8 potential intervention sites delineated

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SURVEY QUALITY CONTROL
Advertisements

MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Field Staff and Field Procedures.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Survey Quality Control.
Interviewing Techniques. Conducting and Interview Interviewing is an art Building rapport –Make a good first impression –Always have a positive approach.
Characteristics of research. Designed to derive generalisable new knowledge.
Conducting the Interview/Survey
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop
Selecting Your Evaluation Tools Chapter Five. Introduction  Collecting information  Program considerations  Feasibility  Acceptability  Credibility.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Training and Procedural Manuals Section A 1.
MICS Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Interpreting Field Check Tables.
Active Parasite Detection 2011 Supplemental Enumerator and CHW Training 21 November, 2011.
NAME Evaluation Report Name of author(s) Name of institution Year.
1 Non-Response Non-response is the failure to obtain survey measures on a sample unit Non-response increases the potential for non-response bias. It occurs.
Conducting Training for Survey Personnel CEI Implementing the Reproductive Health Assessment Toolkit for Conflict-Affected Women November 5, 2006.
Cracking the Code: The ins and outs of public housing.
Michelle March, PhD Wednesday 9:00 P. M.. Documentation and Recording Case Manager’s Responsibility to keep a record of all contacts relevant to each.
5/25/2016Indices and Price Analyses Unit 1 The Household Expenditure Survey (HES) Presented by: The Indices and Price Analyses Unit Statistical.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Processing Workshop Overview of SPSS structural check programs and frequencies MICS Data Processing Workshop.
Preparing for Fieldwork Food and Nutrition Security Survey.
Visit:
CENSUS MICRODATA OF TURKEY Meryem DEMIRCI, Turkish Statistical Institute, June, 2006.
OVERVIEW… WHAT’S INVOLVED?  Sample Size  Sampling Randomization  Demographics **  Methodology **  Question **  Sampling Error (calculate?) **
UOP COM 200 Complete Class NEW Check this A+ tutorial guideline at COM 200 Week 1 DQ 1 COM.
Research Participant Satisfaction
Market Research.
METHODS SECTION OF A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Intermarriage and the intergenerational transmission of Aromanian
2013 [insert name of your Neighbourhood House/s] Members Survey 2014
Beyond gender-aware: Data for gender action in Ethiopia March 9, 2016
SOUTH AFRICA ISIVANDE TAKE-UP Bongi (the dti) Tania (IPA)
Protection mainstreaming – distributions
Godrej Prakriti Sodepur | Godrej Prakriti Kolkata
Pilot Testing of the VAW Survey Module in Georgia: Preliminary Results
TECHjOSH.COM TechJosh.com.
COMMUNICATION.
HCS 586 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com
Giftalove Best Cake Offers
Assessed for eligibility (N = )
Who completed the survey?
مهارات الاتصال والتواصل Communication Skills
مهارات الاتصال والتواصل Communication Skills
Evidence Based Practice 3
Profile Types of Home Buyers
مدیریت استراتژيک منابع انسانی
STATISTICS THE STATISTICAL CYCLE.
Research Participant Satisfaction
فرایند تسهیلگری در مددکاری جامعه ای
Implications for community engagement and readiness
1 مفهوم ارتباطات ارتباطات معادل واژه communications ) ميباشد(. ارتباطات يك فرايند اجتماعي و دو طرفه است كه در آن اطلاعات مبادله شده و نوعي تفاهم بين طرفهاي.
Referendum Baseline Public Opinion Poll June 2010
Wellcome Collection audience survey
2013 [insert name of your Neighbourhood House/s] Members Survey 2014
THE ITALIAN EXPERIENCE ON EHSIS
Интерпретация және зерттеу нәтижесін өңдеу
Delia memorial school (Hip wo)
Ռազմավարական կառավարում
NATIONAL CRIME AND SAFETY SURVEY: SUMMARY REPORT 2011
Analysis of contact forms: results from the HBS in Luxembourg and Slovenia EU Working Group on the Household Budget Surveys (HBS) Eurostat, 12 May 2010.
CAP RESULTS Cumulative Results January 31, 2002.
Baseline Household Survey (CAPI) High-frequency Data Collection (CATI)
Conducting an Assessment & Intervention in Houston’s inner city
Figure A (online only) Flow diagram showing case recruitment, participation and follow up to the three year interview for the Prostate Cancer Care and.
C.2.10 Sample Questions.
C.2.8 Sample Questions.
C.2.8 Sample Questions.
1. What animal 2. Male or Female ? 4. Male or Female? Why? Why?
Visit us:
The Kish Method.
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 20
Durability Monitoring [Country]
Presentation transcript:

8 potential intervention sites delineated 8 communities randomised 4 communities allocated to intervention 4 communities allocated to control Baseline survey 1120 households sampled (560 for female sample, 560 for male sample) 905 (81%) households completed household selection procedure (431 in female sample, 474 in male sample) 816 households identified as having eligible member (387 in female sample, 429 in male sample) 793 (97%) successfully completed questionnaires (374 females, 419 males) Not interviewed: 2 refusals 15 not at home on repeated visits 6 language barrier Baseline survey 1120 households sampled (560 for female sample, 560 for male sample) 922 (82%) households completed household selection procedure (432 in female sample, 490 in male sample) 806 households identified as having eligible member (352 in female sample, 454 in male sample) 790 (98%) successfully completed questionnaires (343 females, 447 males) Not interviewed: 3 refusals 12 not at home on repeated visits 1 language barrier 4 intervention communities surveyed at follow-up 4 control communities surveyed at follow-up Follow-up survey 1680 households sampled (805 for female sample, 875 for male sample) 1539 (92%) households completed household selection procedure (711 in female sample, 828 in male sample) Household selection not completed: 17 refused; 20 dwelling vacant; 4 dwelling destroyed; 5 dwelling not found; 14 household absent for extended period; 22 no one home at time of visit; 1 postponed; 1 no one available to complete it at time of visit; 1 only one household member incapacitated; 56 reason not recorded 1385 households identified as having eligible member (606 in female sample, 779 in male sample) 1368 (99%) successfully completed questionnaires (600 females,768 males) Not interviewed: 6 refusals 4 not at home on repeated visits 7 reason not recorded Follow-up survey 1677 households sampled (837 for female sample, 840 for male sample) 1425 (85%) households completed household selection procedure (698 in female sample, 727 in male sample) Household selection not completed: 51 refused; 41 dwelling vacant; 13 dwelling destroyed; 14 dwelling not found; 17 household absent for extended period; 31 no one home at time of visit; 8 no one available to complete it at time of visit; 3 only one household member incapacitated; 74 reason not recorded 1185 households identified as having eligible member (537 in female sample, 648 in male sample) 1164 (98%) successfully completed questionnaires (530 females, 634 males) Not interviewed: 8 refusals 3 not at home on repeated visits 10 reason not recorded