North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Overview Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Evaluating the 21st Century Educator with Fidelity School Executive Training Pitt County Schools January, 2012.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Standard V: Teacher.
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
NC Educator Evaluation System Inter-rater Reliability Carteret County Schools Mary Keel, Ed.D Tara Patterson, MSA Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
NC Professional Teaching Standards. North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Teacher Leadership Specialist Standards and Evaluation Process Overview.
Using the Online Evaluation Tool with Fidelity Mary Keel, Ed.D. Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D. Region 2 Professional Development Leads.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
School Counselor Evaluation RubricEvaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction.
Effectively Evaluating North Carolina Teachers 1 New Principals and Assistant Principals November 21, 2011.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Overview of the Evaluation Process and the School Counselor Evaluation Rubric NCDPI Webinar.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity School Executive Training Pitt County Schools January, 2012.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Using the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Rubric Proactively
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide Q & A Session Social Studies
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting November, 2013
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting September, 2013
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Align Combine Design.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Building Understanding of the North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards How to READ the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Rubric Using language and.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
NORTH CAROLINA Professional Teaching Standards
Exploring The Power of C!
Before We Begin… Visit:
Evaluation Standards 6 & 8
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
The Nuts and Bolts of National Board Certification
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
What Does a 21st Century School Administrator Look Like?
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Colorado Department of Education
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
21st Century Teaching Standards and Student Assessment
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
Presentation transcript:

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards STANDARD I: Teachers demonstrate leadership. STANDARD II: Teachers establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students. STANDARD III: Teachers know the content they teach. STANDARD IV: Teacher facilitate learning for their students. STANDARD V: Teachers reflect on their practice. STANDARD VI: Teachers facilitate academic growth. Although some teachers will be evaluated on all of the standards, today we are completing an abbreviated evaluation using standards I and IV. We will take a minute to look at the elements in these two standards. Remind Principals that the abbreviated observation is used for career status teachers not in their renewal year. St. 1 - Leadership in and beyond the classroom. Teachers take responsibility for all students’ learning and use data to drive instruction. They establish a safe learning environment. They strive to lead the profession and serve as an advocate for students. St. 2 - Teachers provide an environment in which each child has a positive, nurturing relationship with caring adults. They embrace diversity, treat students as individuals, adapt their teaching, and work collaboratively. St. 3 - Teachers align their instruction w the NCSCOS, know their content, and teach relevant, connected lessons. St. 4 - Teachers understand learning, and they know the appropriate levels of intellectual, physical, social, and emotional development of their students. St. 5 - Teachers analyze student learning and think critically about learning in their classrooms. They seek appropriate pd that matches their professional goals, and they are active learners. When you are finished sharing the posters, you can talk about standard 6. Use this if you would like: This is the newest standard, and there is much more work underway to determine how this standard will be measured. While principals should, of course, always be looking for evidence of student learning, there will be no “observation-based” component to Standard Six. Some are concerned that the sixth standard means more work for principals. It really doesn’t since the rating will be based squarely on data that are collected and aggregated by the state. Here is some help for responding if there are questions: (Tread carefully here…and remind principals not to shoot the messenger!) This info was on the Superintendent's update from Dr. Atkinson and I think it provides a good "blurb" to include somewhere in our training. Teacher Effectiveness: Sixth Standard Update - Effective this school year, the State Board of Education has added a sixth standard to the Teacher Evaluation Instrument. A teacher’s rating on the sixth standard will be based on whether a teacher’s students meet growth expectations, exceed growth expectations, or fail to meet growth expectations. An average of three years of student growth information will be used to determine the teacher’s rating. Only teachers with three or more years of data will receive a formal rating on the sixth standard, although principals are encouraged to discuss any student growth information with teachers. For the 2011-12 school year, there will be no state-mandated consequences for teachers based on their sixth standard rating. The sixth standard requires no change to the evaluation process during the school year. The standard will be automatically populated through the use of three years of data points on student growth. Principals and other classroom observers do not need to take additional action during the year to ensure that data is included. Detailed webinar information will be included in the next communication. For additional information please contact Jenn Preston, Race to the Top Project Coordinator for Teacher Effectiveness, at jennifer.preston@dpi.nc.gov. https://mxweb.media-x.com/home/ncval/help/20081028_NCteacherbooklet.pdf

Standard 1: Teachers Demonstrate Leadership Five Elements Teachers lead in the classroom Teachers lead in the school Teachers lead in the profession Teachers advocate for school and students Teachers demonstrate high ethical standards Briefly ask observers to think what it would look like in the classroom for teachers to demonstrate these elements. Remind Principals that the standards that are checked with a green color should be observed in every lesson every day.

What you will be looking for in Standard One

Record evidence and examples of what the students are doing.

Standard I Teachers Demonstrate Leadership Sample Observable Indicators to “LOOK FOR” Developing -Has assessment data available and refers to it to understand the skills and abilities of students ‐ Accesses data from district assessments ‐ Has written classroom management plan available and posted -Links lessons to prior learning -Has college displays -Clarifies that passing is necessary for graduation -Assumes responsibility for student achievement, proficiency, and growth

Standard I Proficient evaluate student progress and guide instruction ‐ Uses a variety of formative and summative assessments to evaluate student progress and guide instruction ‐ Data analysis guides lesson plans, activities, and group assignments ‐ Communicates vision to students ‐ Enforces the written classroom management plans ‐ Reshapes instruction to fit needs of individual students - Provides extra assistance to students as needed - Refers to current events - Relates instruction to preparation for life Continually encourages students to graduate and plan for college/career -Correlates best instructional practices with progress of students to ensure student college and career readiness -Generates data driven interventions to support student mastery of and concepts taught

Standard I Accomplished ‐ Uses portfolios, rubrics, and other types of assessments to evaluate progress ‐ Uses protocols for collaborative activities ‐ Includes real‐life situations and 21st century skills in lesson plans -Discusses impact of current events ‐ Provides leadership opportunities in classroom ‐ Vision is communicated/modeled to produce student leaders in the classroom ‐ Differentiates instruction and assignments based on data -Creates processes and procedures to align best practices and data driven interventions to facilitate replication of best practices among peers

Standard I Distinguished -Analyzes data with colleagues to make decisions about student needs and instructional planning -Maintains and fully utilizes data to measure student progress -Establishes procedures to ensure that all students participate in discussions and share roles in group work ‐ Facilitates workshops at the school level to ensure all students succeed by using best practices connected to student data ‐ Leads school wide workshops on how to differentiate instruction and assignments based on data and/or how to create a safe and orderly learning environment -Demonstrates processes and procedures to align best practices and data driven interventions to colleagues and coaches peers for implementation of best practices -Leads school and district PLCs in collaborative work to support teachers and improve effectiveness

Standard 4 Teachers Facilitate Learning for Their Students Eight Elements Teachers know the ways in which learning takes place, and they know the appropriate levels of intellectual, physical, social, and emotional development of their students Teachers plan instruction appropriate for their students Teachers use a variety of instructional methods Teachers integrate and utilize technology in their instruction Observers must remember that although some things may not be demonstrated but implied: Example: students are arranged in groups based on a purposeful thought out method (possibly ability) or assignments are different based on a purposeful assessment of students understanding. Although everything may not be “seen” there is evidence to support your marks.

Standard 4 Continued Teachers help students develop critical thinking and problem solving skills Teachers help students work in teams and develop leadership qualities Teachers communicate effectively Teachers use a variety of methods to assess what each student has learned Remind observers that they must see the evidence in order to mark each element and indicator. They should record what the see to support each mark for discussion with their colleagues.

What you should look for in Standard Four