Transition to a new CPU benchmark

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status GridKa & ALICE T2 in Germany Kilian Schwarz GSI Darmstadt.
Advertisements

Ian Bird LCG Project Leader LHCC + C-RSG review. 2 Review of WLCG  To be held Feb 16 at CERN  LHCC Reviewers:  Amber Boehnlein  Chris.
Hepmark project Evaluation of HEP worker nodes Michele Michelotto at pd.infn.it.
Sue Foffano LCG Resource Manager WLCG – Resources & Accounting LHCC Comprehensive Review November, 2007 LCG.
A comparison of HEP code with SPEC benchmark on multicore worker nodes HEPiX Benchmarking Group Michele Michelotto at pd.infn.it.
Storage Task Force Intermediate pre report. History GridKa Technical advisory board needs storage numbers: Assemble a team of experts. 04/05 At HEPiX.
HS06 on the last generation of CPU for HEP server farm Michele Michelotto 1.
Moving out of SI2K How INFN is moving out of SI2K as a benchmark for Worker Nodes performance evaluation Michele Michelotto at pd.infn.it.
Processors Menu  INTEL Core™ i Processor INTEL Core™ i Processor  INTEL Core i Processor INTEL Core i Processor  AMD A K.
Test results Test definition (1) Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma; (2) Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bologna.
Transition to a new CPU benchmark on behalf of the “GDB benchmarking WG”: HEPIX: Manfred Alef, Helge Meinhard, Michelle Michelotto Experiments: Peter Hristov,
SouthGrid Status Pete Gronbech: 4 th September 2008 GridPP 21 Swansea.
Site report: CERN Helge Meinhard (at) cern ch HEPiX spring CASPUR.
CERN - IT Department CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland t Tier0 database extensions and multi-core/64 bit studies Maria Girone, CERN IT-PSS LCG.
3. April 2006Bernd Panzer-Steindel, CERN/IT1 HEPIX 2006 CPU technology session some ‘random walk’
F. Brasolin / A. De Salvo – The ATLAS benchmark suite – May, Benchmarking ATLAS applications Franco Brasolin - INFN Bologna - Alessandro.
RAL Site Report Andrew Sansum e-Science Centre, CCLRC-RAL HEPiX May 2004.
Fast Benchmark Michele Michelotto – INFN Padova Manfred Alef – GridKa Karlsruhe 1.
Benchmarking status Status of Benchmarking Helge Meinhard, CERN-IT WLCG Management Board 14-Jul Helge Meinhard (at) CERN.ch.
CERN IT Department CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland t IHEPCCC/HEPiX benchmarking WG Helge Meinhard / CERN-IT LCG Management Board 11 December.
Benchmarking Benchmarking in WLCG Helge Meinhard, CERN-IT HEPiX Fall 2015 at BNL 16-Oct Helge Meinhard (at) CERN.ch.
Procedure to follow for proposed new Tier 1 sites Ian Bird CERN, 27 th March 2012.
HS06 on last generation of HEP worker nodes Berkeley, Hepix Fall ‘09 INFN - Padova michele.michelotto at pd.infn.it.
Procedure for proposed new Tier 1 sites Ian Bird WLCG Overview Board CERN, 9 th March 2012.
EGEE-III INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks John Gordon SA1 Face to Face CERN, June.
HS06 performance per watt and transition to SL6 Michele Michelotto – INFN Padova 1.
HEPMARK2 Consiglio di Sezione 9 Luglio 2012 Michele Michelotto - Padova.
The last generation of CPU processor for server farm. New challenges Michele Michelotto 1.
Dominique Boutigny December 12, 2006 CC-IN2P3 a Tier-1 for W-LCG 1 st Chinese – French Workshop on LHC Physics and associated Grid Computing IHEP - Beijing.
Moving out of SI2K How INFN is moving out of SI2K as a benchmark for Worker Nodes performance evaluation Michele Michelotto at pd.infn.it.
CERN IT Department CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland t IHEPCCC/HEPiX benchmarking WG Helge Meinhard / CERN-IT Grid Deployment Board 09 January.
Operations Coordination Team Maria Girone, CERN IT-ES GDB, 11 July 2012.
Accounting Review Summary and action list from the (pre)GDB Julia Andreeva CERN-IT WLCG MB 19th April
SI2K and beyond Michele Michelotto – INFN Padova CCR – Frascati 2007, May 30th.
US Tier 2 issues Jim Shank Boston University U.S. ATLAS Tier 2 Meeting Harvard University August, 2006.
Benchmarking of CPU models for HEP application
Brief introduction about “Grid at LNS”
WLCG IPv6 deployment strategy
Evaluation of HEP worker nodes Michele Michelotto at pd.infn.it
CCR Autunno 2008 Gruppo Server
Gruppo Server CCR michele.michelotto at pd.infn.it
Ian Bird WLCG Workshop San Francisco, 8th October 2016
U.S. ATLAS Tier 2 Computing Center
How to benchmark an HEP worker node
The “Understanding Performance!” team in CERN IT
Outline Benchmarking in ATLAS Performance scaling
Gruppo Server CCR michele.michelotto at pd.infn.it
LHC Computing Grid Status of Resources Financial Plan and Sue Foffano
How INFN is moving out of SI2K has a benchmark for Worker Nodes
Database Readiness Workshop Intro & Goals
John Gordon, STFC-RAL GDB 10 October 2007
Update on Plan for KISTI-GSDC
Status and Prospects of The LHC Experiments Computing
ALICE T2 / FAIR Scope of the Meeting:
Proposal for obtaining installed capacity
The INFN TIER1 Regional Centre
RDIG for ALICE today and in future
Passive benchmarking of ATLAS Tier-0 CPUs
John Gordon, STFC-RAL GDB April 8th 2009
Update from the HEPiX IPv6 WG
Meeting Wrap-up Fall 2011 TRIUMF, Vancouver
John Gordon, STFC GDB October 12th 2011
CPU accounting of public cloud resources
System performance and cost model working group
WLCG and support for IPv6-only CPU
CERN Benchmarking Cluster
Bernd Panzer-Steindel CERN/IT
New strategies of the LHC experiments to meet
ETHZ, Zürich September 1st , 2016
HEPiX Spring 2009 Highlights
Presentation transcript:

Transition to a new CPU benchmark G. Merino, GDB 14 Jan 2008 on behalf of the “GDB benchmarking WG”: HEPIX: Manfred Alef, Helge Meinhard, Michelle Michelotto Experiments: Peter Hristov, Alessandro De Salvo and Franco Brasolin, Marie-Christine Sawley, Hubert Degaudenzi Chair: Gonzalo Merino

Background July 2008: The HEPIX CPU WG recommended the MB to adopt SPECall_cpp2006 as new benchmark. Document describing the new benchmark chosen and the conditions in which it will have to be run is in preparation by the HEPIX WG. Mandate of our Working Group: Publish the recipe for running the benchmark (see above) Agree on conversion factors to convert experiment requirement and site pledges tables from si2k units to the new units Aim of this talk is not to present a formal proposal, but to report on the Group discussions up to now and get reactions/feedback.

LXBENCH cluster at CERN Cluster with 8 reference machines for benchmarking at CERN: lxbench01, lxbench02, … lxbench08 (see https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/FIOgroup/TsiLxbench) Old (SPECint2000) and new (SPECall_cpp2006) benchmarks have been run in every machine. Experiments also ran their apps in every machine (May-08, HEPIX CPU WG) Conclusion: All 4 experiments see good correlation between their applications and both benchmarks. NOTE: Not all the experiments ran in lxbench08 Only ATLAS managed to run and provide results for lxbench08 LHCb says it did run, but results still not provided to the HEPIX group CMS and ALICE did not manage to run in lxbench08 in May

SPECs on LXBENCH SPECall_cpp2006 (new) KSI2K-LCG (old) Ratio new/old Intel Xeon 2.8 GHz lxbench01 10,24 2,25 4,55 lxbench02 9,63 2,24 4,29 AMD Opteron 275 lxbench03 28,03 6,20 4,52 Intel Xeon 5150 lxbench04 35,58 8,51 4,18 Intel Xeon 5160 lxbench05 38,21 9,27 4,12 AMD Opteron 2218 lxbench06 31,67 6,85 4,62 Intel Xeon E5345 lxbench07 57,52 14,19 4,05 Intel Xeon E5410 lxbench08 60,76 15,83 3,84

Current processors at the T0/T1s Result of a poll the Tier-0 and Tier-1s showing a snapshot of the number of cores currently installed of each processor type Xeon E5345 (Quad-core) Xeon E5430 AMD Intel Dual-Core Quad-Core

Transition to a new CPU unit The most representative platform, providing the majority of capacity at T0/T1s today are the Intel QuadCore processors. Propose to focus on the conversion factor results got at the newest (Intel QuadCore) machines: lxbench07 and lxbench08 lxbench07: 4,05 lxbench08: 3,84 Manfred Alef did the exercise of computing the CPU performance delivered by the whole GridKa farm with both the old and the new SPEC benchmarks large site with quite a lot of different processors  realistic “mixture” Result: new/old conversion factor = 4,19 Precision O(5%) intrinsic to these measurements: not significative.

Transition to a new CPU unit Proposal: Take a simple approach and adopt 4,00 as conversion factor.  Give more importance to having a simple rule for the transition period than discussing about decimals within the 5% precision. Caveat: during the next days, ALICE and CMS will complete their benchmarking runs up to lxbench08 to confirm the good correlation (no surprises expected). Transition period: before end April (Spring C-RRB meeting) Experiments will re-compute requirements tables given the new LHC schedule: new numbers should be computed already with the new unit. Sites should buy SPECcpu2006 and calibrate their farms to report their current CPU power in the new unit. Pledges for the Spring CRRB should be expressed in the new unit.