Hyeon Jin Kim March 31, 2006 DOSAR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Advertisements

First look at  -jet Samples using BDT e-ID Algorithm Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan (with X. Li and B. Zhou) ATLAS egamma Meeting March 9, 2009.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (with T. Dai, X. Li, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) US-ATLAS.
Higgs Searches using Vector Boson Fusion. 2 Why a “Low Mass” Higgs (1) M H
Summary of Results and Projected Sensitivity The Lonesome Top Quark Aran Garcia-Bellido, University of Washington Single Top Quark Production By observing.
 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Jets Production Association with a Z boson in pp Collision at 7 and 8 TeV with the CMS Detector Kittikul Kovitanggoon Ph. D. Thesis.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
L. Bellagamba, Excited fermions and other searches at HERA 1 International Conference on High Energy Physics Amsterdam July 2002 Excited fermions.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
A Study of Electron Identification Jim Branson UCSD with collaborators from FNAL, UCSB & UCSD.
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
Outline  Higgs Particle Searches for Origin of Mass  Grid Computing  A brief Linear Collider Detector R&D  The  The grand conclusion: YOU are the.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
Lake Louise (February 2002) Ivo van Vulpen 1 Z boson pair production Ivo van Vulpen Outline: LEP and its operation between ZZ production & final.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using radiative Z decays (update) E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI” Outline:
5/28/2002UTA group meeting1 An update of top to stop analysis How to estimate W->e cross section? Why the w to e cross section I used is so big? Next Choose.
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
Hggs-D meeting MPI 11/20061 Higgs Physics – Activities in Bonn/Siegen Jörn Große-Knetter ATLAS-Higgs-D Treffen München,
Search for Higgs portal Dark matter Tohoku Ayumi Yamamoto 11/5 2011/11/51.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
Electron Identification Efficiency from Z→ee Maria Fiascaris University of Oxford In collaboration with Tony Weidberg and Lucia di Ciaccio ATLAS UK SM.
Current Status of e-ID based on BDT Algorithm Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan (with X. Li, T. Dai, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) BNL Analysis Jamboree March.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
VBF H- > ττ- > lept had Electron Channel Analysis Jaspreet Sidhu
Photon Reconstruction Efficiencies in Higgs → γγ Events Neil Cooper-Smith RHUL ATLAS UK Higgs Meeting - Durham 11/01/07.
Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.
Zvi Citron Correlations Between Neutral Bosons and Jets in Pb+Pb Collisions at 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS Detector Zvi Citron for the ATLAS Collaboration.
Methodology and examples to determine fake rate separate signal from background Using fit on sideband. Using independent control sample.
1 Donatella Lucchesi July 22, 2010 Standard Model High Mass Higgs Searches at CDF Donatella Lucchesi For the CDF Collaboration University and INFN of Padova.
on behalf of the CDF and DØ collaborations
ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair
RD. Schaffer, L. Iconomidou Fayard, D. Fournier
Identification of isolated photons
Establishing Standard LHC
on top mass measurement based on B had decay length
Parameterization for ATLAS EMEC
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
陶军全 中科院高能所 Junquan Tao (IHEP/CAS, Beijing)
NIKHEF / Universiteit van Amsterdam
Overview of CMS H→ analysis and the IHEP/IPNL contributions
Electron Identification Based on Boosted Decision Trees
Update of Electron Identification Performance Based on BDTs
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec
Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Argonne National Laboratory
Performance of BDTs for Electron Identification
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Converted photon and π0 discrimination based on H  cut-based analysis Zhen Zhang IHEP
Alessandro Tricoli W production at LHC By
Hyeonjin Kim EG1 meeting, Feb 27, 2008
Presentation transcript:

Hyeon Jin Kim March 31, 2006 DOSAR H-matrix base on e-ID Hyeon Jin Kim March 31, 2006 DOSAR

OUTLINE Motivation Principle of H-matrix – Hm5e & HM10e Data Performance of HM10e & HM5e  2 , e efficiency & jet rejection HM10e & HM5e comparison Comparison of HM10e & LH Comparison of HM10e variables reconstructed by 11.0.1 & 11.0.41 At UTA… Summary H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006

Motivation Vector Boson Fusion is second dominant Higgs production Electron identification from H --> ZZ* --> 4e & H --> WW* --> 2e2v clean signal D0 constructs H-Matrices in many dimensions and computes their 2 for e-ID  has been proved a great alternate tool for electron and hadron separation Improve electron ID by generating a quantity utilizing H-matrix for ATLAS electron  identify good electron ID. Measure and understand Electron ID efficiencies and jet of hadron rejection H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006

 (yi (n) - yi) (yj (n) – yj)  (yi (m) – yi ) Hij (yj (m) – yj ) Principle of H-matrix H-matrix uses the correlation in transverse and longitudinal shower shape of electrons. Using these variables, a covariant matrix M is built m2 for a given candidate object is defined as a measure of how much electron like the object is where, H  M-1 1 N n= 1 Mij =  (yi (n) - yi) (yj (n) – yj) I, j =1 dim cm 2=  (yi (m) – yi ) Hij (yj (m) – yj ) H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006

HM5e & HM10e  coverage is < 2.47 Crack region is not considered. List of HM10e & HM5e variables Built covariant matrix M. Parameterize eta or energy dependence of H-matrix variables or elements of matrix M. Using these relation, calculate elements of H-matrix and 2 for each electron candidate HM5e HM10e e0/etot  e233/e277 e1/etot weta1 e2/etot weta2 e3/etot fracs1 e4/etot isol H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006

Data ZeeJimmy(mc11.004201.ZeeJimmy) DiJet(mc11.005802.JF17_pythia_jet_filter) (); excluding bad HM10e variables. 100GeV Electron dc2.003061.digit.E7_eminus_e100_eta25(11.0.1) mc11.004003.Electron_e100 (11.0.41) 2e/evnt dr(<0.05) et(>20Gev) IsEM track Zee 20671 16846 16834 13154(11711) 9077 11063 Dijet 152187 - 7755(6475) 261 3393 H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006

HM10e 2 for Zee and DiJet Dijet Zee H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006

HM5e 2 for Zee and DiJet DiJet Zee H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006

HM10e e efficiency and jet rejection Zee DiJet 25 0.8890 0.9978 40 0.9635 0.9968 50 0.9725 0.9962 trmatch Zee DiJet 25 0.9008 0.9995 40 0.9716 0.9992 50 0.9788 0.9990 H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006

HM10e & HM5e comparison Zee DiJet 0.9636 0.9635 0.9945 0.9968 0.9488 w/o 0.9636 0.9635 0.9945 0.9968 trmatch 0.9488 0.9989 0.9994 IsEM 0.9520 0.9524 0.9991 H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006

HM10e & LH comparison HM10e LH 0.9556 0.9996 0.9563 0.9959 0.9874 trmatch 0.9556 0.9996 0.9563 0.9959 IsEM 0.9874 0.99996 0.9887 0.99994  IsEM is not independent with track match anymore  LH has bad value(-999.) when track requirement is not satisfied H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006

Variables of HM10e( on 11.0.1 & 11.0.41) 11.0.41 11.0.1 H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006

Variables of HM10e( on 11.0.1 & 11.0.41) 11.0.41 11.0.1 0.567  2.49x10-6 0.593  3.64x10-4 0.167  3.87 x10-4 0.211  4.93 x10-4 0.0094  9.04x10-6 0.0099  1.02x10-5 H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006

HM10e 2 for e (100GeV) 11.0.1 11.0.41 8.09  0.049 12.59  0.052 H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006

At UTA…. Using CERN & BNL ATLAS analysis servers via remote login (SSH)  Plan to perform this development work utilizing UTA resources  Reduce the time required to produce ESD and generate H-matrix Seeking for suitable variables of higher dimensional H-matrix that gives best discriminating power between e and hadrons Understanding algorithms in the each ATLAS analysis package. H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006

SUMMARY H-matrix is a strong method for e-ID and jet rejection. HM10e & HM5e have been tested on Zee and DiJet HM10e has been compared to HM5e  HM10e has higher jet rejection over HM5e HM10e efficiency is comparable to LH. HM10e variables reconstructed by 11.0.1 and 11.0.41 are mostly consistent with each other (except fr37, weta1, weta2, fracs1 and isol) need to regenerate H-matrix on 11.0.41 To DO… Regenerations of HM10e and HM5e processing using by CSC, 11.0.41 prepare to release HM10e & HM5e move on H-matrix for gamma H-matrix base on e - ID DOAR at UTA 03/31/2006