Bruce A. Lawrence, Ted R. Miller, Harold B. Weiss

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
| © 2006 LenovoLenovo Protection Services. | © 2007 LenovoLenovo ThinkPad Protection and LenovoCare Protection Service Accidental Damage Protection 1,2,3,
Advertisements

U.S. States Abbreviations Directions: Type the state abbreviation in the box on each slide. “The English language website where everything.
Company LOGO U. S. EPA, Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
WA 2.ID 3.MT 4.OR 5.CA 6.NV 7.UT 8.WY 9.CO 10.AZ 11.NM 12.AK 13.HI 13 The West`
Prevalence of Self-Reported Obesity Among U.S. Adults by State and Territory Definitions  Obesity: Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or higher.  Body Mass.
Southeast Region States Contained in the region: Alabama (AL) Florida (FL) Georgia (GA) Mississippi (MS) Louisiana (LA) Arkansas (AR) Tennessee (TN)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC Half-Year of Diagnosis** Number of Cases **Adjusted for reporting delay AIDS Cases in Racial/Ethnic Minorities*
Geography Bee Meeting 3: United States Cities and Landforms (While you wait, please insert your microphones and adjust your volume.)
Revised Charts and Graphs for Hawaii A New Look at the Institutional Component of Higher Education Finance: A Guide for Evaluating Performance Relative.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Millions of uninsured Source: Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: United States Census Bureau,
What’s new with the new birth items? Source of payment WIC Infant breastfed June 2-6, 2013 Phoenix, Arizona Sally C. Curtin, MA, Division of Vital Statistics,
Number of Hospital Admissions and Days in the Hospital per Patient, and Number of Days per Admission for Medicare Dialysis Patients*, Year ** *
Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
CHAPTER 2: Visual Description of Data to accompany Introduction to Business Statistics fourth edition, by Ronald M. Weiers Presentation by Priscilla Chaffe-Stengel.
Visual description is an art
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
Definitions: Definitions: Obesity: Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or higher. Obesity: Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or higher. Body Mass Index (BMI): A measure.
Top 3 European countries? 1.England/Britain 2.France 3.Spain.
The US is facing an unprecedented opioid epidemic, which has resulted in increases health care services utilization and a surge in overdose deaths. Medicaid.
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
ecoprintQ NA Sales Coverage
1 Washington, WA 2 Oregon, OR 3 California, CA 4 Arizona, AZ 5 Nevada, NE 6 Utah, UT 7 Idaho, ID 8 Montana, MT 9 Wyoming, WY 10 Colorado, CO 11 New Mexico,
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
Visual Description of Data
House Price
WA OR ID MT ND WY NV 23% CA UT AZ NM 28% KS NE MN MO WI TX 31% IA IL
Demographics of College-Aged Population Bryan C
Who does Medicaid cover? How are Medicaid funds spent?
Firearm Injuries By Intent: A Comparison of Data in the Northeast U.S.
Profile of Nursing Home Residents Admitted Directly From Home
House price index for AK
Exhibit 1. The Number of Uninsured Declined to 40
The US is facing an unprecedented opioid epidemic, which has resulted in increases health care services utilization and a surge in overdose deaths. Medicaid.
The US is facing an unprecedented opioid epidemic, which has resulted in increases health care services utilization and a surge in overdose deaths. Medicaid.
/ March 2015 Net Metering Note: Net Metering rules are being actively discussed in over a dozen state public service & utility commissions.
Elizabeth McOsker October 30, 2017 University of Florida MPH Thesis
Voluntary – Mandatory – Integrated What Does the Terminology Mean?
U.S. FEDERAL CIRCUITS Cir State 11 Alabama AL
Share of Births Covered by Medicaid, 2006
MCO Contracting Strategies for Children in the Child Welfare System
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Who does Medicaid cover? How are Medicaid funds spent?
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
United States of America.
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Adjusted 1st-Year Patient Death Rates by
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Tennessee Texas What’s the capital city? What’s the abbreviation? Where is it located? Nashville What’s the capital city? What’s the abbreviation?
Estimated Total U.S. ESRD Costs, 1997
Uninsured Rate Among Adults Ages 19–64, 2008–09 and 2019
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Post-Reform: Projected Percent of Adults Ages 19–64 Uninsured by State
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Uninsured Nonelderly Adult Rate Has Increased from Percent to 20
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Region I IPP Data Update Region I IPP Advisory Board Meeting
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Presentation transcript:

Bruce A. Lawrence, Ted R. Miller, Harold B. Weiss Estimating the Intent of Nonfatal Poisonings in State Hospital Discharge Data Bruce A. Lawrence, Ted R. Miller, Harold B. Weiss

Background In 10% of poisoning cases in state hospital discharge data, the intent could not be determined from the hospital record. In 1997, the share of cases with undetermined or missing intent ranged from 4% in California and 5% in Rhode Island to 18% in Michigan and South Carolina and 19% in Maine.

Suicide attempts account for a majority of nonfatal hospital-admitted poisonings. Conversely, a majority of nonfatal suicide attempts (ca. 70%) involve poisoning. Therefore, the inability to determine the intent of so many poisonings might result in an undercount of suicide attempts.

Objectives To model the intent of nonfatal, hospital-admitted poisonings whose intent cannot be determined from an E code on the hospital record. To use this model to estimate the likely magnitude of the undercount of nonfatal, hospital-admitted, self-inflicted poisonings.

Data 1997 hospital discharge data from 19 states: Began with 17,798,484 hospital discharges Narrowed to 1,129,994 acute injuries (6.35% of hospital discharges) Selected 124,073 nonfatal poisoning-involved cases (10.98% of acute injuries)

Sex Female 71,270 (57.44%) Male 52,767 (42.53%) Unknown 36 ( 0.03%)

Age 00-04 5,441 ( 4.29%) 05-17 13,204 (10.64%) 18-24 15,072 (12.15%) 25-41 46,556 (37.52%) 42-60 28,319 (22.82%) 61-74 8,269 ( 6.66%) 75+ 7,203 ( 5.81%) Unknown 9 ( 0.02%)

States AZ 3,902 ( 3.14%) CA 25,462 (20.52%) FL 15,031 (12.11%) MA 5,272 ( 4.25%) MD 4,741 ( 3.82%) ME 1,149 ( 0.93%) MI 8,729 ( 7.04%) NE 962 ( 0.78%) NH 1,132 ( 0.91%) NJ 7,334 ( 5.91%) NY 15,676 (12.63%) PA 13,441 (10.83%) RI 878 ( 0.71%) SC 2,639 ( 2.13%) UT 1,618 ( 1.30%) VA 6,308 ( 5.08%) VT 471 ( 0.38%) WA 3,891 ( 3.14%) WI 5,437 ( 4.38%)

Intent Self-Inflicted 68,590 (55.28%) Unintentional 43,034 (34.68%) Assault 318 ( 0.26%) Legal/Military 19 ( 0.02%) Undetermined 6,670 ( 5.38%) Missing 5,442 ( 4.39%)

Methods We selected the 106,795 cases with known intent, known age greater than 4, and known sex. We modeled the probability of self-inflicted intent (versus other known intent, including unintentional, assault, and legal/military) by logistic regression, using the CATMOD procedure in SAS.

The final specification involved 90 terms: Age (6 age groups covering known ages >4) Sex, conditioned on age Admission sources and discharge destinations (4 variables) Payers (5 variables, 2 conditioned on age) Psychiatric procedures (4 values based on ICD‑9‑CM procedure code 94.xx) Counts of diagnoses, causes, and substances (plus substances squared)

(Continued) Length of stay (plus length of stay squared) State suicide rate Dummy variables for 5 substance classes, plus 10 two-way and 3 three-way interactions Dummy variables for 10 diagnosis categories, plus 2 interactions with diagnosis-related drugs Dummy variables for 40 substance categories, 4 conditioned on age

The estimated model was then applied to the 11,999 cases with undetermined intent (E980s) or unknown intent (missing E code). For each case, the model generated a probability that the poisoning was self-inflicted.

Performance of Model If we use a 50% probability cut-off as the standard for identifying a poisoning as self-inflicted, the model successfully identifies self-inflicted poisonings 90% of the time. However, it identifies non-self-inflicted poisonings correctly in just 70% of cases. Perhaps more important, it overestimates the number of self-inflicted poisonings by 4,823 (4.5%).

Estimated vs. Actual Intent with 50% Probability Cut-Off Probability ‚ ‚Other ‚ Self‑ ‚Self‑ ‚Known ‚ Inflicted ‚Inflicted‚Intent ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 00‑49% ‚ 6836 ‚ 26586 ‚ 33422 ‚ (9.97) ‚ (69.51) ‚ 50‑100% ‚ 61714 ‚ 11659 ‚ 73373 ‚ (90.03) ‚ (30.49) ‚ Total 68550 38245 (100.00) (100.00)

Tightening the probability cut-off to 55% reduces the overestimate of self-inflicted poisonings, and tightening it to 60% over-corrects slightly, resulting in an underestimate of 1,423 (1.3%). As the probability cut-off is tightened, the total share of cases whose intent is identified correctly falls from 82.7% to 82.3% to 81.6%.

Estimated vs. Actual Intent with 55% Probability Cut-Off Probability ‚ ‚Other ‚ Self‑ ‚Self‑ ‚Known ‚ Inflicted ‚Inflicted‚Intent ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 00‑54% ‚ 8543 ‚ 27888 ‚ 36431 ‚ (12.46) ‚ (72.92) ‚ 55‑100% ‚ 60007 ‚ 10357 ‚ 70364 ‚ (87.54) ‚ (27.08) ‚ Total 68550 38245 (100.00) (100.00)

Estimated vs. Actual Intent with 60% Probability Cut-Off Probability ‚ ‚Other ‚ Self‑ ‚Self‑ ‚Known ‚ Inflicted ‚Inflicted‚Intent ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 00‑59% ‚ 10517 ‚ 29151 ‚ 39668 ‚ (15.34) ‚ (76.22) ‚ 60‑100% ‚ 58033 ‚ 9094 ‚ 67127 ‚ (84.66) ‚ (23.78) ‚ Total 68550 38245 (100.00) (100.00)

Validation We tested the model on a second multi-state hospital discharge dataset similar to the one on which it was estimated: 81,615 cases from 1998 from 15 states. The results were quite similar to those from the 1997 data.

Performance of Model on 1998 Data from 15 States Percent Predicted Correctly Probability Other Cut-Off Self- Known Level Overall Inflicted Intent 50% 82.4% 88.7% 72.3% 55% 82.0% 86.1% 75.5% 60% 81.4% 83.1% 78.6%

The model actually performs slightly better on the non-self-inflicted cases for 1998 than for 1997. The small differences between the two years can be attributed to the different mix of states, along with the smaller proportion of self-inflicted cases (61% in 1998 vs. 64% in 1997). The model as estimated on the 1997 data can be expected to perform with similar results on similar data.

Results Having tested and validated the model on cases of known intent, we next applied the model to the cases of undetermined (E980s) and missing (not E coded) intent. To provide for a conservative estimate of the number of self-inflicted cases among these, we chose a 60% cut-off probability.

Estimating the Number of Uncoded Self-Inflicted Poisonings Using a 60% Probability Cut-Off Coded Intent Estimated ˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Probability ‚ ‚ ‚ Self‑ ‚Unde‑ ‚ ‚ Inflicted ‚termined ‚Missing ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 00‑59% ‚ 3279 ‚ 2707 ‚ 5986 ‚ (50.02) ‚ (51.61) ‚(50.72) 60‑100% ‚ 3277 ‚ 2538 ‚ 5815 ‚ (49.98) ‚ (48.39) ‚(49.28) Total 6556 5245 (100.00) (100.00)

We estimate that an additional 5,815 cases (4 We estimate that an additional 5,815 cases (4.7% of all poisonings) were self-inflicted. This would raise the total number of self-inflicted poisonings in the 19-state dataset to 74,405 (60.0% of all poisonings). It would also raise the total number of nonfatal self-inflicted injuries in the 19-state dataset from 81,442 to 87,257 (a 7.1% increase).

Note that the estimated share of self-inflicted cases among those coded as undetermined or missing intent (49%) is lower than among cases of known intent (64%). If one were simply to allocate the intent of unknown-intent cases in proportion to the intent of known-intent cases, it would result in an overestimate of the number of self-inflicted poisonings.

The impact of our additional estimated self-inflicted poisoning cases varied widely from state to state. For most states, our estimate of self-inflicted poisonings is only 3%–8% higher than the number E coded as such. For seven states, however, our estimate is even greater: Vermont 9.2% New Jersey 10.1% Virginia 12.3% Florida 14.2% Michigan 15.2% Maine 21.2% South Carolina 22.3%

In four of these states (FL, ME, MI, VA), the problem is a low overall rate of E coding. In each of these states, poisonings are actually more likely to be E coded than other injuries. As these states improve their overall E‑coding rates, it can be expected to address this problem.

In three other states, it appears that there might be a reluctance to code self-inflicted poisonings as such. Two states (NJ, VT) rely heavily on undetermined intent (E980s) E codes, while a third (SC) tends to omit E codes entirely on likely self-inflicted poisonings.

Our model's high rate of false positives (when poisonings coded as unintentional are modeled as self-inflicted) raises the question of whether some self-inflicted poisonings might be falsely coded as unintentional. Overall, our model identifies 23.7% of unintentional-coded poisonings as self-inflicted. But this share varies widely by state. For two states (CA, NY), the rate is well under 20%. For 10 others, it is 29% or higher, with NH at 34%. This suggests that there might be more self-inflicted poisonings hidden as unintentional, in addition to the ones among the undetermined- and missing-intent cases.