VIPLab QA Data Filtering Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SURFACE SOLAR IRRADIANCE FROM SEVIRI SATELLITE DATA
Advertisements

QA flagging of clouds and atmospheric anomalies Fast UV simulation tool - FastRT Ola Engelsen Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU)
Satellite Cloud and Aerosol climate records for the ESA Climate Change Initiative (CCI) Caroline Poulsen, Gareth Thomas, Richard Siddans, Don Grainger,
15 May 2009ACSPO v1.10 GAC1 ACSPO upgrade to v1.10 Effective Date: 04 March 2009 Sasha Ignatov, XingMing Liang, Yury Kihai, Boris Petrenko, John Stroup.
VIIRS LST Uncertainty Estimation And Quality Assessment of Suomi NPP VIIRS Land Surface Temperature Product 1 CICS, University of Maryland, College Park;
Cloud Masking and Cloud Products MODIS Operational Algorithm MOD35 Paul Menzel, Steve Ackerman, Richard Frey, Kathy Strabala, Chris Moeller, Liam Gumley,
A) 80 b) 53 c) 13 d) x 2 = : 10 = 3, x 3 = 309.
NRL09/21/2004_Davis.1 GOES-R HES-CW Atmospheric Correction Curtiss O. Davis Code 7203 Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375
ECMWF CO 2 Data Assimilation at ECMWF Richard Engelen European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reading, United Kingdom Many thanks to Phil Watts,
Data Quality Screening Service Christopher Lynnes, Richard Strub, Thomas Hearty, Bruce Vollmer Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Sciences Center.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder SST field, Versions 5 & 6 Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’ RSMAS Nov 8, 2010 with.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: VIIRS Active Fire algorithm integration in Suomi NPP Data Exploitation (NDE) environment: research to operations.
GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aerosol Optical Depth/Suspended Matter and Aerosol Particle Size Mi Zhou (IMSG) Pubu Ciren (DELL) Hongqing.
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin - Madison Steve Ackerman Director, Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
Ten Years of Cloud Optical/Microphysical Measurements from MODIS M. D. King 1, S. Platnick 2, and the entire MOD06 Team 1 Laboratory for Atmospheric and.
Motivation Many GOES products are not directly used in NWP but may help in diagnosing problems in forecasted fields. One example is the GOES cloud classification.
Sadashiva Devadiga (SSAI) MODIS LDOPE January 17, 2007
CRN Workshop, March 3-5, An Attempt to Evaluate Satellite LST Using SURFRAD Data Yunyue Yu a, Jeffrey L. Privette b, Mitch Goldberg a a NOAA/NESDIS/StAR.
Surface Atmospheric Radiation Budget (SARB) working group update Seiji Kato 1, Fred Rose 2, David Rutan 2, Alexander Radkevich 2, Tom Caldwell 2, David.
SeaDAS Training ~ NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 1 Level-2 ocean color data processing basics NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Goddard Space Flight.
QA flagging of clouds and atmospheric anomalies Fast UV simulation tool - FastRT Ola Engelsen Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU)
MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures for GHRSST-PP Robert H. Evans & Peter J. Minnett Otis Brown, Erica Key, Goshka Szczodrak, Kay Kilpatrick, Warner Baringer,
The MEaSUREs PAR Project Robert Frouin Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla, CA _______________________________________ OCRT Meeting, 4-6 may 2009,
Project Status: Year 1. Milestones and Deliverables Year 1 contained: 25 milestones (from 78) 9 deliverables (from 38) Of these: 22 milestones and 7 deliverables.
Land Long Term Data Record (LTDR) Ed Masuoka, NASA GoddardPrincipal investigator Eric Vermote, University of MarylandSurface reflectance algorithm development.
 Introduction  Surface Albedo  Albedo on different surfaces  Seasonal change in albedo  Aerosol radiative forcing  Spectrometer (measure the surface.
11 Ice Cover and Sea and Lake Ice Concentration with GOES-R ABI Presented by Yinghui Liu Presented by Yinghui Liu 1 Team Members: Yinghui Liu, Jeffrey.
BIOPHYS: A Physically-based Algorithm for Inferring Continuous Fields of Vegetative Biophysical and Structural Parameters Forrest Hall 1, Fred Huemmrich.
Estimating the radiative impacts of aerosol using GERB and SEVIRI H. Brindley Imperial College.
Investigation on the possibilities of trend detection of spectral irradiance Merle Glandorf and Gunther Seckmeyer Institute of Meteorology and Climatology.
QA filtering of individual pixels to enable a more accurate validation of aerosol products Maksym Petrenko Presented at MODIS Collection 7 and beyond Retreat.
LDOPE QA Tools Sadashiva Devadiga (SSAI) MODIS LDOPE January 18, 2007.
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
Intercomparison of OMI NO 2 and HCHO air mass factor calculations: recommendations and best practices A. Lorente, S. Döerner, A. Hilboll, H. Yu and K.
ISCCP Calibration 25 th Anniversary Symposium July 23, 2008 NASA GISS Christopher L. Bishop Columbia University New York, New York.
Co-Retrieval of Surface Color and Aerosols from SeaWiFS Satellite Data Outline of a Seminar Presentation at EPA May 2003 Sean Raffuse and Rudolf Husar.
April NASA Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting 2013 Extending the Terrestrial Observation and Prediction System (TOPS) to Suomi-NPP.
1 GOES-R AWG Land Team: ABI Land Surface Albedo (LSA) and Surface Reflectance Algorithm June 14, 2011 Presented by: Shunlin Liang Dongdong Wang, Tao He.
Co-Retrieval of Surface Color and Aerosols from SeaWiFS Satellite Data Outline of a Seminar Presentation at EPA May 2003 Sean Raffuse and Rudolf Husar.
Retrieval Algorithms The derivations for each satellite consist of two steps: 1) cloud detection using a Bayesian Probabilistic Cloud Mask; and 2) application.
NPI-NILU tasks •Further development of fast simulation tool for UV radiation (Fastrt) •Applications of fast simulation tool for quality assurance of UV.
S. Platnick 1, M. D. King 1, J. Riedi 2, T. Arnold 1,3, B. Wind 1,3, G. Wind 1,3, P. Hubanks 1,3 and S. Ackerman 4, R. Frey 4, B. Baum 4, P. Menzel 4,5,
Data Processing Flow Chart Start NDVI, EVI2 are calculated and Rank SDS are incorporated Integrity Data Check: Is the data correct? Data: Download a) AVHRR.
Terrestrial ECVs Fire/burnt area, Land cover, Soil Moisture.
Armando DATA FILTERING PLAN v2 Tucson, AZ 6/30/11.
Data acquisition From satellites with the MODIS instrument.
March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference over clouds Differences correlate with snow/ice.
MODIS Atmosphere Level-3 Product & Web Site Review Paul A. Hubanks Science Systems and Applications, Inc.
Cloud Masking in OMAERO Lyana Curier and Pepijn Veefkind.
Space-Time Series of MODIS Snow Cover Products
SNPP VIIRS SRIP Provisional Maturity (DR 7344) 474-CCR Eric Vermote NASA-GSFC Sadashiva Devadiga, Land PEATE/NASA-GSFC.
Preliminary Analysis of Relative MODIS Terra-Aqua Calibration Over Solar Village and Railroad Valley Sites Using ASRVN A. Lyapustin, Y. Wang, X. Xiong,
The MODIS SST hypercube is a multi-dimensional look up table of SST retrieval uncertainty, bias and standard deviation, determined from comprehensive analysis.
A comparison of AMSR-E and AATSR SST time-series A preliminary investigation into the effects of using cloud-cleared SST data as opposed to all-sky SST.
NMSC Daytime Cloud Optical and Microphysical Properties (DCOMP) 이은희.
Cloud Detection: Optical Depth Thresholds and FOV Considerations Steven A. Ackerman, Richard A. Frey, Edwin Eloranta, and Robert Holz Cloud Detection Issues.
Science Review Panel Meeting Biosphere 2, Tucson, AZ - January 4-5, 2011 Vegetation Phenology and Vegetation Index Products from Multiple Long Term Satellite.
Chapter 8: Short-Run Costs and Output Decisions. Firm’s Decisions.
CLAVR-x in CSPP Andrew Heidinger, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, Madison WI
J. C. Stroeve, J. Box, F. Gao, S. Liang, A. Nolin, and C. Schaaf
Landsat Analysis Ready Data for LCMAP
CMa & CT Cloud mask and type
Divisibility Rules Practice 2, 5, or 10?
Comparison of GOME-2 and OMI surface UV products
GLC-2000-Continental Southeast Asia
Summary Probability of a cloud free image no more than 16 and 32 days apart during the growing season Still using a fixed growing season April 1st to Oct.
Objective Overshooting Top and Cold V Detection
Zhang Hailong, Xin Xiaozhou, Liu Qinhuo
AVHRR and Ship IR sensor versus in situ SAIL, BOOM and CTD instruments
Estimating Angles.
Presentation transcript:

VIPLab QA Data Filtering Process

Ranking Codes CODE Description 1 Ideal Data, Good and Useful 2 Good to Marginal 3 Marginal to Questionable 4 Snow 5 Cloud 6 Estimated 7 NO DATA

MODIS Flags and Data Variable Data Cloud State Bit 0-1: 00 = Clear 01 = Cloudy 10 = Mixed 11 = not set, assumed clear Cloud Shadow? Bit 2: 1=Yes, 0=No Pixel adjacent to Cloud (Not used) Bit 13: 1=Yes, 0=No Aerosol Quantity Bit 6-7: 00 = Climatology 01 = Low 10 = Average 11 = High Snow/Ice Bit 12: 1=Yes, 0=No Cirrus detected (Not used) Bit 8-9: 00 = None 01 = Small View Angle Pixel Information, Degrees (Solar Zenith Angle)

AVHRR Flags and Data Variable Data Cloudy? Bit 1: 1=yes, 0=no Cloud Shadow? Bit 2: 1=yes, 0=no Aerosol Quantity N/A Snow/Ice N/A (processing) View Angle Pixel Information, Degrees (Solar Zenith Angle, View Zenith Angle)

Decision Tree – Data Filtering START Data valid No Rank =7 Yes Yes IsCloudy Rank=5 No Yes IsSnow Rank=4 No Yes Yes Cloud Shadow Low Aerosol & Vz<30 No No Low Aerosol No Yes No Vz<=30 Yes Rank=1 Rank=2 Rank=3 Rank=2

AVHRR Screening / Decision Tree START No isData Rank =7 Yes Yes IsCloudy Rank=5 No Cloud Shadow Yes No Vz<=30 No Cloud Shadow &Vz>30 Rank=2 Yes Rank=1 Rank=3