Venn Diagrams 1= s that are not p; 2= s that are p; 3= p that are not s 2 3 1 S P.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (1/2).
Advertisements

Venn Diagram Technique for testing syllogisms
Test the validity of this argument: Some lawyers are judges. Some judges are politicians. Therefore, some lawyers are politicians. A. Valid B. Invalid.
Part 2 Module 3 Arguments and deductive reasoning Logic is a formal study of the process of reasoning, or using common sense. Deductive reasoning involves.
Test the validity of this argument: Some lawyers are judges. Some judges are politicians. Therefore, some lawyers are politicians. A. Valid B. Invalid.
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
An overview Lecture prepared for MODULE-13 (Western Logic) BY- MINAKSHI PRAMANICK Guest Lecturer, Dept. Of Philosophy.
Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5. ” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage.
1 Philosophy 1100 Title:Critical Reasoning Instructor:Paul Dickey Website:
Part 2 Module 3 Arguments and deductive reasoning Logic is a formal study of the process of reasoning, or using common sense. Deductive reasoning involves.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams Categorical Syllogisms Venn Diagram tests for validity Rule tests for validity.
Philosophy 1100 Today: Hand Back “Nail that Claim” Exercise! & Discuss
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-08: 1 Critical Issues in Information Systems BUSS 951 Seminar 8 Arguments.
Chapter 16: Venn Diagrams. Venn Diagrams (pp ) Venn diagrams represent the relationships between classes of objects by way of the relationships.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 10 Evaluating Inductive Generalizations.
Categorical Syllogisms
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning. Objectives Use a Venn diagram to determine the validity of an argument. Complete a pattern with the most likely possible.
Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 1, Unit 1D, Slide 1 Thinking Critically 1.
SORTING DATA VENN DIAGRAMS.
Online Class by Satyadhar Joshi
Testing Validity With Venn Diagrams
Philosophy 148 Chapter 7. AffirmativeNegative UniversalA: All S are PE: No S is P ParticularI: Some S is PO: Some S is not P.
Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms
DEDUCTIVE REASONING MOVES FROM A GENERALIZATION THAT IS TRUE OR SELF-EVIDENT TO A MORE SPECIFIC CONCLUSION DEDUCTIVE REASONING.
Chapter 15: Rules for Judging Validity. Distribution (p. 152) Several of the rules use the notion of distribution. A term is distributed if it refers.
4 Categorical Propositions
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes for Fogelin: Categorical Syllogisms We will go over diagramming Arguments in class. Fall Term 2006 North Central.
Breaking Down An Arguments Into Propositions
Writing and Graphing Inequalities Because “I
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS
Diagramming Universal-Particular arguments The simplest style of nontrivial argument is called a Universal-Particular argument. Earlier in Part 2 Module.
Chapter 17: Missing Premises and Conclusions. Enthymemes (p. 168) An enthymeme is an argument with an unstated premise or conclusion. There are systematic.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 6
DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize, analyze, and evaluate deductive arguments.
Chapter 6 Evaluating Deductive Arguments 1: Categorical Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Chapter 14: Categorical Syllogisms. Elements of a Categorical Syllogism (pp ) Categorical syllogisms are deductive arguments. Categorical syllogisms.
Elements of Argument Logic vs. Rhetoric. Syllogism Major Premise: Advertising of things harmful to our health should be legally banned. Minor Premise:
McGraw-Hill ©2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Testing Validity With Venn Diagrams The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn.
Introduction to Categorical Logic PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 18, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
Venn Diagram Technique for testing syllogisms
Deductive reasoning.
VENNS DIAGRAM METHOD FOR TESTING CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
a valid argument with true premises.
Testing Validity With Venn Diagrams
Testing for Validity with Venn Diagrams
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams
5.1 Standard Form, Mood, and Figure
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
3 Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between.
Philosophy 1100 Class #8 Title: Critical Reasoning
Diagramming Universal-Particular arguments
Philosophy 1100 Title: Critical Reasoning Instructor: Paul Dickey
Review To check an argument with a tree:.
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Premise: If it’s a school day, then I have Geometry class.
Section 3.6 Euler Diagrams and Syllogistic Arguments
Chapter 6 Categorical Syllogisms
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (2/2).
6.4 Truth Tables for Arguments
GCF and LCM.
Critical Thinking Lecture 11 The Syllogism
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Practice Quiz 3 Hurley 4.3 – 4.6.
Presentation transcript:

Venn Diagrams 1= s that are not p; 2= s that are p; 3= p that are not s 2 3 1 S P

Universal Propositions No S are P All S are P

Particular Propositions Some S are P Some S are not P X X P S P S

Syllogism Diagrams S= Smokers; P= Philosophers S P M= Musicians 1: Smokers that are not Philosophers or Musicians 3 2 1 2: Non-Musician Philosophers 5 who smoke. 4 3: Non-Musician Philosophers 6 who don’t smoke 4: Musicians who smoke and 7 who are not Philosophers 5: Musician Philosophers who smoke M 6: Musician Philosophers who don’t smoke. 7: Non-smoking Musicians who aren’t Philosophers

The Venn Diagram Validity Test Diagram information from premises and inspect to see if the conclusion is implied; if so, valid argument. 1. Enter marks (shading or “x”) only for premises, not for the conclusion. 2. Enter marks for universal premise first, if one is particular. 3. When entering information, focus on the two circles involved 4. The area where “x” goes is divided into two parts, if one part is shaded, put “x” in the other part; if both parts are unshaded, put “x” on the line.

Venn Diagram, example 1 No critical thinkers are cultists. All Applewhite followers are cultists. \ No Applewhite followers are critical thinkers. A T Valid C