Water Conservation and Efficiency Projects for SWIFT Funding:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Alderwood Water & Wastewater District Draft Water Conservation Goal Kelly ORourke HDR December 17, 2007.
Advertisements

Washington State Department of Health Division of Environmental HealthOffice of Drinking Water Mike Dexel Water Resources Policy Lead Municipal Water Law.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
Water Rates Utility Rates & SDCs Presentation to the West Linn City Council October 5, 2009.
Revised FY 2007 & Proposed FY 2008 Operating & Capital Budgets Retail Rates Committee January 4, 2007.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
IBM Smarter Cities Challenge City of Tucson Award Recipient for 2013 November 14, 2012.
1 Combined Utility System Cost of Service Rate Study Presentation April 6, 2010.
Tracie Billington, P.E. Chief Financial Assistance Branch Department of Water Resources.
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
Accounting Details We show transfers as a separate line below personnel, operating expense, and capital outlay so true cost of the department before transfer.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
City of Savannah Water, the Lifeline of the Community.
Imagine the result Impact Study on MSD Rate Payers of Proposed Consolidation/Merger Phase II – Towns of Biltmore Forest, Montreat and Weaverville Presentation.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FY07 BUDGET HEARING Mayor – Tammy de Weerd Council President – Shaun Wardle Council Vice President – Joe Borton Council – Keith Bird Council.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Determining and Setting Public Utility Rates Bill Wilks, Senior Project Manager November 19, 2014 AGFOA Fall Conference.
Independent Review of FY 2008 Proposed Rates D.C. Water and Sewer Authority Public Hearing June 13, 2007.
Water Use Efficiency Implementation: Lessons Learned in California Tom Peters Mary Lou Cotton.
One Step Ahead: Using a Finance Plan for Regional Water System Operations Deena Hood Central Wyoming Regional Water System Carol Malesky Integrated Utilities.
Twitter
City of Renton, WA Water Use Efficiency Margaret Ales PNWS – AWWA CONFERENCE MAY 1, 2008 Copyright © 2008 by R. W. Beck, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Opportunities,
Withlacoochee Regional Water Supply Authority Water Supply Plan Update - Progress Report #3 May 15 – June 18.
STATE OF OREGON WATER EFFICIENCY STANDARDS PNWS-AWWA Conference Eugene, Oregon May 2014 Lisa Jaramillo Water Right Services Division Oregon Water Resources.
Making Conservation Work for You Chris Brown Chris Brown Consulting for Office of Rural Community Affairs December 2, 2003.
Current Water Conservation (Task 3.1) Alan H. Plummer, Jr., P.E., BCEE.
2016 Water and Wastewater Rates Committee of the Whole November 16, 2015 Presenter: Mike Mayes – Director, Financial Services/Treasurer.
Proposed MMWD Rate Restructure MCOE District Business Officials November 4, 2015.
Pasadena Water and Power Public Hearing Water Capital Improvement Charge Pasadena City Council Meeting January 11, 2016 Item #12.
Water System Master Plan & Rate Study City of DeKalb, Illinois City Council Presentation May 16, 2015.
Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) City of Patterson’s April 19, 2016.
Irrigation with AMR Proposition 84 Drought Round Grant Irrigation with Automated Meter Reading Project Grant Agreement with Association of Bay Area Governments.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
Operating Efficiencies Costs to operate and maintain the water and sewer system have not varied significantly during the first 5 years of operation.
Pasadena Water and Power City of Pasadena 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Public Hearing City Council – June 13, 2016 Item 12.
WATER SYSTEM WORKSHOP February 27, 2012
CASE STUDY: The City of Keller’s Application for SWIFT Funds Grapevine, Texas June 23, 2016.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2015 / 16 First Quarter Enterprise Performance Measures Update John Ward Director of Engineering.
1 TIF 9 (Trinity River Vision) Expanded and Updated Project and Financing Plans December 8, 2009 Presented to the City Council Jay Chapa Housing & Economic.
Current Water Rates $26.66 per month readiness to serve fee (billed on a quarterly basis at $80.00) 5.14 per 1,000 gallons of water used The City of Flushing.
The First Mile – Single Family Loan Document Processing in 37 Minutes
Sustainable Water Infrastructure through Innovative Financing
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
Overview of the CoJ Water & Sanitation Master Plan
MOUNTAIN REGIONAL WATER
Water Loss Audit Findings (FY 13-14)
SEWER SERVICE FEE RATE STRUCTURE ALTERNATIVE
Final Rate Study Findings
Utah Water Conservation Forum – 5/12/2017
MOUNTAIN REGIONAL WATER
Utility Revenue Bonds Series 2016 March 29th, 2016
Texas Water Development Board
Water Conservation in the 2016 Region C Water Plan
Joshua Basin Water District Draft Findings & Rate Scenarios
Utilities Department Wedgefield Water November 28, 2017.
Joshua Basin Water District Revised Rate Recommendations
Vital services provided by LCU
Matthew S. Dickens Resource Conservation Manager
Matthew S. Dickens Resource Conservation Manager
Drought Planning Through Integrated Rate Design
Drought Rate Study Continued from May 19, 2015
Preliminary Proposed Budget April 26, 2016
Future Water Supply Evaluation
Octorara Area School District
City of Sunrise Wastewater Reuse Program
Paul D. Jones II, P.E., General Manager August 25, 2016
Water Loss, Use and Conservation - you gave us the data, now what?
Water Rate Modification – Public Hearing
Water Rates Public Hearing
Indiana Finance Authority (IFA)
Presentation transcript:

Water Conservation and Efficiency Projects for SWIFT Funding: Fort Worth’s Application Process and Lessons Learned SWIFT Funding Workshop June 23, 2016

Background City of Fort Worth consists of approximately 350 square miles Population of 792,727 Fort Worth Water Department provides both retail & wholesale water (31) & wastewater (23) services Total population served (water) Water: 1,169,061 Wastewater: 1,104,433

Current Efficiency Initiatives Residential programs SmartFlush toilet retrofit CARE (Conservation Assistance and Retrofit Efficiency) program for elderly and low income ICI programs SmartWater Audit Outdoor programs Smart Irrigation Audits (residential customers)

Current Efficiency Initiatives Ordinances Waste of water No more than twice per week watering schedule Public Education Texas SmartScape e-magazine Chasing Leaks 5k race Public events School programs Drought Planning

Water Use Is Trending Downward Here you see our trends for Gallons Per Capita Per day usage. The blue bars represent the total by year. That number will vary with the weather so we’ve track a rolling 5 year average. That is reflected in the red line. You can see a steady reduction over time as customers become more aware of the importance of conservation and replace aging fixtures. It is important to note the differences in the two most prominent drought years; 2006 and 2011. Although 2011 was the driest single year on record, GPCD was still well below the 2006 level. Est. 2015 gpcd is 152

Water Loss Current water loss: 17% Total non-revenue water: 24% Increasing/Fluctuating

Conservation Project for SWIFT Implementation of a fixed based Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) system to significantly reduce water loss Replacement of older, inaccurate water meters Retrofit remaining water meters Right sizing/typing of large water meters Automatic leak detection system Meter Data Management system District area metering Fort Worth estimates that approximately 7,000 acre feet/year will be saved thru this project.

Why SWIFT? Better rate on loans AAA rated debt vs. our AA Additional subsidy Flexibility – ability to split project up in multiple debt issues Large percentage of money set aside for conservation/efficiency projects Additional subsidy is 35%. This equates to a savings of several million dollars. Total was 1.64% vs about 3% for our rates on 15 year debt.

Cost Benefit Expected revenue increase with AMI, related to conservation/efficiency Significantly reduce apparent water loss (paper losses from meter reading errors and mistakes with data, theft) Increases in additional wastewater billing Reducing real water loss (reducing treatment of real water loss, identifying leaks and breaks more quickly, better understanding of our water balance) Non-revenue related…better data = better decision making Rapid reduction of apparent water loss expedites revenue recovery and provides a positive rate impact by 2020. 5 year cumulative revenue increase of $23 million

Cost Benefit Expected revenue increase with AMI, related to operational efficiencies Reduce customer calls Elimination of 3rd party meter reading agreement Reduction in truck roll outs Re-reads/rechecks Fleet costs Meter lock outs Initial and final readings

Timeline Council project concept approval Project must be in 2012 State Water Plan to be eligible for SWIFT Requested Region C letter of support for project and request that TWDB determine if project would be a minor (or major) amendment to 2011 Region C Plan (and 2012 State Water Plan) Fort Worth submitted proposed amendment material to TWDB (abridged application)

Timeline TWDB determined it was a minor amendment Region C approval of minor amendment to 2011 Region C Plan TWDB approval of minor amendment to the 2012 State Water Plan SWIFT application process & approval Council final approval and acceptance The good news is…you won’t have to go thru this if your proposed project is already in the State Water Plan!

Lessons Learned Fort Worth used a consultant, familiar with the SWIFT application process, to ensure timeliness and accuracy of document submittal. What did they do for us? What did we do on our own? What value did we receive that we could not have received by doing the entire process on our own?

Take Aways! Conservation projects need to be in the State Water Plan Calculate, evaluate & communicate How do we communicate conservation savings?

Conservation delays costly expansion projects 2010 - $87M 2013 - $73M Westside Southwest 2008 - $14M Rolling Hills $20 million annual financing The other thing we have to consider is that reduced consumption allows us to delay costly capital projects. CLICK The 2005 Water Master Plan required the expansion or construction of three water plants… with an expanded Westside and Rolling Hills Plan and the construction of a Southwest Water Treatment Plant. Here you see the proposed year of construction and the projected cost. CLICK The annual financing cost of those projects is estimated at $20M for 2014. As a result of declining per capita consumption, resulting from Conservation efforts we were able to delay those capital projects up to 20 years. That saved $20M from the current rate calculation. With the add impact of year-round twice per week, we expect to be able to further delay those projects a few more years. 2019 2035 2028 Twice a week watering 2029 2022 2038

Efficient water use defers costly new supply In addition to the deferred costs for Fort Worth., TRWD benefits financially from conservation efforts. Here you see their cost per 1000 gallons from various future water sources. We talk quite a bit about the cost impact of the Integrated Pipeline project but that pales in comparison to the cost of new reservoirs like Marvin Nichols and Toledo Bend. The district indicates that current conservation strategies and adding twice per week should delay the need for a major water supply project, like Toledo Bend ($2.75 B), for decades 

Questions?

Water Conservation Manager City of Fort Worth Water Department Micah Reed Water Conservation Manager City of Fort Worth Water Department micah.reed@fortworthtexas.gov 817-392-8211