Evaluation of SF in Romania

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

SAI Performance Measurement Framework
MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DG “PROGRAMMING OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” EVALUATION.
Project Overview 2010 Programme FA: 14 June 2007 Start: 2 Sept 2007 Completion: 31 June 2011 Budget: €10,155,000 (EU), €155,000 (National)
PUBLIC SECTOR INTERNAL AUDIT IN THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA Mr. Jonas Vaitkevičius Head of Internal Audit and Financial Control Methodology and Monitoring.
1 EFCA - 21th March 2002 Raul Mateus Paula. 2 This presentation underlines: The key objectives of the Relex Reform The division of the responsibilities.
HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities David Hegarty NDP/CSF Evaluation Unit Ireland.
GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA MINISTRY OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Evaluation Central Unit Development of the Evaluation.
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Quality Management (WP5) Roman CHIRCA Agency for Innovation and Technological Transfer TecTNet ………... This project has been funded with support from the.
EU-TURKEY CHAMBER FORUM PROJECT (ETCF) ETCF is funded by the European Union. 1 EU-TURKEY CHAMBER FORUM EU TURKEY CHAMBERS PARTNERSHİP GRANT SCHEME PROCUREMENT.
REPORTING, MONITORING AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROVISIONS ON NON-FINANCIALS – 2013/14 1 MIG Quarterly Workshop 3 – 4 September 2013.
European Social Fund Guidelines for a comprehensive Evaluation Plan Efie Meletiou Unit 03 Evaluation and Impact Assessment,
LINks Procurement Update 10 th July The way forward Following discussion with Essex CC and Thurrock DC it makes sense to consider a collaborative.
IPA Funds Monitoring and Evaluation December Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
M&E requirements for grant signing: M&E Plan Workshop on effective Global Fund Grant negotiation and implementation planning January 2008 Manila,
Implementation Strategy July 2002 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE PROCESS ORP Publishes & Maintains 8 Standing Committee Recommends Approval / Disapproval.
European Commission IDEAS - New Delhi 14 April 2005 European Commission DG Budget – Evaluation Unit.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
Regional Workshop to disseminate Water Supply and Sanitation Standards of Service, adapted to LDCs Préparation to the ISO TC 224 Drafts Standards test.
Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities Session 3: Mid-Term Evaluation.
Customs Eastern Land Border Expert Team (CELBET)
Quality and Safety in Palliative Care - the view from NHS QIS Dr Frances Elliot Chief Executive 3 December
Belgian Technical Cooperation Internal audit presentation.
Sharing Personal Information Programme Wales Accord on the Sharing of Personal Information (WASPI) for organisations involved in the protection, safety,
BUDGET 4Distribution of budget per phases of the project; 4Itemization of budget; 4Division of budget per source of contribution; 4Division of budget between:
Evaluation Expert Committee 2nd meeting SYNTHESIS OF THE ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORTS FOR 2007 CONCERNING ONGOING EVALUATION Irina RAMNICEANU Helpdesk Evaluation.
EDM Strategy for Working with Countries: the Uganda Example
Kick Off Meeting Largs, Scotland
National Population Commission (NPopC)
Welcome to Scottish Improvement Skills
Software Quality Control and Quality Assurance: Introduction
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FUND IIB– Slovak Republic
Preparation of a tender and tender documents
GUIDELINES Evaluation of National Rural Networks
Proposed Organisation of Evaluation of the Romanian NSRF and Operational Programmes, Niall McCann, Technical Assistance Project for Programming,
Development and Energy in Africa
Introduction to the draft GRDP guidelines on partnership
Mid-Term Evaluation of CSF for Ireland
BUYING QUALITY PRIVATE SECURITY SERVICES
Lithuanian Standards for Evaluation of EU Structural Funds
The International Plant Protection Convention
Drafting the Guidelines for applicants
International Open Procedure (1) – PRAG 4.3
Unit E.4 – Compliance & Better Regulation
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
Omurbek Ibraev Project coordinator December 2014
Outcome Harvesting nitty- gritty Promise and Pitfalls of Participatory Design Atlanta, 10:45–11:30 29 October, 2016.
Prof. dr. Giedrius Vanagas
Implementing NQF: developing high quality qualifications
Software Measurement Process ISO/IEC
Assess Plan Do Review Resource 1. Resources
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance

Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Definition of Project and Project Cycle
CSS Update for CoMC 19th September 2018
Procurement Planning Mani Ram Gelal
Albania 2021 Population and Housing Census - Plans
Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2009–2014 Programme LT11
Guidelines on the Mid-term Evaluation
Energy Statistics Compilers Manual
Draft revision of ISPM 6: National surveillance systems ( )

Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of SF in Romania Creating A Procedural Manual for Structural Fund Evaluations Ann Hyde CSF MA - Twinning Project Bucharest, Romania May 2006

What is the purpose of a guidance manual for evaluation? Guidance for each evaluation unit. Source of information. Guarantee a uniformity of approach. Step by step guidance about the whole process of evaluation. Training and capacity building tool.

When will an evaluation manual be used? When deciding When an evaluation should take place? What should be evaluated? Who should be involved in the evaluation? How the evaluation should be carried out.

Main Sections Introduction – Managing evaluations concepts and definitions Managing evaluations Systems, structures Preparing for evaluations Procedures, kick off Contracting evaluations Procurement and managing the contract Disseminating the results of evaluations Debriefing, publishing and distribution

Concepts and Definitions What is evaluation – definition of aims What evaluation is not. Types of evaluations relevant for SF? What can be evaluated? The key evaluation issues. The uses of evaluation

Managing SF evaluation Defining the operational structure for evaluation – proposed model Setting the Evaluation standards. Identifying (agreeing) the flow of information across the organisational structures. Establishing an evaluation steering committee.

Preparing for an evaluation Identifying the aim and purpose of the evaluation? Defining the scope of the evaluation Defining the key evaluation questions. Formulating the analytical requirements Taking stock of available information? Defining the uses and users of the evaluation

Preparing for an evaluation Describing the programmes to be evaluated Describing the methodologies to be followed in data collection and analysis Identify stakeholders Prepare an indicative evaluation work plan and budget. Elaborating a project concept for the evaluation.

Contracting and Procurement Preparing the terms of reference Deciding on type of tender Preparing advert for tender Issuing tender/ call for proposals Evaluating tender Drafting contract Signing contract Scheduling kick off meeting

Evaluation Steering Group Define purpose of the evaluation steering group; Prepare evaluation steering group timetable. Arrange steering group meetings. Define Quality Assurance and compliance checks

Kick Off Meeting Define purpose of kick off meeting. Prepare evaluation stakeholders for the evaluation kick off Prepare contractor for the kick off Ensure ToR, evaluation questions and timetable are up to date. Arrange kick off meeting.

Managing the evaluation period Define flow of information between contractor – evaluation unit – steering group. Define reporting procedures. Set up system for commenting on draft evaluation report (s) Establish QA for report.

Evaluation complete Prepare stakeholders for debrief; Prepare contractor for debrief; Prepare for publication of evaluation report; Define parameters for information dissemination; Arrange full distribution.

Evaluation Follow Up Prepare evaluation follow up procedures; Prepare action plan for implementation of recommendations; Prepare timetable for follow up; Establish QA procedures for evaluation procedures.

The first evaluation In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And God saw everything that He made. “Behold,” God said, “it is very good.” And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. And on the seventh day God rested from all His work. His archangel came then unto Him asking, “God, how do you know that what you have created is ‘very good’? What are your criteria? On what data do you base your judgement? Aren’t you a little close to the situation to make a fair and unbiased evaluation?” God thought about these questions all that day and His rest was greatly disturbed. On the eight day God said, “Lucifer, go to hell.”