Enforcement Overview James Gradney Enforcement Division

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Civil Administrative Enforcement of Environmental Laws.
Advertisements

ADEQ Regulatory Process
NARUC/NIGERIA REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP Peer Review Presented by Elijah Abinah Assistant Director Public Utilities Division Arizona Corporation Commission.
Compliance Application Notice Process Update and Discussion with NERC MRC.
Surface Transportation project delivery program
Legislative Rule-Making Process. Three Different Processes Higher Education 29A-3A-1 et seq State Board of Education 29A-3B-1 et seq All other state agencies.
Understanding the Enforcement Process Environmental Trade Fair Colin Barth Region 11 Compliance Assistance Specialist. Small Business Local Government.
Steve Stich Director Safety and Inspection Standard 6 Breakout Session Compliance and Enforcement Program March 12, :00am – 12:00 pm Julie Loera.
Water Users’ Workshop – Session March 2007 Dixie Center – St. George, Utah Water Users’ Workshop – Session March 2007 Dixie Center – St.
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
Enforcement Overview Melissa Cordell, P.G. Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental.
Monitoring & Oversight Adult Education and Literacy (AEL) Programs Brenda B. Williams Project Manager Texas Workforce Commission Regulatory Integrity Division.
Administrative Penalty Program SB Regulatory Item California Air Resources Board Enforcement Division Public Hearing December 12, 2002 Sacramento,
Nuclearsafety.gc.ca Joint Congress on Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences May 28, 2015 e-Doc CNSC Administrative Monetary Penalties Overview.
Best Practice Performance Measure for Governing Boards and Commissions Board and Commission Training, March 20, 2006 Rita Conrad, Executive Director Oregon.
Overview of Civil Judicial Enforcement. Civil Judicial Enforcement  Who may file civil judicial environmental enforcement actions in U.S.? Federal Government.
1 UST Stakeholders Meeting Compliance & Enforcement “C/E 101” MassDEP January 2012.
WATER QUALITY TOPICS ENFORCEMENT – ARE FINES BECOMING A WAY OF LIFE AT THE DEQ By:Donald D. Maisch Supervising Attorney, Water Quality Division Office.
Employee Privacy at Risk? APPA Business & Financial Conference Austin, TX September 25, 2007 Scott Mix, CISSP Manager of Situation Awareness and Infrastructure.
Chapter 6: Administrative Agencies
When Can You Redact Information Without Requesting an Attorney General Decision? Karen Hattaway Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division Views.
© 2005 Powell Goldstein LLP. All rights reserved. Practical Pointers for Using EPA’s Audit Policy Matthew Mattila
Changes to Contested Case Hearing Requirements and Procedures Janis Hudson Environmental Law Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Enforcement Overview Melissa Cordell, P.G. Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental.
Washington State Collection Agency Board: Regulatory Process Grace Hamilton, Investigator Department of Licensing – Collection Agency Board Complaint Process.
Water Quality/Stormwater Seminar September House Bill 2031 Requires TCEQ to adopt an expedited permitting process for discharge permits for treated.
Financial Management Policy Statements Annual Update and Review Presented to City Council by Lena H. Ellis, Director / CFO October 27, 2009.
CHANGE ORDER/CLAIMS MANAGEMENT MODULE 9. Change Order Management.
WHAT TO DO WHEN YOU HAVE AN “ALLEGED” VIOLATION Keith W. Turner Watkins & Eager.
TCEQ Helps Compliance and Assistance Programs
Hazardous Waste Import-Export Final Rule Requirements and Implementation December 12, 2016.
Department of Environmental Quality
Pat Nestor MSCSI MRICS Head of Building Control Dublin City Council
The Changing World of Guardianships
Dry Cleaning Registration
Understanding the Enforcement Process.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
and Transportation Impacts
CMS and State Enforcement
ENFORCEMENT ISSUES IN STORMWATER REGULATION
Office of Compliance and Enforcement
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
OFFICE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Fiscal Agent Role and process for SwP
Entering Informal Enforcement Actions
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Industrial and Hazardous Waste Easier, Better, Faster Permitting
Session: Enforcement Actions
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING.
Final Order The Final Order is a very important section that must be completed. In this area, you will put the issuance date, and the requirements that.
Background (history, process to date) Status of CANs
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
An Overview of the Payment Process
2018 Stormwater Construction General Permit (CGP) Renewal TXR150000
Department of Environmental Quality
The Optional Protocol Module 8.
PAYROLL DENISSE GARZA CHRISTY MARTINEZ NORA LERMA FRED JUAREZ III
OFFICE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Informed Consent (SBER)
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
Chapter 6 Powers and Functions of Administrative Agencies.
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
Compliance and Enforcement Section
Annual Enforcement Report Overview
Understanding the Enforcement Process.
Water Resources Council
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information
Paid Family and Medical Leave
Enforcement Division Overview
Presentation transcript:

Enforcement Overview James Gradney Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2017 Good afternoon, Thank you for coming to this presentation on the enforcement process and Audit Privilege Act. The first part of this presentation picks up after an investigation, record review, or, possibly a complaint has occurred. A determination has been made that the facts support pursuing formal enforcement. In the event that you end up in enforcement knowing this process may be helpful to you. We want to you to get through this process and the facility back into compliance with the rules as soon as possible.

OCE Mission Statement “The Office of Compliance and Enforcement is dedicated to protecting human health and the environment by ensuring compliance with state and federal regulations. The office seeks to promote voluntary compliance through a comprehensive program of regional inspections, technical assistance, environmental monitoring, training and outreach. When enforcement is necessary, however, the office will take swift action that is fair, sensible and responsive to the needs of the citizens of Texas.” Within the TCEQ - The Enforcement Division is within the Office of Compliance and Enforcement. The Enforcement Division’s part in supporting the OCE Mission statement in protecting human health and the environment is to ensure compliance with state and federal regulations by taking swift action that is fair, sensible and responsive to the needs of the citizens of Texas.

What does that mean? Swift Action Fair, Sensible, and Responsive Case assignment to mail out – 60 days Achieve settlement or refer to the Litigation Division – 60 days Fair, Sensible, and Responsive Use of the Commission-approved Penalty Policies Use the facts of the case and the applicable rules Discuss the case with the Respondent Respondent – entity responsible for the facility where the violations occurred; typically this is the owner or operator

Enforcement Process This chart illustrates the flow of a case from Enforcement Action Referral through Commission or Executive Director Agenda.

Expedited Enforcement Process Overview Within 14 days of assignment, Enforcement Action Referrals (EARs) are screened Enforcement documents are drafted and mailed within 60 days of assignment There are 60 days from after the proposed order is mailed to the Respondent reach a settlement agreement If settlement is reached, the case is scheduled for Commission or Executive Director Agenda If settlement is not reached, the case is referred to the Litigation Division (LD) Enforcement Action Referrals (EARs) are reviewed for completeness and validity. Discuss differences between ED and Commission Agenda

Screening The Enforcement Coordinator (EC) will: Verify the correct Respondent name and Customer Reference Number/Regulated Entity Reference Number associations Contact the Respondent for information regarding the Notice of Enforcement Validate the violations contained in the referral Discuss specific corrective actions (what has and what needs to be completed) Review the facts of the case and the relevant rules and regulations Respondent may already be working on returning to compliance, since the majority of folks are trying to do the right thing.

The Respondent will receive… Enforcement Documents: Cover letter with contact information and Financial Inability to Pay and Supplemental Environmental Project information (if applicable) Agreed Order (1660 or Findings) Penalty Calculation Worksheet (PCW) Compliance History report EC will discuss the enforcement documents with the Respondent

Initial Proposed Agreed Order Most enforcement actions will follow the expedited enforcement process and result in an Agreed Order Agreed Orders With a denial of liability Referred to as a 1660 - The 74th Texas Legislature passed SB 1660 regarding Agreed Orders in 1995. Includes a 20% deferral of the penalty Without a denial of liability (Findings) As defined by 30 Tex. Admin. Code §70.11 Does not include a 20% deferral Laid out in the Texas Administrative Code ch. 70 for Enforcement Most common instance of meeting the findings criteria is having 3 or more enforcement actions for the same violation in a five year period.

Penalty Calculation Worksheet Penalties are assessed in accordance with the Commission’s Penalty Policy Revision 2 Effective on September 1, 2002 Revision 4 Effective on April 1, 2014 http://www.tceq.texas.gov/publications/rg/rg-253.html All violations that occurred before Sept. 1, 2011, are subject to the second revision of the Penalty Policy (effective Sept. 1, 2002). For violations that occurred on or after Sept. 1, 2011: All Enforcement Action Referrals assigned on or after April 1, 2014, are subject to the fourth revision of the Penalty Policy. All EARs assigned before April 1, 2014, are subject to the revision of the Penalty Policy that was applicable at the time the EAR was assigned. The Penalty Policy was last revised on April 1, 2014. The changes brought the document up-to-date with practices that were already effective, including statutory changes that were made during the 82nd and 83rd legislative sessions, adding deferral criteria, reorganization to better align the policy with the penalty calculation worksheet, updating the implementation language, and other edits to improve clarification.

Penalty Calculation Worksheet Factors that affect the penalty: Major or minor source Nature, gravity, and duration of violation Compliance history Culpability Compliance status Economic benefit Penalty Calculation Worksheet (PCW) – reflection of the Commission’s Penalty Policy

Compliance History Report The report will include: The Compliance History Person Classification Repeat Violator status Number of written notices of violation Number of final orders, court judgements, and consent decrees https://www.tceq.texas.gov/enforcement/history/about.html

60 Day Settlement Period Discussions between the TCEQ and the Respondent include: Additional information that can impact the proposed order Penalty calculation Need for a settlement conference Ability or willingness to pay the penalty Interest in Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs) Ability to comply with the technical requirements/ corrective actions and the applicable deadlines as written in the order Desire to settle the case and avoid litigation

60 Day Settlement Period Respondents are strongly encouraged to read and re-read the entire order. If the Respondent signs the order and pays the assessed penalty, then the Respondent is agreeing with the terms of the order. The Respondent is required to completely and timely fulfill the terms of the order. Additional enforcement actions including increased penalties may result if compliance is not achieved.

If We Have Achieved Settlement… Notice of the Agreed Order is published in the Texas Register for a 30 day public comment period Cases are scheduled for final approval Commission agenda Final Assessed Penalties greater than $7,500 Agreed Orders without a denial of liability Special circumstances Executive Director (ED) agenda All other cases are delegated to the ED for adoption

Commission Agenda The Respondent will be contacted before the scheduled Commission agenda: 19 days prior via letter By the EC to determine status of the technical requirements At Commission agenda, the orders will be presented in a group to the Commissioners. If the Respondent wishes to speak at Commission agenda, please arrive early at TCEQ and sign-in.

What happens after the order is approved? The effective date of an Order is the date it is signed by the Commission. Order Compliance Team will track open technical requirements (TRs) Financial Administration Division will monitor remaining payments If the penalty has been paid and TRs have been completed, then the Respondent will receive a compliance letter The order is effective for five years The order will remain on the compliance history for this regulated entity for five years from the effective date of the order.

If Settlement Has Not Been Reached… Case is referred to LD within 70 days after the initial settlement offer was mailed Assigned LD attorney drafts an Executive Director’s Preliminary Report and Petition If the Respondent does not respond, a Default Order is issued The Respondent may request an administrative hearing After the hearing, the State Office of Administrative Hearing judge presents a Proposal for Decision at Commission Agenda

Total Number of Administrative Orders Issued by Fiscal Year As of March 31 this year, the Agency has issued 989 Orders. This chart illustrates the total number of administrative orders issued by the Agency for each fiscal year: 1,826 for FY2012, 2,182 for FY2013, 1,708 for FY2014, 1,681 for FY2015, and 1,404 for FY2016.

Percent of Orders Issued by Media Type This chart illustrates the percent of orders issued by media type for fiscal year 2016: 16% from Air, 27% from Waste, 52% from Water, and 5% from Multi-Media.

If compliance is still not achieved… Referral to the Attorney General Referral to the EPA Criminal Prosecution Emergency Orders

Need Technical Assistance? TCEQ’s Small Business and Local Government Assistance Section (SBLGA) in the Environmental Assistance Division Provides Technical Assistance with understanding the rules and meeting requirements Can provide one-on-one help and resources  

SBLGA Contact Info Hotline 1-800-447-2827 Monday-Friday 8:00am-5:00pm www.TexasEnviroHelp.org

The Take Away Communicate with the assigned Enforcement Coordinator throughout the enforcement process and ask for help (512)239-2545 Goal is compliance

James Gradney (512)239-6549 James.gradney@tceq.texas.gov Questions? James Gradney (512)239-6549 James.gradney@tceq.texas.gov