: Fuel matrix: UAlx, 24-plate Density = 3.7g/cc Typical mixed-fuel core configuration: (640MWD) at 10MW U mass per core = 6.2Kg LEU-CD35 core: Fuel matrix: U-10Mo, 23-plate Density = 15.7g/cc Similar mixed-fuel core configuration: (765MWD) at 12 MW U mass per core = 14.0Kg Discretized Beryllium Sleeve

Discretization of the Beryllium Reflector MCNP5 Model Axial section 1 Discretized Beryllium Sleeve Axial section 2 Inner core region Axial section 3 (peak flux zone) 15 individual depletion zones (rings): 3 radial and 5 axial sections Axial section 4 Axial section 5

Predicted Fast Flux Profile for MURR HEU Core Beryllium Reflector Axial section 1 Current beryllium Peak Fast Flux (> 0.1MeV) = 9.40 x 1013 ncm-2s-1 MURR LEU-CD35 Core (> 0.1MeV) fast flux =1.01 x 1014 ncm-2s-1 Axial section 2 Axial section 3 (peak flux zone) Core Centerline Axial section 4 Axial section 5

Gas Production Predictions from Models Predicted Peak 4He, 3He, 6Li and 3H concentration in beryllium after 8 years of full-power LEU operation Predicted Peak 4He, 3He, 6Li and 3H concentration in beryllium after 8 years of full-power HEU operation ~11% larger gas + 6Li production in beryllium from LEU-CD35 Core

Beryllium Gas Production Profiles for Swelling Analysis in for HEU and LEU Core Total Gas production in beryllium for LEU Core at 8 yrs Total gas production in beryllium for HEU core at 8 yrs

Total Heating Profiles in Beryllium for Thermal Stress Analysis: HEU Vs. LEU Core Total heating rate in beryllium for LEU Core Total heating rate in beryllium for HEU Core

Preliminary Estimation of LEU-CD35 Beryllium Lifetime at MURR Internuclear Company calculated a maximum thermal stress of 16,690psi as compared to the assumed beryllium’s yield stress of 27,000psi for HEU at 10MW Gas swelling stress HEU = beryllium yield stress - maximum thermal stress (10,310 psi) Thermal stress proportional heating difference between surfaces. Ratio between HEU and LEU-CD35 implies LEU-CD35 at 12MW thermal stress is reduced to 13,320 psi Consequently, LEU-CD35 at 12MW swelling stress is increased to 13,680 psi Using a conversion factor of 10.25psi/ppm and the LEU-CD35 gas production rate of 139ppm/yr, lifetime for beryllium extended from 8 years to 9.6 years Caveats: Assumes that the beryllium yield stress is constant (i.e., unaffected during operation The swelling behavior as a function of megawatts is not well known for beryllium No measurements to benchmark model predictions Collaboration with HFIR and ATR for more analysis of data on beryllium

Performance Degradation in Beryllium HEU and LEU Core: Excess Reactivity Loss Core Excess Reactivity loss is due to: Buildup of the neutron poisons 6Li and 3He absorption cross-sections = ~900 and 4900 barns 6Li reaches equilibrium value in ~1 year 3He constant increase with MWDs; small concentration <1ppm at 26000 MWD Swelling due to steady helium + tritium buildup decreases the beryllium macroscopic scattering cross-section Region of greatest expected swelling Exaggeration of MURR beryllium swelling

Excess Reactivity Loss Vs. Time Curve for HEU vs. LEU-CD35 Includes an arbitrury beryllium swelling rate = 0.09% per year LEU has ~10% greater loss in reactivity at 26000 MWDs

Summary and Future Works MCNP-coupled ORIGEN depletion simulations were used to predict the gas production and heating profiles in beryllium neutron reflector to study stress increase that can lead to fracture failure for the HEU and LEU-CD35 MURR core configuration. It is shown that for the HEU core, there is more energy deposited and less gas produced in the beryllium which may correspond to greater thermal stress and lower swelling stress, as compared to the LEU core. Preliminary estimation for MURR’s beryllium shows a 1½ years increase in beryllium lifetime using the LEU-CD35 core as compared to the HEU core. Neutron poison buildup and swelling appears to be responsible an increase lost (~10%) of excess reactivity in LEU-CD35 Core at 8 years of operation. Increasing the data based for the impact of irradiating beryllium at research reactors is planned for future works: Benchmarking measurements are being done for the MURR beryllium Analyzing beryllium irradiation data from HFIR and ATR

Thank you Questions ?